Vitamin D deficiency and SARS­CoV­2 infection: A retrospective case-Control study with big-data analysis covering March 2020 to March 2021.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D may have immunomodulatory functions, and might therefore play a role in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, no conclusive evidence exists regarding its impact on the prevalence of this infection, the associated course of disease, or prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and vitamin D deficiency in patients attending a tertiary university hospital, and to examine the clinical course of infection and prognosis for these patients. METHODS: This non-interventional, retrospective study, which involved big-data analysis and employed artificial intelligence to capture data from free text in the electronic health records of patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, was undertaken at a tertiary university hospital in Madrid, Spain, between March 2020 and March 2021. The variables recorded were vitamin D deficiency, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, course of disease, and prognosis. RESULTS: Of the 143,157 patients analysed, 36,261 had SARS-CoV-2 infection (25.33%) during the study period, among whom 2,588 (7.14%) had a vitamin D deficiency. Among these latter patients, women (OR 1.45 [95%CI 1.33-1.57]), adults over 80 years of age (OR 2.63 [95%CI 2.38-2.91]), people living in nursing homes (OR 2.88 [95%CI 2.95-3.45]), and patients with walking dependence (OR 3.45 [95%CI 2.85-4.26]) appeared in higher proportion. After adjusting for confounding factors, a higher proportion of subjects with SARS-CoV-2 plus vitamin D deficiency required hospitalisation (OR 1.38 [95%CI 1.26-1.51]), and had a longer mean hospital stay (3.94 compared to 2.19 days in those with normal levels; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A low serum 25(OH) vitamin D concentration in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is significantly associated with a greater risk of hospitalisation and a longer hospital stay. Among such patients, higher proportions of institutionalised and dependent people over 80 years of age were detected.

Experiencia con el uso de dalbavancina en la infección profunda de pie diabético / Experience in the use of dalbavancin in diabetic foot infection

Objetivo: Describir la experiencia clínica con dalbavancina en el tratamiento de la infección de pie diabético en una unidad multidisciplinar de un hospital de segundo nivel. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de pacientes con infección de pie diabético tratados con dalbavancina en la Unidad de Pie Diabético del Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón de septiembre de 2016 a diciembre de 2019. Se recogieron parámetros demográficos y comorbilidades, características de la infección y del tratamiento con dalbavancina. Se estimó la tasa de curación a los 90 días tras finalizar el tratamiento. Resultados: Un total de 23 pacientes con infección de pie diabético (osteomielitis) fueron tratados con dalbavancina; 19 eran hombres con una edad media de 65 años. Los microorganismos más frecuentemente aislados fueron Staphylococcus aureus (11) y Corynebacterium striatum (7). En 22 casos se usó dalbavancina como terapia de segunda elección, en 11 debido a toxicidad de otros antibióticos. La mediana de duración del tratamiento fue de 5 (4-7) semanas; la dosis más frecuente de dalbavancina (8 pacientes) fue de 1.000mg seguido de 500mg semanales durante 5 semanas. Tres pacientes presentaron efectos secundarios leves (náuseas y molestias gastrointestinales). A los 90 días de finalizar el tratamiento, el 87% (20) de los pacientes se curaron (IC95%: 65,2-94,52%). Conclusión: Los pacientes con osteomielitis por microorganismos grampositivos que recibieron como parte del tratamiento multidisciplinar antibioterapia con dalbavancina tuvieron una elevada tasa de curación, con una adecuada tolerancia y escasos efectos secundarios. Dalbavancina ofrece una alternativa segura en el tratamiento de la infección profunda de pie diabético.(AU)

Objective: To describe the clinical experience with dalbavancin in the treatment of diabetic foot infection in a multidisciplinary unit of a second level hospital. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was made with all patients with diabetic foot infection treated with dalbavancin in the Diabetic Foot Unit of Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, covering the period from September 2016 to December 2019. Demographic parameters and comorbidities, characteristics of the infection and treatment with dalbavancin were recorded. The cure rate was estimated at 90 days after finishing the treatment. Results: A total of 23 patients with diabetic foot infection (osteomyelitis) started treatment with dalbavancin, 19 were men and the mean age was 65 years. The microorganisms most frequently isolated for the indication of treatment with dalbavancin were Staphylococcus aureus (11) and Corynebacterium striatum (7). Dalbavancin was used as a second choice therapy in 22 cases, in 11 due to toxicity from other antibiotics. The median duration of treatment was 5 (4-7) weeks; the most frequent dose of dalbavancin (8 patients) was 1000mg followed by 500mg weekly for 5 weeks. 3 patients presented mild side effects (nausea and gastrointestinal discomfort). At 90 days after completion of dalbavancin therapy, 87% (20) of the patients were cured (95% CI: 65.2%-94.52%). Conclusion: Patients with osteomyelitis due to gram-positive microorganisms who received as part of the multidisciplinary antibiotic treatment with dalbavancin, had a high rate of cure with adequate tolerance and few side effects. Dalbavancin offers a safe alternative in treating deep diabetic foot infection.(AU)

Experience in the use of dalbavancin in diabetic foot infection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical experience with dalbavancin in the treatment of diabetic foot infection in a multidisciplinary unit of a second level hospital. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was made with all patients with diabetic foot infection treated with dalbavancin in the Diabetic Foot Unit of Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, covering the period from September 2016 to December 2019. Demographic parameters and comorbidities, characteristics of the infection and treatment with dalbavancin were recorded. The cure rate is estimated at 90 days after finishing the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients with diabetic foot infection (osteomyelitis) started treatment with dalbavancin, 19 were men and the mean age was 65 years. The microorganisms most frequently isolated for the indication of treatment with dalbavancin were Staphylococcus aureus (11) and Corynebacterium striatum (7). Dalbavancin was used as a second choice therapy in 22 cases, in 11 due to toxicity from other antibiotics. The median duration of treatment was 5 (4-7) weeks; the most frequent dose of dalbavancin (8 patients) was 1000 mg followed by 500 mg weekly for 5 weeks. 3 patients presented mild side effects (nausea and gastrointestinal discomfort). At 90 days after completion of dalbavancin therapy, 87% (20) of the patients were cured (95% CI: 65.2%-94.52%). CONCLUSION: Patients with osteomyelitis due to gram-positive microorganisms who received as part of the multidisciplinary antibiotic treatment with dalbavancin, had a high rate of cure with adequate tolerance and few side effects. Dalbavancin offers a safe alternative in treating deep diabetic foot infection.

Melatonin in the Prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers (MeCOVID): A Randomised Clinical Trial.

We evaluated in this randomised, double-blind clinical trial the efficacy of melatonin as a prophylactic treatment for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Healthcare workers fulfilling inclusion criteria were recruited in five hospitals in Spain and were randomised 1:1 to receive melatonin 2 mg administered orally for 12 weeks or placebo. The main outcome was the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections. A total of 344 volunteers were screened, and 314 were randomised: 151 to placebo and 163 to melatonin; 308 received the study treatment (148 placebo; 160 melatonin). We detected 13 SARS-CoV-2 infections, 2.6% in the placebo arm and 5.5% in the melatonin arm (p = 0.200). A total of 294 adverse events were detected in 127 participants (139 in placebo; 155 in melatonin). We found a statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events related to treatment: 43 in the placebo arm and 67 in the melatonin arm (p = 0.040), and in the number of participants suffering from somnolence related to treatment: 8.8% (n = 14) in the melatonin versus 1.4% (n = 2) in the placebo arm (p = 0.008). No severe adverse events related to treatment were reported. We cannot confirm our hypothesis that administration of melatonin prevents the development of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers.

Efectividad de los glucocorticoides en pacientes hospitalizados por neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 / Effectiveness of glucocorticoids in patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Introducción: Se han comunicado varios trabajos donde se ha demostrado un efecto beneficioso de los glucocorticoides como tratamiento de la tormenta de citocinas que se asocia a los cuadros graves por SARS-CoV-2, plateándose diferentes pautas de glucocorticoides.MétodosEstudio observacional retrospectivo que incluye pacientes con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 y compara el ingreso en una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) o fallecimiento durante la hospitalización en 3 grupos de pacientes: sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides, uso de dosis diarias de glucocorticoides equivalentes menores a 250mg de prednisona y dosis diarias equivalentes mayores o iguales a 250mg de prednisona. Se realizó un análisis multivariante mediante regresión logística, utilizando el índice de propensión como covariante.ResultadosDe los 259 pacientes incorporados al estudio 67 (25,9%) tuvieron una evolución desfavorable, falleciendo o precisando ingreso en UCI. Los análisis comparativos entre diferentes tratamientos con glucocorticoides, y la asociación con ingreso en UCI o fallecimiento fueron: tratamiento con glucocorticoides (cualquier dosis) versus sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,71 [0,30-1,66]), tratamiento con glucocorticoides (≥250mg de prednisona al día) versus sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,35 [0,11-1,08]) y tratamiento con glucocorticoides (≥250mg de prednisona al día) versus pacientes con dosis de glucocorticoides<250mg de prednisona o sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,30 [0,10-0,88]).ConclusiónLos resultados de este estudio muestran que los paciente con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 tratados con pulsos con glucocorticoides con dosis equivalentes de prednisona mayor o igual de 250mg tienen una evolución más favorable (menos mortalidad e ingreso en UCI). (AU)

Introduction: Several studies have reported the beneficial effect of glucocorticoids in the treatment of cytokine storm that occurs in patients with severe COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids regimens have been proposed.MethodsRetrospective observational study that includes patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and compares admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization in three groups of patients: no glucocorticoids treatment, use of glucocorticoids doses equivalent to less than 250mg of prednisone daily and use of equivalent doses greater than or equal to 250mg of prednisone daily. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, using the propensity index as a covariant.ResultsOf the 259 patients enrolled in the study, 67 (25.9%) had an unfavorable evolution, dying or requiring ICU admission. Comparative analyzes between different glucocorticoids treatments and the association with ICU admission or death were: glucocorticoids treatment (any dose) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.71 [0.30-1.66]), treatment with glucocorticoids (≥250mg prednisone daily) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.35 [0.11-1.08]) and glucocorticoids treatment (≥250mg prednisone daily) versus patients with glucocorticoids doses <250mg prednisone daily or without glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.30 [0.10-0.88]).ConclusionThe results of this study show that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids pulses with equivalent doses of prednisone greater than or equal to 250mg have a more favorable evolution (less mortality and less admission to ICU). (AU)

Effectiveness of glucocorticoids in patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the beneficial effect of glucocorticoids in the treatment of cytokine storm that occurs in patients with severe COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids regimens have been proposed. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that includes patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and compares admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization in three groups of patients: no glucocorticoids treatment, use of glucocorticoids doses equivalent to less than 250 mg of prednisone daily and use of equivalent doses greater than or equal to 250 mg of prednisone daily. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, using the propensity index as a covariant. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients enrolled in the study, 67 (25.9%) had an unfavorable evolution, dying or requiring ICU admission. Comparative analyzes between different glucocorticoids treatments and the association with ICU admission or death were: glucocorticoids treatment (any dose) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.71 [0.30-1.66]), treatment with glucocorticoids (≥250 mg prednisone daily) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.35 [0.11-1.08]) and glucocorticoids treatment (≥250 mg prednisone daily) versus patients with glucocorticoids doses <250 mg prednisone daily or without glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.30 [0.10-0.88]). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids pulses with equivalent doses of prednisone greater than or equal to 250 mg have a more favorable evolution (less mortality and less admission to ICU).

INTRODUCCIÓN: Se han comunicado varios trabajos donde se ha demostrado un efecto beneficioso de los glucocorticoides como tratamiento de la tormenta de citocinas que se asocia a los cuadros graves por SARS-CoV-2, plateándose diferentes pautas de glucocorticoides. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo que incluye pacientes con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 y compara el ingreso en una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) o fallecimiento durante la hospitalización en 3 grupos de pacientes: sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides, uso de dosis diarias de glucocorticoides equivalentes menores a 250 mg de prednisona y dosis diarias equivalentes mayores o iguales a 250 mg de prednisona. Se realizó un análisis multivariante mediante regresión logística, utilizando el índice de propensión como covariante. RESULTADOS: De los 259 pacientes incorporados al estudio 67 (25,9%) tuvieron una evolución desfavorable, falleciendo o precisando ingreso en UCI. Los análisis comparativos entre diferentes tratamientos con glucocorticoides, y la asociación con ingreso en UCI o fallecimiento fueron: tratamiento con glucocorticoides (cualquier dosis) versus sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,71 [0,30­1,66]), tratamiento con glucocorticoides (≥250 mg de prednisona al día) versus sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,35 [0,11­1,08]) y tratamiento con glucocorticoides (≥250 mg de prednisona al día) versus pacientes con dosis de glucocorticoides < 250 mg de prednisona o sin tratamiento con glucocorticoides (OR: 0,30 [0,10­0,88]). CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados de este estudio muestran que los paciente con neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2 tratados con pulsos con glucocorticoides con dosis equivalentes de prednisona mayor o igual de 250 mg tienen una evolución más favorable (menos mortalidad e ingreso en UCI).

Experience in the use of dalbavancin in diabetic foot infection. / Experiencia con el uso de dalbavancina en la infección profunda de pie diabético.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical experience with dalbavancin in the treatment of diabetic foot infection in a multidisciplinary unit of a second level hospital. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was made with all patients with diabetic foot infection treated with dalbavancin in the Diabetic Foot Unit of Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, covering the period from September 2016 to December 2019. Demographic parameters and comorbidities, characteristics of the infection and treatment with dalbavancin were recorded. The cure rate was estimated at 90 days after finishing the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients with diabetic foot infection (osteomyelitis) started treatment with dalbavancin, 19 were men and the mean age was 65 years. The microorganisms most frequently isolated for the indication of treatment with dalbavancin were Staphylococcus aureus (11) and Corynebacterium striatum (7). Dalbavancin was used as a second choice therapy in 22 cases, in 11 due to toxicity from other antibiotics. The median duration of treatment was 5 (4-7) weeks; the most frequent dose of dalbavancin (8 patients) was 1000mg followed by 500mg weekly for 5 weeks. 3 patients presented mild side effects (nausea and gastrointestinal discomfort). At 90 days after completion of dalbavancin therapy, 87% (20) of the patients were cured (95% CI: 65.2%-94.52%). CONCLUSION: Patients with osteomyelitis due to gram-positive microorganisms who received as part of the multidisciplinary antibiotic treatment with dalbavancin, had a high rate of cure with adequate tolerance and few side effects. Dalbavancin offers a safe alternative in treating deep diabetic foot infection.

[Effectiveness of glucocorticoids in patients hospitalized for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia]. / Efectividad de los glucocorticoides en pacientes hospitalizados por neumonía grave por SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported the beneficial effect of glucocorticoids in the treatment of cytokine storm that occurs in patients with severe COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids regimens have been proposed. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that includes patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and compares admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization in three groups of patients: no glucocorticoids treatment, use of glucocorticoids doses equivalent to less than 250mg of prednisone daily and use of equivalent doses greater than or equal to 250mg of prednisone daily. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, using the propensity index as a covariant. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients enrolled in the study, 67 (25.9%) had an unfavorable evolution, dying or requiring ICU admission. Comparative analyzes between different glucocorticoids treatments and the association with ICU admission or death were: glucocorticoids treatment (any dose) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.71 [0.30-1.66]), treatment with glucocorticoids (≥250mg prednisone daily) versus no glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.35 [0.11-1.08]) and glucocorticoids treatment (≥250mg prednisone daily) versus patients with glucocorticoids doses <250mg prednisone daily or without glucocorticoids treatment (OR: 0.30 [0.10-0.88]). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids pulses with equivalent doses of prednisone greater than or equal to 250mg have a more favorable evolution (less mortality and less admission to ICU).

Telemedicina, centros penitenciarios y enfermedad por VIH / Telemedicine, prison and illness associated with HIV

OBJETIVOS: Comunicar la actividad de telemedicina, desde su apertura, entre una consulta hospitalaria de enfermedades infecciosas y un centro penitenciario. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo de la teleconsulta de enfermedades infecciosas del Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón con el centro penitenciario de Navalcarnero desde 2013 hasta 2017, que se lleva a cabo mediante videoconferencia. Se analizó motivo y número de consultas, diagnóstico de VIH, tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR), situación inmunovirológica, diagnóstico del virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) e intervención realizada por el experto en infecciosas. RESULTADOS: Se valoraron 75 pacientes en un total de 168 consultas (en el primer año 11 consultas y en el quinto 62). El índice de consultas sucesivas/nuevas fue de 1,24 y el 85% de los pacientes requirió menos de 1 año de seguimiento. El 84% de los pacientes no se trasladó al hospital. El 99% de los pacientes aceptó esta modalidad. El 96% era VIH positivo, el 94% de estos tomaba TAR y el 85% tenía carga viral indetectable con 532 CD4/mL de mediana. El 90% tenía serología positiva para VHC. El 72% de las consultas fue para la valoración de tratamiento del VHC, que fue sofosbuvir/ledipasvir en un 63%. Un 40% cambió de TAR (70% para evitar interacciones). CONCLUSIÓN: La mayoría de los pacientes valorados tienen infección por VIH. Esta modalidad de consulta tiene una demanda creciente, es eficiente (evita traslados y es resolutiva) y tiene elevada aceptación. El motivo de consulta más frecuente fue el tratamiento del VHC y más de la tercera parte de los pacientes precisó cambio de TAR

OBJECTIVES: Communicate the activity of telemedicine, from its opening, between a hospital consultation of infectious diseases and a penitentiary center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive study of the tele-consultation of infectious diseases of the Alcorcón Foundation University Hospital with the Navalcarnero penitentiary center from 2013 to 2017, which is carried out by videoconference. The reason and number of consultations, diagnosis of HIV, antiretroviral treatment (ART), immunovirological situation, diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV= and intervention performed by the infectious expert were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were evaluated in a total of 168 consultations (in the first year 11 consultations and in the fifth year 62). The index of successive / new consultations was 1.24 and 85% of the patients required less than 1 year of follow-up.84% of patients did not move to the hospital.99% of patients accepted this modality.96% were HIV positive, 94% of them took ART and 85% had undetectable viral load with 532 CD4/mL of medium.90% had positive serology for HCV.72% of the consultations were for the assessment of HCV treatment, which was sofosbuvir/ledipasvir by 63%.40% changed their ART (70% to avoid interactions). CONCLUSION: Most of the evaluated patients have HIV infection. This type of consultation has a growing demand, is efficient (avoids transfers and is decisive) and has high acceptance. The most frequent reason for consultation was the treatment of HCV and more than a third of patients required ART change