Evaluation of Plasma Disappearance Rate Indocyanine Green Clearance as a Predictor of Liver Graft Rejection in Donor Brain Death.

INTRODUCTION: There currently exist no quantitative methods to assess graft viability before the donor procurement procedure. In Europe, around 20% of liver grafts evaluated "in situ" by an experienced surgeon are discarded. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of the plasma disappearance rate indocyanine green (PDR-ICG) clearance in predicting liver graft rejection to avoid this 20% of futile surgeries. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate PDR-ICG as a predictor of liver graft rejection in death brain donors compared with the gold standard evaluation by an experienced surgeon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational single center study. From March 2017 to July 2019, 29 donors were included in the study, 17 were men and 12 women with a median age of 68 years ± 16.9 years. Donors had an intensive care unit stay of 2 days ± 4 days. PDR-ICG was measured with PICCO2 monitor. Indocyanine green clearance dose was 0.25 mg/kg injected intravenously in the operating room just before donor procurement procedure is initiated. The surgeon was unaware of the PDR-ICG measure until the decision of graft acceptance was taken. Data regarding the donors and biopsy results were included in a prospective database. RESULTS: PDR-ICG measure could be obtained in 10 minutes in all of the cases included. The median PDR-ICG obtained was 18%/min (range, 2.4-31%/min). Graft rejection took place in 15 out of the 29 donors. PDR-ICG value was less than 10%/min in 6 of these rejected grafts and less than 15%/min in 10 donors. All donor grafts with PDR-ICG <15% were discarded. The graft had been discarded in 5 donors with a PDR-ICG >15%. CONCLUSIONS: In our study a plasma disappearance rate <10 would have identified the grafts that would be rejected, thus avoiding the displacement work and expense of the surgical team. These results should be confirmed in a multicentric study.

Valoración del grado de conocimiento de los profesionales sobre el Patient Blood Management en su organización. Modelo y resultados de la encuesta del proyecto MAPBM / Assessment of the knowledge level of the professional as regards Patient Blood Management in their organisation. Results of the MAPBM project survey

Introducción: El proyecto Maturity Assessment Model in Patient Blood Management consiste en la aplicación de una matriz que evalúa la madurez del centro sobre la adecuación de su práctica transfusional. Esta herramienta incluye una encuesta dirigida a los profesionales sobre el grado de conocimiento del Patient Blood Management en su centro. Material y métodos: Durante 2016, 41 hospitales estuvieron asociados al proyecto Maturity Assessment Model in Patient Blood Management. La encuesta constaba de 10 preguntas, 3 sobre centro, especialidad y años de experiencia, y 7 sobre el conocimiento del Patient Blood Management. El número mínimo de respuestas por centro fue asignado según el número de camas. Se requería de un mínimo de respuestas de al menos 3 especialidades diferentes para poder ser evaluado. Resultados: El total de encuestas contestadas fue de 1403. La especialidad de mayor respuesta fue anestesiología (40,9%). La distribución respecto a experiencia profesional fue:<10 años 33,4%, 10-20 años 33% y >20 años 33,6%. Un 74,2% conocía el programa Patient Blood Management en su centro y un 60,7% conocía el protocolo de tratamiento de la anemia preoperatoria. El 72% refería conocer el protocolo de transfusión sanguínea de su centro y un 90% consideraba otros factores además del valor de la hemoglobina para la decisión de transfusión. Solo un 30,7% de los profesionales afirmó recibir información periódica sobre la práctica transfusional. Conclusiones: Se observó una falta significativa de conocimiento sobre los protocolos de tratamiento de la anemia y el protocolo transfusional de sus centros. En la actualidad pocos centros comunican datos sobre práctica transfusional

Introduction: The Maturity Assessment Model in Patient Blood Management project involves the use of a matrix that evaluates the maturity of the centre as regards blood transfusion practice. This tool includes a questionnaire to be completed by physicians to determine their level of knowledge of patient blood management strategies in their centre. Material and methods: Forty one hospitals took part in the Maturity Assessment Model in Patient Blood Management project in 2016. The questionnaire included 10 questions, 3 about the centre, specialty, and years of experience, and 7 about patient blood management protocols in the respondent's centre. The minimum responses required per centre was calculated according to the number of beds. Responses from at least 3 different specialties were required in order to be evaluated. Results: A total of 1403 questionnaires were completed. The specialty with the highest completion rate was anaesthesiology (40.9%). The distribution as regards professional experience was homogeneous: <10 years, 33.4%, 10-20 years, 33%, and> 20 years 33.6%. Nearly three-quarters (74.2%) knew the patient blood management protocol used in their centre, and 60.7% knew the protocol for the treatment of pre-operative anaemia. Slightly fewer (72%) reported knowing the blood transfusion protocol (transfusion threshold) used in their centre, and 90% considered other factors besides haemoglobin in the decision to transfuse. Only 30.7% of professionals reported receiving periodic information on transfusion practices. Conclusions: There is a significant lack of knowledge about preoperative anaemia and perioperative transfusion protocols used in the centres polled. Few centres provide their physicians with information on transfusion practices

Assessment of the knowledge level of the professional as regards Patient Blood Management in their organisation. Results of the MAPBM project survey. / Valoración del grado de conocimiento de los profesionales sobre el Patient Blood Management en su organización. Modelo y resultados de la encuesta del proyecto MAPBM.

INTRODUCTION: The Maturity Assessment Model in Patient Blood Management project involves the use of a matrix that evaluates the maturity of the centre as regards blood transfusion practice. This tool includes a questionnaire to be completed by physicians to determine their level of knowledge of patient blood management strategies in their centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty one hospitals took part in the Maturity Assessment Model in Patient Blood Management project in 2016. The questionnaire included 10 questions, 3 about the centre, specialty, and years of experience, and 7 about patient blood management protocols in the respondent's centre. The minimum responses required per centre was calculated according to the number of beds. Responses from at least 3 different specialties were required in order to be evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1403 questionnaires were completed. The specialty with the highest completion rate was anaesthesiology (40.9%). The distribution as regards professional experience was homogeneous: <10 years, 33.4%, 10-20 years, 33%, and> 20 years 33.6%. Nearly three-quarters (74.2%) knew the patient blood management protocol used in their centre, and 60.7% knew the protocol for the treatment of pre-operative anaemia. Slightly fewer (72%) reported knowing the blood transfusion protocol (transfusion threshold) used in their centre, and 90% considered other factors besides haemoglobin in the decision to transfuse. Only 30.7% of professionals reported receiving periodic information on transfusion practices. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant lack of knowledge about preoperative anaemia and perioperative transfusion protocols used in the centres polled. Few centres provide their physicians with information on transfusion practices.

Donor Risk Index Has an Impact in Intraoperative Measure of Hepatic Artery Flow and in Clearance of Indocyanine Green: An Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The increase in indications for liver transplantation has led to acceptance of donors with expanded criteria. The donor risk index (DRI) was validated with the aim of being a predictive model of graft survival based on donor characteristics. Intraoperative arterial hepatic flow and indocyanine green clearance (plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green [ICG-PDR]) are easily measurable variables in the intraoperative period that may be influenced by graft quality. Our aim was to analyze the influence of DRI on intraoperative liver hemodynamic alterations and on intraoperative dynamic liver function testing (ICG-PDR). METHODS: This investigation was an observational study of a single-center cohort (n = 228) with prospective data collection and retrospective data analysis. Measurement of intraoperative flow was made with a VeriQ flowmeter based on measurement of transit time (MFTT). The ICG-PDR was obtained from all patients with a LiMON monitor (Pulsion Medical Systems AG, Munich, Germany). DRI was calculated using a previously validated formula. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's t test. Otherwise, the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test was applied, depending on whether there were 2 or more comparable groups. The qualitative variables and risk measurements were analyzed using the chi-square test. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: DRI score (mean ± SD) was 1.58 ± 0.31. The group with DRI >1.7 (poor quality) had an intraoperative arterial flow of 234.2 ± 121.35 mL/min compared with the group having DRI < 1.7 (high quality), with an intraoperative arterial flow of 287.24 ± 156.84 mL/min (P = .02). The group with DRI >1.70 had an ICG-PDR of 14.75 ± 6.52%/min at 60 minutes after reperfusion compared to the group with DRI <1.70, with an ICG-PDR of 16.68 ± 6.47%/min at 60 minutes after reperfusion (P = .09). CONCLUSION: Poor quality grafts have greater susceptibility to ischemia-reperfusion damage. Decreased intraoperative hepatic arterial flow may represent an increase in intrahepatic resistance early in the intraoperative period.

Are high-sensitivity troponins always reliable? Donor-recipient troponin transfusion in liver transplantation.

Blood troponins are used to diagnose perioperative myocardial injury and infarction. During liver transplantation, a passive donor-recipient troponin transfer with the graft may result in an increase of troponins in the transplant recipient questioning the diagnosis of myocardial injury. We present a case of liver transplantation with sudden elevation of recipient's serum troponin levels immediately after graft reperfusion and its subsequent normalization in which myocardial damage and other non-ischaemic potential causes were ruled out. Patient consent for publication was obtained prior to submission of the manuscript.

Postoperative pulmonary complications, pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses after lung resection surgery with prolonged one-lung ventilation. Randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous and inhalational anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies report the immunomodulatory lung-protective role of halogenated anaesthetics during lung resection surgery (LRS) but have not investigated differences in clinical postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The main goal of the present study was to compare the effect of sevoflurane and propofol on the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing LRS. The second aim was to compare pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses to LRS. METHODS: Of 180 patients undergoing LRS recruited, data from 174 patients were analysed. Patients were randomized to two groups (propofol or sevoflurane) and were managed otherwise using the same anaesthetic protocol. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed in both lungs before and after one-lung ventilation for analysis of cytokines. Arterial blood was drawn for measurement of the cytokines analysed in the BAL fluid at five time points. Intraoperative haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, PPCs (defined following the ARISCAT study), and mortality during the first month and yr were recorded. RESULTS: More PPCs were detected in the propofol group (28.4% vs 14%, OR 2.44 [95% CI, 1.14-5.26]). First-yr mortality was significantly higher in the propofol group (12.5% vs 2.3%, OR 5.37 [95% CI, 1.23-23.54]). Expression of lung and systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines was greater in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane group. Pulmonary and systemic IL-10 release was less in the propofol group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that administration of sevoflurane during LRS reduces the frequency of the PPCs recorded in our study and attenuates the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 02168751; EudraCT 2011-002294-29.

Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus transpulmonary thermodilution during liver transplantation: interchangeable methods?

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) implies hemodynamic instability, making invasive monitoring of cardiac output (CO) mandatory. Intermittent thermodilution with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains the clinical gold standard to measure CO. The agreement between PAC and new monitoring methods in LT needs to be further investigated. Our aim is to clarify whether cardiac index (CI) measurements with transpulmonary intermittent thermodilution, and continuous pulmonary thermodilution methods agree sufficiently with those performed intermittently with PAC to be considered interchangeable during LT. METHODS: We studied prospectively hemodynamic parameters of 72 consecutive patients undergoing LT. Each CI was obtained simultaneously with three different techniques: intermittent (PACi) and continuous (CCI) pulmonary artery thermodilution with PAC, and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) with PiCCO2 in 8 time points of the procedure, obtaining 1350 paired measurements. Exclusion criteria was retransplantation. The statistical Bland Altman method for repeated measures was used to assess agreement, and polar plot methodology to evaluate trending ability. RESULTS: Analysis of agreement between PACi and TPTD measurements (N.=474 paired measurements) showed a bias of -0.42 L/min/m2, 95% limits of agreement (95%LoA) of ±1.5 L/min/m2 and percentage error of 45%. PACi-CCI comparisons (N.=431) showed bias of -0.02 L/min/m2, 95%LoA of ±1.96 L/min/m2, and percentage error of 64%. These results demonstrated questionable clinical agreement between PACi and TPTD, and no agreement between PACi and CCI. TPTD and CCI showed poor CO trending ability. CONCLUSION: Continuous pulmonary thermodilution with PAC is not an alternative monitoring method of CO. Transpulmonary thermodilution CO monitoring with PiCCO2 shows too questionable agreement with the clinical gold standard (PACi) being in the limit of acceptance to be considered interchangeable during liver transplantation.

"Small-for-flow" syndrome: shifting the "size" paradigm.

The "small-for-size" syndrome and "post-hepatectomy liver failure" refers to the development of liver failure (hyperbilirubinemia, coagulopathy, encephalopathy and refractory ascites) resulting from the reduction of liver mass beyond a certain threshold. This complication is associated with a high mortality and is a major concern in liver transplantation involving reduced liver grafts from deceased and living donors as well as in hepatic surgeries involving extended resections of liver mass. The limiting threshold for liver resection or transplantation is currently predicted based on the mass of the remnant liver (or donor graft) in relation to the body weight of the patient, with a ratio above 0.8 being considered safe. This approach, however, has proved inaccurate, because some patients develop the "small-for-size" syndrome despite complying with the "safe" threshold while other patients who surpass the threshold do not develop it. We hypothesize that the development of the "small-for-size" syndrome is not exclusively determined by the ratio of the mass of the liver remnant (or graft) to the body weight, but it is instead strictly determined by the hemodynamic parameters of the hepatic circulation. This hypothesis is based in recent clinical and experimental reports showing that relative portal hyperperfusion is a critical factor in the development of the "small-for-size" syndrome and that maneuvers that manipulate the hepatic vascular inflow are able to prevent the development of the syndrome despite liver-to-body weight ratios well below the "limiting" threshold. Measurements of hepatic blood flow and pressure, however, are not routinely performed in hepatic surgeries. Focusing on the "flow" rather than in the "size" may improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of the "small-for-size" syndrome and "post-hepatectomy liver failure" and it would have important implications for the clinical management of patients at risk. First, hepatic hemodynamic parameters would have to be measured in hepatic surgeries. Second, these parameters (in addition to liver mass) would be the principal basis for deciding the "safe" threshold of viable liver parenchyma. Third, the hepatic hemodynamic parameters are amenable to manipulation and, consequently, the "safe" threshold may also be manipulated. Shifting the paradigm from "small-for-size" to "small-for-flow" syndrome would thus represent a major step for optimizing the use of donor livers, for expanding the indications of hepatic surgery, and for increasing the safety of these procedures.

Artrodesis lumbar, sin identidad de transfusión, en una paciente que rechaza los hemoderivados / No disponible

No disponible

Uso del catéter intercambiador de tubos de Cook en la extubación de un paciente con vía aérea difícil conocida / No disponible

No disponible

Radial to femoral arterial blood pressure differences during liver transplantation.

This observational study compared femoral and radial arterial blood pressure in 72 patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. Simultaneous femoral and radial arterial blood pressures, cardiac index, core temperature and vasoconstrictor therapy were recorded at seven time points during the operation. No significant differences between radial and femoral pressures were found at the start of surgery. Femoral and radial systolic arterial blood pressures were statistically significantly different during liver reperfusion (mean (SD) arterial pressure = 92 (22) mmHg vs. 76 (22) mmHg, p < 0.01). Mean arterial blood pressures showed no statistically significant differences throughout the study. Vasoconstrictor drug administration was associated with a larger systolic pressure difference between femoral and radial arteries (28 (24) mmHg in patients being given vasoconstrictor drugs vs. 9 (19) mmHg in patients not needing vasoconstrictors during reperfusion, p < 0.001). In conclusion, differences in systolic arterial blood pressure occur between femoral and radial arterial monitoring sites during liver reperfusion, and in particular in patients being given vasoconstrictor therapy. Thus, if femoral arterial monitoring is not available, clinicians should rely on mean rather than systolic arterial pressure measurements from a radial artery catheter during liver transplantation.

[Paravertebral analgesia in thoracic surgery]. / Analgesia paravertebral en cirugía torácica.

Managing postoperative pain from thoracotomy is one of the greatest challenges anesthesiologists face in daily practice. Proper management is assumed to improve the patient's prognosis. The thoracic paravertebral block, following its rediscovery, is being used with increasing frequency and success for both surgery and recovery from thoracotomy, challenging the supremacy of thoracic epidural analgesia, which to date has been considered the gold standard. We describe the history, anatomy, techniques and complications of the thoracic paravertebral block and review published randomized controlled trials comparing the thoracic paravertebral block to placebo and to epidural analgesia. In view of published evidence, it seems that the thoracic paravertebral block may replace the thoracic epidural technique as the gold standard for providing analgesia for patients undergoing thoracotomy.

Analgesia paravertebral en cirugía torácica / Paravertebral analgesia in thoracic surgery

El tratamiento del dolor asociado a la toracotomía es uno de los mayores retos a los que se enfrenta el anestesiólogo en su práctica diaria. Se asume que su correcto tratamiento se asocia a un mejor pronóstico de estos pacientes. El bloqueo paravertebral torácico (BPVT), tras su redescubrimiento, está siendo utilizado con éxito cada vez más, tanto en el periodo intraoperatorio como durante el postoperatorio de la toracotomía, compitiendo con la considerada hasta el momento como gold standard, la analgesia epidural torácica. En el presente trabajo se realiza una descripción de la historia, anatomía, técnicas y complicaciones del BPVT así como una revisión de los estudios controlados aleatorizados publicados hasta el momento del BPVT frente a placebo y frente a la analgesia epidural. A la luz de la evidencia publicada, el BPVT puede sustituir a la epidural torácica como técnica gold standard en la analgesia del paciente sometido a toracotomía (AU)

[Recombinant activated factor VII used in a man with refractory bleeding from a stab wound injuring the liver and kidney]. / Factor VII activado recombinante en un paciente con hemorragia incoercible por lesión traumática hepatorrenal.

A 30-year-old man bled massively from a stab wound that injured his liver and right kidney and entered a life-threatening cycle of transfusion, hypothermia, coagulopathy, and rebleeding in spite of surgery and aggressive resuscitation. He was given a single dose of recombinant activated factor VII (rVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Denmark) in a final attempt to save his life. The patient responded favorably, as bleeding stopped almost immediately and coagulation markers became normal. Clinical course following rVIIa administration was good. Severe bleeding in the trauma patient needing massive transfusion can become complicated by dilutional coagulopathy and hypothermia. Therapy with rVIIa is a promising aid to controlling bleeding in the repeatedly transfused patient who does not respond to standard replacement of blood products.

Autonomic neuropathy in end-stage cirrhotic patients and evolution after liver transplantation.

Autonomic neuropathy (AN), which is frequently observed in cirrhosis patients, has been associated with a higher mortality. We have prospectively evaluated the prevalence of AN, its relationship with the degree of liver dysfunction and circulatory disturbances, and the evolution of AN after liver transplantation (LT) in 62 end-stage liver cirrhosis patients. AN was evaluated by seven cardiovascular tests assessing sympathetic or parasympathetic function before and 6 months after LT. Patients were classified as showing absent (A), early (E), or definite dysfunction (D). AN appeared in 67.7% of cases (E: 24.2%, D: 43.5%) without relation to liver disease etiology. Parasympathetic dysfunction was more prevalent than sympathetic dysfunction (59.7% vs. 20.9%). AN was significantly related to Child-Pugh score. Hyperdynamic circulation was more marked in the D than the A group as shown by a greater cardiac output (CO)(9 vs. 7.3 L/min) and a lower peripheral resistance (SVR)(666 vs. 866 dyn.s.cm(-5)). Moreover, AN scores significantly correlated with CO and SVR. Overall the prevalence of AN decreased 6 months after LT (67.7% vs 48%) due to a significant reduction in definite AN (43.5 vs. 14.8%; P<.05). AN improved in 70% of cases after LT. Sympathetic dysfunction remained in only one patient. We conclude that AN is frequent in liver transplant candidates; its severity is associated with the degree of liver failure. Systemic circulatory disturbances seem to correlate with the severity of AN. AN is clearly improved by LT. The evaluation of AN may contribute to a better selection of LT recipients.

Autonomic neuropathy is associated with hemodynamic instability during human liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: End-stage liver disease is frequently associated with autonomic neuropathy (AN). The hemodynamic changes during liver transplantation (LT) require an adequate autonomic response to maintain cardiovascular stability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing LT were evaluated for the influence of AN on the evolution after LT. AN was previously evaluated by seven cardiovascular tests assessing sympathetic (Sy) or parasympathetic (P) function. Patients were classified as absent (A), early (E), or definite dysfunction (D). A hemodynamic study was performed before and after vascular clampings. The analysis included the duration of LT, transfusion requirements, intra-operative artenal hypotensive episodes, incidence of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), cardiac arrhythmias and vasoactive drug requirements. RESULTS: The hyperdynamic circulation worsened during surgery in D patients, as shown by a significantly increased cardiac output and a significantly decreased systemic vascular resistance. The incidence of PRS was greater in the AN group. Arterial hypotension during the neohepatic period was more frequent among patients with AN, more frequently requiring vasoconstrictor and inotropic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: AN is associated with hemodynamic impairment and with increased vasoactive drug requirements during liver transplantation, probably associated with impaired reflex vasoconstrictor responses to surgical manipulations and changes of blood volume. AN may be associated with a greater surgical risk during LT. Preoperative evaluation of AN may select a high-risk population of LT recipients.