Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Exp Brain Res ; 138(1): 8-25, 2001 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11374086

ABSTRACT

Physiological mapping of the body representation 1 month or longer after forelimb removal in adult rats revealed new pockets of shoulder representation in the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) in the first somatosensory cortex (SI). These "new" shoulder representations have longer evoked response latencies than sites in the shoulder representation within the trunk subfield, hereafter referred to as the "original" shoulder representation. We postulated that the "new" shoulder representations in the FBS were relayed from the "original" shoulder representation. We investigated this hypothesis by studying anatomical connectivity between the "original" shoulder representation and the FBS in intact control and forelimb deafferented adult rats using Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L), biocytin, and biotin dextran-amine (BDA) as anterograde tracers. The retrograde tracer cholera toxin beta subunit (CT-B) injected into the FBS was also used to study connectivity between the "original" shoulder representation and the FBS. Using these anatomical tracing techniques, we were unable to show the existence of a direct corticocortical connection between the "original" shoulder representation in the trunk subfield and the FBS in either intact or deafferented rats. Functional connectivity between the two cortical regions was studied by ablating the "original" shoulder representation alone or in combination with the shoulder representation in the second somatosensory cortex (SII) while recording evoked responses in the FBS following electrical stimulation of the shoulder. Both ablations failed to eliminate the evoked responses at the "new" shoulder sites in the FBS, suggesting that SI and SII are not necessary for "new" shoulder input in the FBS. It is suggested that subcortical sites may play a major role in large-scale cortical reorganization. Results of projections from the "original" shoulder representation to parietal medial (PM), parietal lateral (PL), SII, parietal ventral (PV), and parietal rhinal (PR) sensory fields and agranular lateral (AgL) and agranular medial (AgM) motor fields are also described.


Subject(s)
Afferent Pathways/physiology , Biotin/analogs & derivatives , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Forelimb/innervation , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Animals , Axonal Transport , Cerebral Cortex/cytology , Denervation , Dextrans , Fluorescent Dyes , Lysine/analogs & derivatives , Muscle, Skeletal/innervation , Neurons/cytology , Phytohemagglutinins , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Somatosensory Cortex/cytology , Somatosensory Cortex/physiology
2.
Exp Brain Res ; 128(3): 315-31, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10501804

ABSTRACT

The physiological representation of the shoulder and surrounding body was examined in layer IV of somatosensory cortex (SI) in rats that had underground removal of the forelimb, either as newborns on postnatal day three (PND-3) or as adults (at least 8 weeks of age). Electrophysiological recordings were used to map the shoulder and body representations (physiological map), and the mitochondria marker, cytochrome oxidase (CO), was used to visualize recording sites in barrel and barrel-like structures (morphological map) in layer IV of deafferents and intact controls. The SI shoulder representation lies in a nebulously stained region that lies posterior to the forearm, wrist, and forepaw representations; the latter region is associated with the well-defined forepaw barrel subfield (FBS). The major findings are: (1) the shoulder is represented as a single zone located at the posterior extent of the SI body map in intact rats; (2) limb deafferentation in adult or neonatal rats that were physiologically mapped 6-16 weeks post-amputation resulted in two or more islets of "new" representation of the shoulder in the FBS in addition to the representation of the "original" shoulder in the posterior part of the body map; (3) deafferentations made in neonatal rats, physiologically mapped as adults, had a significantly greater (Mann-Whitney U) amount of "new" cortical representation within the FBS than did rats deafferented as adults; (4) fewer unresponsive sites in the FBS were found for neonate deafferents than for adult deafferents; (5) evoked response latencies following electrical stimulation of the shoulder were shortest for cortical sites within the "original" shoulder representation in intact controls, and latencies recorded at the "original" shoulder representation in deafferents were also shorter than latencies recorded in "new" shoulder representations in both groups of deafferents; and (6) morphological maps of the FBS were altered in neonate deafferents to the extent that the barrel structure was poorly formed, as exemplified by the absence of the four mediolateral running bands; however, the overall ovoid shape of the FBS was still apparent, but not as sharply defined as for intact controls or adult deafferents. Possible mechanisms for reorganization following large-scale deafferentation are discussed.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Forelimb/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Shoulder/physiology , Somatosensory Cortex/physiology , Amputation, Surgical , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Denervation , Forelimb/innervation , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
3.
Neuroreport ; 7(14): 2317-23, 1996 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8951845

ABSTRACT

We describe the organization of the hindpaw barrel subfield (HBS) in layer IV of rat somatosensory cortex (SI) and relate this organization to the representation of the hindpaw. The ovoid-shaped, HBS is oriented anterior to posterior and comprises barrels and barrel-like structures, the most prominent of which consist of at least five anteriorly-located elongated barrel bands. Posterior to these elongated bands is a cluster of four barrels. Two additional barrels are found, one lateral, the other medial. The lateral border is formed by a nearly continuous band that overlaps portions of the anterior elongated bands and posterior barrels. The HBS shows considerable variability in size and shape; nevertheless, the overall pattern reflects a common plan of organization. Electrophysiological mapping confirmed that hindpaw representation is somatotopically organized. The glabrous toes are represented anteriorly, the pads posteriorly, and the dorsal hairy skin of the toes and hindpaw laterally. By aligning physiological and morphological (HBS) maps according to lesion sites, our data suggest that the elongated anteriorly-located barrel bands represent the hindpaw toes, the four toe pads are represented immediately posterior followed by barrels representing the plantar pads. The representations of dorsal hairy skin of toe and dorsal hindpaw form the lateral border; the heel and ankle are represented most posterior. We interpret our findings as support that individual barrels in the HBS are associated with discrete regions of the hindpaw; however, the precise relationship of structure and function reported between the vibrissae and posteromedial barrel subfield (PMBSF) and between the forepaw and the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS) were not observed.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Foot/innervation , Hindlimb/innervation , Somatosensory Cortex/physiology , Animals , Electric Stimulation , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Toes/innervation
4.
J Med Chem ; 36(25): 4006-14, 1993 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8258822

ABSTRACT

A series of new derivatives of 3-(1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)indole (4-THPI) has been synthesized, and their dissociation constants at the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes have been determined. The new data were combined with similar binding data on a related set of THPI analogs reported previously (Taylor et al. Mol. Pharmacol. 1988, 34, 42-53) and used to develop 3-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3-D QSARs) for these compounds at the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptor sites, by the method of comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). Since the previous study included several conventional QSARs obtained by Hansch analysis, and the new compounds in some cases fall within the congeneric series used in those analyses, we were able to make a direct comparison of the predictive capabilities of CoMFA and Hansch analysis using identical training and test data sets. The overall quality of actual predictions of activity by both methods appears to be about the same, as assessed by the root mean square (rms) residuals between actual and predicted pKi values. On the one hand, the compounds most poorly predicted by the Hansch analysis were 34, 35, and 37, while compounds 30-33 were relative poorly predicted by CoMFA. However, a clear advantage of CoMFA is the ability to include diversely substituted or noncongeneric analogs that must be omitted from conventional QSAR analysis. Using the entire data set of 45 THPI analogs reported here, pKi predictions for six additional compounds having 5-heteroarylindole substituents gave rms residuals of 0.46 and 0.36 for the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 models, respectively; this is close to the experimental error of the binding data. The significance of the CoMFA field graphs in terms of molecular features required for activity and selectivity at these 5-HT receptor subtypes is discussed.


Subject(s)
Indoles/pharmacology , Receptors, Serotonin/drug effects , Animals , Binding Sites/drug effects , Indoles/chemistry , Indoles/metabolism , Male , Models, Molecular , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Receptors, Serotonin/metabolism , Stereoisomerism , Structure-Activity Relationship
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL