Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22269258

ABSTRACT

ImportanceUnbiased assessment of risks associated with acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 is critical to informing mitigation efforts during pandemics. ObjectiveUnderstand risk factors for acquiring COVID-19 in a large, prospective cohort of adult residents recruited to be representative of a large US metropolitan area. DesignFully remote longitudinal cohort study launched in October 2020 and ongoing; Study data reported through June 15, 2021. SettingBrigham and Womens Hospital, Boston MA. ParticipantsAdults within 45 miles of Boston, MA. InterventionMonthly at-home SARS-CoV-2 viral and antibody testing. Main OutcomesBetween October 2020 and January 2021, we enrolled 10,289 adults reflective of Massachusetts census data. At study entry, 567 (5.5%) participants had evidence of current or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. This increased to 13.4% by June 15, 2021. Compared to whites, Black non-Hispanic participants had a 2.2 fold greater risk of acquiring COVID-19 (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.91-2.50; p=<0.001) and Hispanics had a 1.5 fold greater risk (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.32-1.71; p=<0.016). Individuals aged 18-29, those who worked outside the home, and those living with other adults and children were at an increased risk. Individuals in the second and third lowest disadvantaged neighborhood communities, as measured by the area deprivation index as a marker for socioeconomic status by census block group, were associated with an increased risk in developing COVID-19. Individuals with medical risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease were at a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition. ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status are not only risk factors for severity of disease but are also the biggest determinants of acquisition of infection. Importantly, this disparity is significantly underestimated if based on PCR data alone as noted by the discrepancy in serology vs. PCR detection for non-white participants, and points to persistent disparity in access to testing. Meanwhile, medical conditions and advanced age that increase the risk for severity of SARS-CoV-2 disease were associated with a lower risk of acquisition of COVID-19 suggesting the importance of behavior modifications. These findings highlight the need for mitigation programs that overcome challenges of structural racism in current and future pandemics. Trial RegistrationN/A KEY POINTS QuestionWhat population and occupational groups in the United States are at increased risk for acquiring COVID-19? FindingsIn this remote, longitudinal cohort study involving monthly PCR and serology self-testing of 10,289 adult residents of the Boston metropolitan area, 9257 (90.0%) of TestBoston participants acquired evidence of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 through vaccination, infection, or both as of June 15, 2021. Residents identifying as Black, Hispanic/Latinx had an increased risk of acquisition of COVID-19. Healthcare workers were not at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition. Individuals with medical risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease were at a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition. MeaningThese results demonstrate that race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status are not only risk factors for severity of disease but also are the biggest determinants of acquisition of infection. These findings highlight the need to address the consequences of structural racism during the development of mitigation programs for current and future pandemics.

2.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-958642

ABSTRACT

Schizophrenia is a serious mental disease. The diagnosis of schizophrenia so far relies heavily on subjective evidence, including self-reported experiences by patients, manifestations described by relatives, and abnormal behaviors assessed by psychiatrists. The diagnosis, monitoring of the disease progression and therapy efficacy assessment are challenging due to the lack of established laboratory biomarkers. Based on the current literature, clinical consensus, guidelines, and expert recommendations, this review highlighted evidence-based potential laboratory biomarkers for the diagnosis of schizophrenia, including genetic biomarkers, neurotransmitters, neurodevelopmental-related proteins, and intestinal flora, and discussed the potential future directions for the application of these biomarkers in this field, aiming to provide an objective basis for the use of these biomarkers in the early and accurate diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis and rehabilitation assessment of schizophrenia.

3.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21254260

ABSTRACT

BackgroundAntibody response duration following SARS-CoV-2 infection tends to be variable and depends on severity of disease and method of detection. Study design and methodsCOVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) from 18 donors was collected longitudinally for a maximum of 63 - 129 days following resolution of symptoms. All the samples were initially screened by the Ortho Total Ig test to confirm positivity and subsequently tested with 7 additional direct sandwich or indirect binding assays (Ortho, Roche, Abbott, Broad Institute) directed against a variety of antigen targets (S1, RBD, and NC), along with 2 neutralization assays (Broad Institute live virus PRNT and Vitalant Research Institute Pseudovirus RVPN). ResultsThe direct detection assays (Ortho Total Ig total and Roche Total Ig) showed increasing levels of antibodies over the time period, in contrast to the indirect IgG assays that showed a decline. Neutralization assays also demonstrated declining responses; the VRI RVPN pseudovirus had a greater rate of decline than the Broad PRNT live virus assay. DiscussionThese data show that in addition to variable individual responses and associations with disease severity, the detection assay chosen contributes to the heterogeneous results in antibody stability over time. Depending on the scope of the research, one assay may be preferable over another. For serosurveillance studies, direct, double Ag-sandwich assays appear to be the best choice due to their stability; in particular, algorithms that include both S1 and NC based assays can help reduce the rate of false-positivity and discriminate between natural infection and vaccine-derived seroreactivity.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...