Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 184
Filter
1.
Neurology ; 62(6): 888-90, 2004 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15037687

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the frequency and severity of incidental findings in brain MRIs of young and older adult research volunteers, and to provide an evaluation of the ethical challenges posed by the detection of such findings. METHODS: The authors reviewed 151 research MRI scans obtained retrospectively from subjects recruited to studies as healthy volunteers. Incidental findings were classified into four categories: no referral, routine, urgent, or immediate referral. p Values for significance were computed from chi(2) tests of contingency. RESULTS: Of 151 studies, the authors found an overall occurrence of incidental findings having required referral of 6.6%. By age, there were more findings in the older cohort (aged >60 years) than in the younger cohort (p < 0.05) and in more men than women in the older cohort (p < 0.001). Three of four (75%) findings in the younger cohort were classified in the urgent referral category; 100% of the findings in the older cohort were classified as routine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The significant presence but different characteristics of incidental findings in young and older subjects presumed to be neurologically healthy suggest that standards of practice are needed to guide investigators in managing and communicating their discovery.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Brain Diseases/diagnosis , Brain/pathology , Incidental Findings , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/ethics , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Research Subjects , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution
3.
Am J Pathol ; 158(3): 997-1004, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11238047

ABSTRACT

In this study we evaluate the antifibrotic properties of PG-490-88, a water-soluble derivative of triptolide. Triptolide is an oxygenated diterpene that is derived from a traditional Chinese herb that has potent immunosuppressive and antitumor activity. We used the intratracheal bleomycin mouse model and found that PG490-88 inhibits fibrosis in the bleomycin group when given the same day or 5 days after bleomycin. PG490-88 also markedly reduced the number of myofibroblasts in the bleomycin treatment group. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed a significant decrease in TGF-beta in the PG490-88-treated groups compared to the bleomycin-treated group. Additionally, triptolide blocked bleomycin-induced increase in TGF-beta mRNA in cultured normal human lung fibroblasts. The efficacy of PG490-88 when administered late after bleomycin installation suggests a potential role in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.


Subject(s)
Bleomycin , Diterpenes/pharmacology , Diterpenes/therapeutic use , Drugs, Chinese Herbal , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Phenanthrenes , Pulmonary Fibrosis/drug therapy , Animals , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/chemistry , Cell Survival , Diterpenes/chemistry , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/chemistry , Epoxy Compounds , Fibroblasts/cytology , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Immunosuppressive Agents/chemistry , Inflammation/pathology , Lung/cytology , Lung/metabolism , Lung/pathology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Pulmonary Fibrosis/chemically induced , Pulmonary Fibrosis/genetics , Pulmonary Fibrosis/pathology , Transcription, Genetic/drug effects , Transforming Growth Factor beta/genetics , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism
4.
Arch Intern Med ; 161(2): 202-11, 2001 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11176733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Managed care is practiced in both traditional institutional health maintenance organization (HMO) settings and in a variety of complex and decentralized office-based arrangements. This study examines how practice setting affects physician perceptions of the quality of professional practice and patient care in a managed care environment. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted in 1998 of 1081 physicians in San Mateo County, California, who practice in either a traditional staff group model HMO (SGM-HMO) (n = 113) or office-based independent practice (OBIP) (n = 250). Respondents were surveyed about current and past practice characteristics, income changes, current satisfaction with professional and patient care matters, utility of treatment guidelines and formularies, and general perceptions of managed care. Responses were compared between practice settings using bivariate comparisons and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Physicians in the SGM-HMO and those in OBIP reported similar hours worked per week, time spent with patients during office visits, and total patient encounters per week. Declining income was more frequent in OBIP (61% vs 47%) and relatively more substantial (27% with income declines >25% vs 4% in SGM-HMO). Adjusting for income changes, practice setting, years in practice, and sex, SGM-HMO physicians were significantly more satisfied with a variety of professional and quality of care issues (P<.001), viewed more favorably the utility of treatment guidelines and drug formularies (P<.001), and held more positive general perceptions of managed care (P<.001) than OBIP physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In a managed care environment, SGM-HMO physicians are significantly more satisfied with the quality of practice and patient care than physicians in OBIP. This study suggests that the myriad managed care contracts, formularies, and guidelines received by physicians in OBIPs may lead to more negative perceptions of the quality of professional practice and patient care.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Managed Care Programs , Physicians/psychology , Private Practice , Quality of Health Care , California , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Income , Job Satisfaction , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic
5.
Annu Rev Med ; 52: 79-92, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11160769

ABSTRACT

It is common for health care providers to deal with the complex and difficult issue of withdrawing advanced life support. The patient is always the key source of authority in these decisions. The most important ingredient in end-of-life decision making is effective communication. It is important to try to ascertain what the patient thought about quality-of-life values before surrogate decisions can be made on the patient's behalf. The concepts of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice are the foundation of ethical decision making. Numerous legal precedents have laid the groundwork for end-of-life decision making. Most state courts have supported withholding and withdrawing life support from patients who will not regain a reasonable quality of life. The recent Patient Self-Determination Act encourages patients to fill out advance directives that state their desires. When continued intensive care is futile, advanced life support should be withdrawn. However, a narrow definition of futility in this situation is the key, since the concept of futility could lead to inappropriate decisions. It is best to consider a situation futile when the patient is terminally ill, the condition is irreversible, and death is imminent. During the withdrawal of advanced life support, terminal or rapid weaning is preferable to extubation. Combinations of opiates, benzodiazepines, and other agents help provide comfort to patients who are suffering.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Medical , Euthanasia, Passive/legislation & jurisprudence , Life Support Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Terminal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Communication , Decision Making , Euthanasia, Passive/psychology , Freedom , Humans , Life Support Care/psychology , Medical Futility , Pain/etiology , Pain/prevention & control , Quality of Life , Terminal Care/psychology , United States , Ventilator Weaning
8.
Chest ; 118(4): 1172-82, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11035693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered decision making, which in the United States is typically considered to be appropriate, may not be universally endorsed, thereby harboring the potential to complicate the care of patients from other cultural backgrounds in potentially unrecognized ways. This study compares the attitudes toward ethical decision making and autonomy issues among academic and community physicians and patients of medical center outpatient clinics in Japan and the United States. METHODS: A questionnaire requesting judgments about seven clinical vignettes was distributed (in English or Japanese) to sample groups of Japanese physicians (n = 400) and patients (n = 65) as well as US physicians (n = 120) and patients (n = 60) that were selected randomly from academic institutions and community settings in Japan (Tokyo and the surrounding area) and the United States (the Stanford/Palo Alto, CA, area). Responses were obtained from 273 Japanese physicians (68%), 58 Japanese patients (89%), 98 US physicians (82%), and 55 US patients (92%). Physician and patient sample groups were compared on individual items, and composite scores were derived from subsets of items relevant to patient autonomy, family authority, and physician authority. RESULTS: A majority of both US physicians and patients, but only a minority of Japanese physicians and patients, agreed that a patient should be informed of an incurable cancer diagnosis before their family is informed and that a terminally ill patient wishing to die immediately should not be ventilated, even if both the doctor and the patient's family want the patient ventilated (Japanese physicians and patients vs US physicians and patients, p < 0.001). A majority of respondents in both Japanese sample groups, but only a minority in both US sample groups, agreed that a patient's family should be informed of an incurable cancer diagnosis before the patient is informed and that the family of an HIV-positive patient should be informed of this disease status despite the patient's opposition to such disclosure (Japanese physicians and patients vs US physicians and patients, p < 0.001). Physicians in both Japan and the United States were less likely than patients in their respective countries to agree with physician assistance in the suicide of a terminally ill patient (Japanese physicians and patients vs US physicians and patients, p < 0.05). Across various clinical scenarios, all four respondent groups accorded greatest authority to the patient, less to the family, and still less to the physician when the views of these persons conflicted. Japanese physicians and patients, however, relied more on family and physician authority and placed less emphasis on patient autonomy than the US physicians and patients sampled. Younger respondents placed less emphasis on family and physician authority. CONCLUSIONS: Family and physician opinions are accorded a larger role in clinical decision making by the Japanese physicians and patients sampled than by those in the United States, although both cultures place a greater emphasis on patient preferences than on the preferences of the family or physician. Our results are consistent with the view that cultural context shapes the relationship of the patient, the physician, and the patient's family in medical decision making. The results emphasize the need for clinicians to be aware of these issues that may affect patient and family responses in different clinical situations, potentially affecting patient satisfaction and compliance with therapy.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Decision Making , Ethics, Medical , Euthanasia, Passive/psychology , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Patient Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Physician-Patient Relations , Suicide, Assisted/psychology , Truth Disclosure , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Female , Humans , Informed Consent , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
13.
Chest ; 116(5): 1369-76, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10559102

ABSTRACT

Anthrax, a disease of great historical interest, is once again making headlines as an agent of biological warfare. Bacillus anthracis, a rod-shaped, spore-forming bacterium, primarily infects herbivores. Humans can acquire anthrax by agricultural or industrial exposure to infected animals or animal products. More recently, the potential for intentional release of anthrax spores in the environment has caused much concern. The common clinical manifestations of anthrax are cutaneous disease, pulmonary disease from inhalation of anthrax spores, and GI disease. The course of inhalational anthrax is dramatic, from the insidious onset of nonspecific influenza-like symptoms to severe dyspnea, hypotension, and hemorrhage within days of exposure. A rapid decline, culminating in septic shock, respiratory distress, and death within 24 h is not uncommon. The high mortality seen in inhalational anthrax is in part due to delays in diagnosis. Classic findings on the chest radiograph include widening of the mediastinum as well as pleural effusions. Pneumonia is less common; key pathologic manifestations include severe hemorrhagic mediastinitis, diffuse hemorrhagic lymphadenitis, and edema. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. Treatment involves supportive care in an intensive care facility and high doses of penicillin. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins has been noted. Vaccines are currently available and have been shown to be effective against aerosolized exposure in animal studies.


Subject(s)
Anthrax , Bacillus anthracis/pathogenicity , Pneumonia, Bacterial , Animals , Anthrax/diagnosis , Anthrax/epidemiology , Anthrax/microbiology , Anthrax/therapy , Humans , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/therapy
15.
Genet Test ; 3(1): 3-12, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10464572

ABSTRACT

Several genes associated with Alzheimer disease (AD) have been localized and cloned; two genetic tests are already commercially available, and new tests are being developed. Genetic testing for AD--either for disease prediction or for diagnosis--raises critical ethical concerns. The multidisciplinary Alzheimer Disease Working Group of the Stanford Program in Genomics, Ethics, and Society (PGES) presents comprehensive recommendations on genetic testing for AD. The Group concludes that under current conditions, genetic testing for AD prediction or diagnosis is only rarely appropriate. Criteria for judging the readiness of a test for introduction into routine clinical practice typically rely heavily on evaluation of technical efficacy. PGES recommends a broader and more comprehensive approach, considering: 1) the unique social and historical meanings of AD; 2) the availability of procedures to promote good surrogate decision making for incompetent patients and to safeguard confidentiality; 3) access to sophisticated genetic counselors able to communicate complex risk information and effectively convey the social costs and psychological burdens of testing, such as unintentional disclosure of predictive genetic information to family members; 4) protection from inappropriate advertising and marketing of genetic tests; and 5) recognition of the need for public education about the meaning and usefulness of predictive and diagnostic tests for AD. In this special issue of Genetic Testing, the PGES recommendations are published along with comprehensive background papers authored by Working Group members.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Ethics, Medical , Humans
18.
J Surg Res ; 81(2): 147-55, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9927533

ABSTRACT

Effects of lisofylline (1-(5-R-hydroxyhexyl)-3,7-dimethylxanthine), a functional inhibitor of phosphatidic acid (PA) generation derived from de novo synthesis, on neutrophil function were examined in a porcine sepsis model. Hanford minipigs (18-25 kg) were randomly separated into six groups of six animals each: (1) saline control group; (2) sepsis control group, infused with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1 x 10(6) colony-forming units/kg/min) for 2 h; (3) lisofylline control group, given a 25 mg/kg bolus of lisofylline 30 min prior to time zero, followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/kg/h throughout the study; (4) lisofylline pretreatment sepsis group, given lisofylline 30 min prior to sepsis, (5) lisofylline 1-h post-treatment sepsis group, and (6) lisofylline 2-h post-treatment sepsis group. All animals were studied for 6 h. Neutrophils were isolated at -0.5, 2, and 6 h. In the pretreatment and 1-h post-treatment groups, sepsis-induced neutrophil attachment to fibronectin was significantly attenuated. Sepsis-enhanced phagocytic activity was significantly reduced in the lisofylline pretreatment sepsis group, but not in the post-treatment groups. No treatment affected phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced chemiluminescence and basal filamentous actin content, which increased in sepsis, and cap formation, which declined in sepsis. Sepsis caused neutropenia, pretreatment produced neutrophilia, and 1-h post-treatment caused the neutropenia to recover to control levels. Interestingly, toward the end of the 6-h period, the neutrophil count was higher in the lisofylline control group than in the saline control groups. Thus, the inhibition of PA generation from de novo synthesis during sepsis not only can selectively downregulate some neutrophil functions but can also reverse neutropenia.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Bacteremia/blood , Neutrophils/physiology , Pentoxifylline/analogs & derivatives , Pseudomonas Infections/blood , Actins/blood , Animals , Bacteremia/therapy , Cell Adhesion , Disease Models, Animal , Fluid Therapy , Luminescent Measurements , Neutrophils/drug effects , Pentoxifylline/pharmacology , Phagocytosis/drug effects , Pseudomonas Infections/therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Swine , Swine, Miniature , Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate/pharmacology , Time Factors
20.
Chest Surg Clin N Am ; 8(3): 723-39, 1998 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9742345

ABSTRACT

Health care providers should understand that the practice of good medicine includes not only diagnosing and curing diseases, but also effectively communicating with patients and families and helping terminally ill patients die a peaceful and dignified death. Patients in America come from varied backgrounds, and it is important for physicians to consider cultural and religious issues. Physicians should combine their clinical judgment with objective outcome data to provide optimal care for patients. Informed consent should be obtained from patients after offering a detailed plan of care that would include appropriate interventions and the consequences of no intervention. The physician should then assist the patient in making a decision that would provide the best possible future for that individual. The four fundamental principles of biomedical ethics, namely beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, should be considered when analyzing an ethical problem. Voluntary active euthanasia, which means performing a deliberate act (e.g., administering a lethal injection) to end a patient's life, should not be performed by a physician. Withholding and withdrawing basic and advanced life support constitutes passive euthanasia. Good communication with patients early in the clinical course whenever possible results in an ethically correct decision. A nonconfrontational, sympathetic, and compassionate approach to family members and legal surrogates facing the immediate death of their loved ones leads to the best possible outcome. It is the duty of the physician to assure the patient and the family that he or she will not abandon the patient. Effective communication is the key to solving almost all ethical dilemmas when caring for the dying thoracic patient.


Subject(s)
Terminal Care/standards , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/mortality , Death , Decision Making , Ethics, Medical , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Life Support Care , Patient Participation , Prognosis , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL