H. pylori Eradication Treatment Alters Gut Microbiota and GLP-1 Secretion in Humans.

Changes in the intestinal microbial community and some metabolic disturbances, including obesity and type2 diabetes, are related. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) regulates glucose homeostasis. Microbiota have been linked to incretin secretion. Antibiotic use causes changes in microbial diversity and composition. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between microbiota changes and GLP-1 secretion. A prospective case-control study with a Helicobacter pylori-positive patient model involving subjects under eradication therapy (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin). Forty patients with H. pylori infection and 20 matched participants, but negative for H. pylori antigen. Patients were evaluated before and two months after treatment. We analyzed anthropometric measurements, carbohydrate metabolism, lipid profile, and C-reactive protein. Gut microbiota composition was analyzed through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (IlluminaMiSeq). Eradication treatment for H. pylori decreased bacterial richness (Chao1, p = 0.041). Changes in gut microbiota profiles were observed at phylum, family, genus and species levels. GLP-1 secretion and variables of carbohydrate metabolism were improved. Correlations were seen between GLP-1 changes and variations within microbial community abundances, specifically Bifidobacterium adolescentis, the Lachnobacterium genus, and Coriobacteriaceae family. A conventional treatment to eradicate H. pylori could improve carbohydrate metabolism possibly in relation with an increase in GLP-1 secretion. GLP-1 secretion may be related to alterations in intestinal microbiota, specifically Lachnobacterium, B. adolescentis and Coriobacteriaceae.

Lixisenatida en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y obesidad: más allá del control glucémico / Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: Beyond glycaemic control

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la tolerancia a lixisenatida y sus efectos sobre el peso y el control metabólico de pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y obesidad. DISEÑO: Estudio prospectivo. Emplazamiento: Consultas de atención especializada de Endocrinología y Nutrición en Almería, Granada y Málaga. PARTICIPANTES: Pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y obesidad. INTERVENCIONES: Respuesta y tolerancia al tratamiento con lixisenatida. Mediciones principales: Se analizaron datos clínicos y analíticos con medidas de cambio intrasujeto antes-después del tratamiento. RESULTADOS: Evaluamos 104 pacientes (51% mujeres) con diabetes tipo 2 y obesidad (Almería 18,3%; Granada 40,4%; Málaga 41,3%). Edad media 58,4±10,5 años y duración media de diabetes 11,2±6,7 años. El tiempo medio desde la visita basal a la revisión tras inicio de tratamiento con lixisenatida fue de 3,8±1,6 meses. Encontramos mejoría significativa del peso (p < 0,001), índice de masa corporal (p < 0,001), circunferencia de cintura (p = 0,002), presión arterial sistólica (p < 0,001) y diastólica (p = 0,001), glucemia en ayunas (p < 0,001), HbA1c (p = 0,022), colesterol total (p < 0,001), colesterol LDL (p = 0,046) y triglicéridos (p = 0,020). No se observó alteración de cifras de amilasa en relación con el tratamiento con lixisenatida, y el 7,9% no lo toleraron. CONCLUSIONES: Lixisenatida consigue: 1) mejoría significativa de parámetros antropométricos y control glucémico (glucemia basal y HbA1c); 2) descenso significativo de la presión arterial y del perfil lipídico, y 3) seguridad y buena tolerancia en la mayoría de los pacientes. Además, encontramos una significativa intensificación del tratamiento antihipertensivo e hipolipemiante

AIM: To evaluate tolerance to lixisenatide and its effects on weight and metabolic control in type 2 diabetes and obese patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Endocrinology clinics in Almeria, Granada and Malaga. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. INTERVENTIONS: Response and tolerance to lixisenatide treatment. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and analytical data of the subjects were evaluated at baseline and after treatment. RESULTS: The study included 104 patients (51% women) with type 2 diabetes and obesity (Almeria 18.3%; Granada 40.4%; Malaga 41.3%). The mean age was 58.4±10.5 years, and the mean duration of diabetes was 11.2±6.7 years. The patients were re-evaluated at 3.8±1.6 months after treatment with lixisenatide. Significant improvements were found in weight (P<.001), body mass index (P<.001), waist circumference (P=.002), systolic blood pressure (P<.001), diastolic blood pressure (P=.001), fasting glucose (P<.001), HbA1c (P=.022), Total cholesterol (P<.001), LDL-cholesterol (P=.046), triglycerides (P=.020), hypertension drugs (P<.001), and lipids drugs (P<.001). No changes were observed in levels of amylase related to lixisenatide treatment, and 7.9% of patients did not tolerate it. CONCLUSIONS: Lixisenatide achieved significant improvements in anthropometric parameters, glycaemic control (fasting glucose and HbA1c), blood pressure and lipids. It was safe and well tolerated in most patients. In addition, there was a significant increase in the use of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy

[Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: Beyond glycaemic control]. / Lixisenatida en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y obesidad: más allá del control glucémico.

AIM: To evaluate tolerance to lixisenatide and its effects on weight and metabolic control in type2 diabetes and obese patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Endocrinology clinics in Almeria, Granada and Malaga. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with type2 diabetes and obesity. INTERVENTIONS: Response and tolerance to lixisenatide treatment. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and analytical data of the subjects were evaluated at baseline and after treatment. RESULTS: The study included 104 patients (51% women) with type2 diabetes and obesity (Almeria 18.3%; Granada 40.4%; Malaga 41.3%). The mean age was 58.4±10.5years, and the mean duration of diabetes was 11.2±6.7years. The patients were re-evaluated at 3.8±1.6months after treatment with lixisenatide. Significant improvements were found in weight (P<.001), body mass index (P<.001), waist circumference (P=.002), systolic blood pressure (P<.001), diastolic blood pressure (P=.001), fasting glucose (P<.001), HbA1c (P=.022), Total cholesterol (P<.001), LDL-cholesterol (P=.046), triglycerides (P=.020), hypertension drugs (P<.001), and lipids drugs (P<.001). No changes were observed in levels of amylase related to lixisenatide treatment, and 7.9% of patients did not tolerate it. CONCLUSIONS: Lixisenatide achieved significant improvements in anthropometric parameters, glycaemic control (fasting glucose and HbA1c), blood pressure and lipids. It was safe and well tolerated in most patients. In addition, there was a significant increase in the use of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy.

Adipokines and metabolic syndrome risk factors in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been recognized as a significant risk factor for metabolic syndrome and CVD. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationships between levels of cytokines, components of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk markers in women with previous gestational diabetes. METHODS: Women (n = 41) with gestational diabetes background (cases) and 21 healthy women (controls) in the postpartum period were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and uric acid and adipokine levels (TNF-α, IL-6, leptin and adiponectin) were compared and their relationships analysed. Metabolic syndrome prevalence was calculated by WHO and NCEP-ATPIII definitions. RESULTS: There were significant differences between cases and controls: body mass index (kg/m(2) ) 27.4 ± 5.6 vs 23.9 ± 3.6 (p = 0.013), waist circumference (cm) 85.2 ± 12.9 vs 77.5 ± 9.0 (p = 0.017), metabolic syndrome (WHO definition) 14.6% vs 0% (p = 0.012), metabolic syndrome (NCEP-ATPIII definition) 22% vs 0% (p = 0.002), low HDL 36.6% vs 9.5% (p = 0.024), fasting glucose (mmol/L) 5.4 ± 0.6 vs 4.9 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001), glucose 120' oral glucose tolerance test (mmol/L) 5.8 ± 1.7vs 4.7 ± 0.8 (p = 0.007), fasting insulin (µU/mL) 13.4 ± 8.1 vs 8.4 ± 4.3 (p = 0.004), HOMA index 3.3 ± 2.3 vs 1.8 ± 1.0 (p = 0.002), HbA(1c) (%) 5.4 ± 0.2 vs 5.2 ± 0.2 (p = 0.021), uric acid (mg/dL) 4.1 ± 1 vs 3.5 ± 0.6 (p = 0.009), leptin (ng/mL) 32 025.5 ± 19 917.3 vs 20 258.9 ± 16 359.9 (p = 0.023), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Women with previous gestational diabetes have central adiposity, atherogenic lipid profile, carbohydrate intolerance and adverse adipokine profile, all of which are risk factors for the future development of metabolic disease and CVD.