Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 46(4): 378-384, jul.-ago. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-177869

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy of corticosteroids to prevent atopic dermatitis (AD) relapses has partially been addressed in children. This study compared an intermittent dosing regimen of fluticasone propionate (FP) cream 0.05% with its vehicle base in reducing the risk of relapse in children with stabilized AD. METHODS: A randomized controlled, multicentric, double-blind trial was conducted. Children (2-10 years) with mild/moderate AD (exclusion criteria: >30% affected body surface area and/or head) were enrolled into an Open-label Stabilization Phase (OSP) of up to 2 weeks on twice daily FP. Those who achieved treatment success entered the Double-blind Maintenance Phase (DMP). They were randomly allocated to receive FP or vehicle twice-weekly on consecutive days for 16 weeks. The primary study endpoint was relapse rate; time to relapse and severity of disease were also studied. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (29 girls) entered the OSP (23 mild AD) and 49 (26 girls) continued into the DMP. Mean age was 5.5 (SD: 2.8) and 5.1 (SD: 2.3) yrs for FP and vehicle groups, respectively. Four patients withdrew from the DMP (two in every group). Patients treated with FP twice weekly had a 2.7 fold lower risk of experiencing a relapse than patients treated with vehicle (relative risk 2.72, SD: 1.28; p = 0.034). FP was also superior to vehicle for delaying time to relapse. Both treatment therapies were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This long-term study shows that twice weekly FP provides an effective maintenance treatment to control the risk of relapse in children with AD


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Fluticasone/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention/methods , Double-Blind Method
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 46(4): 378-384, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29373242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy of corticosteroids to prevent atopic dermatitis (AD) relapses has partially been addressed in children. This study compared an intermittent dosing regimen of fluticasone propionate (FP) cream 0.05% with its vehicle base in reducing the risk of relapse in children with stabilized AD. METHODS: A randomized controlled, multicentric, double-blind trial was conducted. Children (2-10 years) with mild/moderate AD (exclusion criteria: >30% affected body surface area and/or head) were enrolled into an Open-label Stabilization Phase (OSP) of up to 2 weeks on twice daily FP. Those who achieved treatment success entered the Double-blind Maintenance Phase (DMP). They were randomly allocated to receive FP or vehicle twice-weekly on consecutive days for 16 weeks. The primary study endpoint was relapse rate; time to relapse and severity of disease were also studied. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (29 girls) entered the OSP (23 mild AD) and 49 (26 girls) continued into the DMP. Mean age was 5.5 (SD: 2.8) and 5.1 (SD: 2.3) yrs for FP and vehicle groups, respectively. Four patients withdrew from the DMP (two in every group). Patients treated with FP twice weekly had a 2.7 fold lower risk of experiencing a relapse than patients treated with vehicle (relative risk 2.72, SD: 1.28; p=0.034). FP was also superior to vehicle for delaying time to relapse. Both treatment therapies were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This long-term study shows that twice weekly FP provides an effective maintenance treatment to control the risk of relapse in children with AD.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Fluticasone/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male
3.
Acta pediatr. esp ; 58(5): 290-294, mayo 2000. graf
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-9730

ABSTRACT

Se valoran los gastos sanitarios producidos como consecuencia de una mala utilización de las urgencias pediátricas en un centro cuya cobertura supera los 350.000 habitantes. Se reflexiona sobre el detrimento que implica, tanto para el área primaria que asiste, como para estos servicios (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Hospitals, Pediatric/economics , Emergency Medical Services/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...