Subject(s)
Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome , Humans , Female , Prevalence , Male , Middle Aged , Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome/diagnosis , Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome/epidemiology , Aged , Lung/physiopathology , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Adult , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosisSubject(s)
Biological Products , Rhinitis , Humans , Nasal Cavity , Biological Products/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), which is characterized by partial loss of smell (hyposmia) or total loss of smell (anosmia), is commonly associated with asthma and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). CRSwNP worsens disease severity and quality of life. The objective of this real-world study was to determine whether biological treatments prescribed for severe asthma can improve olfaction in patients with CRSwNP. A further objective was to compare the improvement in in olfaction in N-ERD and non-N-ERD subgroups. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective, observational study of 206 patients with severe asthma and CRSwNP undergoing biological treatment (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab). RESULTS: Olfaction improved after treatment with all 4 monoclonal antibodies (omalizumab [35.8%], mepolizumab [35.4%], reslizumab [35.7%], and benralizumab [39.1%]), with no differences between the groups. Olfaction was more likely to improve in patients with atopy, more frequent use of short-course systemic corticosteroids, and larger polyp size. The proportion of patients whose olfaction improved was similar between the N-ERD (37%) and non-N-ERD (35.7%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first real-world study to compare improvement in olfaction among patients undergoing long-term treatment with omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, or benralizumab for severe asthma and associated CRSwNP. Approximately 4 out of 10 patients reported a subjective improvement in olfaction (with nonsignificant differences between biologic drugs). No differences were found for improved olfaction between the N-ERD and non-N-ERD groups.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Nasal Polyps/complications , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Smell , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Anosmia/complications , Anosmia/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Asthma/complications , Asthma/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Rhinitis/complications , Rhinitis/drug therapySubject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Edible Grain/adverse effects , Millets , SeedsSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Respiratory Function Tests , Asthma/physiopathology , Lung/physiopathology , Biomarkers , Inflammation , Severity of Illness Index , Retrospective Studies , SpirometrySubject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Persea/adverse effects , Skin TestsSubject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Allergens , Avena/adverse effects , Skin Tests , EatingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition of the airways with a complex pathophysiology. Stratification of asthma subtypes into phenotypes and endotypes should move the field forward, making treatment more effective and personalized. Eosinophils are the key inflammatory cells involved in severe eosinophilic asthma. Given the health threat posed by eosinophilic asthma, there is a need for reliable biomarkers to identify affected patients and treat them properly with novel biologics. microRNAs (miRNAs) are a promising diagnostic tool. The aim of this study was to identify serum miRNAs that can phenotype asthma patients. METHODS: Serum miRNAs of patients with eosinophilic asthma (N=40) and patients with noneosinophilic asthma (N=36) were evaluated using next-generation sequencing, specifically miRNAs-seq, and selected miRNAs were validated using RT-qPCR. Pathway enrichment analysis of deregulated miRNAs was performed. RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing revealed 15 miRNAs that were expressed differentially between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma patients, although no differences were observed in the miRNome between atopic and nonatopic asthma patients. Of the 15 miRNAs expressed differentially between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma patients, hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p were validated by RT-qPCR. Expression levels of these 2 miRNAs were higher in eosinophilic than in noneosinophilic asthma patients. Furthermore, expression values of hsa-miR-26a-1-3p correlated inversely with peripheral blood eosinophil count, and hsa-miR-376a-3p expression values correlated with FeNO values and the number of exacerbations. Additionally, in silico pathway enrichment analysis revealed that these 2 miRNAs regulate signaling pathways associated with the pathogenesis of asthma. CONCLUSIONS: hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p could be used to differentiate between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma.
Subject(s)
Asthma , MicroRNAs , Humans , MicroRNAs/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Biomarkers , Phenotype , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/geneticsSubject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Mangifera , Allergens , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Fruit/adverse effects , Humans , Mangifera/adverse effects , Plant ProteinsABSTRACT
Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition of the airways with a complex pathophysiology. Stratification of asthma subtypes into phenotypes and endotypes should move the field forward, making treatment more effective and personalized. Eosinophils are the key inflammatory cells involved in severe eosinophilic asthma. Given the health threat posed by eosinophilic asthma, there is a need for reliable biomarkers to identify affected patients and treat them properly with novel biologics. microRNAs (miRNAs) are a promising diagnostic tool. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify serum miRNAs that can phenotype asthma patients. Methods: Serum miRNAs of patients with eosinophilic asthma (N=40) and patients with noneosinophilic asthma (N=36) were evaluated using next-generation sequencing, specifically miRNAs-seq, and selected miRNAs were validated using RT-qPCR. Pathway enrichment analysis of deregulated miRNAs was performed. Results: Next-generation sequencing revealed 15 miRNAs that were expressed differentially between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma patients, although no differences were observed in the miRNome between atopic and nonatopic asthma patients. Of the 15 miRNAs expressed differentially between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma patients, hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p were validated by RT-qPCR. Expression levels of these 2 miRNAs were higher in eosinophilic than in noneosinophilic asthma patients. Furthermore, expression values of hsa-miR-26a-1-3p correlated inversely with peripheral blood eosinophil count, and hsa-miR-376a-3p expression values correlated with FeNO values and the number of exacerbations. Additionally, in silico pathway enrichment analysis revealed that these 2 miRNAs regulate signaling pathways associated with the pathogenesis of asthma. Conclusion: hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p could be used to differentiate between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , MicroRNAs/blood , Asthma/blood , Asthma/genetics , Phenotype , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Biomarkers/blood , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
Eosinophils were discovered more than 140 years ago. These polymorphonuclear leukocytes have a very active metabolism and contain numerous intracellular secretory granules that enable multiple effects on both health and disease status. Classically, eosinophils have been considered important immune cells in the pathogenesis of inflammatory processes (eg, parasitic helminth infections) and allergic or pulmonary diseases (eg, asthma) and are always associated with a type 2 immune response. Furthermore, in recent years, eosinophils have been linked to the immune response by conferring host protection against fungi, bacteria, and viruses, which they recognize through several molecules, such as toll-like receptors and the retinoic acid-inducible gene 1-like receptor. The immune protection provided by eosinophils is exerted through multiple mechanisms and properties. Eosinophils contain numerous cytoplasmatic granules that release cationic proteins, cytokines, chemokines, and other molecules, all of which contribute to their functioning. In addition to the competence of eosinophils as effector cells, their capabilities as antigen-presenting cells enable them to act in multiple situations, thus promoting diverse aspects of the immune response. This review summarizes various aspects of eosinophil biology, with emphasis on the mechanisms used and roles played by eosinophils in host defence against viral infections and response to vaccines. The review focuses on respiratory viruses, such as the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2.