ABSTRACT
The objective was to evaluate the prevalence and association of several markers (islet cell antibodies: ICA, insulin autoantibodies: IAA, glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies: GADA and ICA512 antibodies: ICA512A) along with HLA DQB1 genotype in type 1 diabetes mellitus of recent onset, including siblings and individuals without any history of this disease, in an Argentine population. A total of 79 children with type 1 diabetes mellitus of recent onset were studied, as well as 79 control children, and 68 healthy siblings of type 1 diabetic cases. IAA, ICA, GADA, ICA512A and HLA DQB1 alleles were determined. Sensitivity was 67.1% for ICA, 36.7% for IAA, 74.6% for GADA and 63.4% for ICA512A. None of the control subjects was positive for the immunological markers. Combined sensitivity of ICA-IAA-GADA was 89.8%, similar to the ICA512A-GADA (87.3%) or ICA512A-GADA-IAA combination (91.1%). GADA correlated positively with ICA, but no such correlation was found between IAA, ICA512A and ICA. IAA correlated negatively and GADA positively with age. IAA was associated to DQB1*0201, whereas ICA and ICA512A associated to DQB1*0302. Among siblings, 3/68 (4.4%) were positive for IAA and a single case (1.5%) was positive for GADA and one for ICA512A. Our findings show that the combination of multiple tests increases the sensitivity for prediction, with the ICA512A-GADA combination proving highly sensitive and equivalent to other proposed combinations, such as ICA-IAA-GADA.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/immunology , Glutamate Decarboxylase/immunology , HLA Antigens/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Argentina , Biomarkers , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/genetics , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Genetic Markers , HLA Antigens/genetics , Humans , Infant , Islets of Langerhans/immunology , Male , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
The objective was to evaluate the prevalence and association of several markers (islet cell antibodies: ICA, insulin autoantibodies: IAA, glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies: GADA and ICA512 antibodies: ICA512A) along with HLA DQB1 genotype in type 1 diabetes mellitus of recent onset, including siblings and individuals without any history of this disease, in an Argentine population. A total of 79 children with type 1 diabetes mellitus of recent onset were studied, as well as 79 control children, and 68 healthy siblings of type 1 diabetic cases. IAA, ICA, GADA, ICA512A and HLA DQB1 alleles were determined. Sensitivity was 67.1
for ICA, 36.7
for IAA, 74.6
for GADA and 63.4
for ICA512A. None of the control subjects was positive for the immunological markers. Combined sensitivity of ICA-IAA-GADA was 89.8
, similar to the ICA512A-GADA (87.3
) or ICA512A-GADA-IAA combination (91.1
). GADA correlated positively with ICA, but no such correlation was found between IAA, ICA512A and ICA. IAA correlated negatively and GADA positively with age. IAA was associated to DQB1*0201, whereas ICA and ICA512A associated to DQB1*0302. Among siblings, 3/68 (4.4
) were positive for IAA and a single case (1.5
) was positive for GADA and one for ICA512A. Our findings show that the combination of multiple tests increases the sensitivity for prediction, with the ICA512A-GADA combination proving highly sensitive and equivalent to other proposed combinations, such as ICA-IAA-GADA.
ABSTRACT
On type 1 newly diagnosed and on insulin treated diabetic patients, anti-insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and antibodies (IA) having the same specificity are respectively induced. Such immune response may be evaluated either by radiobinding assay (RBA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Both methodologies have been compared at previous International Workshops, which pointed out discrepancies in results. In this work, IAA/IA prevalence was assessed by displacement RBA and ELISA, in normal subjects, type 2 (treated with hypoglycaemic agents), insulin treated and newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. Results showed a lack of RBA-ELISA agreement. An attempt was then made to determine whether such results were, at least in part, attributable to iodination site in Tyr-A14. For this purpose parallel RBA assays were carried out by using radiolabelled insulin at A14 and A19 Tyr residues. Control sera and samples from insulin treated and type 1 newly diagnosed diabetic patients were tested. Our results suggest that labelling position is not involved in artifactual binding of tracers, at least as a systematic phenomenon. In the majority of cases the variability in RBA-ELISA signal ratios are best explained in terms of differences in the basic principles operating in both methods instead of artifacts due to tracer preparation.
Subject(s)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Insulin Antibodies/immunology , Insulin/immunology , Iodine Radioisotopes , Radioligand Assay/methods , Tyrosine , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Autoantibodies/analysis , Autoantibodies/immunology , Binding Sites, Antibody/immunology , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/immunology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/immunology , Female , Humans , Insulin Antibodies/analysis , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Using reliable displacement radiobinding assay (RBA) and ELISA, the existence of anti-human growth hormone autoantibodies (hGHAA) was confirmed in idiopathic hypopituitary patients with growth impairment. Six of 35 hypopituitary patients (17.1%) and 1/85 (1.2%) control children proved positive for hGHAA by RBA (>control mean + 3 SD). IgG isotype-hGHAA by ELISAIgG (> control mean + 3 SD) were positive for 6/34 (17.7%) and 3/85 (3.5% hypopituitary and control children, respectively. Due to an asymmetry to the right of the ELISAIgG distribution, an alternative cutoff based on a nonparametric method was obtained, and positive results for hypopituitary children increased to 10/34 (29.4%). Three of 34 hypopituitary patients but no control children were positive for hGHAA of IgM isotype. The hGHAA were detected in children with or without perinatal problems. These autoantibodies may represent markers of a major autoimmune process involving a portion of the anterior pituitary and may contribute to the development of hypopituitarism in over 15% of hypopituitary children.
