Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 660, 2024 Oct 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39379853

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The treatment of diabetes distress plays an important role in diabetes care; however, no meta-analysis has been performed to synthesize the short- and long-term effects of psychological interventions tailored for diabetes distress in people with type 2 diabetes. We aim to evaluate the evidence on tailored psychological interventions for diabetes distress as the primary outcome, focusing on individuals with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Two reviewers independently searched eight databases from their inception to September 2024. EndNote X9 was used to screen records. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess the risk of bias. The GRADE system was used to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. A random effect model was used to determine the mean difference or standardized mean difference with 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses based on several intervention characteristics and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Totally, 22,279 records were yielded, and we finally included 18 studies in our systematic review. The meta-analysis included data from 16 studies representing 1639 participants. Interventions types included mindfulness-based and cognitive behavioral therapy, among others. Duration of interventions ranged from 4 weeks to 6 months. We found that psychological interventions that measured diabetes distress significantly reduced diabetes distress in the short-term in people with type 2 diabetes (SMD= -0.56; 95% CI= -0.90, -0.22; p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that this effect could be enhanced when delivered in a group format, by psychologist, using a technology component, or including participants having elevated baseline diabetes distress. However, the short- and long-term effects on HbA1c were non-significant, with results showing (MD = 0.02; 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.26; p = 0.89) and (MD = -0.27; 95% CI = -0.64 to 0.10; p = 0.15), respectively. The long-term effect on diabetes distress was also non-significant (SMD = -0.45; 95% CI = -0.93 to 0.03; p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological interventions tailored for diabetes distress in people with type 2 diabetes are effective in reducing the level of diabetes distress immediately after the intervention. More trials are still needed to further enrich the evidence in this area.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Psychological Distress , Psychosocial Intervention , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Psychosocial Intervention/methods , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Blood Glucose , Mindfulness/methods , Adult
2.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0287308, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37379289

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to summarize the use of machine learning for predicting the potential benefits of stroke rehabilitation treatments, to evaluate the risk of bias of predictive models, and to provide recommendations for future models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement and the CHARMS checklist. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CNKI databases were searched up to April 08, 2023. The PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included models. RESULTS: Ten studies within 32 models met our inclusion criteria. The optimal AUC value of the included models ranged from 0.63 to 0.91, and the optimal R2 value ranged from 0.64 to 0.91. All of the included models were rated as having a high or unclear risk of bias, and most of them were downgraded due to inappropriate data sources or analysis processes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There remains much room for improvement in future modeling studies, such as high-quality data sources and model analysis. Reliable predictive models should be developed to improve the efficacy of rehabilitation treatment by clinicians.


Subject(s)
Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Humans , Stroke/therapy , Bias , Machine Learning
3.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1310130, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38162639

ABSTRACT

Antibody-cell conjugation (ACC) technology is a new research direction in medicine and biotechnology in recent years. The concept of ACC was proposed by Hsiao et al. and developed into a viable cell therapy technology, which refers to the cells with specific functions. Such as natural killer cells (NK cells), cytokine induced killer cells (CIK) and other immune cells and monoclonal antibodies through the linker together formed conjugate. ACC directly modifies specific antibodies on the cell surface through a simple and effective chemical coupling method to enable cells to have new functions. ACC has been developed for the treatment of various diseases, including cancers of the blood system and solid tumors. This paper reviews the current ACC construction methods, challenges and future development directions.


Subject(s)
Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells , Neoplasms , Humans , Cytotoxicity, Immunologic , Killer Cells, Natural , Antibodies, Monoclonal
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(27): e29634, 2022 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35801803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a fatal complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is an enormous burden on the patient economy and related health systems. Nevertheless, only a few bibliometric studies have examined the direction of research and the major findings within the field. METHODS: Statistical and visualization bibliometric analysis was performed in April 2021. Our research data were retrieved from the Web of Science using an advanced search strategy. We then used bibliometric analysis to determine the current general research direction and trend of publications and established the most prolific and distinguished authors, institutions, countries, funding agencies, and keywords in GVHD research. We employed VOSviewer (Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands), Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, State of Washington), and GunnMap (https://lert.co.nz/map/) to retrieve, integrate, and visualize the results. RESULTS: Overall, 15,378 publications from 500 journals were extracted from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science Core Collection database based on our analysis, of which the United States and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center were the most prolific countries and institutions, respectively. Moreover, we identified future research trends and the current status of GVHD research based on the top 10 most cited articles. Finally, influential authors' analysis demonstrated that Blazar, BR were both the most productive and most cited among all authors. CONCLUSION: Our study provides an exhaustive and objective overview of the current status of GVHD research. This information would be highly beneficial to anyone seeking information on GVHD and would serve as a reference guide for researchers aiming to conduct further GVHD research.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Publications , Bibliometrics , Efficiency , Humans , Netherlands
5.
Nurse Educ Pract ; 63: 103354, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35580368

ABSTRACT

AIM: The primary goal of this analysis is to determine the effectiveness of blended learning versus traditional face-to-face teaching in nursing education from the three aspects of knowledge, skills and satisfaction. BACKGROUND: With the rapid development of health care, traditional teaching has been unable to meet the learning needs of nursing education. With the development of Internet technology, blended learning seems to be a new available choice to solve the current predicament. However, the effectiveness of blended learning is still controversial. In addition, most studies have primarily evaluated the teaching effect unilaterally. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library for publications in English from inception to April 2021. Two researchers independently screened the eligibility of each publication and extracted the data. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the MINORS (methodological items for non-randomized studies) were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The statistical heterogeneity was analyzed by the meta-regression and subgroup analysis. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test. RESULTS: The search strategy identified a total of 3682 potentially relevant articles. We finally included 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 quasi-experimental studies (QRs), with a total of 2706 nursing students. The meta-analysis results showed that blended learning is more effective than traditional teaching in terms of knowledge, skill performance and learning satisfaction (SMD=0.64, z = 3.237, p = 0.001; SMD = 0.37, z = 2.58, p = 0.010; SMD = 0.32, z = 2.347, p = 0.019). Egger's test showed no significant publication bias. In addition, sensitivity analysis suggested that the results are relatively reliable. Through subgroup analysis and meta regression, we found that although the heterogeneity could not be significantly reduced or eliminated, the publication year, the study design and the duration of the intervention time and the number of items in the intervention may be the potential factors affecting heterogeneity of knowledge and learning satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The research results showed that blended learning may be an effective teaching strategy and appears to have excellent long-term developmental potential. Although its initial construction may require specific investment to improve the teaching resources and standardize the design of blended learning, in the long term, this new teaching strategy can not only improve nursing students' professional ability and learning satisfaction but also save nursing education resources to promote the balanced development of nursing education. The results of this study can lay a foundation for establishing standardized blended teaching strategies and evaluation indicators in the future.


Subject(s)
Education, Distance , Education, Nursing , Students, Nursing , Clinical Competence , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Nursing/methods , Humans , Learning , Teaching
6.
Int Wound J ; 19(8): 2019-2030, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307948

ABSTRACT

To carry out the translation and cultural adaptation of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument for use in Chinese and to analyse the validity and reliability of the adapted version of the questionnaire. In this quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study, after translation of the questionnaire from English to Chinese, back-translation, and assessment of equivalence between the original and back-translated version by an expert panel, the Chinese version instrument was assessed by a convenience sample of registered nurses in several hospitals in cities of China. The internal consistency and content validity of the instrument was tested, and a confirmatory factor analysis was also performed. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the goodness of fit of the five-factor model after the scale localization was not ideal. Therefore, confirmatory factor analysis is performed to obtain the three-factor solution of comparative fit index, goodness-of-fit index, and adjusted goodness-of-fit index reaching the acceptable standard. The instrument score of nurses with wound care certification was significantly higher than that of nurses without wound care special certification. The adapted version of the instrument for Chinese nurses can be used as a tool to measure attitudes towards pressure injury prevention.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Psychometrics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Translations , Surveys and Questionnaires , China
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL