ABSTRACT
A osteonecrose dos maxilares induzida por medicamentos (MRONJ) caracteriza-se por exposição óssea ou osso que pode ser sondado através de fístula intra ou extraoral, em região maxilofacial, e que não cicatriza dentro de oito semanas. A MRONJ é uma condição rara e debilitante que pode causar dor, disfagia e odor desagradável na cavidade oral, afetando pacientes com histórico ou sob uso contínuo de terapia antirreabsortiva, isolada ou associada a imunomoduladores ou drogas antiangiogênicas, mas sem histórico de radioterapia nos maxilares. O objetivo desta revisão narrativa de literatura é compilar os principais aspectos sobre a etiopatogenia da MRONJ e as opções terapêuticas disponíveis. A etiologia da MRONJ é multifatorial, complexa, e não está totalmente compreendida, não havendo um tratamento definitivo, mas diversas modalidades terapêuticas que visam o controle da dor e da progressão da osteonecrose. Conclui-se com essa revisão que o entendimento da etiopatogenia da MRONJ pelo cirurgião-dentista lhe permite adotar medidas preventivas, bem como o conhecimento das modalidades terapêuticas disponíveis lhe possibilita oferecer o manejo adequado para seu paciente, conforme o estágio da doença.
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is characterized by exposed bone or bone that can be probed through an intra or extraoral fistula, in the maxillofacial region, which does not heal within eight weeks. MRONJ is a rare and debilitating condition that can cause pain, dysphagia and unpleasant odor in the oral cavity, affecting patients with a history or continuous use of antiresorptive therapy, alone or associated with immunomodulators or antiangiogenic drugs, but without a history of radiotherapy to the jaws. The aim of this narrative literature review is to compile the main aspects about the etiopathogenesis of MRONJ and the available therapeutic options. The etiology of MRONJ is multifactorial, complex, and is not fully understood, with no definitive treatment, but several therapeutic modalities that aim to control pain and the progression of osteonecrosis. It is concluded from this review that the understanding of the etiopathogenesis of MRONJ by the dental surgeon allows him to adopt preventive measures, as well as the knowledge of the therapeutic modalities available allows him to offer the appropriate management for his patient, depending on the stage of the disease.
Subject(s)
Osteonecrosis , Pathology, Oral , Therapeutics , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Zoledronic Acid , JawABSTRACT
ABSTRACT For decades, conventional histomorphometry has been the gold standard for analyzing trabecular bone microarchitecture. In recent years, micro-computed tomography (μCT) devices have been validated and are now considered the gold standard for quantifying bone microstructure Aim The aim of this preliminary report is to evaluate the usefulness of CBCT to assess trabecular mandible microstructural properties in normal ewes and to compare the quantitative changes associated with ovariectomy and antiresorptive treatment Material and Method Twelve adult Corriedale ewes (n=4/group) aged 3-4 years were divided into 3 groups and studied for 28 months. Eight ewes were ovariectomized (OVX) and divided into OVX and OVX+ZOL groups (n=4/group) which were treated as follows, by jugular injection: OVX received saline solution and OVX+ZOL received zoledronate (Zol) (Gador SA, CABA, Argentina) (4 mg/month). Another four ewes were subjected to sham surgery (SHAM group) and received saline solution Results Densitometry showed that jaw mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) were significantly lower in OVX than in SHAM and OVX+ZOL ewes; no difference was observed between OVX+ ZOL and SHAM groups. CBCT analysis showed that bone volume (BV/TV%); trabecular thickness (TbTh); connectivity density (CD) and anisotropy degree (AD) were significantly lower, and trabecular spacing (TbSp), significantly higher in OVX than in SHAM ewes. AD was significantly higher and TbSp significantly lower in OVX+ZOL than in OVX groups. BV/TV%, TbTh and CD showed a clear tendency to being higher in OVX+ZOL than in OVX groups. No statistical difference was observed between OVX+ZOL and SHAM ewes. CBCT in a nondestructive, fast, very precise procedure for measuring bone morphometric indices without biopsies, which are not indicated for morphometric evaluation in osteoporosis Conclusions The current study demonstrated the potential of the high-resolution CBCT imaging to assess in vivo quantitative bone morphometry and bone quality of lower jaw cancellous bone under normal conditions and to differentiate changes associated with excessive bone loss induced by estrogen withdrawal and antiresorptive intervention.
RESUMEN Objetivo El presente informe preliminar evaluó la utilidad de Tomografía Computada de Haz Cónico (CBCT) para analizar las propiedades microestructurales trabeculares del maxilar inferior de ovejas y comparar los cambios cuantitativos asociados con la ovariectomía y tratamiento antirresortivo. Se estudiaron dieciséis ovejas Corriedale adultas de 3-4 años Materiales y Método Doce ovejas fueron ovariectomizadas (OVX) y divididas en 2 grupos: OVX y OVX+ZOL (n=4/grupo) cuyo tratamiento por inyección endovenosa en la yugular durante 28 meses fue el siguiente: OVX con solución salina y OVX+ZOL con zoledronato (Gador S.A. CABA. Argentina) (Zol) (4 mg/mes); 4 ovejas fueron sometidas a cirugía simulada (grupo SHAM) Resultados La densitometría (Lunar DPX) mostró que el contenido mineral del hueso maxilar (CMO) y la densidad (DMO) fueron significativamente más bajos en OVX que en SHAM y OVX+ZOL; no se observaron diferencias entre los grupos OVX+ZOL y SHAM. El análisis de las imágenes por CBCT (Planmeca Promax 3D Classic) mostró que el volumen óseo (BV/TV%); el espesor trabecular (TbTh); la densidad de conectividad (CD) y el grado de anisotropía (AD) fueron significativamente menores (p<0.05), y el espaciado trabecular (TbSp), significativamente mayor en OVX que en SHAM (p<0.05). AD fue significativamente mayor (p<0.05) y TbSp, significativamente menor en OVX+ZOL que en OVX (p<0.05). BV/TV%, TbTh y CD mostró una clara tendencia a ser mayor en OVX+ZOL que en OVX. No se observaron diferencias estadísticas entre OVX+ZOL y SHAM Conclusiones En base a nuestros resultados consideramos que CBCT presenta suficiente confiabilidad y validez para evaluar in vivo la morfometría cuantitativa y la calidad del hueso esponjoso del maxilar inferior en condiciones normales, así como para diferenciar los cambios en dichos parámetros asociados a la pérdida ósea excesiva por la caída estrogénica e intervención antirresortiva. Aunque se necesitan estudios futuros, nuestros resultados agregarían una herramienta no invasiva adicional para diferenciar la microestructura del hueso trabecular mandibular en estudios preclínicos , sentando las bases para su futura aplicación en la práctica clínica.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo. Evaluar el efecto del tratamiento con ácido zoledrónico e hidroxocobalamina sobre la microarquitectura ósea alveolar en ratones con periodontitis y osteoporosis inducidas. Métodos. Diseño experimental en fase preclínica. Se incluyeron 16 ratones hembras a quienes se les indujo osteoporosis mediante la ovariectomía total y también se indujo la periodontitis por inflamación por ligadura de seda negra 5/0 en el segundo molar maxilar, todos los protocolos fueron sometidos durante anestesia general. Los ratones se distribuyeron en 4 grupos: control, tratamiento con ácido zoledrónico, tratamiento con hidroxocobalamina y tratamiento combinado. A las 16 semanas, se realizó la autanasia, se realizó la disección para la evaluación mediante microtomografía; determinando la densidad mineral ósea (BMD), el volumen de hueso (BV/TV), espesor trabecular (Tb. Th), número de trabéculas (Tb.N), separación trabecular (Tb.Sp); se realizó el análisis descriptivo y bivariado mediante ANOVA de 1 vía considerando un 95% de nivel de confianza. Resultados. El grupo que recibió tratamiento combinado de ácido zoledrónico e hidroxocobalamina presentó mayor densidad mineral ósea (DMO), mayor volumen óseo (BV/TV) y menor separación trabecular (Tb.Sp) en comparación con el grupo de control (p<0,05). Conclusiones. El tratamiento combinado de ácido zoledrónico e hidroxocobalamina mejora las características microarquitectónicas óseas en ratones con osteoporosis y periodontitis inducidas.
Objective. Evaluate the effect of zoledronic acid and hydroxocobalamin treatment on alveolar bone microarchitecture in mice with induced periodontitis and osteoporosis. Methods. Experimental design in preclinical phase. Sixteen female mice were included in which osteoporosis was induced by total ovariectomy and periodontitis was also induced by inflammation by 5/0 black silk ligation of the maxillary second molar, all protocols were performed under general anesthesia. The mice were distributed into 4 groups: control, treatment with zoledronic acid, treatment with hydroxocobalamin and combined treatment. At 16 weeks, euthanasia was performed, dissection was performed for evaluation by microtomography; determining bone mineral density (BMD), bone volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number of trabeculae (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp); descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed using 1-way ANOVA with a 95% confidence level. Results. The group that received combined treatment of zoledronic acid and hydroxocobalamin presented higher bone mineral density (BMD), higher bone volume (BV/TV) and lower trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) compared to the control group (p<0.05). Conclusions. Combined treatment with zoledronic acid and hydroxocobalamin improves bone microarchitectural features in mice with induced osteoporosis and periodontitis.
ABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: El ácido zoledrónico es un inhibidor de la resorción ósea que se utiliza en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Paget, la prevención de la osteoporosis inducida por glucocorticoides y la osteoporosis en mujeres posmenopáusicas y hombres. Objetivo: Evaluar la estabilidad de un nuevo inyectable liofilizado de ácido zoledrónico 5 mg a través de los parámetros de calidad. Métodos: Se validó un método de HPLC con detector UV para determinar la estabilidad química de la formulación a través de la presencia de productos de degradación y la concentración del ácido zoledrónico en el producto terminado. También se midieron las características organolépticas, pH, esterilidad y endotoxinas bacterianas, partículas en inyectables y totalidad y transparencia de soluciones de este. Resultados: El método cromatográfico resultó satisfactorio para su empleo en la evaluación del producto terminado. Se elaboraron 3 lotes del inyectable de ácido zoledrónico 5 mg liofilizado, los cuales cumplieron con los límites de calidad establecidos durante los 6 meses (estabilidad acelerada) y hasta los 24 meses (vida útil).
SUMMARY Introduction: Zoledronic acid is an inhibitor of bone resorption used in the treatment of Paget's disease, the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and in men. Aim: To evaluate the stability of a new lyophilized injection of zoledronic acid 5 mg through the quality parameters. Methods: An HPLC method with UV detector was validated for the finished product and the chemical stability of the formulation was determined through the presence of degradation products and the concentration of zoledronic acid in the finished product. In addition, the organoleptic characteristics, pH, sterility and bacterial endotoxins, particles in injectables and totality and transparency of solutions were measured. Results: The chromatographic method was satisfactory for its use in the evaluation of the finished product. 3 batches of the lyophilized 5 mg zoledronic acid injection were made which met the quality limits established during 6 months (accelerated stability) and up to 24 months (shelf life).
RESUMO Introdução: O ácido zoledrónico é um inibidor da reabsorção óssea utilizado no tratamento da doença de Paget, na prevenção da osteoporose induzida por glico-corticóides e na osteoporose em mulheres e homens na pós-menopausa. Objetivo: Avaliar a estabilidade de um novo injetável liofilizado de ácido zoledrónico 5 mg por meio de parâmetros de qualidade. Métodos: Um método de HPLC com detector UV foi validado para determinar a estabilidade química da formulação através da presença de produtos de degradação e da concentração de ácido zoledrónico no produto acabado. Também foram medidas as características organolépticas, pH, esterilidade e endotoxinas bacterianas, partículas em injetáveis e totalidade e transparência de suas soluções. Resultados: O método cromatográfico foi satisfatório para sua utilização na avaliação do produto acabado. Foram produzidos três lotes de injeção de ácido zoledrónico liofilizado de 5 mg, que atenderam aos limites de qualidade estabelecidos para 6 meses (estabilidade acelerada) e até 24 meses (prazo de validade).
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a resposta dos tecidos periimplantares em condições de normalidade e com peri-implantite induzida por ligadura, em implantes osseointegrados na maxila de ratas senescentes submetidas ao tratamento posterior com dosagem oncológica de zoledronato. Material e métodos: Foram utilizadas 28 ratas Wistar (Rattus novergicus) iniciando o experimento com aproximandamente 14 meses de idade e pesando entre 350 e 450g. Os animais foram submetidos à exodontia do incisivo superior direito e instalação imediata de um implante de titânio com 2,5 mm de diâmetro por 5,7 mm de comprimento, onde após quase 2 meses, foi realizada a cirurgia de reabertura dos implantes e instalação de um cicatrizador. Após uma semana, os animais foram divididos de acordo com os seguintes tratamentos: veículo, administração de solução salina estéril 0,9% intraperitoneal (Grupo VEI); zoledronato, com administração de 100 µg/Kg de zoledronato (Grupo ZOL); veículo com peri-implantite experimental (Grupo VEI-PIE) e; zoledronato com peri-implantite experimental (Grupo ZOL-PIE), com a indução da peri-implantite experimental (PIE) por meio de uma ligadura de algodão 5 semanas após o início do tratamento medicamentoso. A porcentagem de tecido ósseo total (PTO-T) e porcentagem de tecido ósseo não vital (PTO-NV) foram analisadas histometricamente, e foram realizadas imunomarcações para fosfatase ácida resistente ao tartarato (TRAP), fator de necrose tumoral alfa (TNFα), interleucina 1 beta (IL1-ß), fator de crescimento endotelial vascular (VEGF) e osteocalcina (OCN). Os dados foram submetidos à análise estatística. Resultados: O grupo ZOL mostrou persistência de inflamação no tecido conjuntivo peri-implantar e uma quantidade considerável de PTO-NV ao redor do implante quando comparado com VEI. A inflamação peri-implantar foi mais exacerbada em ZOL-PIE, assim como, o comprometimento da vitalidade do tecido ósseo ao redor dos implantes quando comparado com VEI-PIE. Conclusão: Conclui-se que o tratamento com altas doses de zoledronato ocasiona alterações ao nível periimplantar, dentre elas, um aumento da inflamação local, e da PTO-NV ao redor do implante osseointegrado, o que pode representar um possível fator de risco para o surgimento da osteonecrose dos maxilares associada à terapia medicamentosa relacionada ao implante odontológico (ONMM-IO). Na presença da PIE há uma exacerbação da inflamação e um aumento ainda maior da PTO-NV, o que implica em um importante fator de risco agravante para o surgimento da ONMM-IO no modelo experimental estudado(AU)
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of peri-implant tissues under normal conditions and with ligature-induced peri-implantitis, in osseointegrated implants in the maxilla of senescent rats submitted to subsequent treatment with oncological dosage of zoledronate. Material and methods: Twenty-eight female Wistar rats (Rattus novergicus) were used, starting the experiment at approximately 14 months of age and weighing between 350 and 450g. The animals underwent extraction of the upper right incisor and immediate installation of a titanium implant 2.5 mm wide by 5.7 mm long, where after almost 2 months, surgery to reopen the implants and installation of a healer was performed. After one week, the animals were divided according to the following treatments: vehicle, administration of 0.9% sterile saline intraperitoneally (VEI Group); zoledronate, with administration of 100 µg/Kg of zoledronate (ZOL Group); vehicle with experimental peri-implantitis (VEIPIE Group) and; zoledronate with experimental peri-implantitis (ZOL-PIE Group), with the induction of experimental peri-implantitis (PIE) by means of a cotton suture 5 weeks after the start of drug treatment. The percentage of total bone tissue (PBT-T) and percentage of non-vital bone tissue (PBT-NV) were analyzed histometrically, and immunostaining for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin 1 beta (IL1-ß), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and osteocalcin (OCN). Data were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: The ZOL group showed persistence of inflammation in the peri-implant connective tissue and a considerable amount of PBT-NV around the implant when compared to VEI. Peri-implant inflammation was more exacerbated in ZOL-PIE, as well as compromised bone tissue vitality around the implants when compared to VEI-PIE. Conclusion: It is concluded that treatment with high doses of zoledronate causes changes at the peri-implant level, among them, an increase in local inflammation, and in PBT-NV around the osseointegrated implant, which may represent a possible risk factor for the emergence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws implant- associated (MRONJ-IA). In the presence of PIE, there is an exacerbation of inflammation and an even greater increase in PBT-NV, which implies an important aggravating risk factor for the emergence of MRONJ-IA in the experimental model studied(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Rats , Osteonecrosis , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Zoledronic Acid , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , MaxillaABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: La osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a medicamentos (OMAM) se define como la presencia de hueso necrótico expuesto de los maxilares en pacientes con historia de tratamiento farmacológico antirresortivo o antiangiogénico. Se describen diferentes estadios se severidad, con tratamiento conservador para estadios 0 y I, y tratamiento médico-quirúrgico para II-III. Objetivo: Describir los factores desencadenantes, opciones de tratamiento médico-quirúrgico y resultados en pacientes con OMAM estadios II-III. Material y Método: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, de pacientes diagnosticados con OMAM estadios II y III que requirieron manejo médico-quirúrgico en la Red de Salud UC-Christus entre los años 2007 y 2018. Resultados: Todos los pacientes presentaron historia de tratamiento con bifosfonatos intravenosos. La mayoría de los registros de seguimiento de pacientes estuvo disponible para su análisis. El tratamiento consistió en aseo quirúrgico, decorticación y secuestrectomía. Se reportó disminución de la sintomatología con resolución parcial en la mitad de los casos y cierre completo de la exposición ósea en los restantes. Conclusión: Sugerimos que el tratamiento médico-quirúrgico en pacientes con OMAM en etapas II y III es efectivo en términos de disminución de sintomatología y control de infección. Sin embargo, es necesario realizar nuevos estudios prospectivos, con mayor cantidad de pacientes y tiempo de seguimiento.
Abstract Introduction: Medication-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is defined as the presence of exposed necrotic bone of the jaws in patients with a history of antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drug treatment. Different stages of severity are described, with conservative treatment for stages 0 and I, and medical-surgical treatment for II-III. Aim: To describe the triggers, medical-surgical treatment options and outcomes in patients with stage II-III MRONJ. Material and Method: Retrospective, descriptive study of patients diagnosed with MRONJ stages II and III that required medical-surgical management in the UC-Christus Health Network between 2007 and 2018. Results: All patients had a history of treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates. Most of the patient follow-up records were available for analysis. Treatment consisted of surgical grooming, decortication, and sequestrectomy. A decrease in symptoms was reported with partial resolution in half of the cases, and complete closure of bone exposure in the remainder. Conclusion: We suggest that medical-surgical treatment in patients with MRONJ in stages II and III is effective in terms of reducing symptoms and controlling infection. However, it is necessary to carry out new prospective studies, with a greater number of patients and follow-up time.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Tooth Extraction , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Age Distribution , Aftercare , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , JawABSTRACT
Introducción: El ácido zoledrónico mejora la calidad de vida en pacientes con metástasis óseas por cáncer prostático. Objetivo: Evaluar la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud con el cuestionario EORTC QLQ-BM22 en pacientes con metástasis óseas por cáncer prostático tratados con ácido zoledrónico. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo-descriptivo de 71 pacientes con cáncer prostático metastásico a hueso tratados en el servicio de oncología del Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico "Hermanos Ameijeiras" con: edades 18-80 años, ECOG<3, expectativa de vida >6 meses, y seguimiento de al menos doce meses. Se administró ácido zoledrónico cada 21-28 días. Se aplicó la escala visual análoga y el módulo EORTC QLQ-BM22. Resultados: Los pacientes tenían una mediana de 71 años de edad, Gleason ≥ 8: en 57,7 % de los pacientes, PSA al diagnóstico ≥ 20 ng/mL: 70,4 por ciento, ECOG 1: 67,6 por ciento, y estadio IV como presentación inicial: 50,7 por ciento. Metástasis óseas sin toma visceral: 84,5 por ciento, en vértebras 36,6 por ciento, <3 sitios 66,2 por ciento, y metástasis óseas blásticas 60,6 por ciento. Eventos esqueléticos relacionados previos al ácido zoledrónico 7,9 por ciento (fractura), y posteriores, 5,6 por ciento (radioterapia anti-álgica). A doce meses, acorde a la escala visual análoga, se alcanzó respuesta completa: 71 por ciento, y parcial: 29 por ciento (p<0,05). Luego de la aplicación del módulo EORTC QLQ-BM22, se comprobó disminución significativa tanto en la escala de síntomas como en la funcional, independientemente de otros factores. Conclusiones: Los tratamientos específicos para cáncer prostático combinado a zoledrónico mejoran significativamente el dolor y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes con metástasis óseas(AU)
Introduction: Zoledronic Acid improves the quality of life of patients suffering from prostate cancer. Objectives: To assess the health-related quality of life using EORTC QLQ-BM22 questioner in patients suffering from prostate cancer, treated with zoledronic acid. Method: A prospective-descriptive study was carried out in 71 patients suffering from prostate cancer involving bones, with ages ranging between 18 and 80 years, and who were treated in the oncology service at Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital. The ECOG was less than 3, life expectancy> 6 months, and follow-up of at least twelve months. Zoledronic acid was administered every 21-28 days. The visual analog scale and EORTC QLQ-BM22 module were applied. Results: The patients had median age of 71 years, Gleason ≥ 8: in 57.7% of the patients, PSA at diagnosis ≥ 20 ng / mL: 70.4%, ECOG 1: 67.6 percent, and stage IV as initial presentation: 50.7 percent. Bone metastases without visceral intake: 84.5 percent, in vertebrae 36.6 percent, <3 sites 66.2 percent, and blast bone metastases 60.6 percent. Skeletal events related to zoledronic acid before 7.9 percent (fracture), and after 5.6 percent (anti-allergic radiotherapy). At twelve months, according to the visual analog scale, a complete response was achieved, 71 percent, and a partial response, 29 percent (p <0.05). After the application of EORTC QLQ-BM22 module, a significant decrease was found in both the symptom and functional scales, regardless of other factors. Conclusions: Specific treatments for prostate cancer combined with zoledronic significantly improve pain and health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Bone Neoplasms , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Metastasis/diagnosis , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: La osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a medicamentos (OMAM) es una patología que involucra la exposición necrótica de hueso maxilar o mandibular, relacionada al uso de fármacos antirresortivos y antiangiogénicos, con una prevalencia de 0,94%-13% en pacientes oncológicos y con osteoporosis que hacen uso de ellos. Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia de osteonecrosis de los maxilares en pacientes en tratamiento con bifosfonatos intravenosos (BFIV) en el Centro del Cáncer de la Red de Salud UC-Christus, Santiago de Chile. Material y Método: Se analizaron los datos de pacientes que recibieron tratamiento de bifosfonatos intravenoso entre marzo y septiembre de 2016, con seguimiento por los equipos tratantes. Se consideró para la extracción de datos el género, edad, diagnóstico primario, bifosfonato intravenoso utilizado, tiempo de seguimiento, presencia de metástasis óseas y diagnóstico de OMAM. Resultados: Se obtuvo una muestra de 143 pacientes, con una relación hombre:mujer de 1:2; promedio de edad de 63,2 años; 78% de ellos fueron tratados con ácido zoledrónico y un 22% con pamidronato. Del total de pacientes un 1,4% (n = 2) desarrolló OMAM. Ambos casos con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama en tratamiento con ácido zoledrónico, lo que corresponde al 1,8% de los pacientes en tratamiento con este fármaco. Conclusión: Si bien la OMAM es una patología infrecuente, esta se presenta con alta morbilidad y es de manejo complejo. La prevención y tratamiento de focos infecciosos odontogénicos de pacientes antes, durante o después del tratamiento con BFIV es fundamental para prevenir su desarrollo.
Abstract Introduction: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a disease involving exposition of necrotic maxillary and mandibular bone and it's related to antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs, with a prevalence that variates from 0,94%-13% in oncologic and osteoporosis patients treated with them. Aim: To determine the prevalence of MRONJ in patients that underwent treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates (IVBP) at Centro del Cancer de la Red de Salud UC-CHRISTUS of Santiago, Chile. Material and Method: Data from patients who received intravenous bisphosphonate treatment between March and September 2016 were analyzed, with follow-ups by their treating teams. Data extraction considered gender, age, primary diagnosis, intravenous bisphosphonate used, follow up time, bone metastases and diagnosis of MRONJ. Results: A sample of 143 patients was obtained with a men:women ratio of 1:2; an average age of 63,2 years, 78% of the patients were treated with zoledronic acid and 22% of the patients with pamidronate. From the total number of patients,1.4% (n = 2) developed MRONJ, both cases had breast cancer as primary diagnosis and in treatment with zoledronic acid, which corresponds to 1.8% of patients being treated with this drug. Conclusion: Although MRONJ is an infrequent disease, it presents high morbidity and complex management. Prevention and treatment of odontogenic infectious foci in patients before, during and after treatment with IVBP drugs is fundamental to prevent this pathology.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Estimar o custo por evento relacionado ao esqueleto (ERE) e o impacto econômico anual da adoção de denosumabe em pacientes com metástases ósseas secundárias ao câncer de mama, próstata e outros tumores sólidos ou mieloma múltiplo sob a perspectiva do sistema de saúde privado brasileiro. Métodos: Um modelo econômico foi desenvolvido para comparar os custos relacionados com denosumabe versus ácido zoledrônico na prevenção de EREs. O modelo incluiu os seguintes custos: medicamento, administração, monitoramento e manejo de ERE. O custo anual foi apresentado em reais (BRL) para 100 pacientes. Os custos do manejo de ERE [fratura vertebral (FV), fratura não vertebral (FNV), radiação óssea (RO), cirurgia óssea (CO) e compressão da medula espinhal (CME)] foram estimados a partir dos recursos e procedimentos coletados da revisão de literatura, bases de dados e painel Delphi. Dados coletados dos estudos clínicos randomizados relacionados com cada tipo de tumor na análise e de um estudo prospectivo observacional foram utilizados para estimar a eficácia clínica de denosumabe versus ácido zoledrônico. Resultados: O custo por cada tipo de ERE variou de BRL 27.246 a BRL 28.035 para FV, BRL 18.023 a BRL 18.811 para FNV, BRL 42.750 a BRL 43.538 para RO, BRL 18.023 a BRL 18.811 para CO e BRL 12.472 a BRL 13.260 para CME. A introdução de denosumabe foi estimada em economia anual por 100 pacientes de até BRL 1.072.043,14 para câncer de mama, BRL 1.212.822,79 para outros tumores sólidos, BRL 1.929.660,67 para câncer de próstata e BRL 77.965,07 para mieloma múltiplo. Conclusão: Esta análise sugere que EREs adicionam custos substanciais no manejo de pacientes com metástases ósseas. Dessa forma, o uso de denosumabe pode prevenir e retardar EREs em pacientes com câncer e pode possivelmente levar à redução do impacto econômico associado aos EREs sob a perspectiva dos pagadores de saúde privada brasileira.
Objective: To estimate the cost per SRE and annual economic impact of denosumab adoption in patients with bone metastases (BM) secondary to breast cancer, prostate cancer, other solid tumors or multiple myeloma from the Brazilian private healthcare system's perspective. Methods: An economic model was developed to compare the cost outcomes associated with denosumab instead of zoledronic acid for SRE prevention. The model included the following costs: drug, administration, monitoring and SRE management. Annual costs per 100 patients were reported in 2019 Brazilian currency (BRL). The SRE management costs (vertebral fracture (VF), non-vertebral fracture (NVF), radiation to bone (RB), surgery to bone (SB) and spinal cord compression (SCC)) were estimated from the resources and procedures collected from literature review, official database, and a Delphi panel. Data collected from randomized clinical trials related to each tumor type in the analysis and from a prospective observational study was used to estimate the clinical efficacy of denosumab vs zoledronic acid. Results: The cost per each type of SREs across all tumors ranged BRL 27,246 BRL 28,035 for VF, BRL 18,023 BRL 18,811 for NVF, BRL 42,750 BRL 43,538 for RB, BRL 18,023 BRL 18,811 for SB and BRL 12,472 BRL 13,260 for SCC. The introduction of denosumab was estimated to result in annual savings per 100 patients of up to BRL 1,072,043.14 for breast cancer, BRL 1,212,822.79 for other solid tumors, BRL 1,929,660.67 for prostate cancer and BRL 77,965.07 for multiple myeloma. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that SREs add substantial costs to the management of patients with bone metastases. In this way, the use of denosumab would prevent and delay SREs in cancer patients and might possibly lead to reduce the economic burden associated with SREs, borne by Brazilian private healthcare payers.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms , Denosumab , Zoledronic Acid , Multiple Myeloma , Neoplasm MetastasisABSTRACT
O objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar os efeitos da quimioterapia com Cisplatina (CIS) combinado ao uso de Zoledronato (ZOL) sobre os tecidos periodontais saudáveis e na progressão da periodontite experimental induzida em ratos. Foram utilizados 160 ratos machos, distribuídos em dois grupos sem periodontite experimental induzida (SPE) e com periodontite experimental induzida (PE) e subdivididos em quatro subgrupos: SS/SS: receberam duas injeções de 0,5 mL de solução salina a 0.9% (SS) (n= 20); SS/ZOL: receberam uma injeção 0,5 mL de SS e uma injeção de 100 µg/kg de ZOL diluído 0,45 mL em SS (n= 20); CIS/SS: receberam uma injeção de CIS (5mg/kg) e outra injeção de 0,5 mL de SS (n= 20); CIS/ZOL: receberam uma injeção de CIS (5mg/kg) e uma injeção de 100 µg/kg de ZOL diluído 0,45 ml em SS (n= 20). A administação ocorreu por via intraperitoneal em um intervalo de três dias, durante oito semanas. Na quarta semana, foi realizado a indução da PE no primeiro molar inferior esquerdo. Nos períodos de 14 e 28 dias após indução da PE, os animais foram eutanasiados pela administração de dose letal de thiopental (150mg/kg). As mandíbulas obtidas foram fixadas em formaldeído tamponado 4%, descalcificadas em EDTA e incluídas em parafina para confecção de cortes histológicos seriados de 4 µm de espessura para coloração com Hematoxilina e Eosina e realização de reações imunoistoquímicas. Foi realizado análise histológica (escores), histométrica de porcentagem de osso na furca (POF), porcentagem de osso necrosado (PON) e padrões de imunomarcação para TNFα, IL-1ß e TRAP. Os dados obtidos foram submetidos à análise estatística (p<0,05) em programa computacional especializado. Foi observado diminuição do espaço do ligamento periodontal (aos 28 dias) e maior PON (aos 14 e 28 dias) em SPE-SS/ZOL e SPE-CIS/ZOL comparado a SPE-SS/SS e SPE-CIS/SS. Houve menor perda óssea e maior PON em PE-SS/ZOL e PECIS/ZOL comparado a PE-SS/SS e PE-CIS/SS aos 14 e 28 dias. Dentro dos limites do presente estudo, pode-se concluir que o uso combinado de CIS e ZOL é potencial fator de risco para desenvolvimento da osteonecrose dos maxilares, tanto em periodonto saudável quanto em periodonto acometido pela PE(AU)
The objective of the present research was to evaluate the effects of Cisplatin (CIS) chemotherapy combined with zoledronic acid (ZOL) on healthy periodontal tissues and on the progression of experimental periodontitis induced in rats. Were used 160 male rats, divided into two groups, either without induction of experimental periodontitis (NEP) or with induction of experimental periodontitis (EP), and subdivided into 4 subgroups: SS/SS: received two injections of 0.5 mL of saline solution 0.9% (SS) (n=20); SS/ZOL: received one injection of SS and one injection of 100 µg/kg of ZOL solved in 0.45 mL of SS (n=20); CIS/SS: received one injection of CIS (5mg/kg) and one injection of 0.5 mL of SS (n=20); CIS/ZOL: received one injection of CIS (5mg/kg) and one injection of 100 µg/kg of ZOL solved in 0.45 mL of SS (n=20). The drugs/SS were administered via intraperitoneal at 3 days interval, during 8 weeks. On the fouth week, EP was induced in the left mandibular first molar. At 14 and 28 days efter EP induction, the animals were euthanized by lethal dose of sodium thiopental (150mg/kg). The collected mandibles were fixed in buffered 4% formaldehyde solution, demineralized in EDTA and embedded in paraffin for obtention of 4 µm thick semi-serial sections. Then, were submitted to Hematoxylin and Eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. Was performed the following analysis: histologic (scores), histometric of the percentage of bone in the furcation (PBF) and percentage of necrotic bone (PNB), and immunolabelling patter for TNFα, IL-1ß and TRAP. The collected data were submitted to statistical analysis (p<0,05) using an appropriate computer software. Was observed reduction in the periodontal ligament space (at 28 days) and increased PNB (at 14 and 28 days) in NEP-SS/ZOL and NEP-CIS/ZOL when compared with NEP-SS/SS and NEPCIS/SS. Less bone loss and higher PBF was observed in EP-SS/ZOL and EP-CIS/ZOL when compared with EP-SS/SS and EP-CIS/SS at 14 and 28 days. Within the limits of the present research, it can be concluded that combined use of CIS and ZOL is a potential risk factor for the development of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw both in healthy periodontium and periodontium affected by EP(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Rats , Periodontium , Cisplatin , Osteonecrosis , Periodontal Diseases , Bone Resorption , Alveolar Bone Loss , Rats, WistarABSTRACT
Tecnologia: Ácido zoledrônico e bifosfonados orais (alendronato e risedronato de sódio). Indicação: Prevenção de fraturas em pessoas com osteoporose. Pergunta: Em pessoas com osteoporose, o ácido zoledrônico é mais eficaz e seguro que os bifosfonados orais para prevenção de fraturas e outros desfechos de interesse? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado nas bases eletrônicas Pubmed e BVS usando estratégias de buscas predefinidas. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). Resultados: Foram selecionadas e incluídas 5 revisões sistemáticas. Conclusão: O ácido zoledrônico é similar aos bifosfonados orais para prevenir fraturas em mulheres com osteoporose. Seu efeito sobre a densidade mineral óssea femoral é similar ao do alendronato e superior ao do risedronato. Um tratamento por 3 anos com ácido zoledrônico ou por 5 anos com alendronato de sódio é suficiente para prevenir fraturas vertebrais e não vertebrais. Bifosfonados têm similar risco de eventos adversos que o placebo, incluindo transtornos cardiovasculares e taxa de abandono do tratamento devido a distúrbios gastrointestinais. O ácido zoledrônico tem maior incidência de sintomas influenza-like que o placebo. O ácido zoledrônico não provoca eventos adversos do tipo esofágicos, gastrointestinais sérios ou do trato gastrointestinal superior, mas tem maior risco de náuseas, que pode estar relacionada à infusão intravenosa de grandes doses
Technology: Zoledronic acid and oral bisphosphonates. Indication: Prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Question: In people with osteoporosis, is zoledronic acid more effective and safer than oral bisphosphonates for preventing fractures and other outcomes? Methods: Bibliographic search was performed on PUBMED and BVS, using predefined search strategies. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews was done by the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Results: 5 systematic reviews were selected and included. Conclusion: Zoledronic acid is similar to bisphosphonates for preventing fractures in women with osteoporosis and his effect on femoral bone mineral density is similar to that of alendronate and superior to risedronate. A 3 years treatment with zoledronic acid or for 5 years with sodium alendronate is sufficient to prevent vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates have a similar risk of adverse events than placebo, including cardiovascular disorders and risk of attrition due to gastrointestinal events. Zoledronic acid has a higher incidence of influenza-like symptoms (myalgia and arthralgia) than placebo, limited to the first dose and lasting a few days. Zoledronic acid does not cause esophageal, serious gastrointestinal or upper gastrointestinal tract adverse events, but has a higher risk of nausea, which can be caused by large doses of intravenous infusion
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Risedronic Acid/therapeutic use , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use , Bone Density/drug effects , Treatment Outcome , Alendronate/adverse effectsABSTRACT
La osteonecrosis de la mandíbula asociada a bisfosfonatos (BRONJ) es una afección progresiva que aún no tiene consenso sobre su tratamiento ideal. La terapia con plasma rico en fibrina (PRF) ha demostrado ser efectiva en BRONJ. El presente caso relata el tratamiento de un paciente masculino de 76 años que asistió quejándose de dolor en la boca durante 8 meses. Su historial médico reportó metástasis de mieloma múltiple y uso de bisfosfonatos, que había dejado de tomar tres meses antes. En la mandíbula posterior izquierda, la evaluación clínica intraoral presentó supuración y exposición ósea de aproximadamente 4 cm; en la radio-grafía panorámica se identificó una imagen radiotransparente y desorganización de trabéculas óseas; en la tomografía computarizada fue evidente cierta destrucción de la cortical lingual y bucal, que sugirió secuestro óseo. El diagnóstico fue osteonecrosis asociada a bisfosfonatos. El tratamiento consistió en extraer el hueso necrótico y llenar el defecto con PRF obtenido de la sangre del paciente. Se consiguió el cierre completo de la herida. Después de 2 meses, el paciente volvió a quejarse de dolor, una radiografía panorámica mostró una línea radiolúcida de discontinuidad, sugestiva de fractura mandibular en la zona tratada previamente. Se realizó una segunda cirugía con acceso extraoral ya que la mucosa oral se encontraba completamente sana. Se extrajo el hueso necrótico y se colocaron placas de titanio. Después de 3 meses de seguimiento, hubo signos de consolidación ósea y ausencia de dolor; el paciente pudo comer adecuadamente y su calidad de vida mejoró.
Bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a progressive condition that still has no consen-sus about its ideal treatment. Fibrin-rich plasma (FRP) therapy shows effectiveness on BRONJ's treatment by clinicians. A 76-year-old male patient attended for our evaluation complaining of pain in his mouth for 8 months. The medical history showed multiple myeloma metastasis and the use of bisphosphonate (BP) for metastasis control. On intraoral clinical evaluation, suppuration and exposed bone was evident on posterior left mandible measuring approximately 4 centimeters. On panoramic radiograph, we observed a radiolucent image and an area of osseous trabeculae disorganization on left mandible. Computed Tomography (CT) image showed some destruction of lingual and buccal cortical, suggestive of bone sequestration. The treatment was to remove all necrotic bone and fill the defect with FRP from the patient's own blood. Sutures were placed to provide wound primary closure and after 2 months without evidence of exposed bone, the patient came complaining with pain again. After a panoramic radiograph, it was clearly observed a radiolucent image with an image of a jaw dis-continuity line, suggestive of mandible fracture in the same side treated before. New surgery was performed and as the intraoral mucosa was perfectly healthy, an extraoral access was made. All the necrotic bone was removed and titanium plates were placed. After 3 months following up, there were signs of bone consolidation and no pain complaint by patient. The patient was able to eating properly and had his quality of life improved.
A osteonecrose da mandíbula associada aos bisfosfonatos (BRONJ) é uma condição progressiva que ainda não tem consenso sobre seu tratamento ideal. A terapia de Plasma Rico em Fibrina (PRF) tem demostrado ser eficaz no BRONJ. O presente caso relata o tratamento de um paciente do sexo masculino, 76 anos, que se apresentou com manifestação de dor na boca por 8 meses. Seu histórico médico relatou metástase de mieloma múltiplo e uso de bisfosfonatos, que ele havia parado de tomar três meses antes. Na mandíbula pos-terior esquerda, a avaliação clínica intraoral apresentou supuração e exposição óssea de aproximadamente 4 cm; na radiografia panorâmica, foi identificada uma imagem radiolúcida e desorganização das trabéculas ósseas; Na tomografia computadorizada, foi evidente alguma destruição do córtex lingual e bucal, o que su-geria sequestro ósseo. O diagnóstico foi oseonecrose associada a bisfosfonatos. O tratamento consistiu na extração do osso necrótico e preenchimento do defeito com PRF obtido do sangue do paciente. Foi alcança-do o fechamento completo da lesão. No entanto, após 2 meses, o paciente apresentou novamente dor, uma radiografia panorâmica mostrou uma linha radiolúcida de descontinuidade, sugestiva de fratura mandibular na área previamente tratada. Uma segunda cirurgia foi realizada com acesso extra-oral, pois a mucosa oral estava completamente saudável. O osso necrótico foi removido e as placas de titânio foram colocadas. Após 3 meses de acompanhamento, houve sinais de consolidação óssea e ausência de dor; o paciente que pode-ria comer adequadamente e sua qualidade de vida melhorou.
Subject(s)
Osteonecrosis , Surgery, Oral , Diphosphonates , Titanium , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Zoledronic AcidABSTRACT
Zoledronic acid (ZA) is an antiresorptive drug used in children with bone diseases like osteogenesis imperfecta, juvenil osteoporosis, fibrous dysplasia and primary bone tumors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of ZA dose accumulation on growing bone during different periods of treatment in normal rats. Methods: A 4x2 factorial design was used to study the effect of the dose of ZA (D: 0-2.5-12.5-25 µg Z/kg body weight/s.c. weekly) and the length of treatment (T: 15-30 days) in normal female Sprague Dawley rats. Bone morphometric, histomorphometric, densitometric and biomechanical studies were performed. Results: Femoral length and cross-sectional area were affected by both D and T. A significant interaction between D and T was observed in length with a lower value at higher dose and 30 days of treatment. Growth plate of the tibia showed a decrease in total thickness with D and T. Histomorphometric and connectivity parameters of trabecular bone were significantly increased with D and several parameters were also affected by T. Cortical bone strength was increased only with T. Biomechanical parameters of trabecular bone showed significant interaction with greater effect at higher D and T. Conclusion: Even though a mild negative effect of the highest dose of ZA on linear and appositional growth was observed, the other bone parameters evaluated were improved. A careful risk/benefit analysis would lead us to conclude that the mild deleterious effects of ZA during growth are outweighed by the benefit obtained with treatment. (AU)
El ácido zoledrónico (AZ) es un fármaco antirresortivo utilizado en niños con enfermedades óseas como osteogénesis imperfecta, osteoporosis juvenil, displasia fibrosa y tumores óseos primarios. El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar los efectos de las dosis acumuladas de AZ en el hueso en crecimiento de ratas hembras normales durante diferentes períodos de tratamiento. Métodos: se utilizó un diseño factorial de 4x2 para estudiar el efecto de la dosis de AZ (D: 0-2,5-12,5-25 µg Z / kg de peso corporal /sc semanalmente) y el período de tratamiento (T: 15-30 días) en ratas Sprague Dawley. Se realizaron estudios óseos morfométricos, histomorfométricos, densitométricos y biomecánicos. Resultados: la longitud y el área de sección transversal del fémur se vieron afectadas tanto por D como por T. Se observó una interacción significativa entre D y T en la longitud obteniéndose un valor más bajo a la dosis más alta y a 30 días de tratamiento. El cartílago de crecimiento de la tibia mostró una disminución en el espesor total con D y T. Los parámetros histomorfométricos y de conectividad del hueso trabecular aumentaron significativamente con D y varios parámetros también se vieron afectados por T. La fortaleza ósea cortical aumentó solo con T. Los parámetros biomecánicos del hueso trabecular mostraron una interacción significativa con un mayor efecto a mayor D y T. Conclusión: a pesar que se observó un leve efecto negativo de la dosis más alta de AZ sobre el crecimiento lineal y aposicional, el resto de los parámetros óseos evaluados mejoraron. Un análisis cuidadoso del riesgo /beneficio permite concluir que los efectos negativos leves del AZ durante el crecimiento son superados por el beneficio obtenido con el tratamiento. (AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Zoledronic Acid/adverse effects , Growth Plate/drug effects , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/drug therapy , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rats, Sprague-Dawley/physiology , Femur/drug effects , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone/drug therapy , Zoledronic Acid/administration & dosageABSTRACT
La osteonecrosis de maxilar asociada a aminobisfosfonatos (BRONJ) constituye un efecto secundario del tratamiento crónico con los más potentes. Un modelo experimental permitiría determinar la patogenia de dicha alteración. La oveja presenta características orales y del metabolismo óseo similar al humano y permite realizar manipulaciones bucales. Se evaluaron cambios clínicos, remodelación ósea y masa ósea maxilar en ovejas hembras adultas tratadas con zolendronato (ZOL), durante 22 meses y utilizando dosis equivalente al tratamiento de neoplasias. Seis ovariectomizadas (OVX) recibieron ZOL; 5 OVX y 4 SHAM (control) recibieron solución fisiológica. Al inicio, 4 y 22 meses se evaluó calcemia, fosfatemia, crosslaps (CTX) y fosfatasa alcalina ósea. Al final, se evaluó contenido mineral óseo de la hemimandíbula superior (CMO: mg/cm2). Al final del estudio, CTX disminuyó significativamente en ZOL (p<0,05) sin diferencias entre SHAM y OVX. En maxilar, los contenidos de Ca y P (g/g tejido) y CMO (g/cm2 ) disminuyeron en OVX vs. SHAM (p<0,05) y solo Ca y CMO respecto de ZOL (p<0,05). ZOL incrementó el contenido de Ca y CMO, mientras que el de P permaneció significativamente disminuido respecto de SHAM. La sobrevida en SHAM y OVX fue del 100% y en ZOL 77% (2 muertes); 2 ovejas del grupo ZOL presentaron necrosis de maxilar. Conclusiones: fue posible obtener desarrollo de BRONJ por tratamiento crónico con ZOL, el cual redujo notablemente la resorción y, según la relación Ca/P, posiblemente haya afectado la mineralización ósea. (AU)
Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a complication of chronic treatment with the most powerful aminobisphosphonates (BPs). An experimental animal model would allow to determine the pathogenesis of this complication. Ewes exhibit similar oral cavity characteristics and bone metabolism as humans, and they are suitable for oral cavity interventions. We examined herein the clinical manifestations, bone remodeling status, and maxillary bone mass in adult female ewes treated with zoledronate (ZOL) for 22 months. Six ovariectomized (OVX) ewes received ZOL; and 5 OVX and 4 SHAM animals received saline solution. At the start of the experiment, and at the 4 and 22 month-time points serum Ca, P, crosslaps (CTX), and bone alkaline phosphatase were measured. Bone mineral content (BMC) of the superior hemimandible was measured at the end of the experiment. At this time point, CTX was significantly decreased only in the ZOL group (p<0.05). Ca and P content (g/g tissue) and BMC in the mandible were significantly decreased in the OVX group compared to SHAM animals (p<0.05) and only Ca content and BMC were decreased when compared to ZOL (p<0.05). ZOL treatment increased the Ca content and BMC, whereas the P content remained low compared to the SHAM group (p<0.05). All ewes from the SHAM and OVX groups and 77% of the animals from the ZOL group survived until the end of the experiment, whereas two ewes of ZOL group exhibited BRONJ. Conclusion: under our experimental conditions, it was possible to induce BRONJ by the chronic ZOL administration, which in turn induced a high reduction in bone resorption as well as possibly impaired bone mineralization, based on the Ca/P ratio in the mandible. (AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/pathology , Zoledronic Acid/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/chemically induced , Sheep/metabolism , Sheep/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Densitometry , Experimental Development , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/immunology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Zoledronic Acid/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Ilium/cytology , Anesthetics, Dissociative/therapeutic use , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Maxilla/cytology , Maxilla/drug effects , Maxilla/metabolism , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
RESUMEN Los bifosfonatos se utilizan para el manejo de enfermedades con incremento de la resorción ósea como la osteoporosis, la enfermedad metastásica ósea y la hipercalcemia maligna, entre otras patologías. En los últimos años se ha reportado que el uso de bifosfonatos intravenosos como el zoledronato y el pamidronato pueden generar efectos adversos oculares, ocasionados por una reacción de fase aguda mediada por la interleucina-6 (IL-6) y factor de necrosis tumoral alfa (TNF-a). Se reportan 2 casos (una mujer de 71 años y un hombre de 67 años) que entre las 24 a 72 h después de recibir terapia con zoledronato presentaron una uveítis anterior.
ABSTRACT Bisphosphonates are used in the management of diseases characterized by an increase in bone resorption such as osteoporosis, metatasic bone disease, malignant hypercalcemia among others. It has been reported that the use of IV bisphosphonates as zoledronate and pamidronate generate ocular adverse effects by an acute phase reaction mediated by an increase of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumoral necrosis factor (TNF-a). We present 2 cases, a woman 71 years old and a 67 years old man that received therapy with bisphosphonates and 24 to 72hours later they presented an anterior uveitis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Diphosphonates , Zoledronic Acid , Pamidronate , Uveitis, Anterior , Eye AbnormalitiesABSTRACT
Resumo Objetivos: Investigar os efeitos aditivos do agente antirreabsorção ácido zoledrônico (ZOL), isolado e em combinação ao propranolol (PRO), em um modelo de rato com osteoporose por desuso. Métodos: Usou-se um modelo de pata traseira direita de rato privada de descarga de peso para estudar as consequências da falta de descarga de peso sobre o esqueleto durante várias condições, como missões espaciais e repouso prolongado no leito em idosos. Ratos Wistar machos de três meses de idade foram submetidos à imobilização da pata traseira direita (IPTD) por 10 semanas para induzir à osteopenia; em seguida, foram divididos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos: 1 – IPTD para controle positivo; 2 – IPTD mais ZOL (50 μg/kg, dose única intravenosa); 3 – IPTD mais PRO (0,1 mg/kg, via subcutânea, cinco dias na semana); 4 – IPTD mais PRO (0,1 mg/kg, via subcutânea, cinco dias na semana) mais ZOL (50 μg/kg, dose única intravenosa) por outras 10 semanas. Um grupo de ratos não imobilizados foi usado como controle negativo. No fim do tratamento, os fêmures foram removidos e testaram-se a porosidade do osso e suas propriedades mecânicas, além do peso seco e das cinzas do osso. Resultados: No que diz respeito à melhoria da resistência mecânica da diáfise femoral média, a terapia combinada com ZOL mais PRO foi mais eficaz do que a monoterapia com ZOL ou PRO. Além disso, a terapia combinada com ZOL mais PRO foi mais eficaz na melhoria do peso seco do osso e preservou melhor a porosidade do osso cortical do que a monoterapia com ZOL ou PRO em ratos submetidos à imobilização da pata traseira direita. Conclusões: Esses dados sugerem que a terapia combinada com ZOL mais PRO deve ser recomendada para o tratamento da osteoporose por desuso.
Abstract Objectives: A model that uses right hind-limb unloading of rats is used to study the consequences of skeletal unloading during various conditions like space flights and prolonged bed rest in elderly. This study was aimed to investigate the additive effects of antiresorptive agent zoledronic acid (ZOL), alone and in combination with propranolol (PRO) in a rat model of disuse osteoporosis. Methods: In the present study, 3-month-old male Wistar rats had their right hind-limb immobilized (RHLI) for 10 weeks to induce osteopenia, then were randomized into four groups: (1) RHLI positive control, (2) RHLI plus ZOL (50 μg/kg, i.v. single dose), (3) RHLI plus PRO (0.1 mg/kg, s.c. 5 days per week), (4) RHLI plus PRO (0.1 mg/kg, s.c. 5 days per week) plus ZOL (50 μg/kg, i.v. single dose) for another 10 weeks. One group of non-immobilized rats was used as negative control. At the end of treatment, the femurs were removed and tested for bone porosity, bone mechanical properties, and bone dry and ash weight. Results: With respect to improvement in the mechanical strength of the femoral mid-shaft, the combination treatment with ZOL plus PRO was more effective than ZOL or PRO monotherapy. Moreover, combination therapy using ZOL plus PRO was more effective in improving dry bone weight and preserved the cortical bone porosity better than monotherapy using ZOL or PRO in RHLI rats. Conclusions: These data suggest that this combined treatment with ZOL plus PRO should be recommended for the treatment of disuse osteoporosis.
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Propranolol/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/etiology , Random Allocation , Bone Density , Rats, Wistar , Drug Therapy, Combination , Immobilization/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Objetivo: realizar uma revisão da literatura para analisar a eficácia do ácido zoledrônico(ZOL) no tratamento adjuvantedo câncer de mama quanto à mortalidade e recidiva. Método: para a realização da busca, foi utilizada a base de dadosMedline, usando os descritores ?zoledronic acid OR Diphosphonates? ?AND Breast Neoplasms? e o filtro ?TherapyBroad?. Os critérios de inclusão e exclusão pré-estabelecidos foram utilizados para selecionar os estudos incluídosnesta revisão. Resultados: Foram incluídos quatro estudos. O ABCSG-12 observou uma redução dos eventos desobrevida livre de doença (p=0,008) e do número de mortes (p=0,09) no grupo com ZOL. Já no estudo AZURE, asobrevida livre de doença (p= 0,79) e o número de mortes (p=0,07) não apresentaram diferença significativa entreos grupos na população geral, sendo observado benefício somente nas pacientes com menopausa há mais de cincoanos, com diferença na sobrevida global significativa (p= 0,04). Coleman et al, em 2010 verificou maior redução dotamanho do tumor invasivo residual no grupo que recebeu ZOL (p=0,0059). O ZO-FAST demonstrou uma diferençaabsoluta na sobrevida livre de doença de 3,2% (p= 0,0314) a favor do grupo que recebeu ZOL imediato. Conclusão:Não se pode afirmar que o ácido zoledrônico seja benéfico na terapia adjuvante do câncer de mama para todas asmulheres, porém os resultados são promissores quando utilizado em pacientes com baixos níveis estrogênico.
Objective:It is a literature review to examine the effectiveness of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in the adjuvant treatmentof breast cancer in terms of mortality and recurrence. Method:It was used the Medline database, using the keywords?Diphosphonates OR zoledronic acid??AND Breast Neoplasms? and the filter ?Therapy Broad?. The inclusion andexclusion criteria previously established were used to select the studies included in this review. Results: Four studieswere included. The ABCSG-12 observed a reduction in the event-free survival (p = 0.008) and in the number ofdeaths (p = 0.09) in the group with ZOL. In the AZURE trial, the disease-free survival (p = 0.79) and the numberof deaths (p = 0.07) did not show significant difference between groups in the general population. The benefit wasobserved only in patients with menopause for more than five years, with significant difference in overall survival (p =0.04). Coleman et al, in 2010, found a further reduction in tumor size invasive residual in the group receiving ZOL (p= 0.0059). The ZO-FAST demonstrated an absolute difference in disease-free survival of 3.2% (p = 0.0314) in favorof the group receiving ZOL immediately. Conclusion:It is not possible to assert that zoledronic acid is beneficial inthe adjuvant therapy of breast cancer for all women; however, the results are promising when used in patients withlow estrogen levels.
ABSTRACT
Objetivos: O desuso pelo repouso no leito, pela imobilização de membros ou por missões espaciais provoca a perda óssea rápida. Fez-se este estudo para investigar os efeitos terapêuticos do ácido zoledrônico (ZOL), isoladamente e em combinação ao alfacalcidol (ALF), em um modelo de rato com osteoporose por desuso. Métodos: Ratos Wistar machos de três meses foram submetidos à imobilização da pata traseira direita (IPTD) por 10 semanas para induzir a osteopenia; em seguida, foram divididos em quatro grupos: 1 – IPTD para controle positivo; 2 – IPTD mais ZOL (50 µg/kg, dose única intravenosa); 3 – IPTD mais ALF (0,5 µg/kg, via oral diariamente); 4 – IPTD mais ALF (0,5 µg/kg, via oral diariamente) mais ZOL (50 µg/kg, dose única intravenosa) por outras 10 semanas. Um grupo de ratos não imobilizados foi usado como controle negativo. No fim do tratamento, os fêmures foram removidos e testaram-se a porosidade do osso e suas propriedades mecânicas, além do peso seco e das cinzas do osso. Resultados: A terapia combinada com ZOL mais ALF foi mais eficaz em reduzir a porosidade do osso do que a monoterapia com um dos fármacos administrado isoladamente em ratos submetidos à IPTD. No que diz respeito à melhoria da resistência mecânica da diáfise femoral média, o tratamento combinado com ZOL mais ALF foi mais eficaz do que a monoterapia com um dos fármacos administrado isoladamente. Além disso, a terapia combinada com ZOL mais ALF foi mais eficaz na melhoria do peso seco e das cinzas do osso do que a monoterapia com ZOL ou ALF em ratos submetidos à IPTD. Conclusões: Esses dados sugerem que a terapia combinada com ZOL mais ALF representa uma opção terapêutica potencialmente útil para o tratamento da osteoporose por desuso. .
Objectives: Disuse by bed rest, limb immobilization or space flight causes rapid bone loss. We conducted the present study to investigate the therapeutic effects of zoledronic acid (ZOL), alone and in combination with alfacalcidol (ALF) in a rat model of disuse osteoporosis. Methods: In the present study, 3-month-old male Wistar rats had their right hind-limb immobilized (RHLI) for 10 weeks to induce osteopenia, then were divided into four groups: 1 – RHLI positive control; 2 – RHLI plus ZOL (50 µg/kg, i.v. single dose); 3 – RHLI plus ALF (0.5 µg/kg, oral gauge daily); 4 – RHLI plus ALF (0.5 µg/kg, oral gauge daily) plus ZOL (50 µg/kg, i.v. single dose) for another 10 weeks. One group of non-immobilized rats was used as negative control. At the end of the treatment, the femurs were removed and tested for bone porosity, bone mechanical properties, and bone dry and ash weight. Results: Combination therapy with ZOL plus ALF was more effective in decreasing bone porosity than each drug administered as monotherapy in RHLI rats. With respect to improvement in the mechanical strength of the femoral mid-shaft, the combination treatment of ZOL plus ALF was more effective than each drug administered as a monotherapy. Moreover, combination therapy using ZOL plus ALF was more effective in improving dry bone and ash weight, than single-drug therapy using ZOL or ALF in RHLI rats. Conclusions: These data suggest that combination therapy with ZOL plus ALF represents a potentially useful therapeutic option for the treatment of disuse osteoporosis. .
Subject(s)
Rats , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Hydroxycholecalciferols/therapeutic use , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Synergism , Hindlimb Suspension , Hydroxycholecalciferols/pharmacology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Osteoporosis/etiologyABSTRACT
Objetivos: Este estudo foi desenvolvido para investigar a eficácia e a segurança do ácidozoledrônico (ZOL) e do propranolol (PRO) como monoterapia e terapia combinada em ummodelo de rato com osteoporose pós-menopáusica. Métodos: Ratas Wistar fêmeas foram ovariectomizadas (OVX) ou submetidas à cirurgia simulada (placebo) aos três meses de idade. Doze semanas depois da cirurgia, as ratas foram divididas em seis grupos: (1) placebo + veículo; (2) OVX + veículo; (3) OVX + ZOL (100 µg/kg, dose única intravenosa); (4) OVX + ZOL (50 µg/kg, dose única intravenosa); (5) OVX + PRO (0,1 mg/kg, via subcutânea, cinco dias por semana); (6) OVX + ZOL (50 µg/kg, dose única intravenosa) + PRO (0,1 mg/kg, via subcutânea, cinco dias por semana) durante 12 semanas. Depois do tratamento, testou-se a densidade óssea, a porosidade e a microarquitetura tra-becular dos fêmures. Também foram avaliados marcadores bioquímicos séricos e urinários. Resultados: A terapia combinada com ZOL mais PRO foi mais eficaz em corrigir a diminuição do cálcio sérico e o aumento do nível sérico de fosfatase alcalina e fosfatase ácida resistenteao tartarato do que a monoterapia com ZOL ou PRO. Além disso, a terapia combinada comZOL mais PRO foi mais eficaz em corrigir o aumento dos níveis urinários de cálcio, fósforo ecreatinina do que a monoterapia com ZOL ou PRO. A terapia combinada com ZOL mais PRO também preservou a microarquitetura trabecular e a porosidade do osso cortical. Conclusão: Os resultados sugerem que a terapia combinada com ZOL mais PRO pode ser aabordagem mais eficaz para o tratamento da osteoporose grave em humanos. .
Objectives: The present study was designed to investigate further the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid (ZOL) and propranolol (PRO) as monotherapy and combination therapy in a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Methods: Female Wistar rats were ovariectomized (OVX) or sham-operated at 3 months ofage. Twelve weeks post-surgery, rats were randomized into six groups: (1) sham + vehicle; (2) OVX + vehicle; (3) OVX + ZOL (100 뀅g/kg, i.v. single dose); (4) OVX + ZOL (50 뀅g/kg, i.v. single dose); (5) OVX + PRO (0.1 mg/kg, s.c. 5 days per week); (6) OVX + ZOL (50 뀅g/kg, i.v. single dose) + PRO (0.1 mg/kg, s.c. 5 days per week) for 12 weeks. After treatment, femurs were tested for bone density, porosity and trabecular micro-architecture. Biochemical markers in serum and urine were also determined. Results: Combined treatment with ZOL plus PRO corrected the decrease in serum calcium and increase in serum alkaline phosphatase and tartarate resistant acid phosphatase level better than single-drug therapy using ZOL or PRO. Moreover, combined treatment with ZOL plus PRO corrected the increase in urine calcium, phosphorous and creatinine level better than single-drug therapy using ZOL or PRO. Combination therapy using ZOL plus PRO also preserved the trabecular micro-architecture and cortical bone porosity. Conclusion: These data suggest that combined treatment with ZOL plus PRO could be a more effective approach for treating severe osteoporosis in humans. .
Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Female , Rats , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/pharmacology , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/drug therapy , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Propranolol/pharmacology , Propranolol/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Drug Synergism , Drug Therapy, Combination , Ovariectomy , Random AllocationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to investigate further the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid (ZOL) and propranolol (PRO) as monotherapy and combination therapy in a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: Female Wistar rats were ovariectomized (OVX) or sham-operated at 3 months of age. Twelve weeks post-surgery, rats were randomized into six groups: (1) sham + vehicle; (2) OVX + vehicle; (3) OVX + ZOL (100 µg/kg, i.v. single dose); (4) OVX + ZOL (50 µg/kg, i.v. single dose); (5) OVX + PRO (0.1 mg/kg, s.c. 5 days per week); (6) OVX + ZOL (50 µg/kg, i.v. single dose) + PRO (0.1 mg/kg, s.c. 5 days per week) for 12 weeks. After treatment, femurs were tested for bone density, porosity and trabecular micro-architecture. Biochemical markers in serum and urine were also determined. RESULTS: Combined treatment with ZOL plus PRO corrected decrease in serum calcium and increase in serum alkaline phosphatase and tartarate resistant acid phosphatase level better than single-drug therapy using ZOL or PRO. Moreover, combined treatment with ZOL plus PRO corrected increase in urine calcium, phosphorous and creatinine level better than single-drug therapy using ZOL or PRO. Combination therapy using ZOL plus PRO also preserved the trabecular micro-architecture and cortical bone porosity. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that combined treatment with ZOL plus PRO could be more effective approach for treating severe osteoporosis in humans.