Eptifibatida y vasodilatadores intracoronarios para prevenir la ausencia de reperfusión en el IAMCEST con diabetes y alta carga de trombos. Un ensayo aleatorizado / Intracoronary eptifibatide with vasodilators to prevent no-reflow in diabetic STEMI with high thrombus burden. A randomized trial

Introducción y objetivos Estudiar el impacto de la inyección intracoronaria de eptifibatida más vasodilatadores a través de un catéter de aspiración de trombos frente a la aspiración de trombos aislada en la reducción del riesgo de ausencia de reperfusión (no-reflow) en infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del ST (IAMCEST) con diabetes y elevada carga de trombos. Métodos Participaron 413 pacientes diabéticos con IAMCEST y elevada carga de trombos que se aleatorizaron a inyección intracoronaria (distal a la oclusión) de eptifibatida, nitroglicerina y verapamilo después de aspirar el trombo y previo al inflado del balón (n=206) frente a aspiración del trombo únicamente (n=207). El criterio de valoración principal fue el grado de blush miocárdico (GBM) y el Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count corregido (cTFC). Los eventos cardiovasculares adversos mayores (MACE) se notificaron a los 6 meses. Resultados El grupo de eptifibatida intracoronaria y vasodilatadores fue superior a la tromboaspiración sola en lo que respecta a la MBG-3 (82,1% frente a 31,4%; p=0,001). El grupo de eptifibatida y vasodilatadores intracoronarios locales tuvo un cTFC más corto (18,16±6,54 frente a 29,64±5,53; p=0,001), y mejor flujo TIMI-3 (91,3% frente a 61,65%; p=0,001). La eptifibatida intracoronaria y los vasodilatadores mejoraron la fracción de eyección a los 6 meses (55,2±8,13 frente a 43±6,67; p=0,005). No hubo diferencia en las tasas de MACE a los 6 meses. Conclusiones Entre los pacientes diabéticos con IAMCEST y alta carga de trombos, la inyección intracoronaria distal de eptifibatida más vasodilatadores fue beneficiosa en prevenir la falta de reperfusión comparada con la tromboaspiración sola. Se recomiendan estudios más amplios para investigar el beneficio de esta estrategia en reducir el riesgo de eventos clínicos adversos (AU)

Introduction and objectives To study the impact of injecting intracoronary eptifibatide plus vasodilators via thrombus aspiration catheter vs thrombus aspiration alone in reducing the risk of no-reflow in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with diabetes and high thrombus burden. Methods The study involved 413 diabetic STEMI patients with high thrombus burden, randomized to intracoronary injection (distal to the occlusion) of eptifibatide, nitroglycerin and verapamil after thrombus aspiration and prior to balloon inflation (n=206) vs thrombus aspiration alone (n=207). The primary endpoint was post procedural myocardial blush grade and corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count (cTFC). Major adverse cardiovascular events were reported at 6 months. Results The intracoronary eptifibatide and vasodilators arm was superior to thrombus aspiration alone regarding myocardial blush grade-3 (82.1% vs 31.4%; P=.001). The local intracoronary eptifibatide and vasodilators arm had shorter cTFC (18.16±6.54 vs 29.64±5.53, P=.001), and better TIMI 3 flow (91.3% vs 61.65%; P=.001). Intracoronary eptifibatide and vasodilators improved ejection fraction at 6 months (55.2±8.13 vs 43±6.67; P=.005). There was no difference in the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events at 6 months. Conclusions Among diabetic patients with STEMI and high thrombus burden, intracoronary eptifibatide plus vasodilators injection was beneficial in preventing no-reflow compared with thrombus aspiration alone. Larger studies are encouraged to investigate the benefit of this strategy in reducing the risk of adverse clinical events (AU)

Intracoronary eptifibatide with vasodilators to prevent no-reflow in diabetic STEMI with high thrombus burden. A randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of injecting intracoronary eptifibatide plus vasodilators via thrombus aspiration catheter vs thrombus aspiration alone in reducing the risk of no-reflow in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with diabetes and high thrombus burden. METHODS: The study involved 413 diabetic STEMI patients with high thrombus burden, randomized to intracoronary injection (distal to the occlusion) of eptifibatide, nitroglycerin and verapamil after thrombus aspiration and prior to balloon inflation (n=206) vs thrombus aspiration alone (n=207). The primary endpoint was post procedural myocardial blush grade and corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count (cTFC). Major adverse cardiovascular events were reported at 6 months. RESULTS: The intracoronary eptifibatide and vasodilators arm was superior to thrombus aspiration alone regarding myocardial blush grade-3 (82.1% vs 31.4%; P=.001). The local intracoronary eptifibatide and vasodilators arm had shorter cTFC (18.16±6.54 vs 29.64±5.53, P=.001), and better TIMI 3 flow (91.3% vs 61.65%; P=.001). Intracoronary eptifibatide and vasodilators improved ejection fraction at 6 months (55.2±8.13 vs 43±6.67; P=.005). There was no difference in the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetic patients with STEMI and high thrombus burden, intracoronary eptifibatide plus vasodilators injection was beneficial in preventing no-reflow compared with thrombus aspiration alone. Larger studies are encouraged to investigate the benefit of this strategy in reducing the risk of adverse clinical events.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Tirofiban for Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Related Occlusion with Residual Stenosis after Endovascular Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for residual stenosis in patients with acute intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis related occlusion (ICAS-O) after endovascular treatment (EVT) is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose tirofiban in patients with residual stenosis after EVT due to acute ICAS-O. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with residual stenosis after EVT due to acute ICAS-O from March 2015 to May 2019. Patients were divided into EVT alone group or EVT plus tirofiban group. The primary endpoint was the favorable functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. The secondary endpoints were the proportions of reocclusion of recanalized arteries within 72 hours after EVT, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any ICH, and mortality at 90 days. Logistic regression for predictors of reocclusion and functional outcomes were performed. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients, 50 treated with tirofiban and 48 without tirofiban, were enrolled in this study. Compared with patients in EVT alone group, patients in EVT plus tirofiban group had higher favorable functional outcome rate, lower mortality, and a lower reocclusion rate (56.3% versus 30.4%; P = .014, 8.3% versus 28.3%; P = .016, and 10.4% versus 32.6%; P = .011, respectively). The rates of any ICH and sICH were similar between the 2 groups. The use of tirofiban was associated with the favorable functional outcome (odds ratio [OR], 3.417; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.149-10.163; P = .027) and lower reocclusion rate (OR, 0.145; 95% CI, 0.038-0.546; P = .004) on multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with residual stenosis after EVT due to acute ICAS-O, a low-dose of tirofiban is associated with favorable functional outcome and reduced incidence of reocclusion without increasing any ICH and sICH.

Platelet inhibition by abciximab bolus-only administration and oral ADP receptor antagonist loading in acute coronary syndrome patients: the blocking and bridging strategy.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines still recommend the bolus and infusion administration of glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to evaluate the extent of platelet inhibition by a blocking and bridging strategy with intracoronary abciximab bolus-only administration and oral loading of adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients with bolus-only abciximab administration (0.25 mg/kg i.c.) and loading with 600 mg clopidogrel (55%) or 60 mg prasugrel (45%) were included in this study. Platelet aggregation induced by thrombin receptor-activating peptide and adenosine diphosphate was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry up to 7 days. RESULTS: Thrombin receptor-activating peptide induced platelet aggregation was significantly suppressed for a minimum of 48 h (45±17U) and returned to a normal range (>84 U) after 6 days (90±26U; p<0.001). Co-medication with prasugrel significantly reduced adenosine diphosphate-induced (p=0.002) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide-induced (p=0.02) platelet aggregation compared with clopidogrel throughout the observation period. No stent thrombosis or repeat myocardial infarction occurred at 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate blocking of platelet aggregation in high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients by intracoronary abciximab bolus-only administration and bridging to prolonged inhibition via oral blockade of ADP receptors effectively inhibited overall platelet reactivity for at least 48 h, questioning the value of continuous abciximab infusion. Co-medication with prasugrel vs. clopidogrel synergistically augmented platelet inhibition.

Rescue Use of Tirofiban for Acute Carotid In-Stent Thrombosis

Carotid artery stenting is widely performed for extracranial carotid artery stenosis. In-stent thrombosis is a rare but potentially devastating complication. We present a case of acute in-stent thrombosis immediately following stent insertion and post-balloon dilatation in a 64-year-old male. Thrombosis was successfully treated by intravenous tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor.