Telemedicine and Neurology: A Survey of Neurology Patients in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital.

Background Telemedicine has been recognized as a viable solution for addressing the shortage of medical professionals in developing countries such as Nigeria. Tele-neurology has the potential to provide remote consultations and care for patients with neurological conditions, thereby reducing the burden of travel and improving access to medical care. Despite its growing popularity, there is a lack of research on patient's views on this mode of care delivery in Nigeria. This study was conducted to investigate patient's perspectives on the use of tele-neurology in Nigeria. Methodology A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 398 neurology patients at Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a chi-square test using p < 0.05. Results Only 3% of our respondents had previously used telemedicine, with 78.1% of the respondents open to using telemedicine as a means of consultation. The disadvantages of telemedicine noted include limitations in assessing neurological status (94.7%), difficulty in explaining health conditions (84.4%), and lack of technical support (14.6%). The majority of respondents (96.5%) believed telemedicine will help in saving time. There was a statistically significant association between propensity to use telemedicine and time spent in the hospital (0.045) and time off work (<0.001). The propensity to use telemedicine was statistically significant to the use of email (0.001) and type of email address (0.001). Conclusion The findings suggested that there is a need for healthcare providers and policymakers to invest in developing telemedicine to improve access to care.

Poisson Modeling Predicts Acute Telestroke Patient Call Volume.

Background: Predicting the frequency of calls for telestroke and emergency teleneurology consultation is essential to prepare staffing for the immediate management of time-sensitive strokes. In this study, we evaluate Poisson distribution count data using a generalized linear model that predicts the volume of hourly telestroke calls over a 24-h period. Methods: We performed an Institutional Review Board approved retrospective cohort review of patients (January 2019-December 2022) from an institutional telestroke database at a large nonprofit multihospital system in the United States. All patients ≥18 years with a telestroke activation were included. Telestroke calls were quantified in frequency per day and analyzed by multiple time and date intervals. Poisson probability mass function (PMF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) were used to predict call probabilities. A univariable Poisson regression model was fit to predict call volumes. Results: A total of 8,499 patients at 21 hospitals met inclusion criteria, the mean calls/day were 5.82 ± 2.54, and mean calls/day within each hour increment ranged from a minimum of 0.07 from 5 a.m. to 6 a.m. to a maximum of 0.45 from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. The Poisson distribution was the most appropriate parametric probability model for these data, confirmed by the fit of the data to the expected distributions corresponding to the calculated means. The predicted probabilities of call frequencies by hour were calculated using the Poisson PMF and CDF; the probability of two or fewer calls/day by hour ranged from 98.9% to 99.9%. Univariable Poisson regression modeled an increase of future calls/day from 6.7 calls/day in July 2023 to 7.6 calls/day in October 2025. Conclusion: Poisson modeling closely fits telestroke call volumes, predicts the future volumes, and can be applied to any health system in which the mean call volume is known, which may inform the number of physicians needed to cover calls in real-time.

Virtual versus usual in-office care for multiple sclerosis: The VIRTUAL-MS multi-site randomized clinical trial study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects nearly 1 million people and is estimated to cost $85.4 billion in the United States annually. People with MS have significant barriers to receiving care and telemedicine could substantially improve access to specialized, comprehensive care. In cross-sectional analyses, telemedicine has been shown to be feasible, have high patient and clinician satisfaction, reduce patient costs and burden, and enable a reasonable assessment of disability. However, no studies exist evaluating the longitudinal impact of telemedicine care for MS. Here we describe the study protocol for VIRtual versus UsuAL In-office care for Multiple Sclerosis (VIRTUAL-MS). The main objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of telemedicine for MS care on: patient clinical outcomes, economic costs, patient, and clinician experience. METHODS: This two-site randomized clinical trial will enroll 120 adults with a recent diagnosis of MS and randomize 1:1 to receive in-clinic vs. telemedicine care for 24 months. The primary outcome of the study is worsening in any one of the four Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite 4 (MSFC4) measures at 24 months. Other study outcomes include patient and clinician satisfaction, major healthcare costs, Expanded Disability Status Scale, treatment adherence, and digital outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will directly address the key gaps in knowledge about longitudinal telemedicine-enabled care in an MS population. It will inform clinical care implementation as well as design of trials in MS and other chronic conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05660187.

Managing pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis in an austere setting: A case report.

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is the most common demyelinating disease in children. Patients suffer from physical disability, cognitive impairment, and psychosocial challenges. Management requires a multidisciplinary care team. Here we present a case of an 11-year-old boy with POMS who relocated to Guam prior to initiation of a disease-modifying treatment and who experienced a flare without immediate access to an MRI or a child neurologist. Care required the combined efforts of ophthalmology, pediatrics, and emergency medicine in Guam, real-time remote guidance by child neurology, and asynchronous collaboration with cardiology and child neurology. As a result, the immediate flare was accurately diagnosed and treated with steroids, the patient was started on Fingolimod, and an emergency management plan for future flares was constructed. This case illustrates the nuances of both the acute and chronic management of multiple sclerosis in a resource-limited setting and how a combination of synchronous and asynchronous telemedicine was able to achieve a satisfactory treatment plan.

Survey of Teleneurology Use by Neurologists in a Low-Middle Income Country.

Background Teleneurology has been in existence for decades, and the COVID-19 pandemic has escalated its widespread usage. Neurological conditions are a leading cause of death globally, with sub-Saharan Africa bearing the bulk of the burden. Nigeria has few trained neurologists with the few available concentrated in an urban region. The adoption of teleneurology will help close this treatment gap. Despite evidence of its advantage, the adoption and state of teleneurology in Nigeria are very low. This study aims to determine the state and perception of teleneurology in the care of neurological patients in Nigeria and identify challenges to its wide usage. Methods The primary research method was a descriptive cross-sectional survey among 48 neurologists in Nigeria across the six geo-political zones of the country. Descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentage were used to summarize and present the results. Results A total of 48 neurologists participated, of which 46 (95.8%) specialized in general neurology. Videoconferencing is the most preferred means of telemedicine (24, 50%), followed by phone calls (16, 33.3%) and short messages (6, 12.5%). Three-quarters of the respondents are concerned about legal actions from telemedicine use. The majority (34, 70.9%) are not familiar with telemedicine tools, and 40 (83.3%) indicate low telemedicine seminar attendance. More than 90% (46) of neurologists believe that it is a viable approach and can save time and money. Barriers to telemedicine included the lack of incentive to use the technology (38, 79.2%), poor Internet connectivity (36, 75%), and the lack of exposure to telemedicine (36, 75%). Conclusions It is important to overcome the existing barrier to teleneurology in order to fully harness its potential in addressing the shortage of health professionals in Nigeria as most neurologists are open to using it.

Patient acceptance of teleneurology across neurologic conditions.

INTRODUCTION: Patient acceptability with outpatient teleneurology has been reported within specific conditions, but less is known about acceptability across neurologic conditions. The study objective was to compare the acceptability of teleneurology between patients with various neurological conditions and determine what other factors influence acceptability. METHODS: This was a prospective study of Veterans who completed new outpatient teleneurology visits with the Department of Veterans Affairs National Teleneurology Program. Visits were conducted via video to home or video to the outpatient clinic. Patient acceptability was assessed via telephone interview two weeks post-visit. Acceptability was a summed score (3-21) of three 7-point Likert questions (higher = more acceptable). Clinical diagnosis categories were based on the neurologists' ICD10 diagnosis code. Acceptability score was modeled using a censored Tobit model controlling for demographics, type of tele-visit, medical comorbidity, and ICD10 category. RESULTS: In FY 2021, 277 of 637 (43.5%) patients completed an interview with analyzable acceptability data. Of these 277, 70 (25.3%) had codes indicating headache, 46 (16.6%) movement disorder, 45 (16.2%) general symptoms, and 116 (41.9%) for all other categories. Mean patient acceptability was 18.3 (SD 3.2). There was no significant difference in scores between these groups. The only factor independently related to acceptability was medical comorbidity, with higher comorbidity associated with higher acceptability scores. DISCUSSION: Patients find their outpatient teleneurology experience highly acceptable independent of neurologic condition. Those with more comorbidity report higher acceptability. Use of teleneurology may be useful and acceptable across many outpatient neurologic conditions including for more medically complex patients.

The Role of Ophthalmology in Tele-Stroke Consults for Triaging Acute Vision Loss.

Advances in telemedicine have allowed physicians to provide care in areas that were previously geographically or practically inaccessible. Roughly 70% of all US hospital have less than 200 bed capacity and nearly 50% have fewer than 100 beds. These smaller hospitals often do not have specialists available for bedside patient care, making them potential beneficiaries of telemedicine medical specialty services. In 2005, the American Stroke Association proposed implementing telemedicine services in effort to increase access to acute stroke care in neurologically underserved areas such as small hospitals. Tele-stroke services have since become established across the country and are now utilized by approximately 30% of US hospitals. By reducing the time between presentation and evaluation by a stroke specialist, tele-stroke programs have successfully increased patient access to life-saving treatment with tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) treatments. This change has been especially profound remote and underserved community hospitals. However in the evaluation of acute vision loss, an area where ophthalmology and stroke care overlap, increased reliance on tele-stroke services has contributed to some unique challenges. Acute vision has a complex differential and is commonly a result of conditions other than stroke. When tele-stroke services are engaged for the evaluation of acute vision loss, the neurologist is asked to make medical decisions without complete information about the eye. This situation can expose patients to costly or inappropriate testing, unnecessary hospitalizations, or lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment of non-neurologic conditions of the eye. The goal of this paper is to provide an overview of the overlap between stroke and vision loss, highlight the challenges inherent in using tele-stroke in evaluating acute vision loss and to offer our comments on how increased communication between emergency medicine, ophthalmology, and neurology services can ensure that patients with vision loss receive the highest standard of care in all hospitals.

Telemedicine Use, Comfort, and Perceived Effectiveness in the Spinal Muscular Atrophy Community.

Background: Telemedicine may increase access to clinical care, particularly for mobility-limited communities such as the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) community. However, much of the information on exposure to and attitudes toward telemedicine in neuromuscular diseases generally and SMA specifically is anecdotal or from focus groups. Gaining greater insight into patient perspectives is important, given telemedicine's potential for expanding access to care and growing use of telemedicine as a result of technology advances and the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Cure SMA collected information on the SMA community's exposure to, comfort with, and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine through its 2021 Community Update Survey. The final analytic sample represented 463 SMA-affected individuals, resident in the United States. Descriptive analyses, correlations, and ordered logit regression models were used to characterize the sample and identify predictors of exposure, comfort, and perceived effectiveness. Data were analyzed on weighted and unweighted bases to account for differences between the survey sample and the SMA community. Stratified analyses were used to compare self-completed surveys with caregiver-completed surveys. Results: 463 individuals answered questions about telemedicine. Approximately four-fifths of these respondents had used telemedicine previously. Factors predicting greater likelihood of prior telemedicine use included male gender, increasing income, having received drug treatment for SMA, history of mental illness, and having non-neutral views regarding comfort and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine. Several factors were also significant predictors of comfort with and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine. Stratified analyses indicated differences between self-completed and caregiver-completed surveys. Conclusion: These results can provide insight into patient experiences with telemedicine and can inform approaches to its use by health care professionals and clinical trial sponsors.

A Comparison of Patients' and Neurologists' Assessments of their Teleneurology Encounter: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Background and Objectives: To better understand patients' and neurologists' assessments of their experiences regarding effectiveness of teleneurology encounters. Methods: Following an audio-video telehealth visit, neurologists asked patients to participate in a survey-based research study about the encounter, and then, the neurologists also recorded their own evaluations. Data were analyzed using standard quantitative and qualitative techniques for dichotomous and ordered-category survey responses in this cross-sectional analysis. Results: The study included unique encounters between 187 patients and 11 general neurologists. The mean patient age was 49 ± 17.5 years. Two thirds of the patients (66.8%, 125/187) were female. One third (33.2%; 62) were patients new to the NYU Langone Health neurology practices. The most common patient chief complaints were headache (69/187, 36.9%), focal and generalized numbness or tingling (21, 11.2%), memory difficulty (15, 8%), spine-related symptoms (12, 6.4%), and vertigo (11, 5.9%). Most patients (94.7%, 177/187) reported that the teleneurology encounter satisfied their needs. Patients and their neurologists agreed that the experience was effective in 91% (162/178) of encounters, regardless of whether the visit was for a new or established patient visit. Discussion: More than 90% of new and established patients and their neurologists agreed that teleneurology encounters were effective despite some limitations of the examination, the occasional need for patient assistance, and technical difficulties. Our results provide further evidence to justify and to expand the clinical use of teleneurology.

Interest and Satisfaction of Telemedicine Use Among Ambulatory Neurology Patients in Western North Carolina During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, care shifted from exclusively telemedicine to hybrid models with in-person, video, and telephone visits. We explored how patient satisfaction and visit preferences have changed by comparing in-person versus virtual visits (telephone and video) in an ambulatory neurology practice across three time points. Methods: Patients who completed a virtual visit in March 2020 (early-pandemic), May 2020 (mid-pandemic), and March 2021 (later-pandemic) were contacted. Patients were assessed for visit satisfaction and desire for future telemedicine. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine factors independently associated with video visit completion. Results: Four thousand seven hundred seventy-eight the number of ambulatory visits (n = 4,778) were performed (1,004 early; 1,265 mid; and 2,509 later); 1,724 patients (36%) assented to postvisit feedback; mean age 45.8 ± 24.4 years, 58% female, 79% white, and 56% with Medicare/Medicaid insurance. Patient satisfaction significantly increased (73% early, 79% mid, 81% later-pandemic, p = 0.008). Interest in telemedicine also increased for patients completing telephone visits (40% early, 50% mid, 59% later, p = 0.027) and video visits (52% early, 59% mid, 62% later, p = 0.035). Patients satisfied with telemedicine visits were younger (p < 0.001). White patients were more interested in future telemedicine (p = 0.037). Multivariable analysis showed that older patients (for each 1 year older), Black patients, and patients with Medicare/Medicaid were 2%, 45%, and 54% less likely to complete a video visit than telephone, respectively. Discussion: Patients, especially younger ones, have become more satisfied and more interested in hybrid care models during the COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers to conducting video visits persist for older, Black patients with Medicare or Medicaid insurance.

CAN TELEMEDICINE BE AS RELIABLE AS CONVENTIONAL MEDICINE WHEN USED IN UNIFIED HEALTH SYSTEM - SUS? / A TELEMEDICINA PODE SER TÃO CONFIÁVEL QUANTO A MEDICINA CONVENCIONAL QUANDO USADA NO SISTEMA ÚNICO DE SAÚDE - SUS?

Introduction: Telemedicine, when applied to neurology, allows for better diagnosis and more specific and appropriate procedures, as well as an outcome with a great reduction in costs due to the absence of the need for unnecessary referrals. Objective: To present the tactical and technical evolution of the implementation of the information age in remote care in neurology, that is, teleneurology. Method: Collection of information and data existing in Brazilian legislation on the subject, in virtual bookstores and publishers, and on virtual platforms searched for related descriptors, which were identified through Mesh using the following terms: "Referrals. Unified Health System. SUS. Telemedicine. Teleneurology" with AND or OR search, considering the title and/or abstract. Results: The search included laws and 58 articles, which, after analyzing the title, summary and considering their suitability, were read in full by 2 of the authors. Conclusion: The potential of teleneurology is promising, acting in reducing healthcare costs, hospitalization services and expanding multidisciplinary communication between different providers, as it can include virtual consultations through videoconferencing, the transmission of exams and medical images, monitoring vital signs and other clinical data giving healthcare professionals the opportunity to assess and treat patients remotely.

Introdução: A telemedicina quando aplicada à neurologia, possibilita melhor diagnóstico e condutas mais específicas e adequadas, bem como desfecho com grande diminuição de custos pela não necessidade de encaminhamentos desnecessários. Objetivos: Apresentar a evolução tática e técnica da implantação da era da informação no atendimento à distância em neurologia, ou seja, a teleneurologia. Método: Coleta de informações e dados existentes na legislação brasileira sobre o tema, em livrarias e editoras virtuais, e em plataformas virtuais buscada por descritores relacionados, os quais foram identificados por meio do DeCS utilizando os seguintes termos: "Encaminhamentos. Sistema Único de Saúde. SUS. Telemedicina. Teleneurologia" e seus equivalentes em inglês "Brazilian Unified Health System. SUS. Referrals. Telemedicine. Teleneurology" com busca AND ou OR, considerando o título e/ou resumo. Resultados: A busca incluiu 58 artigos, que após análise do título, resumo e vista sua adequação foram lidos na íntegra por 2 dos autores. Conclusão: O potencial da teleneurologia é promissor, atuando na redução de custos de saúde, serviços de hospitalização e ampliação da comunicação multidisciplinar entre diferentes provedores, uma vez que pode incluir as consultas virtuais por meio de videoconferência, a transmissão de exames e imagens médicas, a monitorização de sinais vitais e outros dados clínicos dando aos profissionais de saúde oportunidade de avaliar e tratar os pacientes de maneira remota.

IMPACT OF USING TELENEUROLOGY ON REDUCING REFERRALS IN THE SINGLE HEALTH SYSTEM / IMPACTO DA UTILIZAÇÃO DA TELENEUROLOGIA NA REDUÇÃO DE ENCAMINHAMENTOS NO SISTEMA ÚNICO DE SAÚDE

Introdução : A telemedicina, quando aplicada à neurologia, permite melhores diagnósticos e procedimentos mais específicos e adequados, além de resultado altamente econômico pela redução de encaminhamentos desnecessários. Objetivos : Analisar o impacto do uso da teleneurologia na redução de encaminhamentos no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e verificar as variáveis ​​associadas que impactaram nos encaminhamentos. Método : Pesquisa documental, quantitativa, descritiva e transversal, realizada a partir de informações contidas em um banco de dados, construído a partir de serviços incluídos em uma plataforma que presta serviços de teleneurologia no Brasil. A análise foi realizada para examinar a relação entre a variável dependente binária (encaminhamento de emergência) e um conjunto de cinco variáveis ​​independentes (idade, sexo, unidade de tratamento, história clínica e resultados tomográficos). Resultados : O estudo compreendeu 2.165 prontuários de pacientes que necessitaram de atendimento neurológico via telemedicina entre abril de 2019 e outubro de 2022. Após análise, observou-se que o modelo de regressão logística foi estatisticamente significativo (p<0,05) para a unidade de saúde. tratamento, história clínica e resultados tomográficos, indicando que essas variáveis ​​estavam relacionadas à probabilidade de encaminhamento de emergência. Ao examinar os coeficientes estimados nas unidades assistenciais, a chance de ser encaminhado via emergência foi 0,59 vezes maior quando internado do que no SAMU, ou seja, quem está internado tem 41,01% menos chances de ser encaminhado via emergência. Porém, quem está na UPA tem 39,17% menos probabilidade de ser encaminhado via urgência do que no SAMU. Conclusão : A abordagem inovadora do atendimento proporcionou maior eficiência diagnóstica e orientação terapêutica, resultando em economia substancial para o SUS.

Introdução : A telemedicina quando aplicada à neurologia possibilita melhor diagnóstico e condutas mais específicas e específicas, bem como avançado com grande economicidade devido à diminuição de encaminhamentos desnecessários. Objetivos : Analisar o impacto do uso da teleneurologia na redução de encaminhamentos no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e verificar as variáveis ​​associadas que impactaram no encaminhamento. Método : Pesquisa documental, quantitativa, descritiva e transversal, que foi realizada a partir da utilização de informações contidas em banco de dados, construído de atendimentos incluídos na plataforma que presta serviços de teleneurologia no Brasil. Foi realizada análise para examinar a relação entre a variável dependente binária (encaminhamento via emergência) e um conjunto de cinco variáveis ​​independentes (idade, sexo, unidade de tratamento, história clínica e resultado da tomografia). Resultados : O estudo compreendeu 2.165 prontuários de pacientes que demandaram atendimento neurológico via telemedicina entre abril de 2019 e outubro de 2022. Após a análise, observou-se que o modelo de regressão logística foi estatisticamente significativo (p<0,05) para unidade de tratamento, história clínica e resultado da tomografia, diminuíram que essas variáveis ​​estavam relacionadas à probabilidade de encaminhamento emergencial. Ao examinar os coeficientes estimados nas unidades de atendimento, a chance de ter encaminhamento via emergencial foi 0,59 vezes maior estando no hospital do que no SAMU, ou seja, quem está no hospital tem 41,01% menos chances de ser encaminhado via emergencial . Porém, quem está na UPA tem 39,17% menos chances de ser encaminhado via emergencial do que no SAMU. Conclusão : Uma abordagem inovadora de atendimento proporcionou maior eficiência diagnóstica e orientação terapêutica, resultando em economia substancial ao SUS.

Aplicación de la telemedicina en la asistencia a pacientes con cefaleas: situación actual y recomendaciones del Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Española de / NeurologíaTelemedicine in the management of patients with headache: current situation and recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group

Introducción: La pandemia COVID-19 ha provocado un inusitado impulso a la telemedicina(TM). Analizamos el impacto de la pandemia en la TM aplicada en las consultas de cefaleasespañolas, revisamos la literatura y lanzamos unas recomendaciones para implantar la TM enlas consultas. Método: Tres fases: 1) Revisión de la base Medline desde el año 1958 (primera experienciade TM); 2) Formulario Google Forms enviado a todos los neurólogos del Grupo de Estudio de Cefaleas de la Sociedad Espa˜nola de Neurología (GECSEN), y 3) Consenso on-line de expertosGECSEN para emitir recomendaciones para implantar la TM en España. Resultados: La pandemia por COVID-19 ha empeorado los tiempos de espera presenciales,incrementando el uso de todas las modalidades de TM antes y después de abril de 2020: teléfonofijo (del 75% al 97%), teléfono móvil (del 9% al 27%), correo electrónico (del 30% al 36%) yvideoconsulta (del 3% al 21%). Los neurólogos son conscientes de la necesidad de ampliar laoferta con videoconsultas, claramente in crescendo, y otras herramientas de e-health y m-health. Conclusiones: Desde el GECSEN recomendamos y animamos a todos los neurólogos que asis-ten a pacientes con cefaleas a implantar recursos de TM, teniendo como objetivo óptimo lavideoconsulta en menores de 60-65 a˜nos y la llamada telefónica en mayores, si bien cada casodebe individualizarse. Se deberá contar previamente con la aprobación y asesoramiento de losservicios jurídicos e informáticos y de la dirección del centro. La mayoría de los pacientes concefalea y/o neuralgia estable son candidatos a seguimiento mediante TM, tras una primeravisita que tiene que ser siempre presencial.(AU)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unexpected boost to telemedicine. Weanalyse the impact of the pandemic on telemedicine applied in Spanish headache consultations,review the literature, and issue recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine inconsultations. Method: The study comprised 3 phases: 1) review of the MEDLINE database since 1958 (firstreported experience with telemedicine); 2) Google Forms survey sent to all members of theSpanish Society of Neurology’s Headache Study Group (GECSEN); and 3) online consensus ofGECSEN experts to issue recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine in Spain.Results: COVID-19 has increased waiting times for face-to-face consultations, increasing theuse of all telemedicine modalities: landline telephone (from 75% before April 2020 to 97% after),mobile telephone (from 9% to 27%), e-mail (from 30% to 36%), and video consultation (from 3%to 21%). Neurologists are aware of the need to expand the availability of video consultations,which are clearly growing, and other e-health and m-health tools. Conclusions: The GECSEN recommends and encourages all neurologists who assist patients withheadaches to implement telemedicine resources, with the optimal objective of offering videoconsultation to patients under 60-65 years of age and telephone calls to older patients, althougheach case must be considered on an individual basis. Prior approval and advice must be soughtfrom legal and IT services and the centre’s management. Most patients with stable headacheand/or neuralgia are eligible for telemedicine follow-up, after a first consultation that mustalways be held in person.(AU)

Challenges of Teleneurology in the Care of Complex Neurodegenerative Disorders: The Case of Parkinson's Disease with Possible Solutions.

Teleneurology is a specialist field within the realm of telemedicine, which is dedicated to delivering neurological care and consultations through virtual encounters. Teleneurology has been successfully used in acute care (e.g., stroke) and outpatient evaluation for chronic neurological conditions such as epilepsy and headaches. However, for some neurologic entities like Parkinson's disease, in which an in-depth physical examination by palpating muscles and performing neurologic maneuvers is the mainstay of monitoring the effects of medication, the yield and feasibility of a virtual encounter are low. Therefore, in this prospective review, we discuss two promising teleneurology approaches and propose adjustments to enhance the value of virtual encounters by improving the validity of neurological examination: 'hybrid teleneurology', which involves revising the workflow of virtual encounters; and 'artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted teleneurology', namely the use of biosensors and wearables and data processing using AI.

Telemedicine in Neurology: Challenges and Opportunities.

Objective: Our objective is to explore challenges encountered by neurologists with the use of telemedicine in neurology. Methods: A cross- sectional study via an anonymous survey to explore neurologists' experiences with telemedicine. They survey was sent to randomly selected 200 participants from Academic Institutions in the United States. Descriptive statistics were reported as percentages for each survey question. Results: 110 neurologists completed the survey. Fifty-one percent of neurologists stated that they experienced technological issues in (1%-20%) of telemedicine visits and 57% of neurologists needed technological assistance from informational technology support. With regards to the impact of limited neurological examination via telemedicine, 34% of neurologists agreed that the limited examination makes them worried that they are providing a suboptimal care to patients and 55% recommended a subsequent in-person visit (in 1%-20% of telemedicine visits) for further evaluation. Among the challenges that hindered patients' ability to participate in telemedicine visits, 95% of neurologists rated patients' technological challenges with setting up telemedicine to be the most common issue encountered, 37% of neurologists rated patient's cognitive/mental disability to be the second most common challenge to complete telemedicine visits as well as availability of interpreter services for non-English speaking patients. Neurologists rated improving administrative support (39%), integration of EMR for video and telephone calls (37%), and sufficient time allotment to complete telemedicine visits (27%) to be the most important issues to address to optimize the use of telemedicine in neurology. Significance: Potential opportunities to improve neurologists' experiences in telemedicine include improving technological support, integration of virtual platforms within the EMR, and adequate administrative support. Patients with cognitive/physical disabilities may need additional support to engage in the health system via telemedicine.

High acceptability, convenience and reduced carbon emissions of tele-neurology outpatient services at a regional referral centre in Kenya.

Background: There is severe shortage of neurologists in sub-Saharan Africa. Tele-neurology consultations (TNC) can bridge this service gap, but there is very little published evidence on TNC in our setting, which we addressed through our study. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients at our neurology outpatients from October 2020 to October 2021. We administered a post-TNC questionnaire which captured satisfaction/acceptability using Likert scales. A sub-group of participants who also did in-person consultations (IPC) were additionally administered post-IPC questionnaires. Statistical comparisons were made using the paired student t-test, and descriptive data expressed as median (inter-quartile range). Results: From 219 enrolled patients, 66.7% participants responded: 74.0% had both IPC and TNC; 63.0% were female; age was 40.9 (30.6-55.2) years; and 2.7% were from neighbouring countries. The commonest presentations were headache (30.8%), seizures (26.0%) and neurodegenerative disorders (15.1%). For TNC, >90% found it: (i) as comfortable as IPC (p = 0.35); (ii) didn't violate their privacy; (iii) saved time [3.0 (2.0-4.0) hours], travel [11.0 (7.2-21.1) km] and cost [$9.09 (4.55-18.18)]; and (iv) addressed their concerns satisfactorily such that they would use TNC again. Conversely, 15.1% didn't agree with TNC being as effective as IPC, and felt the neurologist did not satisfactorily identify all of their health problems (p = 0.03). In total, our TNC service saved our patients $6167, 1143 h, and 25,506 km of travel, translating to 3.5 t (equivalent to 21 newly-planted trees) of carbon dioxide emissions. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that TNC is an acceptable, efficient, effective, and environmentally-sustainable care delivery model.

Neurologists' Experiences and Attitudes Towards Teleneurology - Has Covid-19 Pandemic Made a Difference?

Teleneurology is an adaption of telemedicine used in neurological practices. Due to the widespread availability of the Internet and the development of information and communication technology (ICT), the use of teleneurology has increased in healthcare systems. This study aimed to determine how the Covid-19 pandemic has affected neurologists' attitudes towards teleneurology as well as their experiences of remote health care before and after the pandemic. The study was conducted as a web-based questionnaire sent to all Finnish neurologists. Two identical surveys were sent via e-mail from the National Neurology Society. The first survey was conducted in spring 2021 and second in spring 2023. The results show that the pandemic moderately increased the use of teleneurology, which enhanced neurologists' technical skills. Neurologists estimated that the use of teleneurology will continue to increase in the future.

Telemedicine in the management of patients with headache: current situation and recommendations of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unexpected boost to telemedicine. We analyse the impact of the pandemic on telemedicine applied in Spanish headache consultations, review the literature, and issue recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine in consultations. METHOD: The study comprised 3 phases: 1) review of the MEDLINE database since 1958 (first reported experience with telemedicine); 2) Google Forms survey sent to all members of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group (GECSEN); and 3) online consensus of GECSEN experts to issue recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine in Spain. RESULTS: COVID-19 has increased waiting times for face-to-face consultations, increasing the use of all telemedicine modalities: landline telephone (from 75% before April 2020 to 97% after), mobile telephone (from 9% to 27%), e-mail (from 30% to 36%), and video consultation (from 3% to 21%). Neurologists are aware of the need to expand the availability of video consultations, which are clearly growing, and other e-health and m-health tools. CONCLUSIONS: The GECSEN recommends and encourages all neurologists who assist patients with headaches to implement telemedicine resources, with the optimal objective of offering video consultation to patients under 60-65 years of age and telephone calls to older patients, although each case must be considered on an individual basis. Prior approval and advice must be sought from legal and IT services and the centre's management. Most patients with stable headache and/or neuralgia are eligible for telemedicine follow-up, after a first consultation that must always be held in person.

Protocol for an economic evaluation of a tele-neurologic intervention alongside a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial (NeTKoH).

BACKGROUND: A significant and growing portion of the global burden of diseases is caused by neurological disorders. Tele-neurology has the potential to improve access to health care services and the quality of care, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The economic evaluation of the stepped wedge randomised controlled trial NeTKoH aims to ascertain the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility regarding the effects of a tele-neurologic intervention in primary care in a rural area in Germany. METHODS: This protocol outlines the methods used when conducting the trial-based economic evaluation of NeTKoH. The outcomes used in our economic analysis are all prespecified endpoints of the NeTKoH trial. Outcomes considered for the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will be quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L, proportion of neurologic problems being solved at the GP's office (primary outcome), hospital length-of-stay and number of hospital stays. Costs will be prospectively collected during the trial by the participating statutory health insurances, and will be analysed from a statutory health insurance perspective within the German health care system. This economic evaluation will be reported complying with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. DISCUSSION: This within-trial economic evaluation relaying the costs and outcomes of an interdisciplinary tele-consulting intervention will provide high-quality evidence for cost-effectiveness and policy implications of a tele-neurological programme, including the potential for application in other rural areas in Germany or other jurisdictions with a comparable health system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00024492), date registered: September 28, 2021.