Fifteen years of engine-driven nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments, what do we know so far? An umbrella review.

Numerous systematic reviews (SRs) have produced conflicting findings on engine-driven nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments (reciprocating instruments) since Yared's seminal study 15 years ago. This umbrella review analysed SRs examining the clinical and laboratory evidence regarding reciprocating instruments for root canal treatment. SRs that evaluated qualitatively and/or quantitatively the outcomes postoperative pain, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), shaping ability, debris extrusion, microbial load, endotoxins reduction, cyclic fatigue, file fracture, dentinal cracks and root canal filling removal were included. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to evaluate SRs quality, while the ROBIS tool to assess risk of bias (RoB). Forty SRs were included. The SRs revealed predominantly 'high' RoB and 'critically low' quality. Most focused on technical outcomes, exhibiting significant methodological and statistical heterogeneity. Findings suggest comparable efficacy between reciprocating and rotary instruments. However, due to the scarcity of high-quality evidence, future well-designed studies and reviews considering core outcome measures are needed.

Shaping Ability of Reciprocating and Rotary Systems After Root Canal Retreatment: a CBCT Study

Abstract The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shaping ability of reciprocating and continuous rotary systems after root canal retreatment. After preparation and root canal filling, mesial canals of 54 mandibular molars were distributed into 3 groups (n=18), according to the filling material removal and re-instrumentation protocols: WOG group - WaveOne Gold system; PTN group - ProTaper Next system; and PTU group - ProTaper Universal system. Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images acquisition of the mesial root canals was performed at different moments: (1) before instrumentation (unprepared root canals), (2) after preparation and filling, (3) after filling material removal and (4) re-instrumentation. The apical transportation (AT), centering ability (CA) and change in root canal diameter were assessed by CBCT analysis. The remaining filling material quantification was performed by radiographic examination. The statistical analyses were performed using the 3-way ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn multiple Comparison tests (p<0.05). The tested instruments did not show full CA (=1.0). PTN group had greater AT at the 5th mm in comparison with the WOG group (p<0.05). After re-instrumentation, WOG group had greater root canal diameter change at the 1st and 5th mm than PTN and PTU groups (p<0.05). There was no significant difference among groups when comparing the amount of remaining filling material after re-instrumentation (p>0.05). The tested systems provided minimal alteration in root canal morphology at the apical portion after root canal retreatment. However, WOG promoted greater change in root canal diameter.

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi avaliar a capacidade de modelagem de sistemas rotatórios e reciprocantes após o retratamento do canal radicular. Após o preparo e obturação do canal radicular, os canais mesiais de 54 molares inferiores foram distribuídos em 3 grupos, de acordo com os protocolos de remoção do material obturador e re-instrumentação: (n=18): grupo WOG - sistema WaveOne Gold; Grupo PTN - sistema ProTaper Next; e grupo PTU - sistema ProTaper Universal. A análise das imagens de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico foi realizada em diferentes momentos: (1) antes da instrumentação (canais radiculares não preparados), (2) após o preparo e obturação, (3) após a remoção do material obturador e (4) re-instrumentação. O transporte apical (TA), a capacidade de centralização (CC) e a mudança no diâmetro do canal radicular foram avaliados por análise tomográfica. A quantificação do restante do material obturador foi realizada por exame radiográfico. As análises estatísticas foram realizadas utilizando os testes de ANOVA de 3 fatores, Tukey-Kramer, Kruskal-Wallis e Comparações Múltiplas de Dunn (p<0,05). Os instrumentos não apresentaram CC perfeita (=1,0). PTN apresentou maior TA no 5º mm em comparação ao grupo WOG (p<0,05). Após a re-instrumentação, o grupo WOG apresentou maior aumento no diâmetro do canal radicular no 1° e 5° mm do que os grupos PTN e PTU. Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos em relação à remoção do material obturador (p>0,05). Os sistemas testados proporcionaram alteração mínima na morfologia do canal radicular na porção apical após o retratamento do canal radicular. No entanto, WOG promoveu maior alteração no diâmetro do canal radicular.

Fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments during root canal retreatment performed by postgraduate students: a cross-sectional retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the fracture incidence of Reciproc R25 instruments (VDW) used during non-surgical root canal retreatments performed by students in a postgraduate endodontic program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the analysis of clinical record cards and periapical radiographs of root canal retreatments performed by postgraduate students using the Reciproc R25, a total of 1,016 teeth (2,544 root canals) were selected. The instruments were discarded after a single use. The general incidence of instrument fractures and its frequency was analyzed considering the group of teeth and the root thirds where the fractures occurred. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 test (p < 0.01). RESULTS: Seven instruments were separated during the procedures. The percentage of fracture in relation to the number of instrumented canals was 0.27% and 0.68% in relation to the number of instrumented teeth. Four fractures occurred in maxillary molars, 1 in a mandibular molar, 1 in a mandibular premolar and 1 in a maxillary incisor. A greater number of fractures was observed in molars when compared with the number of fractures observed in the other dental groups (p < 0.01). Considering all of the instrument fractures, 71.43% were located in the apical third and 28.57% in the middle third (p < 0.01). One instrument fragment was removed, one bypassed, while in 5 cases, the instrument fragment remained inside the root canal. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Reciproc R25 instruments in root canal retreatments carried out by postgraduate students was associated with a low incidence of fractures.

Micro-computed tomographic assessment of dentinal microcrack formation in straight and curved root canals in extracted teeth prepared with hand, rotary and reciprocating instruments.

AIM: To compare microcrack formation in roots of extracted teeth after the shaping of straight and curved root canals with hand, rotary and reciprocating files using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) analysis. METHODOLOGY: Thirty straight mandibular incisors and 30 severely curved mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly divided into 6 experimental groups (n = 10) according to the systems used for the root canal preparation and the root canal curvature: ProTaper Universal for Hand Use (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), HyFlex EDM (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) and Reciproc Blue (VDW, Munich, Germany) files used in mandibular incisors (straight canals) and mesial roots of mandibular molars (curved canals). The roots were imaged with micro-CT scanning at an isotropic resolution of 14 µm before and after root canal preparation, and the cross-sectional images generated were assessed to detect microcracks. RESULTS: All dentinal defects identified after root canal preparation were already present before instrumentation, and no new microcracks were detected. Dentinal microcracks were present in 19% (ProTaper Universal for Hand Use), 11% (Hyflex EDM) and 23% (Reciproc Blue) of the cross-sections when the instrumentation was performed in mandibular incisors. Instrumentation of mandibular molars revealed microcracks in 15% (ProTaper Universal for Hand Use), 16% (Hyflex EDM) and 17% (Reciproc Blue) of the cross-sections. CONCLUSIONS: Preparation of straight and curved root canals with ProTaper Universal for Hand Use, HyFlex EDM and Reciproc Blue systems did not produce microcracks in extracted teeth when evaluated with micro-CT.

Assessment of Mechanical Root Canal Preparation with Centric Reciprocating or Eccentric Rotary Kinematics: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare, using micro-computed tomographic imaging, the preparation of mesial canals of mandibular molars with the Reciproc (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) and XP-endo Shaper (FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) systems, evaluating changes in dentin and canal volume, the percentage of untouched walls, the volume of accumulated hard tissue debris, and root canal deviation in the apical third. METHODS: Twenty-four mandibular molars with 2 mesial root canals and a single foramen were anatomically paired and divided into 2 experimental groups (n = 12) according to the system used. The specimens were scanned before and after preparation with the SkyScan 1176 microtomographic scanner (Bruker-microCT, Kontich, Belgium) at a resolution of 17.42 µm. The resulting data were statistically compared at a significance level of 5% using the Student t test and the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in the untouched surface area for the total canal and the cervical and middle thirds, with the lowest untouched surface area in the XP-endo Shaper group (P < .05). The volume of accumulated hard tissue debris was significantly higher in the Reciproc group in the total canal as well as in the middle and apical thirds. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the volume of dentin removed or the increase in canal volume and surface area (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The XP-endo Shaper touched more walls and left less accumulated hard tissue debris in the root canal system than the Reciproc group. Although the XP-endo Shaper showed superior results, neither system was able to fully prepare the root canal.

Effect of larger apical size on the quality of preparation in curved canals using reciprocating instruments with different heat thermal treatments.

AIM: To evaluate the influence of larger apical canal enlargement in curved canals using reciprocating systems subjected to various heat treatments. METHODOLOGY: Ninety mandibular premolars with root curvatures ranging from 20° to 30° were selected and scanned by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) before and after root canal preparation with reciprocating systems (n = 30): Reciproc Blue (RB size 25, .08 taper and size 40, .06 taper; VDW, Munich, Germany), WaveOne Gold (WOG size 25, .07 taper and size 35, .06 taper; Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and ProDesign R (PDR size 25, .06 taper and size 35, .05 taper; Easy Dental Equipment, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Canal transportation, untouched areas, and apical and total root canal volumes were measured. Statistical analysis was performed with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests and a significance level set at 5%. RESULTS: The between-group comparison revealed no significant difference in untouched areas, canal transportation, and apical root canal volume among the groups (P > 0.05). However, WOG size 35, .06 taper was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of total canal volume in comparison to the PDR size 35, .05 taper (P < 0.05). The within-group comparison revealed a significant decrease in untouched areas, increase in apical and total root canal volume for all groups when using a larger instrument (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in transportation among the groups and when a larger apical preparation was created (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Larger apical enlargement of curved canals was associated with a decrease in untouched areas, an increase in root canal volume and maintenance of canal trajectory. In addition, all systems were safe and provided similar root canal shapes.

Canal transportation and centering ratio after preparation in severely curved canals: analysis by micro-computed tomography and double-digital radiography.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared canal transportation and centering ratio produced after instrumentation with a single heat-treated reciprocating system, WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa, OK, USA) and a single heat-treated rotary instrument, XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) imaging, and evaluated the ability of double-digital radiography (DDR) to detect canal transportation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mesial root canals of mandibular molars with severe curvature (25-70°) were randomly assigned to either WOG or XPS groups for preparation. Centering ratio was measured by micro-CT imaging, while canal transportation was measured by micro-CT and DDR methods at 3, 5, and 7 mm from the apex. Data were statistically compared between groups using the t test (α = 5%). RESULTS: The micro-CT method showed that XPS's shaping ability regarding the centering ability (P = 0.030) and canal transportation (P = 0.028) was significantly better than WOG only at the 7-mm level. The DDR technique detected no difference in canal transportation between groups at any level (P > 0.05); however, a significant difference between evaluation methods was detected at the 5-mm level in the WOG group (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Micro-CT technique revealed a significantly better centering ability and less canal transportation with XPS compared to WOG. The DDR technique was not capable of detecting the significant difference between the tested groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Root canal curvatures may lead to procedural errors during endodontic treatment. Thus, differences on the shaping ability of single heat-treated reciprocating and rotary systems should be known.

Antibacterial efficacy of synthetic and natural-derived novel endodontic irrigant solutions

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of grape seed extract (GSE), calcium hypochlorite [Ca(ClO)2], and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigant solutions with rotary or reciprocating instrumentation for disinfection of root canals inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis. The mesiobuccal root canals of mandibular molars were prepared and inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis for 21 days. The roots were then randomly divided into the following eight experimental groups (n=11) according to the instrumentation technique and disinfection protocol: ProTaper Next or Reciproc R25 with sodium chloride (control group), 6% NaOCl, 6% Ca(ClO)2, or 50% GSE used for irrigation during instrumentation. The antimicrobial activity was determined on the basis of a reduction in colony-forming units (CFUs) counted on bacterial samples collected before and after root canal instrumentation and expressed as a percentage of reduction. Data were evaluated by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc tests (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in bacterial reduction between the ProTaper Next and Reciproc R25 systems (p>0.05), regardless of the irrigant solution used. Furthermore, all active solutions (6% NaOCl, 50% GSE, and 6% Ca(ClO)2) showed similar potential to reduce bacterial counts (p>0.05) and were significantly more effective than sodium chloride (control) (p<0.05). The results suggest that the GSE and Ca(ClO)2 have potential clinical application as irrigant solutions in endodontic therapy since they present bactericidal efficacy against Enterococcus faecalis.

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficácia do extrato de semente de uva (ESU), hipoclorito de cálcio [Ca(ClO)2] e hipoclorito de sódio (NaOCl) como soluções irrigadores quando utilizadas com instrumentos reciprocantes e rotatórios para desinfecção de canais radiculares infectados com Enterococcus faecalis. Raízes mesio-vestibulares de molares inferiores foram preparados e inoculados com E. faecalis por 21 dias. As raízes foram aleatoriamente divididas em 8 grupos (n=11) de acordo com a técnica de instrumentação e protocolo de irrigação: ProTaper Next ou Reciproc R25 associados com soro fisiológico (grupo controle), Ca(ClO)2 6%, NaOCl 6% ou ESU 50%. A atividade antimicrobiana foi determinada pela redução do número de Unidades Formadoras de Colonias (UFCs) coletadas antes e após a instrumentação e expressas em porcentagens de redução. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente pelos testes ANOVA seguido pelo teste complementar de Tukey HSD (p<0,05). Não foi encontrado diferença estatisticamente significante na redução bacteriana entre os sistemas ProTaper Next e Reciproc R25 (p>0.05), independente da solução irrigadora usada. Além disso, todas as soluções ativas (NaOCl, ESU e Ca(ClO)2) mostraram similar potencial em reduzir a quantidade de bactérias (p>0.05) e foram significativamente mais efetivas que o soro fisiológico (p<0.05). Pode-se concluir que o ESU e o Ca(ClO)2 apresentam potencial para aplicação clínica como irrigantes endodônticos uma vez que apresentaram efetividade antimicrobiana contra o E. faecalis.

Does adding an instrument after root preparation with Reciproc® R25 increase bacterial reduction?

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial reduction achieved with reciprocating instruments such as Reciproc® R25 (VDW GMBH, Munich, Germany) and Reciproc® R25 combined with rotary file Mtwo 40.04 (VDW GMBH) during root canal preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty mesiobuccal root canals of maxillary molars were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis broth culture and then an initial bacterial sample was collected from the root canal with paper cones and plated on brain-heart infusion agar. The root canals were divided into four groups as follows: Reciproc® R25 (n = 20) and Reciproc® R25 combined with Mtwo 40.04 instrument (n = 20). The negative controls consisted of five uncontaminated root canals and the positive control consisted of five contaminated roots that were not subjected to any decontamination procedure. Irrigation was performed using sodium chloride. After instrumentation, samples were collected with paper cones and the rate of bacterial reduction was calculated. Microbiological testing (colony-forming units [CFUs]) was performed to quantify the decontamination obtained by the proposed protocols. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t-test and analysis of variance test. RESULTS: Both techniques significantly reduced the number of bacteria in the root canal (P < 0.05), with no significant difference among them (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of the instrument Mtwo 40.04 after the root preparation with the instrument R25 does not improve its decontamination capability.

Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of the reciprocating single-file systems Reciproc Blue 25.08 (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany), Prodesign R 25.06 (Easy Dental Equipment, Belo Horizonte, Brazil), and WaveOne Gold 25.07 (Dentsply/Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK, USA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty reciprocating instruments of the systems Reciproc Blue R25 (RB #25 .08 taper), Prodesign R (PDR #25 .06 taper), and WaveOne Gold (WOG #25 .07 taper) (n = 20) were used. Cyclic fatigue resistance testing was performed by measuring the time to failure in an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60° angle of curvature and a 5-mm radius located 5 mm from the tip (n = 10). The torsional test (ISO 3630-1) evaluated the torque and angle of rotation at failure of new instruments (n = 10) in the portion 3 mm from the tip. The fractured surface of each fragment was also observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, a supplementary examination was performed to measure the cross-sectional area of each instrument 3 and 5 mm from the tip. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, and the level of significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The cyclic fatigue resistance values of PDR 25.06 were significantly higher (P < 0.05). RB 25.08 showed higher fatigue resistance than WOG 25.07 (P < 0.05). The torsional test showed that PDR 25.06 had lower torsional strength (P < 0.05). No differences were observed between RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 (P > 0.05). PDR 25.06 showed higher angular rotation values than RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 (P < 0.05). RB 25.08 presented higher angular rotation than WOG 25.07 (P < 0.05). The cross-sectional area analysis showed that PDR 25.06 presented the smallest cross-sectional areas at 3 and 5 mm from the tip (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PDR 25.06 presented the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and angular rotation until fracture compared to RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07. In addition, RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 had higher torsional strength than PDR 25.06. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In endodontic practice, thermally treated reciprocating instruments have been used for the root canal preparation of curved and constricted canals; therefore, these instruments should present high flexibility and suitable torsional strength to minimize the risk of instrument fracture.

Counterclockwise or clockwise reciprocating motion for oval root canal preparation: a micro-CT analysis.

AIM: To evaluate oval root canal preparation using one or two instruments in counterclockwise or clockwise reciprocating motion. METHODOLOGY: The radiographic diameter of mandibular human incisors was evaluated, and oval canals were selected (2 ≤ Diameter Ratio ≤ 4). Fifty-seven teeth were assigned to root canal preparation (n = 19): Reciproc 40 (R40) in a counterclockwise reciprocating motion; Mtwo size 40, .06 taper (M 40.06) in a clockwise reciprocating motion or Mtwo size 20, .06 taper and size 40, .06 taper (M 20/40.06) in a clockwise reciprocating motion. Mtwo instruments were coupled to an ENDO DUAL motor, turning 150° clockwise and 30° counterclockwise. Scanning was performed before and after root canal preparation using a SkyScan 1176 micro-computed tomography. Volume, percentage of debris and percentage of uninstrumented surface were analysed in the entire root canal and in each third of the canal. Data were compared using anova and Tukey's tests or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests. RESULTS: The Reciproc and Mtwo systems using different kinematics were associated with a similar increase in root canal volume. Additionally, both system had similar percentage of uninstrumented surface (P > 0.05). Mtwo size 20, .06 taper and size 40, .06 taper was associated with significantly lower debris (P < 0.05) in the middle third (0.56%) when compared to R40 (1.31%) and M size 40, .06 taper (1.54%). CONCLUSIONS: The conventional reciprocation motion for R40 and the clockwise reciprocation motion for Mtwo resulted in similar root canal preparations. Less remaining debris was present in the middle third when two instruments with different diameters were used.

Evaluating the cutting efficiency of NiTi instruments with reciprocating motions / Avaliação da eficiência de corte de instrumentos NiTi com movimento reciprocante

Aim:This study tested a setup for in vitro experimental analysis of axial forces and torque during the preparation of artificial canals using nickel-titanium reciprocating endodontic files.Methods: The cutting efficiency of Reciproc (RC) and WaveOne (WO) reciprocating size 25/.08 instruments (n = 10) was evaluated, taking into account their dimensional and geometrical features. Measurements of the diameter at each millimeter from the tip, pitch length, helical angle, and cross-sectional design and area were assessed. Cutting efficiency tests were carried out on a specific bench device by measuring the torque and axial force required during artificial canal shaping. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results:The WO samples showed larger A3 mean values than did the RC instruments (p < 0.0001), despite having equal diameters at 3mm from the tip (D3) (p = 0.521). The mean values of pitch length were higher for RC than for WO instruments (p< 0.0001), with consequently smaller helical angles (p < 0.0001). For the cutting efficiency tests, the required torque was lower for the RC group when compared to the WO group, but it was significant only in the first stage of insertion in the artificial canals (p = 0.008). Regarding the apical force, the RC instruments reached higher values when compared to the WO instruments (p = 0.04) in the second stage of cutting action. Conclusion: Reciproc instruments demonstrated statistically higher cutting efficiency when compared to WaveOne instruments.

Objetivo: Este estudo testa uma configuração para análise experimental in vitro de forças axiais e torque durante o preparo de canais artificiais usando instrumentos endodônticos reciprocantes de níquel-titânio. Métodos: Foi avaliada a eficiência de corte dos instrumentos reciprocantes tamanho 25 / 0,08 (n = 10) Reciproc (RC) e WaveOne (WO), levando em consideração suas características dimensionais e geométricas. Medidas do diâmetro a cada milímetro a partir da ponta, comprimento de pitch, ângulo helicoidal e desenho da área transversal e área foram avaliados. Testes de eficiência de corte foram realizados em um dispositivo de bancada específico, medindo-se o torque e a força axial exigidos durante a modelagem de canais artificiais. A análise estatística foi feita com ANOVA one-way (α = 0,05). Resultados: As amostras de WO mostraram valores médios A3 maiores do que os instrumentos RC (p <0,0001), apesar de terem diâmetros iguais a 3 mm da ponta (D3) (p = 0,521). Os valores médios do comprimento do pitch foram maiores para o RC do que para os instrumentos do WO (p < 0,0001), com consequentemente menores ângulos helicoidais (p < 0,0001). Para os testes de eficiência de corte, o torque necessário foi menor para o grupo RC em comparação com o grupo WO, mas significativo apenas no primeiro estágio de inserção nos canais artificiais (p = 0,008). Em relação à força apical, os instrumentos RC alcançaram valores maiores em relação aos instrumentos WO (p = 0,04) no segundo estágio de corte. Conclusão: Os instrumentos Reciproc demonstraram uma eficiência de corte estatisticamente superior em comparação com os instrumentos WaveOne.

Topographic and Chemical Analysis of Reciprocating and Rotary Instruments Surface after Continuous Use

Abstract This study aimed at evaluating the changes in surface characteristics and NiTi content of reciprocating and rotary instruments after continuous use. Thirty brand-new instruments were assigned to 3 groups (n=10): PNX1 Group - ProTaper Next system - instrument X1; PNX2 Group - ProTaper Next system - instrument X2 and WO Group - WaveOne system - Primary instrument 25.08. The instruments were used to prepare 60 simulated root canals. Analysis of surface characteristics by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and chemical analysis of Ni and Ti content by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were performed before and after the first and third use of the instruments. Only WO Group had significant increase in the quantity of defects and deformations after the third use (p<0.05). PNX1 Group had significant decrease in Ni content after the third use, in comparison with the unused instruments (p<0.05). PNX1 Group had no decrease in Ti content throughout the time of use (p>0.05), however, in PNX2 Group, there was significant decrease in the different time interval of analysis (p<0.05). Continuous use promoted increase in defects and deformations only for WaveOne instruments. Chemical composition presented significant changes according to the time of instruments use.

Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar as alterações nas características de superfície e teor de NiTi de instrumentos reciprocantes e rotatórios após uso contínuo. Trinta instrumentos novos foram separados em três grupos (n=10): Grupo PNX1 - ProTaper Next system - instrumento X1; Grupo PNX2 - ProTaper Next system - instrumento X2 e Grupo WO - WaveOne system - instrumento Primary 25.08. Os instrumentos foram utilizados para o preparo de 60 canais radiculares simulados. Análise por microscopia eletronica de varredura (MEV), a análise química do conteúdo de Ni e Ti por espectroscopia de energia dispersiva (EED) foram realizadas antes e após o primeiro e terceiro uso dos instrumentos. Apenas o Grupo WO apresentou aumento significativo na quantidade de defeitos e deformações após o terceiro uso (p<0,05). O grupo PNX1 teve diminuição significativa no teor de Ni após o terceiro uso, em comparação aos instrumentos não utilizados (p<0,05). O grupo PNX1 não apresentou diminuição do teor de Ti ao longo do tempo de uso (p>0,05), no entanto, no Grupo PNX2, houve diminuição significativa nos diferentes intervalos de tempo de análise (p<0,05). O uso contínuo promoveu aumento nos defeitos e deformações somente para os instrumentos WaveOne. A composição química apresentou alterações significativas de acordo com o tempo de uso dos instrumentos.

WaveOne Gold, un nuevo instrumento reciprocante para la conformación de los conductos radiculares / WaveOne Gold, a new reciprocating instrument for root canal shaping

El objetivo del presente artículo es describir y analizar el nuevo sistema de limas reciprocantes WaveOne Gold, evolución del sistema WaveOne presentado en 2010. Las mejoras en su diseño y en su metalurgia les otorgan más flexibilidad y aumentan su resistencia a la fatiga cíclica, lo cual brinda al clínico la posibilidad de instrumentar con más seguridad y confianza el sistema de conductos radiculares.

The aim of the present article is to describe and analyzethe new reciprocating system WaveOne Gold.This instrument, preceded by the WaveOne in 2010, showsimprovements in its design and in its metallurgy, providingmore flexibility and increasing its resistance to cyclic fatigue.Alfie D, García G, Rodríguez P. WaveOne Gold, un nuevo instrumento reciprocante para la conformaciónde los conductos radiculares. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent 2016;105:78-82.This gives the clinician greater security and confidence duringthe shaping of the root canal system.

Filling Material Removal with Reciprocating and Rotary Systems Associated with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this ex vivo study was to evaluate the filling material removal ability, and the time required to perform this procedure, of reciprocating and conventional rotary systems when associated with passive ultrasonic irrigation. METHODS: The palatal roots of 40 maxillary molars were submitted to root canal preparation and filling. The desobturation of root canals was initially performed with Largo burs in the coronal portion (4 mm) to drill the gutta-percha and to facilitate the action of the instruments used then. Next, the palatal roots were randomly distributed (n=10) according to the systems and irrigation protocols used for filling material removal: ProTaper universal retreatment (PTR), PTR+passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) (PTR+PUI), Reciproc system (RS), and RS+PUI. Passive ultrasonic activation was performed in the root canals completely filled with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution using a smooth and straight ultrasonic tip, coupled to a low-power (20%) ultrasonic device for 1 min (3 cycles of 20 s). After retreatment, the roots were longitudinally sectioned to the remaining filling material quantification using an operating microscope. Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) micrographs at 97, 105, and 250 X magnifications were also taken to evaluate the quantity of filling material present at the apical portion of the palatal roots. RESULTS: The RS group presented greater quantity of filling material attached to the root canal walls than the other groups (P>0.05). PTR+PUI and RS+PUI groups were statistically similar (P>0.05). Reinstrumentation of root canals using RS was faster than PTR, irrespective of the irrigation protocol used (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The association between PUI and the different systems for reinstrumentation yielded greSater filling material removal. The reciprocating system was faster.

Influence of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on the Removal of Root Canal Filling Material in Straight Root Canals.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in removing root canal filling material from endodontically treated teeth after using one of two reciprocating systems, Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) or WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), or one nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary system, ProTaper Universal Retreatment (Dentsply Maillefer). METHODS: One hundred and twenty straight root canals of extracted human maxillary incisors were instrumented and then obturated. The specimens were divided into six groups (n=20) as follows: Group R, Reciproc R25 instrument without PUI; Group W, WaveOne Primary instrument without PUI; Group PT, ProTaper Universal Retreatment system without PUI; Group R-PUI, Reciproc R25 with PUI; Group W-PUI, WaveOne Primary with PUI and Group PT-PUI, ProTaper Universal Retreatment system with PUI. After removing the filling material, the teeth were cleaved longitudinally and photographed. The total canal space and remaining material were quantified with the aid of an imaging software tool. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to identify significant differences between the groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences (P>0.05) in residual filling material were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of PUI did not improve the removal of filling material from the root canals, regardless of the previously used instrumentation system.

Comparative Analysis of Dentinal Erosion after Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation versus Irrigation with Reciprocating Activation: An Environmental Scanning Electron Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess ex vivo the erosive effects of passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation on the dentinal surface of the root canal at 3 predetermined levels using environmental scanning electron microscopy. METHODS: Ten roots of mandibular premolars were prepared using the ProTaper Universal system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). The specimens were embedded in flasks cleaved longitudinally, and indentations were made 3.0, 6.0, and 9.0 mm from the apex. The specimens in the control group (n = 10) were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath containing 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA and then dried. Then, environmental scanning electron microscopic images were obtained at magnification × 800. The specimens were then reassembled in their flasks, and the NaOCl and EDTA solutions were activated according to the conditions established for the experimental groups (ie, the passive ultrasonic irrigation group [n = 5] and the EasyClean (Easy Equipamentos Odontológicos, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil) group, irrigation with reciprocating activation with the EasyClean instrument [n = 5]). The specimens of both experimental groups were analyzed in the same manner as in the control group. Analysis of the dentinal surface topography was conducted using the 3D Roughness Reconstruction program (Phenom-World BV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) as a means for assessing erosion. The data were evaluated by means of the Kruskal-Wallis, Student-Newman-Keuls, and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: In the EasyClean group, the degree of dentinal erosion at 3.0 mm was significantly higher than at 9.0 mm. In the other comparisons, there was no statistically significant difference (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The final irrigation techniques tested were equivalent in relation to the degree of erosion caused to the dentinal surface.

Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review.

The aim of this review was to provide a detailed analysis of the literature concerning the correlation between different movement kinematics and the cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi rotary endodontic instruments. From June 2014 to August 2015, four independent reviewers comprehensively and systematically searched the Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar databases for works published since January 2005, using the following search terms: endodontics; nickel-titanium rotary files; continuous rotation; reciprocating motion; cyclic fatigue. In addition to the electronic searches, manual searches were performed to include articles listed in the reference sections of high-impact published articles that were not indexed in the databases. Laboratory studies in English language were considered for this review. The electronic and manual searches resulted in identification of 75 articles. Based on the inclusion criteria, 32 articles were selected for analysis of full-text copies. Specific analysis was then made of 20 articles that described the effects of reciprocating and continuous movements on cyclic fatigue of the instruments. A wide range of testing conditions and methodologies have been used to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary endodontic instruments. Most studies report that reciprocating motion improves the fatigue resistance of endodontic instruments, compared to continuous rotation, independent of other variables such as the speed of rotation, the angle or radius of curvature of simulated canals, geometry and taper, or the surface characteristics of the NiTi instruments.

Micro-Computed Tomography Study of Filling Material Removal from Oval-shaped Canals by Using Rotary, Reciprocating, and Adaptive Motion Systems.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated filling material removal from distal oval-shaped canals of mandibular molars with rotary, reciprocating, and adaptive motion systems by using micro-computed tomography. METHODS: After cone-beam computed tomography scanning, 21 teeth were selected, prepared up to a size 40 file, root filled, and divided into 3 groups (n = 7) according to the filling material removal technique: group PTUR, ProTaper Universal Retreatment combined with ProTaper Universal F2, F3, F4, and F5 files; group RP, Reciproc R50 file; and group TFA: TF Adaptive 50.04 files. The specimens were scanned preoperatively and postoperatively to assess filling material removal by using micro-computed tomography imaging, and the percent volume of residual filling material was calculated. RESULTS: The statistical analysis showed the lowest percent volume of residual filling material at the coronal third in all groups (P < .05). There was no significant difference among the systems in the coronal third (P > .05). In the middle third, group TFA (31.2 ± 10.1) showed lower volume of residual filling material than group RP (52.4 ± 14.1) (P < .05). In the apical third, groups TFA (44.8 ± 20.6) and PTUR (48.6 ± 16.8) presented a lower percent volume of filling material than group RP (70.6 ± 7.2) (P < .05), as confirmed by the qualitative analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the adaptive motion increased the amount of root filling removed in the middle and apical thirds compared with the reciprocating motion. However, no technique was able to completely remove the filling material from the canals.

A micro-computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for filling material removal in root canal retreatment.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of rotary and reciprocating techniques for removing filling material from root canals, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distal root canals of 42 human mandibular molars were instrumented with hand files up to size 40 according to a step-down technique and obturated with gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer using Tagger's hybrid technique. Teeth were divided into six groups (n = 7) according to the instruments used for removal of filling material: group PTUR (Protaper Universal Retreatment), group W40 (WaveOne 40.08), group R40 (Reciproc 40.06), group R50 (Reciproc 50.05), group W25/W40 (WaveOne 25.08/40.08), and group R25/R40/R50 (Reciproc 25.08/40.06/50.05). Teeth were scanned with a micro-CT device before and after use of the instruments to calculate the percentage of remaining filling material. Data were compared using one-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD test at 5 % significance level. RESULTS: The mean percentage of remaining filling material was significantly lower when canals were retreated with the set of instruments R25/R40/R50 and single instruments W40 and R50 compared with the set of instruments W25/W40 (P < 0.05), which promoted material compaction in the apical region. CONCLUSION: None of the retreatment techniques removed the root fillings completely. PTUR instruments performed equally effective regarding filling removal compared with W40, R40, R50, W25/W40, and R25/R40/R50. For WaveOne, the use of a single instrument (size 40, taper 0.08) was more effective in removing filling material, while for Reciproc showed similar cleaning ability using single instrument or combination of instruments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this in vitro study provide consistent information on filling material removal capacity of mechanized systems during retreatment at the different root canal thirds.