Factors associated with concordance between POLST orders and current treatment preferences.

BACKGROUND: POLST is widely used to document the treatment preferences of nursing facility residents as orders, but it is unknown how well previously completed POLST orders reflect current preferences (concordance) and what factors are associated with concordance. OBJECTIVES: To describe POLST preference concordance and identify factors associated with concordance. DESIGN: Chart reviews to document existing POLST orders and interviews to elicit current treatment preferences. SETTING: POLST-using nursing facilities (n = 29) in Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing facility residents (n = 123) and surrogates of residents without decisional capacity (n = 152). MEASUREMENTS: Concordance was determined by comparing existing POLST orders for resuscitation, medical interventions, and artificial nutrition with current treatment preferences. Comfort-focused POLSTs contained orders for do not resuscitate, comfort measures, and no artificial nutrition. RESULTS: Overall, 55.7% (123/221) of residents and 44.7% (152/340) of surrogates participated (total n = 275). POLST concordance was 44%, but concordance was higher for comfort-focused POLSTs (68%) than for non-comfort-focused POLSTs (27%) (p < 0.001). In the unadjusted analysis, increasing resident age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p < 0.01), better cognitive functioning (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13, p < 0.01), surrogate as the decision-maker (OR 2.87, OR 1.73-4.75, p < 0.001), and comfort-focused POLSTs (OR 6.01, 95% CI 3.29-11.00, p < 0.01) were associated with concordance. In the adjusted multivariable model, only having an existing comfort-focused POLST was associated with higher odds of POLST concordance (OR 5.28, 95% CI 2.59-10.73, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of all POLST forms were concordant with current preferences, but POLST was over five times as likely to be concordant when orders reflected preferences for comfort-focused care. Findings suggest a clear need to improve the quality of POLST use in nursing facilities and focus its use among residents with stable, comfort-focused preferences.

Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures in Mozambique: Two Consecutive Online Surveys

We assessed adherence to government recommendations implemented shortly after the introduction of COVID-19 in Mozambique in March 2020, through two online cross-sectional surveys in April and June 2020. We quantified adherence to preventive measures by a composite score comprising of five measures: physical distancing, face mask use, hand hygiene, cough hygiene, and avoidance of touching the face. 3770 and 1115 persons participated in the first and second round respectively. Wearing face masks, regular handwashing and cough hygiene all reached compliance rates of over 90% while physical distancing and avoiding to touch the face reached a compliance rate of 80-90%. A multivariable model investigating factors associated with adherence found that being older, more educated, and belonging to the healthcare sector increased the odds for higher adherence. Private workers and retired people, respondents receiving COVID-19 information through social media, and those who reported flu-like symptoms were less likely to adhere. 6% of respondents reported flu-like symptoms which aligned with the WHO clinical definition of COVID-19, suggesting low level community transmission. In conclusion, most respondents in this online survey in Mozambique complied well with strategies to prevent COVID-19. Whether the good preventive behaviour explains the low grade COVID-19 transmission requires further study.

¿Conocen los profesionales de cuidados intensivos el documento de voluntades anticipadas? Revisión crítica / Are palliative care proffesionals aware of the advanced care planning document? Critical review

JUSTIFICACIÓN: Las instrucciones previas o documento de voluntades anticipadas (IP/DVA) constituyen un conjunto de documentos en los que el paciente puede dejar constancia de cómo desea morir o ser tratado al final de su vida, con el fin de que su voluntad sea respetada. En 1998 surgió una nueva corriente, Advance Care Planning (Planificación Anticipada de las Decisiones). En ella, el DVA aparece como una herramienta, resultado final de un amplio proceso de comunicación que exige a los profesionales sanitarios una formación acorde para proporcionar una mejor atención sanitaria al final de la vida. A este respecto, son varios los estudios que muestran que una inadecuada formación en los cuidados al final de la vida, especialmente en las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI), dificulta las habilidades y actitudes en la comunicación, los cuidados y el respeto del DVA con todas las medidas que contempla y, en definitiva, dificulta mantener la dignidad en el proceso de la muerte del paciente. OBJETIVO: Analizar la competencia (conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes) de médicos y enfermeras de las UCI de la Comunidad de Madrid sobre las IP o DVA. DISEÑO: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal. LUGAR Y PERÍODO: Nueve hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid, entre octubre y diciembre de 2010. PARTICIPANTES: Se encuestó a una muestra de conveniencia cuyos criterios de inclusión fueron todos los médicos y enfermeras de las UCI de adultos de los nueve hospitales. INTERVENCIÓN: Cuestionario ad hoc estructurado, anónimo, autocumplimentado, con variables dicotómicas y escala de tipo Likert. RECOGIDA DE DATOS Y ANÁLISIS: Las variables estudiadas fueron: sociodemográficas, de conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes. Para la entrega de los cuestionarios se contactó con las supervisoras de las unidades y jefes de servicio, se hizo una charla informativa, se colgaron carteles informativos y se repartieron los cuestionarios a través de los investigadores y personas de enlace. Para la recogida de las encuestas se dispuso de urnas ubicadas en las unidades. La entrega de formularios se realizó mediante consentimiento informado previo y el estudio fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética e Investigación Clínica del Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid. as variables cualitativas se describieron mediante frecuencias absolutas y relativas porcentuales de sus categorías, y se buscaron asociaciones con la prueba de ji cuadrado o el test exacto de Fisher. En las variables objeto de análisis se calculó su intervalo de confianza para un error a del 5 %, a través del programa estadístico SPSS V. 18.0. RESULTADOS: Se entregaron 649 encuestas en total y se recogieron 331 al terminar el periodo de recepción (3 meses). La tasa de respuesta fue del 51 %. De las características sociodemográficas destaca que el 73,4 % (243) de los profesionales eran mujeres y el 67,2 % (222) con más de 31 años; del total, el 20,5 % (68) eran médicos y el 79,5 % (263) profesionales de enfermería. Los resultados obtenidos con relación a los conocimientos muestran que el 64,4 % de los encuestados afirma no conocer los diferentes documentos que existen para expresar últimas voluntades. Con relación a las medidas concretas que contemplan las IP, como son la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico, los cuidados paliativos, la donación de órganos, el rechazo a la obstinación terapéutica y la asignación de un representante legal, tan solo el 9,7 % de los profesionales las conocían todas. El 82,8 % opinaba que el DVA es un instrumento útil para los profesionales en la toma de decisiones. El 50,2 % opinaba que los DVA no se respetan. El 85,3 % de los médicos respetaría el DVA de un paciente en caso de urgencia vital, frente al 66,2 % de las enfermeras (p = 0,007). Solo el 19,1 % de los médicos y el 2,3 % de las enfermeras conocían si los pacientes que llevaban a su cargo poseían un DVA (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Aunque los profesionales sanitarios muestran conocimientos escasos sobre las IP, presentan una actitud favorable hacia su utilidad. Sin embargo, la mayoría no conocen si los pacientes que están a su cargo poseen un DVA e incluso algunos profesionales, a pesar de conocerlo, en caso de urgencia vital no lo respetarían. Se hace necesaria una mayor formación sobre las IP

Overriding advance directives: A 20-year legal and ethical overview.

Health professionals have been known to override patients' advance directives. The most ethically problematic instances involve a directive's explicitly forbidding the administration of some life-prolonging treatment like resuscitation or intubation with artificial ventilation. Sometimes the code team is unaware of the directive, but in other instances, the override is done knowingly and intentionally with clinicians later pleading that it was done "in the patient's best interests." This article surveys a twenty-year period extending back to 1997 when ethicists began to question the legitimacy of overriding advance directives despite clinicians believing they had compelling reasons to do so. A legal and ethical analysis of advance directive overrides is provided as no court to date has awarded damages to plaintiffs who alleged their loved one suffered "wrongful life" following a successful life-prolonging intervention. A hypothetical scenario is especially discussed wherein a patient's DNR status is overridden because her cardiac arrest was caused by error whose effects might be reversible. The authors conclude with a strategy for mitigating certain vagaries associated with overriding advance directives, but suggest that until courts provide clinicians with clear guidelines and protections, violations of patients' advance directives are likely to continue.

Adherence to "No Transfer to Hospital" Advance Directives Among Nursing Home Residents.

OBJECTIVES: Many older adults in long-term care (LTC) experience acute health crises but are at high risk of transfer distress and in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Residents often complete advance directives (ADs) regarding future care wishes, including directives for hospital transfers. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of, and adherence to, "no transfer to hospital" ADs in LTC, and to explore the circumstances leading to transfers against previously expressed directives. DESIGN: We conducted a mixed methods study in 10 nursing homes in Nova Scotia, Canada. A total of 748 resident charts and Emergency Health Services (EHS) database notes were reviewed from 3 time periods spanning implementation of a new primary care model, Care by Design (CBD). MEASURES: ADs were divided into those requesting transfer to hospital vs on-site management only, which were then analyzed in relation to actual hospital transfers. Reasons for EHS calls, management, and qualitative data were derived from the EHS database. Resident variables were obtained from LTC charts. Measures were compared between time periods. RESULTS: ADs were complete in 92.4% of charts. Paramedics were called for 80.5% of residents, and 73.6% were transferred to hospital, 51.3% of whom had explicit ADs to the contrary. The majority of those were transferred for fall-related injuries, followed by medical illness. Unclear care plans, symptom control, and perceived need for investigations and procedures all influenced transfer decisions. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The use of "no transfer to hospital" directives did not appear to impact the number of residents being transferred to acute care. Half of those transferred to hospital had explicit ADs to the contrary, largely driven by fall-related injury. The high incidence of injury-related transfers highlights an important gap in advance care planning. Clarifying transfer preferences for injury management in advance directives may lead to better end-of-life experiences for residents and improve effective resource utilization.

Grado de conocimiento y actitudes de los profesionales sanitarios sobre el documento de voluntades anticipadas / Knowledge and attitudes of health professionals towards advance directives

Objetivo: Evaluar el grado de conocimiento y las actitudes sobre el documento de voluntades anticipadas (DVA) del personal médico y de enfermería de dos departamentos sanitarios, así como examinar su asociación con variables sociodemográficas y laborales de los profesionales. Método: Se realizó una encuesta transversal a 329 profesionales a través de Internet y mediante un procedimiento estandarizado. Se examinaron los conocimientos y las actitudes hacia el DVA utilizando dos cuestionarios validados de 17 y 12 ítems, respectivamente. Se recogieron datos sociodemográficos y profesionales. Resultados: El 45% fueron médicos/as, con una media de 13,1 (desviación típica [DT]: 8,3) años de experiencia profesional. El 67,5% fueron mujeres, con una edad media de 38,9 (DT: 9,2) años. Tuvieron actitudes muy positivas hacia el documento (media: 75,37; DT: 11,97; R=0-90), a pesar de que su nivel de conocimientos fue medio-bajo (media: 9,31; DT: 2,73; R=0-18). Tanto el nivel de conocimientos como su autopercepción se asociaron a la formación previa en cuidados paliativos, a la experiencia en el manejo del documento, su lectura o la demanda de información. La suscripción del documento se relacionó con la autopercepción de los conocimientos. Las actitudes se asociaron con la experiencia en el manejo y la actitud positiva hacia la formación. Conclusiones: Los/las profesionales mostraron actitudes positivas hacia el DVA, pero escasos conocimientos sobre el mismo. La experiencia con el DVA fue la única variable que se asoció tanto a los conocimientos como a las actitudes de los profesionales

Objective: To evaluate the degree of knowledge and attitudes of medical and nursing professionals in two health departments to advance directives, as well as to examine their association with the sociodemographic and occupational variables of the professionals. Methods: A cross-sectional survey on 329 health professionals was carried out through the internet and a standardised procedure. The knowledge and attitudes of the professionals about advance directives were examined using two validated questionnaires of 17 and 12 items, respectively. Sociodemographic and professional data were also collected from the participants. Results: 45% of the professionals were physicians, with X¯=13,1 (SD: 8.3) years of professional experience. Sixty-seven point five percent were women and the mean age was 38.9 (SD: 9.2) years. Professionals had very positive attitudes towards the advance directives document (X¯=75.37;SD: 11.97;R=0-90), although their level of knowledge about them was medium-low (X¯=9.31;SD: 2.73;R=0-18). Both the level of knowledge and self-perception were associated with previous training in palliative care, experience with document management, reading, or the demand for information. Completing the document related to self-perception of knowledge. Attitudes towards the document related to experience in its use and a positive attitude toward training. Conclusions: The professionals showed positive attitudes towards the advance directive document although low knowledge about it. Experience with the document was the only variable associated with both the knowledge and the attitudes of the professionals

Razones para decidir morir en el hospital o en el domicilio. Visión de los/las profesionales / Reasons for deciding to die in hospital or at home. The vision of professionals

Objetivo: Conocer las razones que llevan a decidir que los pacientes terminales mueran en el hospital o en su domicilio, desde la perspectiva de los/las profesionales. Método: Estudio cualitativo fenomenológico. Muestreo intencionado. Se realizaron cuatro grupos focales multidisciplinarios: dos en hospitales y dos en centros de Atención Primaria de Salud (APS) de Sevilla. Participaron 29 profesionales con al menos 2 años de experiencia con pacientes terminales, siguiendo el criterio de saturación teórica. Resultados: Las respuestas obtenidas del guion inicial se agruparon en tres categorías centrales: paciente y familia, profesionales y proceso asistencial. No suele consultarse al paciente sobre sus preferencias respecto al lugar donde quiere morir, y si además la familia las desconoce, no se puede realizar una planificación anticipada de cuidados. La familia elige el hospital por inseguridad respecto a la posibilidad de seguimiento y recursos en APS. Los/las profesionales poseen formación para abordar la muerte, pero no se sienten preparados, focalizando la atención en aspectos clínicos o administrativos. El proceso asistencial favorece a los pacientes oncológicos, pues es más sencillo identificar su terminalidad. No hay equidad en los recursos y es mejorable la comunicación interniveles. No se facilita la integración de la familia en el proceso que interfiere en su toma de decisiones. Conclusiones: Se debe fomentar la planificación anticipada de cuidados y usar el documento de voluntades anticipadas, la comunicación y la coordinación interniveles, dotar de recursos, especialmente a APS, y formar y preparar a los/las profesionales para abordar la muerte. Hay que implicar a la familia en el proceso, aportándole el apoyo necesario

Objective: To discover the reasons for deciding to die in hospital or at home, from the perspective of professionals involved. Method: Qualitative phenomenological study. Intentional sample. Four multidisciplinary focus groups were held, two in hospitals and two in primary care centres in Seville (Spain). Twenty-nine professionals with at least two years experience in the care of people with a terminal disease participated, following the theoretical saturation of information criterion. Results: Responses from the first script were gathered in three core categories: patient and the family, professionals and care process. Patients are generally not asked about their preferences as to where they wish to die, and if their family is not aware of their preference, it is not possible to carry out advanced planning of care. Families tend to choose the hospital because of the possibility of monitoring and resources in primary care. Professionals are trained in how to approach death, but they do not feel sufficiently prepared and focus on the clinical and administrative issues. The care process favours oncology patients because it is easier to identify their illness as terminal. Resources are not equal and interlevel communication needs to be improved. The family's involvement in the process is not facilitated, which impedes their decision-making. Conclusions: Advance care planning and use of the advance directive should be promoted, as well as, interlevel communication and coordination, supply resources, especially in primary care, and professionals should receive training on how to approach death.. The patient's family should be involved in the care process and provided the necessary support

Does implementation matter if comprehension is lacking? A qualitative investigation into perceptions of advance care planning in people with cancer.

PURPOSE: While advance care planning holds promise, uptake is variable and it is unclear how well people engage with or comprehend advance care planning. The objective of this study was to explore how people with cancer comprehended advance care plans and examine how accurately advance care planning documentation represented patient wishes. METHODS: This study used a qualitative descriptive design. Data collection comprised interviews and an examination of participants' existing advance care planning documentation. Participants included those who had any diagnosis of cancer with an advance care plan recorded: Refusal of Treatment Certificate, Statement of Choices, and/or Enduring Power of Attorney (Medical Treatment) at one cancer treatment centre. RESULTS: Fourteen participants were involved in the study. Twelve participants were female (86%). The mean age was 77 (range: 61-91), and participants had completed their advance care planning documentation between 8 and 72 weeks prior to the interview (mean 33 weeks). Three themes were evident from the data: incomplete advance care planning understanding and confidence, limited congruence for attitude and documentation, advance care planning can enable peace of mind. Complete advance care planning understanding was unusual; most participants demonstrated partial comprehension of their own advance care plan, and some indicated very limited understanding. Participants' attitudes and their written document congruence were limited, but advance care planning was seen as helpful. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted advance care planning was not a completely accurate representation of patient wishes. There is opportunity to improve how patients comprehend their own advance care planning documentation.

National Standards and State Variation in Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Forms.

BACKGROUND: The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Paradigm is used across the country to document the treatment preferences of seriously ill or frail patients as medical orders. The National POLST Paradigm Task Force maintains consensus-based standards for POLST programs and uses these to determine whether a state POLST program is developing, endorsed, or mature. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate state program form adherence to national standards. DESIGN: Document review. MEASUREMENTS: Forms from endorsed/mature (n = 21) and developing (n = 23) states were compared with national standards to assess adherence to required and optional form elements. RESULTS: Required elements were present on 84% of endorsed/mature state POLST forms and 73% of the developing state POLST forms. Compliance with required elements in endorsed states ranged from 50% to 100%. Three endorsed/mature states (14%) had forms that met all of the required elements fully and 14 (67%) had forms that met the all of the elements fully or partially. CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in adherence to required and optional standards as well as challenges in interpreting and applying existing standards. Although there may be legal and logistical barriers to the existence of a national POLST form, standardization remains an important goal to support patient-centered care.

How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized adults do not have the capacity to make their own health care decisions and thus require a surrogate decision-maker. While the ethical standard suggests that decisions should focus on a patient's preferences, our study explores the principles that surrogates consider most important when making decisions for older hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine how frequently surrogate decision-makers prioritized patient preferences in decision-making and what factors may predict their doing so. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a secondary data analysis of a study conducted at three local hospitals that surveyed surrogate decision-makers for hospitalized patients 65 years of age and older. MAIN MEASURES: Surrogates rated the importance of 16 decision-making principles and selected the one that was most important. We divided the surrogates into two groups: those who prioritized patient preferences and those who prioritized patient well-being. We analyzed the two groups for differences in knowledge of patient preferences, presence of advance directives, and psychological outcomes. KEY RESULTS: A total of 362 surrogates rated an average of six principles as being extremely important in decision-making; 77.8% of surrogates selected a patient well-being principle as the most important, whereas only 21.1% selected a patient preferences principle. Advance directives were more common to the patient preferences group than the patient well-being group (61.3% vs. 44.9%; 95% CI: 1.01-3.18; p = 0.04), whereas having conversations with the patient about their health care preferences was not a significant predictor of surrogate group identity (81.3% vs. 67.4%; 95% CI: 0.39-1.14; p = 0.14). We found no differences between the two groups regarding surrogate anxiety, depression, or decisional conflict. CONCLUSIONS: While surrogates considered many factors, they focused more often on patient well-being than on patient preferences, in contravention of our current ethical framework. Surrogates more commonly prioritized patient preferences if they had advance directives available to them.

Prevalence of advance directives and impact on advanced life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims.

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of advance directives and their impact on the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. METHODS: We analyzed data extracted from the French national registry of adult OHCA patients (RéAC). The data concerned the emergency medical services (EMS) of a Paris suburb over the period 01/01/2013 to 30/11/2015. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of advance directives. Secondary endpoints were the characteristics of the population, of cardiac arrest, and of basic life support as well as outcomes in patients with or without advance directives. RESULTS: Advance directives were available for 148/1985 (7.5%) of OHCA patients. Advanced life support was given to 35 patients with directives and 941 patients without (24% vs. 51%, p <0.0001) with no significant difference in the characteristics of the support provided. Spontaneous recovery of cardiac activity was observed in 5 patients with directives and in 217 patients without (14% vs. 23%, p=0.3). Among patients with advance directives, only one was admitted to hospital. He/she died within 24h of admission. CONCLUSION: Advance directives were accessed by EMS for 7.5% OHCA patients. Despite their availability, advanced life support was provided to 24% of patients.

Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care among Nursing Home Residents Receiving Maintenance Dialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the relation between the content of advance directives and downstream treatment decisions among patients receiving maintenance dialysis. In this study, we determined the prevalence of advance directives specifying treatment limitations and/or surrogate decision-makers in the last year of life and their association with end-of-life care among nursing home residents. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using national data from 2006 to 2007, we compared the content of advance directives among 30,716 nursing home residents receiving dialysis to 30,825 nursing home residents with other serious illnesses during the year before death. Among patients receiving dialysis, we linked the content of advance directives to Medicare claims to ascertain site of death and treatment intensity in the last month of life. RESULTS: In the last year of life, 36% of nursing home residents receiving dialysis had a treatment-limiting directive, 22% had a surrogate decision-maker, and 13% had both in adjusted analyses. These estimates were 13%-27%, 5%-11%, and 6%-13% lower, respectively, than for decedents with other serious illnesses. For patients receiving dialysis who had both a treatment-limiting directive and surrogate decision-maker, the adjusted frequency of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, intensive procedures, and inpatient death were lower by 13%, 17%, 13%, and 14%, respectively, and hospice use and dialysis discontinuation were 5% and 7% higher compared with patients receiving dialysis lacking both components. CONCLUSIONS: Among nursing home residents receiving dialysis, treatment-limiting directives and surrogates were associated with fewer intensive interventions and inpatient deaths, but were in place much less often than for nursing home residents with other serious illnesses.

Advance Directives and Care Received by Older Nursing Home Residents.

BACKGROUND: Research shows variable success as to whether care provided aligns with individual patient preferences as reflected in their advance directives (AD). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study AD status and subsequent care received in older nursing home (NH) residents deemed at risk for infections and care transitions: those with a urinary catheter (UC), feeding tube (FT), or both. Design/participants/measurements: A subgroup analysis of a prospective cohort of 90 residents with a UC and/or FT from 15 NHs in southeast Michigan. Outcomes assessed at enrollment and at 30-day intervals were hospitalizations and antibiotic use. The ADs were divided as follows: (1) comfort oriented: comfort measures only, no hospital transfer; (2) palliative oriented: comfort focused, allowing hospital transfer (except intensive care unit), antibiotic use, but no cardiopulmonary resuscitation; (3) usual care: full code, no limitations to care. We calculated incidences for these outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (87%) residents had ADs: 18 (23%) comfort oriented, 32 (41%) palliative oriented, and 28 (36%) usual care. The groups did not differ regarding demographics, comorbidity, function, device presence, or time in study. Using the usual care group as comparison, the comfort-oriented group was hospitalized at a similar rate (Incidence rate [IR] = 15.6/1000 follow-up days vs IR = 8.8/1000 follow-up days, Incident rate ratio [IRR] 0.6 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.3 -1.1], P value .09) but received fewer antibiotics (IR = 18.9/1000 follow-up days vs IR = 7.5/1000 follow-up days, IRR 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.8], P value .005). CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents with comfort-oriented ADs were hospitalized at a rate similar to those with usual-care ADs but received fewer antibiotics, although the small sample size of this analysis suggests these findings deserve further study.

ICU Deaths in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A significant number of advanced cancer admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) are inappropriate in that they do not result in prolonged survival. No clear consensus criteria for reasonable admissions of advanced cancer patients have been developed. METHOD: We established four criteria for reasonable admissions to ICU in patients who suffered from advanced, incurable cancer: post procedure complication, recent notification of cancer, ECOG performance status of 0-1, and life expectancy of more than 6 months. Based on these criteria, we reviewed the charts of all patients who died in the ICU at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC) affiliated Veteran's Affairs Medical Center between 10/2005 and 10/2010. We identified patients with advanced, incurable cancer and performed an in depth review of their charts. RESULTS: In the 421 charts of patients who died in our ICU between October 2005 and October 2010 we identified 52 patients admitted to the ICU with advanced, incurable cancer. 14 patients were diagnosed with cancer one month or less prior to admission. 21 patients had ECOG performance status of 0-1. 14 patients had life expectancy of more than 6 months and 8 patients were admitted for post procedure complication. 47% of patients who did not satisfy any of our reasonable admission criteria had APDs. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating proposed admission criteria in ICU admission guidelines may prevent 37% of inappropriate, advanced cancer admissions to the ICU. A simple increase in numbers of APDs would not likely change significantly the numbers of inappropriate ICU admissions.

Investigating Compliance with Standard Precautions During Residency Physicians in Gynecology and Obstetrics.

OBJECTIVES: Physician compliance with standard precautions is important in the specialty of gynecology and obstetrics because of the high frequency of invasive procedures. The current study investigated compliance with standard precautions among resident physicians working in gynecology and obstetrics. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among resident physicians in gynecology and obstetrics in their first (R1), second (R2) and third (R3) years of residency at a teaching hospital in a city in São Paulo. A structured questionnaire that included demographic and professional aspects and the Standard Precautions Adherence Scale were used to collect data. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM® SPSS version 20. Ethical aspects were considered. RESULTS: Fifty-eight resident physicians participated in the study. Of the enrolled participants, 27 (46.6%) were in R1, 12 (20.7%) were in R2 and 19 (32.8%) were in R3. The standard precautions compliance score was 4.1, which was classified as intermediate. There were no significant differences in the compliance scores of the resident physicians across the three years of residency (H=2.34, p=0.310). CONCLUSION: Compliance with standard precautions among resident physicians was intermediate. Preventive measures in clinical practice are not fully adopted in the specialty of gynecology and obstetrics. More important, many professionals claimed lack of sufficient training in standard precautions in the workplace. Such circumstances should draw the attention of hospital management with regard to occupational health risks.

Investigating Compliance with Standard Precautions During Residency Physicians in Gynecology and Obstetrics

OBJECTIVES: Physician compliance with standard precautions is important in the specialty of gynecology and obstetrics because of the high frequency of invasive procedures. The current study investigated compliance with standard precautions among resident physicians working in gynecology and obstetrics. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted among resident physicians in gynecology and obstetrics in their first (R1), second (R2) and third (R3) years of residency at a teaching hospital in a city in São Paulo. A structured questionnaire that included demographic and professional aspects and the Standard Precautions Adherence Scale were used to collect data. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM® SPSS version 20. Ethical aspects were considered. RESULTS: Fifty-eight resident physicians participated in the study. Of the enrolled participants, 27 (46.6%) were in R1, 12 (20.7%) were in R2 and 19 (32.8%) were in R3. The standard precautions compliance score was 4.1, which was classified as intermediate. There were no significant differences in the compliance scores of the resident physicians across the three years of residency (H=2.34, p=0.310). CONCLUSION: Compliance with standard precautions among resident physicians was intermediate. Preventive measures in clinical practice are not fully adopted in the specialty of gynecology and obstetrics. More important, many professionals claimed lack of sufficient training in standard precautions in the workplace. Such circumstances should draw the attention of hospital management with regard to occupational health risks.

Instrucciones previas en cuidados intensivos: competencias de los profesionales sanitarios / Advance directives in intensive care: Health professional competences

OBJETIVO: Explorar los conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes de los médicos y enfermeras de las unidades de cuidados intensivos de adultos sobre las instrucciones previas (IP) o documento de voluntades anticipadas (DVA). DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo, transversal. ÁMBITO: Nueve hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid. PARTICIPANTES: Médicos y enfermeras de cuidados intensivos de adultos. Intervenciones: Cuestionario anónimo, autocumplimentado con variables dicotómicas y escala tipo likert. VARIABLES: Conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes sobre las IP. Análisis estadístico descriptivo con porcentajes y prueba de ji-cuadrado, tomando como significativos valores p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Respondieron al cuestionario 331 profesionales (tasa de respuesta del 51%). Además de los sociodemográficos, se obtuvo que el 90,3% no conoce todas las medidas que contemplan las IP. El 82,8% opina que el DVA es un instrumento útil para los profesionales en la toma de decisiones. El 50,2% opina que los DVA no se respetan. El 85,3% de los médicos respetaría el DVA de un paciente en caso de urgencia vital, frente al 66,2% de las enfermeras (p = 0,007). Solo el 19,1% de los médicos y el 2,3% de las enfermeras conoce si los pacientes que llevan a su cargo poseen un DVA (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Aunque los profesionales sanitarios muestran conocimientos escasos sobre las IP, presentan una actitud favorable hacia su utilidad. Sin embargo, la mayoría no conocen si los pacientes que están a su cargo poseen un DVA e incluso algunos profesionales a pesar de conocerlo, en caso de urgencia vital no lo respetarían. Se hace necesaria una mayor formación sobre las IP

OBJECTIVE: To identify knowledge, skills and attitudes among physicians and nurses of adults' intensive care units (ICUs), referred to advance directives or living wills. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. SETTING: Nine hospitals in the Community of Madrid (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Physicians and nurses of adults’ intensive care. INTERVENTIONS: A qualitative Likert-type scale and multiple response survey was made. Variables Knowledge, skills and attitudes about the advance directives. A descriptive statistical analysis based on percentages was made, with application of the chi-squared test for comparisons, accepting P<0.05 as representing statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 331 surveys were collected (51%). It was seen that 90.3% did not know all the measures envisaged by the advance directives. In turn, 50.2% claimed that the living wills are not respected, and 82.8% believed advance directives to be a useful tool for health professionals in the decision making process. A total of 85.3% the physicians stated that they would respect a living will, in cases of emergencies, compared to 66.2% of the nursing staff (p = .007).Lastly, only 19.1% of the physicians and 2.3% of the nursing staff knew whether their patients had advance directives (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although health professionals displayed poor knowledge of advance directives, they had a favorable attitude toward their usefulness. However, most did not know whether their patients had a living will, and some professionals even failed to respect such instructions despite knowledge of the existence of advance directives. Improvements in health profesional education in this field is needed

Planificación anticipada de cuidados: resultados de un programa de implementación en residencias de ancianos / Advance care planning: results of implementation program in nursing homes

No disponible

Adherencia a las recomendaciones sobre la linfadenectomía de las guías clínicas del 2009 en el Registro Nacional de Cáncer de Próstata-2010 / Adherence to the lymphadenectomy recommendations of the 2009 clinical guidelines in the 2010 National Prostate Cancer Registry

Objetivo: Evaluar la adherencia a las recomendaciones de las GC de 2009 en la realización de LFD durante la prostatectomía radical, y análisis de las variables que influyen en esa decisión en el Registro Nacional de Cáncer de Próstata de 2010. Material y método: Análisis de 1.272 pacientes tratados con prostatectomía en 25 hospitales nacionales. Clasificación de los pacientes según los criterios de riesgo de pN+ contemplados en las GC de la EAU y de la CNNC. Cálculo de la concordancia bruta y del índice de concordancia kappa. Regresión logística para evaluar las variables predictoras en la decisión de realizar una linfadenectomía. Resultados: Se realizó linfadenectomía a 225 (17,7%) pacientes con una variabilidad entre centros del 0-62,2% (p < 0,001). En 17 (7,5%) pacientes existía invasión linfática (pN + ). La concordancia bruta con la GC de la EAU-09 fue de 0,672 (0,48-0,96 en los distintos centros) y el índice kappa de 0,289. La concordancia bruta con la GC de la NCCN-09 fue de 0,814 (0,51-1 en los distintos centros) y el índice kappa de 0,228. En el análisis multivariable se identificaron como variables predictoras independientes en la realización de linfadenectomía el score de Gleason, el estadio clínico, el PSA, el centro hospitalario y la vía de abordaje quirúrgica a la prostatectomía (todas p < 0,001). Conclusiones: En nuestro estudio la adherencia a las recomendaciones de las GC sobre la realización de linfadenectomía fue moderada. En la decisión para la realización de la linfadenectomía, además de las variables clínicas clásicas, fueron determinantes la vía de abordaje y el hospital donde se realizó la prostatectomía

Objective: To assess the adherence to the recommendations of the 2009 clinical guidelines in the implementation of lymphadenectomy during radical prostatectomy and analysis of the variables that influence this decision in the 2010 National Prostate Cancer Registry. Material and method: Analysis of 1,272 patients who underwent prostatectomy in 25 national hospitals. Patient classification according to the pathological node-positive (pN + ) risk criteria included in the clinical guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Calculation of the raw agreement and index of agreement kappa. Logistic regression to assess the predictors in the decision to perform lymphadenectomy. Results: Lymphadenectomy was performed on 225 (17.7%) patients, with a variability among centers of 0-62.2% (p<.001). There was lymphocytic invasion (pN + ) in 17 (7.5%) patients. The raw agreement with the EAU-09 clinical guidelines was .672 (.48-.96 in the various centers), and the kappa index was .289. The raw agreement with the NCCN-09 clinical guidelines was.814 (.51-1 in the various centers), and the kappa index was .228. In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictors for performing lymphadenectomy were the Gleason score, the clinical stage, the prostate-specific antigen, the hospital center and the surgical approach route to prostatectomy (all P < .001). Conclusions: In our study, adherence to the recommendations of the clinical guidelines on the implementation of lymphadenectomy was moderate. When deciding on lymphadenectomy, the determinants (in addition to the classic clinical variables) were the approach route and the hospital where the prostatectomy was performed

Las voluntades vitales anticipadas en Andalucía, 2004-2014 / Advanced care directives in Andalusia, 2004-2014

No disponible