Facing a request for assisted death - views of Finnish physicians, a mixed method study.

BACKGROUND: Assisted death, including euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), is under debate worldwide, and these practices are adopted in many Western countries. Physicians' attitudes toward assisted death vary across the globe, but little is known about physicians' actual reactions when facing a request for assisted death. There is a clear gap in evidence on how physicians act and respond to patients' requests for assisted death in countries where these actions are not legal. METHODS: A survey including statements concerning euthanasia and PAS and an open question about their actions when facing a request for assisted death was sent to all Finnish physicians. Quantitative data are presented as numbers and percentages. Statistical significance was tested by using the Pearson chi-square test, when appropriate. The qualitative analysis was performed by using an inductive content analysis approach, where categories emerge from the data. RESULTS: Altogether, 6889 physicians or medical students answered the survey, yielding a response rate of 26%. One-third of participants agreed or partly agreed that they could assist a patient in a suicide. The majority (69%) of the participants fully or partly agreed that euthanasia should only be accepted due to difficult physical symptoms, while 12% fully or partly agreed that life turning into a burden should be an acceptable reason for euthanasia. Of the participants, 16% had faced a request for euthanasia or PAS, and 3033 answers from 2565 respondents were achieved to the open questions concerning their actions regarding the request and ethical aspects of assisted death. In the qualitative analysis, six main categories, including 22 subcategories, were formed regarding the phenomenon of how physicians act when facing this request. The six main categories were as follows: providing an alternative to the request, enabling care and support, ignoring the request, giving a reasoned refusal, complying with the request, and seeing the request as a possibility. CONCLUSIONS: Finnish physicians' actions regarding the requests for assisted death, and attitudes toward euthanasia and PAS vary substantially. Open discussion, education, and recommendations concerning a request for assisted death and ethics around it are also highly needed in countries where euthanasia and PAS are not legal.

Ethical perspectives regarding Euthanasia, including in the context of adult psychiatry: a qualitative interview study among healthcare workers in Belgium.

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has explored euthanasia's ethical dimensions, primarily focusing on general practice and, to a lesser extent, psychiatry, mainly from the viewpoints of physicians and nurses. However, a gap exists in understanding the comprehensive value-based perspectives of other professionals involved in both somatic and psychiatric euthanasia. This paper aims to analyze the interplay among legal, medical, and ethical factors to clarify how foundational values shape the ethical discourse surrounding euthanasia in both somatic and psychiatric contexts. It seeks to explore these dynamics among all healthcare professionals and volunteers in Belgium. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 Dutch-speaking healthcare workers who had encountered patients requesting euthanasia for psychiatric conditions, in Belgium, from August 2019 to August 2020. Qualitative thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts. FINDINGS: Participants identified three pivotal values and virtues: religious values, professional values, and fundamental medical values encompassing autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence, linked to compassion, quality care, and justice. These values interwove across four tiers: the patient, the patient's inner circle, the medical realm, and society at large. Irrespective of their euthanasia stance, participants generally displayed a blend of ethical values across these tiers. Their euthanasia perspective was primarily shaped by value interpretation, significance allocation to key components, and tier weighting. Explicit mention of varying ethical values, potentially indicating distinct stances in favor of or against euthanasia, was infrequent. CONCLUSION: The study underscores ethical discourse's central role in navigating euthanasia's intricate landscape. Fostering inclusive dialogue, bridging diverse values, supports informed decision-making, nurturing justice, and empathy. Tailored end-of-life healthcare in psychiatry is essential, acknowledging all involved actors' needs. The study calls for interdisciplinary research to comprehensively grasp euthanasia's multifaceted dimensions, and guiding policy evolution. While contextualized in Belgium, the implications extend to the broader euthanasia discourse, suggesting avenues for further inquiry and cross-cultural exploration.

Euthanasia and End-of-Life Decisions: From the Empirical Turn to Moral Intuitionism.

Most medical learned societies have endorsed both "equivalence" between all forms of withholding or withdrawing treatment and the "discontinuity" between euthanasia and practices to withhold or withdraw treatment. While the latter are morally acceptable insofar as they consist in letting the patient die, the former constitutes an illegitimate act of actively interfering with a patient's life. The moral distinction between killing and letting die has been hotly debated both conceptually and empirically, most notably by experimental philosophers, with inconclusive results. This article employs a "revisionary" intuititionist perspective to discuss the results of a clinical ethics study about intensivists' perceptions of withhold or withdraw decisions. The results show that practitioners' moral experience is at odds with both the discontinuity and equivalence theses. This outcome allows us to revisit certain concepts, such as intention and causal relationship, that are prominent in the conceptual debate. Intensivists also regard end-of-life decisions as being on a scale from least to most active, and whether they regard active forms of end-of-life decisions as ethically acceptable depends on the overarching professional values they endorse: the patient's best chances of survival, or the patient's quality of life.

La objeción de conciencia en el ámbito sanitario: un equilibrio entre derechos y deberes / L’objecció de consciència en l'àmbit sanitari: un equilibri entre drets i deures / Conscientious objection in the healthcare domain: A balance between rights and responsibilities

La entrada en vigor de la Ley Orgánica 3/2021 sobre eutanasia en España (2021), ha propiciado un debate de relevancia en el ámbito de la bioética, como es el de la objeción de conciencia (OC) de los profesionales de la salud. Ahora bien, a pesar de que la literatura científica ha abordado esta cuestión, lo cierto es que la comprensión de los motivos subyacentes que impulsan a los profesionales a objetar no está del todo clara. Diversos autores han destacado que la OC halla sus fundamentos en creencias personales, ética profesional, aspectos emocionales y dinámicas del propio sistema. A su vez, se ha observado cómo hay posiciones diversas sobre la legitimidad de la OC, generando debates sobre su validez.Los objetivos de este artículo son revisar el concepto objeción de conciencia en el ámbito sanitario; analizar los factores que motivan este derecho; examinar las consecuencias de la OC en la carga asistencial de los profesionales no objetores; y explorar su posible conflicto ético con la justicia distributiva en la atención sanitaria. Por último, se reflexionará sobre la posibilidad de la OC institucional y sus posibles consecuencias en los derechos de pacientes y trabajadores.(AU)

L'entrada en vigor de la Llei Orgànica 3/2021 sobre l'eutanàsia a Espanya (2021) ha suscitat un debat rellevant en l'àmbit de la bioètica, com és el de l’objecció de consciència(OC) dels professionals de la salut. Tanmateix, malgrat que la literatura científica ha abordat aquesta qüestió, és cert que la comprensió dels motius subjacents que impulsen els professionals a objectar no està del tot clara. Diversos autors han destacatque l’OC troba els seus fonaments en creences personals, ètica professional, aspectes emocionals i dinàmiques del propi sistema. Al seu torn, s'ha observat com hi ha posicions diverses sobre la legitimitat de l’OC, generant debats sobre la seva validesa. Els objectius d'aquest article són revisar el concepte d’objecció de consciència en l'àmbit sanitari; analitzar els factors que motiven aquest dret; examinar les repercussions de l’OC en la càrrega assistencial dels professionals no objectors; i explorar el seu possible conflicte ètic amb la justícia distributiva en l'atenció sanitària. Finalment, es reflexionarà sobre la possibilitat de l’OC institucional i les seves possibles repercussions en els drets dels pacients i treballadors.(AU)

The enactment of Organic Law 3/2021 on euthanasia in Spain has sparked a significant debate in the field of bioethics, namely the issue of conscientious objection (CO) among healthcare professionals. However, despite the scientific literature addressing this matter, the understanding of the underlying reasons that drive professionals to object is not entirely clear. Several authors have highlighted that CO is rooted in personal beliefs, professional ethics, emotional aspects, and dynamics within the healthcare system. Simultaneously, there have been varying stances on the legitimacy of CO, leading to debates regarding its validity.The objectives of this article are to review the concept of conscientious objection in the healthcare context, analyze the factors motivating this right, examine the consequences of CO on the workload of non-objecting professionals, and explore its potential ethical conflict with distributive justice in healthcare. Finally, we will reflect on the possibility of institutional CO and its potential implications for the rights of patients and healthcare workers.(AU)

Eutanasia: ¿una solución equivocada a un problema no reconocido? / Euthanasia: a wrong solution to an unrecognized problem?

La Ley Orgánica 3/2021, de 24 de marzo, de regulación de la eutanasia, ha intensificado un duro de bate. A priori se trata de un conflicto de valores bioéticos y de una visión antropológica diferente entre las diferentes partes, sin embargo, no debemos olvidar que quizá antes de plantearse ningún debate se deba interpretar correctamente lo que el paciente realmente quiere cuando manifiesta que quiere morir. En nuestro sistema sanitario y en nuestra sociedad, hay ciertos rasgos y necesidades de la persona que son ignorados, y que requieren urgentemente, para el paciente, de atención. Descubrir el sentido de la propia vida, considerar la trascendencia humana, encontrar un orden personal y poder experimentar el amor, son elementos vitales de la vida, que en un momento tan crítico como es un sufrimiento de alto grado o una muerte inminente, requieren de toda la atención del personal sanitario. Todo ello puede contrastar fuer temente con los valores de nuestra sociedad, no dedicándosele la atención adecuada, entre otros motivos, por el esfuerzo que supone llevar a cabo una atención integral de este tipo, así, resulta mucho más sencillo realizar los trámites requeridos por la ley de regulación de la eutanasia que abordar carencias tan íntimas del ser, a pesar de que éstas puedan ser el verdadero problema del paciente, que en su dramática vivencia pide auxilio (AU)

Organic Law 3/2021, of March 24, regulating euthanasia, has intensified a harsh debate. A priori, it is a conflict of bioethical values and a different anthropological vision between the different parties, however, we must not forget that perhaps before considering any debate, it is necessary to correctly interpret what the patient really wants when he states that he wants to die. In our health system and in our society, there are certain traits and needs of the person that are ignored, and that urgently require attention for the patient. Discovering the meaning of one’s life, considering human transcendence, finding personal order and being able to experience love are vital elements of life, which at such a critical moment as high-grade suffering or imminent death, require all the attention of the health personnel. All this can contrast sharply with the values of our society, not dedicating adequate attention to it, among other reasons, due to the effort involved in carrying out comprehensive care of this type, thus making it much easier to carry out the procedures required by law regulation of euthanasia than addressing such intimate deficiencies of the being, despite the fact that these may be the real problem of the patient, who in his dramatic experience asks for help (AU)

[Euthanasia: a wrong solution to an unrecognized problem?] / Eutanasia: ¿una solución equivocada a un problema no reconocido?

Organic Law 3/2021, of March 24, regulating euthanasia, has intensified a harsh debate. A priori, it is a conflict of bioethical values and a different anthropological vision between the different parties, however, we must not forget that perhaps before considering any debate, it is necessary to correctly interpret what the patient really wants when he states that he wants to die. In our health system and in our society, there are certain traits and needs of the person that are ignored, and that urgently require attention for the patient. Discovering the meaning of one's life, considering human transcendence, finding personal order and being able to experience love are vital elements of life, which at such a critical moment as high-grade suffering or imminent death, require all the attention of the health personnel. All this can contrast sharply with the values of our society, not dedicating adequate attention to it, among other reasons, due to the effort involved in carrying out comprehensive care of this type, thus making it much easier to carry out the procedures required by law regulation of euthanasia than addressing such intimate deficiencies of the being, despite the fact that these may be the real problem of the patient, who in his dramatic experience asks for help.

Despenalización de la eutanasia en Bélgica: un perfil de veinte años e implicaciones deontológicas / Legalització de l'eutanàsia a Bèlgica: un perfil de vint anys i implicacions ètiques / Decriminalization of euthanasia in Belgium: Aprofile of twenty years and deontological implications

El artículo pone en contexto las estadísticas de veinte años desde la despenalización de la eutanasia en Bélgica. En esta reconstrucción se analizan los aspectos centrales de la política, tales como su carácter democrático y la protección de la objeción de conciencia. A menudo discutido de forma aislada, este artículo plantea el fin de vida voluntario como parte de un programa paliativo que, a su vez, integra una visión más amplia, como se refleja en el paquete de regulaciones del año 2002. Además de delinear ciertas consecuencias deontológicas, entre otras, el artículo subraya el carácter excepcional de la eutanasia, limitándose a casos debidamente calificados de sufrimiento físico o psíquico, pero que de manera significativa reivindica el respecto de la autonomía de la persona. Con todo, el artículo invita a considerar códigos morales múltiples de cara a uno de los pocos eventos de los que tenemos certeza: la muerte.(AU)

L'article posa en context les estadístiques de vint anys des de la despenalització de l'eutanàsia a Bèlgica. En aquesta reconstrucció s'analitzen els aspectes centrals de la política, com el seu caràcter democràtic i la protecció de l'objecció de consciència. Sovint discutit de forma aïllada, aquest article planteja la fi de vida voluntària com a part d'un programa pal·liatiu que, al seu torn, integra una visió més àmplia, com es reflecteix en el paquet de regulacions de l'any 2002. A més de delinear certes conseqüències deontològiques, entre d'altres, l'article subratlla el caràcter excepcional de l'eutanàsia, limitant-se a casos degudament qualificats de patiment físic o psíquic, però que de manera significativa reivindica el respecte de l'autonomia de la persona. Amb tot, l'article convida a considerar codis morals múltiples de cara a un dels pocs esdeveniments dels quals tenim certesa: la mort.(AU)

The article brings into context the statistics of twenty years since the decriminalization of euthanasia in Belgium. In reconstructing this process, the central aspects of the policy are analysed, such as its democratic nature and the protection of conscientious objection. Often discussed in isolation, this article considers voluntary end of life as part of a palliative program that, in turn, integrates a broader vision, as reflected in the 2002 package of regulations. In addition to outlining some of its consequences, deontological and otherwise, the article underlines the exceptional use of euthanasia, limited to duly qualified cases of physical or mental suffering, but that it also significantly increases respect for the autonomy of the person. All in all, the article invites us to consider multiple moral codes in the face of one of the few events of which we are certain: death.(AU)

El derecho fundamental a eutanasia y su problemática constitucionalen España / El dret fonamental a eutanàsia i la seva problemàtica constitucionala Espanya / The fundamental right to euthanasia and its constitutional problems in Spain

Tras la regulación de la eutanasia emerge una problemática constitucional y bioética que revela las deficiencias, lagunas y conflictos jurídicos sin resolver por la LO 3/2021, de 24 de marzo (LORE). La desprotección de colectivos vulnerables, la huida de las garantías jurídicas convencionales y la lesividad de derechos fundamentales, entre otras razones, fundamentan la dimensión constitucional del derecho a morir. El control jurídico de la eutanasia se enfrenta en la actualidad a su construcción legal como derecho fundamental pese a la apariencia como derecho prestacional de “ayuda a morir”, en base a la conexión con el derecho a la vida, integridad física y moral, dignidad, libertad, intimidad (Exposición de Motivos LORE). Sin embargo, desde una perspectiva constitucional, resulta insatisfactoria la exclusión de menores y sujetos sin capacidad de su ámbito subjetivo y el riesgo de eludir la ponderación en conflicto con otros derechos al adoptar una jerarquía superior de hecho.(AU)

Després de la regulació de l'eutanàsia emergeix una problemàtica constitucional i bioètica que revela les deficiències, les llacunes i els conflictes jurídics sense resoldre per la LO 3/2021, de 24 de març (LORE). La desprotecció de col·lectius vulnerables, la fugida de les garanties jurídiques convencionals i la lesivitat de drets fonamentals, entre altres raons, fonamenten la dimensió constitucional del dret a morir. El control jurídic de l'eutanàsia s'enfronta actualment a la seva construcció legal com a dret fonamental malgrat l'aparença com a dret prestacional d'“ajuda a morir”, en base a la connexió amb el dret a la vida, integritat física i moral, dignitat , llibertat, intimitat (Exposició de Motius LORE). Tanmateix, des d'una perspectiva constitucional resulta insatisfactòria l'exclusió de menors i subjectes sense capacitat del seu àmbit subjectiu i el risc d'eludir la ponderació en conflicte amb altres drets en adoptar una jerarquia superior de fet.(AU)

After the legalization of euthanasia, a constitutional and bioethical problem emerges that reveals the deficiencies, gaps and legal conflicts unresolved by LO 3/2021, of March 24. The lack of protection of vulnerable groups, the flight from conventional legal guarantees and the harmfulness of fundamental rights, among other reasons, support the constitutional dimension of the right to die. The legal control of euthanasia currently faces its legal construction as a fundamental right despite the appearance as a right to "help to die", based on the connection with theright to life, physical and moral integrity, dignity, freedom, privacy (LORE Statement of Reasons). However, from a constitutional perspective, the exclusion of minors and subjects without capacity from their subjective sphere, and the risk of eluding theweighting in conflict with other rights by adopting a higher in fact hierarchy is unsatisfactory.(AU)

La regulación de la eutanasia en España y el farmacéutico de hospital: estado de la cuestión / The regulation of euthanasia in Spain and the hospital pharmacist: state of the art

Objetivo: Conocer la realidad del farmacéutico de hospital en relación a la Ley Orgánica 3/2021 de regulación de la eutanasia. Método: Se diseñó una encuesta de 22 preguntas acerca de la Ley de regulación de la eutanasia y se difundió via on-line a los farmacéuticos hospitalarios pertenecientes a la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria. La solicitud de participación se llevó a cabo en mayo 2022. Resultados: Se recopilaron 242 respuestas siendo un 66% facultativos especialistas de área. Cabe destacar que el 81% afirmaban conocer la Ley Orgánica 3/2021 de regulación de la eutanasia y el 63% no se declararía objetor de conciencia. Los protocolos de actuación para la prestación de ayuda para morir sólo existían antes de tener el primer caso en el 31% de los hospitales. Conclusiones: Solo conociendo el pronunciamiento del profesional facultativo ante la prestación de ayuda para morir puede conocerse la realidad y mejorar la asistencia. Ante las incógnitas y falta de desarrollo normativo se crea la necesidad de contar con equipos de profesionales formados que lleven a cabo esta prestación. (AU)

Objective: To know the reality of the hospital pharmacist in relation to the Spanish Law 3/2021, of regulation of euthanasia Methods: A 22-question survey regarding the Law that regulates euthanasia in Spain was designed and spread online to hospital pharmacists belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy. The request for participation was sent in May 2022. Results: 242 responses were collected, 66% of which came from area specialists. It is important to highlight that 81% claimed to be aware of the Spanish Law 3/2021 and the results showed that 63% of the respondents would not declare themselves a conscientious objector. The action protocols for the provision of Aid in Dying only existed before the first case was carried out in 31% of the hospitals in Spain. Conclusions: Only by knowing the pronouncement of the health professionals regarding the provision of Aid in Dying, the current situation can be known and, therefore, the patient care been improved. Given the unknowns and lack of normative development, the need for teams of trained professionals to carry out the provision for the service is needed. (AU)

A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Perspectives of Dignity and Assisted Dying.

INTRODUCTION: The debate on assisted dying and its components, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide has evolved with the emergence of the right to dignity and the wish to hasten death (WTHD). Whilst shaped by local legal and sociocultural considerations, appreciation of how patients, healthcare professionals and lawmakers relate notions of dignity to self-concepts of personhood and the desire for assisted dying will better inform and direct support of patients. METHODS: Guided by the Systematic Evidence Based Approach, a systematic scoping review (SSR in SEBA) on perspectives of dignity, WTHD and personhood featured in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Scopus databases and four key Palliative Care journals was conducted. The review hinged on the following questions: "what is the relationship between dignity and the wish to hasten death (WTHD) in the assisted dying debate?", "how is dignity conceptualised by patients with WTHD?" and "what are prevailing perspectives on the role of assisted dying in maintaining a dying patient's dignity?" RESULTS: 6947 abstracts were identified, 663 full text articles reviewed, and 88 articles included. The four domains identified include 1) concepts of dignity through the lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) including their various definitions and descriptions; 2) the relationship between dignity, WTHD and assisted dying with loss of dignity and autonomy foregrounded; 3) stakeholder perspectives for and against assisted dying including those of patient, healthcare provider and lawmaker; and 4) other dignity-conserving measures as alternatives to assisted dying. CONCLUSION: Concepts of dignity constantly evolve throughout the patient's end of life journey. Understanding when and how these concepts of personhood change and trigger the fear of a loss of dignity or intractable suffering could direct timely, individualised and appropriate person-centred dignity conserving measures. We believe an RToP-based tool could fulfil this role and further study into the design of this tool is planned.

Consentimiento informado, limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico, eutanasia. Una reflexión profesional / Informed consent, limitation of therapeutic effort, euthanasia. A professional reflection

Introducción: en la formación del profesional de las Ciencias Médicas en Cuba, se destaca la formación humanista, no obstante, profundizar en los conceptos consentimiento informado, limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico y la eutanasia, el conocimiento y dominio de estos conceptos fortalecerían la práctica médica. Desarrollo: el conocimiento de la bioética y la ética médica es de suma importancia, pues no solo tiene que ver con los principios de la ética, sino también con los valores humanos, y dentro de ellos la claridad de los conceptos y de la profesionalidad médica, que va desde la constante preocupación y ocupación por la superación profesional, así como los aspectos del comportamiento social, institucional, la autodisciplina, la entrega total, y la forma de presentarse no solo en la sociedad y en la institución, sino frente a cada paciente, siendo sobrios, elegantes, educados, amables, utilizando correctamente la bata sanitaria, conocida como bata médica, haciendo honor al color blanco como expresión de pureza y de guardar el secreto médico. Conclusiones: deberá ampliarse a la población por los diferentes medios de comunicación, y especialmente en los educandos y profesionales no solo en la impartición por parte de profesores universitarios, sino a través del uso de las tecnologías de la información. Es el momento para institucionalizar jurídicamente el consentimiento informado(AU)

Introduction: in the training of the professional of the Medical Sciences in Cuba, the humanist training stands out, however, deepening in the concepts informed consent, limitation of the therapeutic effort and euthanasia, the knowledge and mastery of these concepts would strengthen the medical practice. Development: the knowledge of bioethics and medical ethics is of the utmost importance, because it not only has to do with the principles of ethics, but also with human values, and within them the clarity of concepts and medical professionalism, ranging from the constant concern and occupation for professional improvement, as well as the aspects of social, institutional behavior, self-discipline, total dedication, and the way of presenting oneself not only in society and in the institution, but in front of each patient, being sober, elegant, polite, kind, correctly using the sanitary gown, known as a medical gown, honoring the white color as an expression of purity and keeping the medical secret. Conclusions: it should be extended to the population by the different means of communication, and especially in the learners and professionals not only in the teaching by university professors, but through the use of information technologies. It is time to legally institutionalize informed consent(EU)