Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 76: 142-151, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153489

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The creation and maintenance of durable hemodialysis access is critically important for reducing patient morbidity and controlling overall costs within health systems. Our objective was to quantify the costs associated with hemodialysis access creation and its maintenance over time within a rate-controlled health system where charges equate to payments. METHODS: The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission administrative claims database was used to identify patients who underwent first-time access creation from 2012-2020. Patients were identified using CPT codes for access creation, and costs were accrued for the initial encounter and all subsequent outpatient access-related encounters. T-tests and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare reinterventions and access-related costs ($USD) between arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG). Multivariable modeling was used to quantify the association of access type with charge variation. RESULTS: Overall, 12,716 patients underwent first-time access creation (69.3% AVF vs. 30.7% AVG). There was no difference in freedom from reintervention between the two access types at any point following creation (HR: 1.03, 95%CI: 0.97-1.10); however, AVF were associated with a lower number of cumulative reinterventions (1.50 vs. 2.24) compared to AVG (P<0.0001). AVF was associated with lower overall costs in the year of creation ($9,388 vs. $13,539, P<0.0001), a difference that remained significant over the subsequent 3 years. The lower costs associated with AVF were present both in the costs associated with creation and subsequent maintenance. On multivariable analysis, AVF was associated with a $3,557 reduction in total access-related costs versus AVG (95%CI -$3828, -3287). CONCLUSION: AVF require fewer interventions and are associated with lower costs at placement and over the first three years of maintenance compared to AVG. The use of AVF for first-time hemodialysis access represents an opportunity for healthcare savings in appropriately selected patients with a high preoperative likelihood of AVF maturation.


Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/economics , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Systems Plans/economics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/economics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Renal Dialysis/economics , Administrative Claims, Healthcare , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis , Male , Maryland , Middle Aged , Reoperation/economics , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Lancet Oncol ; 22(2): 182-189, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33485458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The growing demand for cancer surgery has placed a global strain on health systems. In-depth analyses of the global demand for cancer surgery and optimal workforce requirements are needed to plan service provision. We estimated the global demand for cancer surgery and the requirements for an optimal surgical and anaesthesia workforce, using benchmarks based on clinical guidelines. METHODS: Using models of benchmark surgical use based on clinical guidelines, we estimated the proportion of cancer cases with an indication for surgery across 183 countries, stratified by income group. These proportions were multiplied by age-adjusted national estimates of new cancer cases using GLOBOCAN 2018 data and then aggregated to obtain the estimated number of surgical procedures required globally. The numbers of cancer surgical procedures in 44 high-income countries were divided by the actual number of surgeons and anaesthetists in the respective countries to calculate cancer procedures per surgeon and anaesthetist ratios. Using the median (IQR) of these ratios as benchmarks, we developed a three-tiered optimal surgical and anaesthesia workforce matrix, and the predictions were extrapolated up to 2040. FINDINGS: Our model estimates that the number of cancer cases globally with an indication for surgery will increase by 5 million procedures (52%) between 2018 (9 065 000) and 2040 (13 821 000). The greatest relative increase in surgical demand will occur in 34 low-income countries, where we also observed the largest gaps in workforce requirements. To match the median benchmark for high-income countries, the surgical workforce in these countries would need to increase by almost four times and the anaesthesia workforce by nearly 5·5 times. The greatest increase in optimal workforce requirements from 2018 to 2040 will occur in low-income countries (from 28 000 surgeons to 58 000 surgeons; 107% increase), followed by lower-middle-income countries (from 166 000 surgeons to 277 000 surgeons; 67% increase). INTERPRETATION: The global demand for cancer surgery and the optimal workforce are predicted to increase over the next two decades and disproportionately affect low-income countries. These estimates provide an appropriate framework for planning the provision of surgical services for cancer worldwide. FUNDING: University of New South Wales Scientia Scholarship and UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/trends , Health Systems Plans/trends , Health Workforce/trends , Neoplasms/surgery , Anesthesia/economics , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Global Health/economics , Health Systems Plans/economics , Health Workforce/economics , Humans , Income , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Surgeons/economics
9.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 55(3): 313-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26003160

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and cost of medications dispensed despite discontinuation (MDDD) of the medications in the electronic medical record within an integrated health care organization. SETTING: Dean Health System, with medical clinics and pharmacies linked by an electronic medical record, and a shared health plan and pharmacy benefits management company. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Pharmacist-led quality improvement project using retrospective chart review. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Electronic medical records, pharmacy records, and prescription claims data from patients 18 years of age or older who had a prescription filled for a chronic condition from June 2012 to August 2013 and submitted a claim through the Dean Health Plan were aggregated and cross-referenced to identify MDDD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographics and MDDD incidence. Fisher's exact test and independent samples t tests were used to compare MDDD and non-MDDD groups. Wholesale acquisition cost was applied to each MDDD event. RESULTS: 7,406 patients met inclusion criteria. For 223 (3%) patients with MDDD, 253 independent events were identified. In terms of frequency per category, antihypertensive agents topped the list, followed, in descending order, by anticonvulsants, antilipemics, antidiabetics, and anticoagulants. Nine medications accounted for 59% (150 of 253) of all MDDD events; these included (again in descending order): gabapentin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, warfarin, furosemide, metformin, and metoprolol. Mail-service pharmacies accounted for the highest incidence (5.3%) of MDDD, followed by mass merchandisers (4.6%) and small chains (3.9%). The total cost attributable to MDDD was $9,397.74. CONCLUSION: Development of a technology-based intervention to decrease the incidence of MDDD may be warranted to improve patient safety and decrease health care costs.


Subject(s)
Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Electronic Health Records , Health Systems Plans/economics , Electronic Prescribing/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality Improvement
11.
Health Syst Transit ; 15(3): 1-431, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24025796

ABSTRACT

This analysis of the United States health system reviews the developments in organization and governance, health financing, health-care provision, health reforms and health system performance. The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. It has a large and well-trained health workforce, a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, a robust health sector research program and, for selected services, among the best medical outcomes in the world. But it also suffers from incomplete coverage of its citizenry, health expenditure levels per person far exceeding all other countries, poor measures on many objective and subjective measures of quality and outcomes, an unequal distribution of resources and outcomes across the country and among different population groups, and lagging efforts to introduce health information technology. It is difficult to determine the extent to which deficiencies are health-system related, though it seems that at least some of the problems are a result of poor access to care. Because of the adoption of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the United States is facing a period of enormous potential change. Improving coverage is a central aim, envisaged through subsidies for the uninsured to purchase private insurance, expanded eligibility for Medicaid (in some states) and greater protection for insured persons. Furthermore, primary care and public health receive increased funding, and quality and expenditures are addressed through a range of measures. Whether the ACA will indeed be effective in addressing the challenges identified above can only be determined over time.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Health Systems Plans/economics , Health Systems Plans/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Care Reform/methods , Healthcare Financing , Humans , United States
13.
Ann Pharmacother ; 43(4): 611-20, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19336646

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services incorporated the requirement for a Medication Therapy Management Program (MTMP) for individuals with Part D coverage to ensure that drug regimens provide optimal therapeutic outcomes through improved medication use, thereby reducing adverse drug events. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an MTMP implemented for Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug members enrolled with Health Alliance Plan (HAP) during 2006 and 2007. METHODS: Patient eligibility for MTMP was searched electronically. Clinical pharmacists researched medication histories and adherence and, through telephone contact, ascertained the patients' healthcare goals and needs. A patient-centered pharmacotherapy plan was created and implemented collaboratively with the patient's physician(s). To ensure that therapy goals were met, pharmacists performed follow-up interventions. Clinical outcomes and cost savings were compared for MTMP enrollees versus those declining enrollment. RESULTS: Average enrollment rate for the MTMP was 20% for 2006 and 2007. Nearly 60% of interventions involved changing therapy to improve efficacy and greater than 40% involved changing therapy to improve safety. Analysis of 2006 data revealed an overall improvement in electronically measurable clinical outcomes for MTMP enrollees versus individuals who declined enrollment, including a trend toward improved adherence to drug therapy for heart failure, insulin use, and a significant reduction in gastrointestinal bleeds (p = 0.001). Cost-savings analysis indicated a greater reduction in total prescription per member per month costs ($PMPM) of 17.2% for MTMP enrollees versus a 7% reduction for those who declined MTMP (p = 0.001). Patients who enrolled into the 2006 MTMP also saw a sustained positive effect in lowered $PMPM for prescription drugs in 2007. CONCLUSIONS: The HAP MTMP, conducted through telephone contacts, produced positive trends in improving clinical outcomes, reductions in pharmacy costs, and sustained pharmacy cost savings for patients who enrolled in the MTMP compared with patients who declined enrollment.


Subject(s)
Medication Adherence , Medication Therapy Management/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Systems Plans/economics , Health Systems Plans/standards , Humans , Male , Medication Therapy Management/economics , Middle Aged , Pharmacists/economics , Pharmacists/standards , Retrospective Studies
16.
Cuad. gest. prof. aten. prim. (Ed. impr.) ; 8(4): 167-178, oct. 2002. tab, ilus
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-21294

ABSTRACT

El Servei Català de la Salut (CatSalut) ha puesto en marcha una prueba piloto para evaluar la implantación de un sistema de compra de base poblacional en cinco zonas de Cataluña. El objetivo del nuevo modelo de compra es estimular la creación de sistemas de salud integrados (SSI), mediante la alianza de los proveedores que operan en un territorio. A cambio de cubrir una cartera de servicios para una población definida geográficamente, el SSI recibe una asignación per cápita ajustada por variables de necesidad en salud. Este artículo analiza la adecuación del diseño del nuevo modelo de compra, a partir de un marco conceptual sobre fórmulas de asignación per cápita. La principal debilidad del modelo, desde el punto de vista de la equidad, reside en la inexistencia de la redistribución global de los recursos en toda Cataluña utilizando una fórmula de asignación capitativa. Desde la perspectiva de la integración asistencial, las dificultades más importantes son los incentivos insuficientes a la coordinación que presenta la fórmula diseñada y la escasa autonomía de gestión de algunos de los proveedores que participan en la prueba. La propuesta para mejorar la equidad del modelo consiste en redistribuir globalmente los recursos a través de la asignación per cápita a las Regiones Sanitarias del CatSalut y, posteriormente, para la asignación a las redes de proveedores integradas. Con el fin de fortalecer los incentivos a coordinar se sugiere la transferencia de una cápita global al SSI, en lugar de fragmentada por entidad (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Health Systems Plans/economics , Cost Allocation/methods , Spain
17.
Alaska Med ; 44(2): 30-4, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12162074

ABSTRACT

The injury death rate in Alaska for American Indians and Alaska Natives is more than triple the injury death rate for the United States. We examined the direct medical expenditures for injury-related hospitalizations to one Alaska Native health care system, the Tanana Chiefs Conference in Interior Alaska, to identify priorities for injury prevention and to promote efforts at prevention. The total expenditure for the 511 injuries resulting in hospitalizations from 1994-1998 was $4,145,440. Suicide attempts, falls, and acts of violence were the most frequent causes of injury hospitalization. Injuries caused by acts of violence, suicide attempts, and falls had the highest overall expenditures. On a per-victim basis, unintentional injuries involving the use of firearms and snowmobile/all-terrain vehicle injuries were the most expensive. We hope this report will raise the visibility of injuries as a prevention priority for Alaska Native communities, Native health systems, and community action programs.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Health Systems Plans/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Accidental Falls/economics , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Alaska , Firearms , Health Care Costs , Humans , Off-Road Motor Vehicles , Suicide, Attempted/economics , Suicide, Attempted/prevention & control , United States , Violence/economics , Violence/prevention & control , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/mortality
19.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 26(4): 799-809, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9439956

ABSTRACT

More patients will have managed care in the future. Therefore, every practice should have a strategy for working with managed care organizations (MCOs). Learn how to evaluate an MCO and how to obtain detailed information about MCOs in your area. Know how to market your practice and build relationships between your group and MCOs. Develop a practice profile that outlines all the benefits that your group can bring to an MCO. Plan how you will respond when an MCO says, "No."


Subject(s)
Gastroenterology/trends , Health Systems Plans/trends , Managed Care Programs/trends , Marketing of Health Services/trends , Gastroenterology/economics , Health Systems Plans/economics , Humans , Managed Care Programs/economics , Marketing of Health Services/economics , Program Evaluation , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...