[Primary renal triple expressor DLBCL treated with chemotherapy under continuous hemodialysis and filtration support].

A 69-year-old woman was previously treated with antibiotics for suspected pyelonephritis due to fever but showed limited improvement. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed heterogeneous areas of decreased contrast enhancement in both kidneys, along with an elevated soluble level of the IL-2 receptor (5,090 U/ml), and thus the patient was referred to our department for further evaluation. A percutaneous renal biopsy performed due to suspected malignant lymphoma confirmed lymphoma cell infiltration into the renal interstitium. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for MYC/BCL2/BCL6, leading to the diagnosis of stage IVB primary renal triple expressor diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Due to acute kidney injury, continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) was initiated, followed by rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy. The patient's renal function improved rapidly, and complete response was achieved after six cycles of R-CHOP. Although DLBCL is a common lymphoma, the primary renal subtype is extremely rare and poses both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This case highlights the potential clinical implications of combining CHDF with chemotherapy to achieve complete response despite an initial poor prognosis based on the patient's overall clinical condition and pathology.

A chronic intermittent haemodialysis pig model for functional evaluation of dialysis membranes.

Performance evaluation of new dialysis membranes is primarily performed in vitro, which can lead to differences in clinical results. Currently, data on dialysis membrane performance and safety are available only for haemodialysis patients. Herein, we aimed to establish an in vivo animal model of dialysis that could be extrapolated to humans. We created a bilateral nephrectomy pig model of renal failure, which placed a double-lumen catheter with the hub exposed dorsally. Haemodialysis was performed in the same manner as in humans, during which clinically relevant physiologic data were evaluated. Next, to evaluate the utility of this model, the biocompatibility of two kinds of membranes coated with or without vitamin E used in haemodiafiltration therapy were compared. Haemodialysis treatment was successfully performed in nephrectomized pigs under the same dialysis conditions (4 h per session, every other day, for 2 weeks). In accordance with human clinical data, regular dialysis alleviated renal failure in pigs. The vitamin E-coated membrane showed a significant reduction rate of advanced oxidation protein products during dialysis than non-coated membrane. In conclusion, this model mimics the pathophysiology and dialysis condition of patients undergoing haemodialysis. This dialysis treatment model of renal failure will be useful for evaluating the performance and safety of dialysis membranes.

Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion for uremic toxin removal in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To delineate the efficacy and safety profile of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) for uremic toxin removal in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). METHODS: Patients who have been on MHD for a period of at least 3 months were enrolled. Each subject underwent one HFR and one hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatment. Blood samples were collected before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment to test uremic toxin levels and to calculate clearance rate. The primary efficacy endpoint was to compare uremic toxin levels of indoxyl sulfate (IS), λ-free light chains (λFLC), and ß2-microglobulin (ß2-MG) before and after HFR treatment. Secondary efficacy endpoints was to compare the levels of urea, interleukin-6 (IL-6), P-cresol, chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40), leptin (LEP), hippuric acid (HPA), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) before and after HFR treatment. The study also undertook a comparative analysis of uremic toxin clearance between a single HFR and HDF treatment. Meanwhile, the lever of serum albumin and branched-chain amino acids before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment were compared. In terms of safety, the study was meticulous in recording vital signs and the incidence of adverse events throughout its duration. RESULTS: The study enrolled 20 patients. After a single HFR treatment, levels of IS, λFLC, ß2-MG, IL-6, P-cresol, YKL-40, LEP, HPA, TMAO, ADMA, TNF-α, and FGF23 significantly decreased (p < 0.001 for all). The clearance rates of λFLC, ß2-MG, IL-6, LEP, and TNF-α were significantly higher in HFR compared to HDF (p values: 0.036, 0.042, 0.041, 0.019, and 0.036, respectively). Compared with pre-HFR and post-HFR treatment, levels of serum albumin, valine, and isoleucine showed no significant difference (p > 0.05), while post-HDF, levels of serum albumin significantly decreased (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: HFR treatment effectively eliminates uremic toxins from the bloodstream of patients undergoing MHD, especially protein-bound toxins and large middle-molecule toxins. Additionally, it retains essential physiological compounds like albumin and branched-chain amino acids, underscoring its commendable safety profile.

Relationship between effective blood flow rate and clinical outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a single-center study.

The association between blood flow rate (BFR) and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) is inconclusive. This retrospective study included 175 patients undergoing MHD treatment between July 2015 and March 2022, divided into two groups based on time-averaged effective blood flow rate (eBFR) median value. We investigated arteriovenous fistula (AVF) outcomes and the association of eBFR with all-cause mortality and new major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Mean ± SD and median time-averaged eBFR values were 276 ± 24 and 275 mL/min, respectively. After adjusting for relevant factors including age, sex, vintage, diabetes, CVD, receiving hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatment and spKt/V, Cox models indicated a low time-averaged eBFR (≤ 275 ml/min) was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 14.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.14-64.1) and new MACE (HR 3.76; 95% CI, 1.91-7.40) in MHD patients. Continuous Cox models demonstrated each 20 ml/min increase in eBFR linked to a 63% decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23-0.59) and a 38% decrease in the occurrence of new MACE (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84). There was no significant difference in AVF outcomes between the two groups. Our study noted higher eBFR (>275 mL/min) is associated with lower risks of both all-cause mortality and new MACE compared with low eBFR (≤275 mL/min). Increased eBFR is not associated with a higher risk of AVF failure.

Effects of haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration compared with haemodialysis on prognosis in patients with end-stage renal disease: protocol an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials with trial sequential analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Haemodialysis is the most common treatment option for patients with life-sustaining end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In recent years, haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration has been widely used in patients with ESKD, and there are still conflicting findings as to whether both are superior to traditional haemodialysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to determine whether haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration is more effective than haemodialysis in reducing all-cause mortality risk in patients with ESKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a systematic PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library and Scopus search, including studies published before September 2023. Randomised controlled trials will be included exploring the effects of haemodiafiltration or haemofiltration compared with haemodialysis on prognosis in patients with ESKD. Outcomes of interest include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, dialysis adequacy and adverse effects. The Cochrane Collaboration tools (ROB-2) will assess the bias risk. Available data will be used to calculate effect sizes. Heterogeneity between studies will be evaluated with I2. The trial sequential analysis will be used to eliminate false-positive results. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis was deemed exempt from ethics review. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and research conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023464509.

Hemodiafiltration: a synergy yet to be convincing.

The desperate attempt to improve mortality, morbidity, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in patients on hemodialysis has led to multiple attempts to improve the different modes, frequencies, and durations of dialysis sessions in the last few decades. Nothing has been more appealing than the combination of diffusion and convection in the form of hemodiafiltration. Despite the concrete evidence of better clearance of middle weight molecules and better hemodynamic stability, tangible evidence to support the universal adoption is still at a distance. Survival benefits seen in selected groups who are likely to tolerate hemodiafiltration with better vascular access and with lower comorbid burden, need to be extended to real life dialysis patients who are older than the population studied and have significantly higher comorbid burden. Technical demands of initiation hemodiafiltration, the associated costs, and the incremental benefits targeted, along with patient-reported outcomes, need to be explored further before recommending hemodiafiltration as the mode of choice.

Experience with Tandem Pre-Dilution Online Hemodiafiltration and Centrifugal Plasma Exchange in Pretransplant Desensitization for Abo-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: In the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) as antibody removal therapy for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation, it is technically possible to perform online hemodiafiltration (OHDF) and TPE simultaneously for patients who are receiving OHDF. In this study, we report tandem therapy of pre-dilution OHDF and centrifugal plasma exchange (cTPE), instead of membrane plasma exchange, which is the mainstay of TPE in Japan. METHODS: A total of 14 sessions of tandem cTPE and pre-dilution OHDF were performed as preoperative antibody removal therapy for 6 ABOi kidney transplant recipients. cTPE intra-circuit pressure, decreased antibody titer, and adverse events were evaluated. The study was carried out following the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and Istanbul. Donors were not prisoners or individuals who were coerced or paid. RESULTS: The tandem therapy was completed safely in 12 of the 14 sessions, with no problems such as pressure upper and lower limit alarms or circuit coagulation. In 2 sessions, the tandem therapy had to be interrupted due to coagulation on the dialysis circuit side. Antibody titers were reduced by a median of 3-fold for both IgG and IgM. There was no acute antibody-associated rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In preoperative apheresis therapy for ABOi kidney transplantation, tandem therapy of pre-dilution OHDF and cTPE may be a useful treatment option that can be performed safely and results in sufficient reduction of antibody levels.

[Clinical practice guideline for quality control of hemodiafiltration].

This guideline was co-authored by a writing committee of experts in hemodiafiltration. Based on the current evidence-based resources, the guideline drew on and referred to the current relevant clinical practice guidelines and expert recommendations at home and abroad, as well as the Standard Operating Procedures for Blood Purification (2021 Edition), focusing on clinical and medical quality control issues such as the indications for hemodiafiltration, the selection of treatment modes, the selection of replacement fluid and the adjustment of components, vascular access, anticoagulation therapy, prescription setting, and prevention and treatment of related complications. The guideline aimed to guide the clinical practice and clinical research of hemodiafiltration in China, and improve the standardization, normalization and homogeneity of medical quality of hemodiafiltration.

Clinical Efficacy and Long-term Prognosis of High Flux Hemodialysis Combined with Different Frequency Hemodiafiltration in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Uremia.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze the clinical efficacy and long-term prognosis of high flux hemodialysis (HFHD) combined with different frequency hemodiafiltration (HDF) in uremic patients. METHODS: 86 middle-aged and elderly patients with uremia were divided into the HF group (HFHD combined with high-frequency HDF) and the LF group (HFHD combined with low-frequency HDF). The changes between the two groups in various indicators after 12 months of dialysis and the survival rate at 5 years of follow-up were compared. We used SPSS 25.0 software for data analysis. RESULTS: The differences of the levels of serum albumin, hemoglobin and transferrin in HF Group was significantly higher than LF Group before and after treatment (P < .05). The differences of the levels and clearance rate of calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, ß2-microglobulin and cysteine protease inhibitor C in the patients' blood after dialysis were significantly higher in HF Group than in LF Group (P < .05). The all-cause mortality rate, new cardiovascular event rate, new cerebrovascular event rate, and new infection event rate of HF Group were significantly lower than those of LFHD group, respectively (P < .05). The LF Group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality events, new cardiovascular cerebrovascular and infectious events than the HF Group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: 1 week/time HDF combined with HFHD can more effectively eliminate the vascular related toxins in middle-aged and elderly patients with uremia, improve their nutritional status, treatment effect, and long-term prognosis.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7864.

Most recently developed polyester polymer alloy dialyzer: A new medium cut-off membrane?

BACKGROUND: New versions of the polyester polymer alloy (PEPA) membrane have appeared over the years, with increases in both the pore size and the amount of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to optimize hydrophilicity performance. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the most recently developed PEPA dialyzer, the FDY series, in hemodialysis (HD) modality in terms of uremic toxin removal and albumin loss and to compare it with that of several high-flux dialyzers currently used in HD and post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in 21 patients. All patients underwent six dialysis sessions with the same routine dialysis parameters; only the dialyzer and/or the dialysis modality varied: FX80 in HD, FDY 180 in HD, Clearum HS17 in HDF, Elisio 19H in HDF, Vitapes 180 in HDF, and FX80 in post-dilution HDF. The reduction ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, λFLC, and albumin were compared intraindividually. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured. RESULTS: Both membranes FDY and FX80 are high-flux dialyzers and are applied here in high-flux HD. The average RR of ß2-microglobulin was slightly lower in the two HD treatments than in the HDF treatments. Comparison of dialysis treatments revealed that the PEPA FDY dialyzer in the HD modality was more effective than the FX80 dialyzer in high-flux HD and was as effective as post-dilution HDF, especially in terms of myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, and λFLC RRs. The FDY treatments obtained similar albumin RR in blood and slightly higher dialysate albumin loss, although the values were clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The most recently developed PEPA dialyzers in the HD modality were as effective as all treatments in the HDF modality and were clearly superior to high-flux helixone HD treatment. These results confirm that this dialyzer should be categorized within the medium cut-off (MCO) membrane classification.

Removal of inflammatory factors and prognosis of patients with septic shock complicated with acute kidney injury by hemodiafiltration combined with HA330-II hemoperfusion.

INTRODUCTION: To explore the effect of CRRT using CVVHDF + HP on the removal of inflammatory mediators in patients with septic shock complicated with AKI. METHODS: A total of 20 patients between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, were included. The patients were randomly divided into the treatment group (CVVHDF + HP) and the control group (CVVHDF). Changes in inflammatory factors, including IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, PCT, and CRP were compared. Other observed measures were also analyzed, for example, Lac, Scr, BUN, SOFA, and norepinephrine (NE) dosage. The clinical outcomes of both groups were followed up for 28 days. RESULTS: The IL-6 and PCT levels in the treatment group were significantly lower (p = 0.005, 0.007). Although the IL-1ß, TNFα, and CRP levels in the treatment group decreased, there were no statistical differences (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in Lac, SOFA, and NE dosage levels between both groups (p = 0.023, 0.01, 0.023). Survival analysis showed that the 28-day survival rate was significantly higher in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: CRRT using CVVHDF+HP can effectively remove inflammatory factors and improve the prognosis of patients.

Controversy on the CONVINCE study findings: the PRO take.

The CONVINCE study, recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, reveals a groundbreaking 23% reduction in the relative risk of all-cause mortality among end-stage kidney patients undergoing high convective volume hemodiafiltration. This significant finding challenges the conventional use of high-flux hemodialysis and offers hope for improving outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients. While some controversies surround the study's findings, including concerns about generalizability and the causes of death, it is essential to acknowledge the study's design and its main outcomes. The CONVINCE study, part of the HORIZON 2020 project, enrolled 1360 patients and demonstrated the superiority of hemodiafiltration in reducing all-cause mortality overall, as well as in specific patient subgroups (elderly, short vintage, non-diabetic, and those without cardiac issues). Interestingly, it was shown that hemodiafiltration had a protective effect against infection, including COVID-19. Future research will address sustainability, dose scaling effects, identification of subgroups especially likely to benefit and cost-effectiveness. However, for now, the findings strongly support a broader adoption of hemodiafiltration in renal replacement therapy, marking a significant advancement in the field.

The highlights of dialysis in 2023 / Les temps forts en dialyse en 2023

There has been a wealth of new developments in dialysis this year with the publication of several trials relating to dialysis technique, physical activity and the use of new dialysis treatments. Quality of life should be assessed and managed in all dialysis patients. Lowering the temperature of the dialysis bath in the MyTemp trial does not appear to have an effect on mortality and cardiovascular events. High volume convective hemodiafiltration currently represents the reference technique in hemodialysis; the Convince study confirms its superiority in terms of all-cause mortality. The DIATT study shows the benefit of the presence of an adapted physical activity professional to promote physical activity in dialysis patients and shows that it is necessary for this support to be reimbursed. The RENAL-AF and AXADIA-AFNET 8 studies lack power to conclude on the use of new oral anticoagulants in hemodialysis. For angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, studies are too weak to allow their use. SGLT2 inhibitors could be used in peritoneal dialysis to increase diuresis or delay the appearance of peritoneal fibrosis but to date only studies on models animals exist. Factor XI inhibitors are a new therapeutic class that could be used and would reduce the risk of thrombosis and hemorrhage. Increasingly, the feelings of patients and caregivers are more and more taken into account. Patient/caregiver communication must be at the heart of care. We will also be looking at the conservative treatment, the management of pruritus in hemodialysis and finally the care of patients with calciphylaxis.

Les nouveautés en dialyse ont été riches cette année avec la publication de plusieurs essais touchant aussi bien à la technique de dialyse, à l'activité physique et à l'utilisation de nouveaux traitements en dialyse. La qualité de vie doit être évaluée et prise en charge chez tous les patients dialysés. La baisse de température du bain de dialyse dans l'essai MyTemp ne semble pas avoir d'effet sur la mortalité et les événements cardiovasculaires. L'hémodiafiltration haut volume convectif représente la technique de référence en hémodialyse dialyse actuellement : l'étude Convince confirme sa supériorité en termes de mortalité toute cause. L'étude DIATT montre l'intérêt de la présence d'un professionnel en activité physique adaptée pour favoriser l'activité physique chez les patients dialysés et montre qu'il est nécessaire que cette prise en charge soit remboursée. Les études RENAL-AF et AXADIA-AFNET 8 manquent de puissance pour conclure sur l'utilisation des nouveaux anticoagulants oraux en hémodialyse. Pour les angiontensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, les études sont trop faibles pour permettre leur utilisation. Les inhibiteurs des cotransporteurs sodium-glucose de type 2 (iSGLT2) pourraient être utilisés en dialyse péritonéale pour augmenter la diurèse ou retarder l'apparition de la fibrose péritonéale mais, à ce jour, seules des études sur modèles animaux existent. Les inhibiteurs du facteur XI sont une nouvelle classe thérapeutique qui pourrait être utilisée et diminuerait le risque de thrombose et d'hémorragie. Le ressenti des patients et aidants est de plus en plus pris en compte. La communication patients/soignants doit être au cœur de la prise en charge. Seront abordés également le traitement conservateur, la prise en charge du prurit en hémodialyse et le soin des patients atteints de calciphylaxie.

Is hemodiafiltration superior to high-flow hemodialysis in reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in kidney failure patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Hemodiafiltration (HDF) and high-flux hemodialysis (hf-HD) are different methods of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) used for the treatment of kidney failure patients. A debate has raged over the last decade about the survival benefit of patients with the use of HDF compared with hf-HD, but with divergent results from randomized controlled trials. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare HDF and hf-HD regarding all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched until July 19, 2023, for randomized clinical trials comparing HDF and hf-HD in patients on maintenance dialysis. A meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.1, applying fixed or random effect models according to the heterogeneity between studies. FINDINGS: Of the 496 studies found, five met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the hf-HD group, the risk ratio (RR) for all-cause mortality with HDF use was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.88, I2 = 0%). HDF was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality, although the sensitivity analysis showed that the result differed between scenarios. Subgroup analysis showed lower all-cause mortality among patients without diabetes in the HDF group compared with hf-HD (RR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81, I2 = 0%), but not in diabetic patients (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65-1.12, I2 = 0.0%). A subgroup analysis considering convection volumes was not performed, but the studies with the highest weight in the meta-analysis described convection volume as more than 20 L/session. DISCUSSION: More clinical studies considering critical risk factors, such as advanced age and preexisting cardiovascular disease, are needed to confirm the supremacy of HDF over hf-HD on the survival of patients treated by these two forms of kidney replacement therapy.

Successful treatment of a severe 5-hydroxytrytophan intoxication using carbon hemoperfusion, hemodiafiltration, and mechanical ventilation in a dog.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the successful use of carbon hemoperfusion and hemodiafiltration in combination with mechanical ventilation (MV) to treat a severe intoxication of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) in a dog. CASE SUMMARY: A dog ingested a minimum of 550 mg/kg of extended-release 5-HTP, resulting in serotonin syndrome that progressed to a comatose state and severe hypoventilation requiring MV. Extracorporeal carbon hemoperfusion coupled with hemodiafiltration was performed to remove 5-HTP from this patient. A carbon hemoperfusion cartridge was placed in series upstream in the extracorporeal circuit from the hemodialyzer. A total of 46.5 L of blood (4.89 L/kg) was processed during a 4.85-hour treatment. Serial plasma samples were obtained at 0, 60, 90, and 150 minutes during the session and 14 hours after the session. These samples were later analyzed for 5-HTP and serotonin concentrations. The extraction ratio of 5-HTP was 93.6%-98.9% through the carbon filter. The dog was weaned from MV within 8 hours after extracorporeal therapy and, after a full recovery, was successfully discharged. NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED: Despite an extensive review of the available literature, this appears to be the first reported case of using a carbon hemoperfusion, hemodiafiltration, and MV to treat severe serotonin syndrome secondary to 5-HTP intoxication in a dog. The combination of carbon hemoperfusion and hemodiafiltration can significantly reduce plasma 5-HTP concentrations after acute intoxication and may serve to decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with severe intoxication.

Anti-inflammatory effect of high flux dialyzer surface area 2.6m2 in high flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

Dialysis therapy has remarkably evolved through the innovation in dialyzers and hemodialysis modalities, enhancing patients' quality of life. The efficacy of dialysis can be determined by measuring the reduction ratio (RR) of middle molecules such as Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Procalcitonin. In our study, we tested a high-flux dialyzer, BIOPURE (Biorema) 260 HF, with a surface area (SA) of 2.6 m2, in terms of IL-6 and Procalcitonin removal while performing high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). This crossover study comprised 25 patients who received a session of HF-HD using the BIOPURE (Biorema) 260 H, followed by a session of post-dilution OL-HDF. A washout period of 2 weeks was instilled between the two sessions, during which the patients received HF-HD using high-flux dialyzers (maximum SA 2.0 m2). All patients' pre/post dialysis concentrations of IL-6 and procalcitonin were measured. The dialyzer used in this study resulted in a significant IL-6 RR of 44.92±5.11% (p <0.001) with HDF and 32.48±5.72% (p <0.001) with HF-HD; and a procalcitonin RR of 50.32±3.94% (p <0.001) with HDF and 41.80±4.32% (p <0.001) with HF-HD. In conclusion, the dialyzer BIOPURE (Biorema) 260 HF (SA 2.6 m2) is efficient in eliminating IL-6 and procalcitonin, especially with OL-HDF compared to HF-HD, with acceptable albumin loss in the dialysate.

Comparison of citrate dialysate in pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration: effect on clot formation and adequacy of dialysis in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Citrate dialysate (CD) has been successfully used in conventional hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy; however, no study has compared pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (oL-HDF). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of citrate anticoagulation for oL-HDF and the metabolic changes and quality of life of patients on hemodialysis treated using both modes. METHOD: Eight dialysis patients were treated with CD containing 0.8 mmol of citric acid for 4 weeks in each phase. Visual clotting scores were investigated as the primary endpoints. Adequacy of dialysis, laboratory parameters, and quality of life were measured as secondary objectives. RESULTS: The mean clotting scores in the pre-dilution mode were significantly lower than those in the post-dilution mode and in all phases except the heparin-free phase (p < 0.001 in the baseline phase, p = 0.001 in phase 1, and p = 0.023 in phase 2). The values of Kt/V in both modalities were comparable except during the baseline phase, in which the values of pre-dilution were significantly greater than post-dilution (2.36 ± 0.52/week vs. 1.87 ± 0.33/week;95% CI -0.81 to -0.19, p = 0.002). The patient's quality of life regarding their physical activity level was significantly higher in the post-dilution mode than in the pre-dilution mode at baseline and in phase 1 (p = 0.014 and 0.004 at baseline and in phase 1, respectively). Metabolic changes did not differ between the two modes. CONCLUSION: Citrate dialysate decreased or prevented anticoagulation in both pre- and post-dilution modes of oL-HDF without significant side effects and had comparable adequacy of dialysis.

On the total albumin losses during haemocatharsis.

Excessive albumin losses during HC (haemocatharsis) are considered a potential cause of hypoalbuminemia-a key risk factor for mortality. This review on total albumin losses considers albumin "leaking" into the dialysate and losses due to protein/membrane interactions (i.e. adsorption, "secondary membrane formation" and denaturation). The former are fairly easy to determine, usually varying at the level of ~ 2 g to ~ 7 g albumin loss per session. Such values, commonly accepted as representative of the total albumin losses, are often quoted as limits/standards of permissible albumin loss per session. On albumin mass lost due to adsorption/deposition, which is the result of complicated interactions and rather difficult to determine, scant in vivo data exist and there is great uncertainty and confusion regarding their magnitude; this is possibly responsible for neglecting their contribution to the total losses at present. Yet, many relevant in vitro studies suggest that losses of albumin due to protein/membrane interactions are likely comparable to (or even greater than) those due to leaking, particularly in the currently favoured high-convection HDF (haemodiafiltration) treatment. Therefore, it is emphasised that top research priority should be given to resolve these issues, primarily by developing appropriate/facile in vivo test-methods and related analytical techniques.