Early predictors of severe left main and/or three-vessel disease in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A dual-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of patients concomitant with left main and/or three-vessel disease (LM/3VD) and high SYNTAX score (SS) is crucial for determining the most effective revascularization options regarding the use of antiplatelet medications and prognosis risk stratification. However, there is a lack of study for predictors of LM/3VD with SS in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We aimed to identify potential factors that could predict LM/3VD with high SS (SS > 22) in patients with NSTEMI. METHODS: This dual-center retrospective study included a total of 481 patients diagnosed with NSTEMI who performed coronary angiography procedures. Clinical factors on admission were collected. The patients were divided into non-LM/3VD, Nonsevere LM/3VD (SS ≤ 22), and Severe LM/3VD (SS > 22) groups. To identify independent predictors, Univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted on the clinical parameters. RESULTS: A total of 481 patients were included, with an average age of 60.9 years and 75.9% being male. Among these patients, 108 individuals had severe LM/3VD. Based on the findings of a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the extent of ST-segment elevation observed in lead aVR (OR: 7.431, 95% CI: 3.862-14.301, p < .001) and age (OR: 1.050, 95% CI: 1.029-1.071, p < .001) were identified as independent predictors of severe LM/3VD. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that the age of patients and the extent of ST-segment elevation observed in lead aVR on initial electrocardiogram were the independent predictive factors of LM/3VD with high SS in patients with NSTEMI.

Prognosis of cardiogenic shock with and without acute myocardial infarction: results from a prospective, monocentric registry.

OBJECTIVE: The study investigates the prognostic impact of cardiogenic shock (CS) stratified by the presence or absence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) related mortality in CS patients remains unacceptably high despite improvement concerning the treatment of CS patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CS from 2019 to 2021 were included monocentrically. The prognostic impact of CS related to AMI was compared to patients without AMI-related CS. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier analyses, multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses and propensity score matching. RESULTS: 273 CS patients were included (AMI-related CS: 49%; non-AMI-related CS: 51%). The risk of 30-day all-cause mortality was increased in patients with AMI-related CS (64% vs. 47%; HR = 1.653; 95% CI 1.199-2.281; p = 0.002), which was still observed after multivariable adjustment (HR = 1.696; 95% CI 1.153-2.494; p = 0.007). Even after propensity score matching (i.e., 87 matched pairs), AMI was still an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (HR = 1.524; 95% CI 1.020-2.276; p = 0.040). In contrast, non-ST-segment AMI (NSTEMI) and STEMI were associated with comparable prognosis (log-rank p = 0.528). CONCLUSION: AMI-related CS was associated with increased 30-day all-cause mortality compared to patients with CS not related to AMI. In contrast, the prognosis of STEMI- and NSTEMI-CS patients was comparable.

Association between anaemia and long-term prognosis in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The majority of existing studies examining the association between anaemia and the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have focused on all patients with ACS without further categorisation. As a result, there is a dearth of research specifically exploring the relationship between anaemia and the long-term prognosis of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). To address this gap, this study aimed to investigate the correlation between anaemia and the long-term prognosis of NSTEMI patients. METHODS: This study included 482 NSTEMI patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from September 1, 2016 to May 31, 2022, and the patients were classified into the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) group and non-MACEs group according to whether or not they had developed MACE as of February 28, 2023 at follow-up.COX regression analysis was used to assess whether anaemia was an independent factor influencing MACE occurrence in patients with NSTEMI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine if haemoglobin levels could enhance the predictive capacity of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score for the prognosis of NSTEMI patients. Haemoglobin levels were categorised into two groups based on the optimal cut-off value and transformed into binary data. The log-rank test was performed to compare the two groups, and a risk function was plotted. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 31 months, 124 (25.7%) MACE were identified. Univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses revealed that sex, age, smoking history, diabetes, creatinine, erythrocyte count, and haemoglobin level were independent risk factors that significantly influenced survival time. Subsequently, ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of specific variables. When the cut-off value for the decline ratio of haemoglobin was set at 128.50, the area under the curve (AUC) was determined to be 0.604, with a sensitivity of 0.403 and a specificity of 0.771. Similarly, setting the cut-off value for the reduction ratio of the GRACE score at 141.5 yielded an AUC of 0.700, with a sensitivity of 0.645 and a specificity of 0.709. Furthermore, when the cut-off value for the predicted probability of haemoglobin combined with the GRACE score was 0.270, the AUC was calculated as 0.702, with a sensitivity of 0.677 and a specificity of 0.696. CONCLUSION: Haemoglobin levels were identified as an independent factor influencing the survival duration of patients with NSTEMI.

Resistive index as predictor of acute kidney injury in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Early detection of AKI is likely to speed diagnosis and implementation of measures to preserve renal function. To evaluate if renal Doppler resistive index (RI) would predict AKI in patients with NSTEMI on presentation in the emergency department. METHODS: Patients with NSTEMI at the emergency department were included. The renal Doppler RI was measured. Baseline demographic data and clinical characteristics of patients at admittance were recorded. Based on discharge diagnosis, the patients were divided into AKI group and no-AKI group. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictor variables significantly associated with AKI. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were included in the analysis; 44 (15.0%) developed AKI without need for dialysis. There were statistical differences in the age, incidence of diabetes mellitus and cerebrovascular disease, beta-receptor blockers, serum creatinine and renal index between the two groups. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, age [OR 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.595-2.585; p = 0.027], diabetes mellitus (OR 2.007, 95% CI: 1.489-2.793; p = 0.014), serum creatinine (OR 1.817, 95% CI: 1.568-2.319; p = 0.013), and RI (OR 2.168, 95% CI: 1.994-4.019; p = 0.003) predicted AKI in patients with NSTEMI. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, RI showed a significantly increased area under the curve (AUC) compared to serum creatitine (AUC: 0.891 vs 0.679; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Renal Doppler RI may be a useful predictor of AKI in patients with NSTEMI in the emergency department.

Outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by in-hospital cardiac arrest based on management strategy.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) complicating non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) based on management strategy. METHODS: We used National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017) to identify adults with NSTEMI (not undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting) and concomitant IHCA. The cohort was stratified based on use of early (hospital day 0) or delayed (≥hospital day 1) coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical management. Outcomes included incidence of IHCA, in-hospital mortality, adverse events, length of stay, and hospitalization costs. RESULTS: Of 6,583,662 NSTEMI admissions, 375,873 (5.7 %) underwent early CAG, 1,133,143 (17.2 %) received delayed CAG, 2,326,391 (35.3 %) underwent PCI, and 2,748,255 (41.7 %) admissions were managed medically. The medical management cohort was older, predominantly female, and with higher comorbidities. Overall, 63,085 (1.0 %) admissions had IHCA, and incidence of IHCA was highest in the medical management group (1.4 % vs 1.1 % vs 0.7 % vs 0.6 %, p < 0.001) compared to early CAG, delayed CAG and PCI groups, respectively. In adjusted analysis, early CAG (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.67 [95 % confidence interval {CI} 0.65-0.69]; p < 0.001), delayed CAG (aOR 0.49 [95 % CI 0.48-0.50]; p < 0.001), and PCI (aOR 0.42 [95 % CI 0.41-0.43]; p < 0.001) were associated with lower incidence of IHCA compared to medical management. Compared to medical management, early CAG (adjusted OR 0.53, CI: 0.49-0.58), delayed CAG (adjusted OR 0.34, CI: 0.32-0.36) and PCI (adjusted OR 0.19, CI: 0.18-0.20) were associated with lower in-hospital mortality (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early CAG and PCI in NSTEMI was associated with lower incidence of IHCA and lower mortality among NSTEMI-IHCA admissions.

Impact of Acute Myocardial Infarction Type on Prognosis in Female Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.

There are limited data about mid-term prognosis according to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) type in female patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). In this study, we evaluated the impact of AMI type on prognosis in female patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI complicated by CS. A total of 184 female patients who underwent PCI for AMI complicated by CS were enrolled from 12 centers in the Republic of Korea. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to AMI type: the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 114) and the non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 70) group. Primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization). Propensity-score matching analysis was performed to reduce selection bias and potential confounding factors. During 12-month follow-up, a total of 73 MACEs occurred (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction group, 47 [41.2%] vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction group, 26 [37.1%], p = 0.643). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant difference in the incidence of MACE at 12 months between the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 2.37, p = 0.646). After propensity-score matching, the incidence of MACE at 12 months remained similar between the 2 groups (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 2.52, p = 0.413). The similarity in MACEs between the 2 groups was consistent across a variety of subgroups. In conclusion, after adjusting for baseline differences, AMI clinical type did not appear to increase the risk of MACEs at 12 months in female patients who underwent emergency PCI for AMI complicated by CS.

Prevalence and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Concomitant Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Results from the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2019).

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) may concomitantly occur with acute ischemic stroke. The incidence and outcomes of acute non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) in acute ischemic stroke are not well studied. We examined hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke and a concomitant NSTEMI diagnosis who were included in the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2019. Acute ischemic stroke and NSTEMI were defined by using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patients with ST-elevation MI were excluded. The outcomes were expressed as percentages. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of concomitant acute ischemic stroke and NSTEMI with the primary outcome of mortality and the secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of patients with NSTEMI with acute ischemic stroke that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (angiography and angioplasty) was also performed. Of the total hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke (n = 1,726,265), 1.60% (n = 27,630) patients (mean age 73.5 years, 52.2% women, 67% White race) had NSTEMI diagnosed during the hospitalization. Of these, 14.1% (n = 3,890) died in the NSTEMI group and 3.4% (n = 57,670) died in the non-NSTEMI group. The most common outcomes in the NSTEMI group were Acute kidney injury 31.8%, Intracranial hemorrhage 6.6%, and sepsis 6.13%. NSTEMI in acute ischemic stroke was associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] 3.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.29 to 3.93, p ≤0.001), ICH (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.63, p <0.001), and having any of the secondary outcomes (OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.57 to 2.90, p <0.001). PCI was performed in 9.14% of patients with acute ischemic stroke with NSTEMI. PCI was associated with having any of the secondary outcomes (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.02, p = 0.8), mortality (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.54, p <0.001), and ICH (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.7, p = 0.01). In conclusion, NSTEMI in acute ischemic stroke is associated with increased mortality and other adverse events. PCI in the subgroup of patients with NSTEMI was not associated with increased mortality or intracranial bleeding.

Role of Invasive Strategy for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have traditionally been excluded from randomized trials. We aimed to compare percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative management, and early intervention (EI; within 24 hours of admission) versus delayed intervention (DI; after 24 to 72 hours of admission) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and concomitant CKD. An electronic literature search was performed to search for studies comparing invasive management to conservative management or EI versus DI in patients with NSTEMI with CKD. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) or dialysis, major bleeding, and recurrent MI. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the primary outcome and odds ratios for secondary outcomes were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Eleven studies (140,544 patients) were analyzed. Invasive management was associated with lower mortality than conservative management (HR 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.67, p <0.001, I2 = 47%), with consistent benefit across all CKD stages, except CKD 5. There was no significant mortality difference between EI and DI, but subgroup analyses showed significant benefit for EI in stage 1 to 2 CKD (HR 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%), with no significant difference in stage 3 and 4 to 5 CKD. Invasive strategy was associated with higher odds of AKI or dialysis and major bleeding, but lower odds of recurrent MI compared with conservative management. In conclusion, in patients with NSTEMI and CKD, an invasive strategy is associated with significant mortality benefit over conservative management in most patients with CKD, but at the expense of higher risk of AKI and bleeding. EI appears to benefit those with early stages of CKD. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023405491.

Delaying Cardiac Catheterization in Favor of Endoscopy in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Is Associated with Worse Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We evaluated inpatient outcomes of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) before cardiac catheterization in patients with NSTEMI and NVUGIB. METHODS: We utilized the National Readmission Database (2016-2019) to identify all index hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of NSTEMI and a secondary diagnosis of NVUGIB that underwent EGD before cardiac catheterization (cases). A matched comparison cohort of similar hospitalizations that undergo EGD after cardiac catheterization were identified (controls) after 1:1 propensity score matching for age, gender, cardiac comorbidities, causes, and severity of bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 796 cases were matched with 796 controls. There was a higher median length of hospital stay (8 vs. 5 days, P = 0.01) and median hospital charges ($111,218 vs. $99,115, P = 0.002) for cases compared to controls. There was a higher all-cause inpatient mortality in cases compared to controls (5.5% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.26). Furthermore, there was a higher proportion of patients with ICU admission (7% vs. 3%, P < 0.001), septic shock (7.1% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.41), atrial fibrillation (27.1% vs. 19.8%, P < 0.001) and acute kidney injury (42.8% vs. 29.1%, P < 0.001) for cases compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Delaying cardiac catheterization in favor of EGD is associated with increased hospital stay, costs, and cardiac complications. Further studies are warranted to establish our findings.

Risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke in individuals with first-diagnosed paroxysmal vs. non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation under anticoagulation.

AIMS: There is conflicting evidence on whether the type of atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with risk of cardiovascular events, including acute myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the risk of MI and ischemic stroke differs between individuals with first-diagnosed paroxysmal vs. non-paroxysmal AF treated with anticoagulants. METHODS AND RESULTS: De-identified electronic medical records from the TriNetX federated research network were used. Individuals with a new diagnosis of paroxysmal AF who had no evidence of other types of AF in their records were 1:1 propensity score-matched with individuals with non-paroxysmal AF, defined as persistent or chronic AF, who had no evidence of other types of AF in their records. All patients were followed for three years for the outcomes of MI and ischemic stroke. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the propensity-matched cohort, among 24 848 well-matched AF individuals [mean age 74.4 ± 10.4; 10 101 (40.6%) female], 410 (1.7%) were diagnosed with acute MI and 875 (3.5%) with ischemic stroke during the three-year follow-up. Individuals with paroxysmal AF had significantly higher risk of acute MI (HR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.35-2.01) compared to those with non-paroxysmal AF. First diagnosed paroxysmal AF was associated with higher risk of non-ST elevation MI (nSTEMI) (HR: 1.89, 95%CI: 1.44-2.46). No significant association was observed between the type of AF and risk of ischemic stroke (HR: 1.09, 95%CI: 0.95-1.25). CONCLUSION: Patients with first-diagnosed paroxysmal AF had higher risk of acute MI compared to individuals with non-paroxysmal AF, attributed to the higher risk of nSTEMI among patients with first-diagnosed paroxysmal AF. There was no significant association between type of AF and risk of ischemic stroke.

Outcomes of Non-ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction During Chronic Heart Failure and End-Stage Renal Disease.

Non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) occurs frequently in a growing population of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) but outcomes with invasive management approaches are unknown. We sought to determine in-hospital outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with medical management only. The National Inpatient Sample was used to capture hospitalizations in the United States from 2006 to 2019. Admissions for NSTEMI in patients with chronic HF and ESRD were identified by International Classification of Diseases codes. The cohort was divided into those that received PCI or medical management only. In-hospital outcomes were compared by multivariable logistic regression and propensity matching. In 27,433 hospitalizations, 8,004 patients (29%) underwent PCI, and 19,429 (71%) were managed with medications only. PCI was associated with lower adjusted odds of death during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.66, p <0.01). This association remained consistent after propensity matching (adjusted odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.64, p <0.01) and was apparent across all subtypes of HF. Patients with PCI had greater duration (5, 3, to 9 vs, 5, 3 to 8 days, p <0.01) and cost of hospitalization ($107,942, 70,230 to $173,182 vs, $44,156, 24,409 to $80,810, p <0.01). In conclusion, patients with HF and ESRD admitted for NSTEMI experienced lower in-hospital mortality with PCI in comparison with medical therapy only. Invasive percutaneous revascularization may be reasonable for appropriately selected patients with HF and ESRD but randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its safety and efficacy in this high-risk population.

Outcomes Associated With Early vs. Delayed Invasive Strategy in NSTEMI Complicated by High Degree AV Block: A Nationwide Analysis.

Background: High degree atrioventricular block (HDAVB) is an uncommon complication of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) that frequently necessitates pacemaker implantation. This contemporary analysis compares need for pacemaker implantation based on the timing of intervention in acute NSTEMI complicated by HDAVB.Methods: We used 2016-2017 National Inpatient Sample database to identify admissions with NSTEMI and HDAVB. Time to coronary intervention from initial admission was used to segregate the admissions into two groups: early invasive strategy (EIS) (<24 hours) and delayed invasive strategy (DIS) (>24 hours). Multivariable linear and logistic regression analysis was performed to compare in-hospital outcomes among the two groups.Results: Out of 949,984 NSTEMI related admissions, coexistent HDAVB was present in 0.7% (n=6725) patients. Amongst those, 55.61% (n=3740) hospitalizations included invasive intervention (EIS=1320, DIS=2420). Patients treated with EIS were younger (69.95 years vs. 72.38 years, P<0.05) and had concomitant cardiogenic shock. Contrarily, prevalence of chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension was higher in DIS group. EIS was associated with lower length of stay and total hospitalization cost. In-hospital mortality and pacemaker implantation rates were not significantly different between patients in the EIS and DIS groups.Conclusion: HDAVB is a rare complication of NSTEMI and often associated with right coronary artery disease. The timing of revascularization does not appear to influence the rate of pacemaker placement in NSTEMI complicated by HDAVB. Further studies are needed to assess if early invasive strategy can benefit all patients with NSTEMI and HDAVB.

Invasive Versus Conservative Management of NSTEMI Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years. / Manejo Invasivo versus Conservador de Pacientes com IAMSSST Com Idade ≥ 75 Anos.

BACKGROUND: The efficiency of invasive management in older patients (≥75 years) with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains ambiguous. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficiency of invasive management in older patients with NSTEMI based on meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies were included. The primary outcomes were all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. Pooled odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five RCTs and 22 observational studies with 1017374 patients were included. Based on RCT and TSA results, invasive management was associated with lower risks of myocardial infarction (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.40-0.65; I2=0%), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.49-0.77; I2=27.0%), and revascularization (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.15-0.55; I2=5.3%) compared with conservative management. Pooling results from RCTs and observational studies with multivariable adjustment showed consistently lower risks of all-cause death (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.50-0.64; I2=86.4%), myocardial infarction (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.56-0.71; I2=0%), stroke (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.51-0.69; I2=0%), and MACE (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.54-0.76; I2=43.4%). The better prognosis associated with invasive management was also observed in real-world scenarios. However, for patients aged ≥85 years, invasive management may increase the risk of major bleeding (OR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.12-6.42; I2=0%). CONCLUSIONS: Invasive management was associated with lower risks of myocardial infarction, MACE, and revascularization in older patients with NSTEMI, yet it may increase the risk of major bleeding in patients aged ≥85 years.

FUNDAMENTO: A eficiência do manejo invasivo em pacientes mais velhos (≥75 anos) com infarto do miocárdio sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST (IAMSSST) permanece ambígua. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a eficiência do tratamento invasivo em pacientes idosos com IAMSSST com base em metanálise e análise sequencial de estudo (TSA). MÉTODOS: Ensaios clínicos randomizados relevantes (ECR) e estudos observacionais foram incluídos. Os resultados primários foram morte por todas as causas, infarto do miocárdio, acidente vascular cerebral e hemorragia grave. O odd ratio agrupado (OR) e o intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC) foram calculados. P<0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. RESULTADOS: Cinco ECRs e 22 estudos observacionais com 1.017.374 pacientes foram incluídos.Com base nos resultados de ECR e TSA, o manejo invasivo foi associado a menores riscos de infarto do miocárdio (OR: 0,51; 95% IC: 0,40-0,65; I2=0%), eventos cardiovasculares adversos maiores (MACE; OR: 0,61; 95% IC: 0,49-0,77; I2=27,0%) e revascularização (OR: 0,29; 95% IC: 0,15-0,55; I2=5,3%) em comparação com o tratamento conservador. A combinação de resultados de ECRs e estudos observacionais com ajuste multivariável mostrou riscos consistentemente menores de morte por todas as causas (OR: 0,57; IC 95%: 0,50-0,64; I2 = 86,4%), infarto do miocárdio (OR: 0,63; IC 95%: 0,56 -0,71; I2=0%), acidente vascular cerebral (OR: 0,59; 95% IC: 0,51-0,69; I2=0%) e MACE (OR: 0,64; 95% IC: 0,54-0,76; I2=43,4%). O melhor prognóstico associado ao manejo invasivo também foi observado em cenários do mundo real. No entanto, para pacientes com idade ≥85 anos, o manejo invasivo pode aumentar o risco de sangramento maior (OR: 2,68; IC 95%: 1,12-6,42; I2=0%). CONCLUSÕES: O manejo invasivo foi associado a menores riscos de infarto do miocárdio, MACE e revascularização em pacientes idosos com IAMSSST,no entanto, pode aumentar o risco de sangramento maior em pacientes com idade ≥85 anos.

Prognostic role of the left ventricular global function index in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome patients.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of the left ventricular (LV) global function index (LVGFI) in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome after long-term follow-up. Methods: This retrospective study included 718 patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 781 patients with non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The LVGFI was calculated on echocardiography with the following formula: (LV stroke volume/[LV cavity volume + LV myocardial volume]) × 100. Results: Mean LVGFI was higher in the NSTEMI group than in the STEMI group. Decreased LVGFI levels were independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in both the STEMI and the NSTEMI group. Conclusion: Echocardiographic LVGFI may be a useful prognostic screening tool for acute coronary syndrome cohorts.

After a heart attack, poor heart performance is an important cause of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The left ventricular global function index (LVGFI) is a new index that evaluates cardiac performance. Early identification of patients with poor heart performance following a heart attack could prevent the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events and improve survival. This study aimed to explore whether the LVGFI is associated with the risk of MACEs in heart attack patients. We found that a decrease in LVGFI levels was independently associated with MACEs at 3-year follow-up in patients after a heart attack. Accordingly, we showed that an assessment of LVGFI using echocardiography offers a good distinction in identifying patients at risk for MACE after a heart attack. These findings indicate that the LVGFI may be helpful in identifying high-risk patients and optimizing treatment strategies in clinical practice.

A Comprehensive Secondary Prevention Benchmark (2PBM) Score Identifying Differences in Secondary Prevention Care in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to quantify secondary prevention care by creating a secondary prevention benchmark (2PBM) score for patients undergoing ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 472 consecutive ACS patients who completed the ambulatory CR program between 2017 and 2019 were included. Benchmarks for secondary prevention medication and clinical and lifestyle targets were predefined and combined in the comprehensive 2PBM score with maximum 10 points. The association of patient characteristics and achievement rates of components and the 2PBM were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients were on average 62 ± 11 yr of age and predominantly male (n = 406; 86%). The types of ACS were ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 241 patients (51%) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 216 patients (46%). Achievement rates for components of the 2PBM were 71% for medication, 35% for clinical benchmark, and 61% for lifestyle benchmark. Achievement of medication benchmark was associated with younger age (OR = 0.979: 95% CI, 0.959-0.996, P = .021), STEMI (OR = 2.05: 95% CI, 1.35-3.12, P = .001), and clinical benchmark (OR = 1.80: 95% CI, 1.15-2.88, P = .011). Overall ≥8 of 10 points were reached by 77% and complete 2PBM by 16%, which was independently associated with STEMI (OR = 1.79: 95% CI, 1.06-3.08, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Benchmarking with 2PBM identifies gaps and achievements in secondary prevention care. ST-elevation myocardial infarction was associated with the highest 2PBM scores, suggesting best secondary prevention care in patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Clinical and angiographic features of SCAD type 4.

INTRODUCTION: The angiographic type 4 in SCAD is described as a total occlusion of the coronary artery and its management may differ according to its clinical presentation. We previously have observed that these patients present a low incidence of adverse events. Our objective was to describe clinical and angiographic characteristics of this condition, according to its initial management in the DISCO registry. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of consecutive SCAD patients from 26 centres of Italy and Spain (DISCO registry). Angiotype 4 SCAD cases were selected and classified according to the initial treatment chosen: conservative management vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clinical and angiographic characteristics were compared. RESULTS: We recruited 81 (mean age 52.6 ± 11 years) patients with SCAD angiotype 4 out of 302 patients of the DISCO registry. Thirty-eight (46.9%) patients received conservative management and 43 (53.1%) received PCI. Nearly all patients undergoing PCI had ST-segment elevation (93% vs 47.4%, p < 0.0001), the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was more commonly involved (67.4% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.006), and they had more frequent proximal segment involvement (25.6% vs 2.7%, p = 0.004) and longer lesions (46.5 ± 23.2 mm vs 26.4 ± 18.8 mm, p = 0.017). On the other hand, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (52.6% vs 2.3%, p = 0.001) and isolated involvement of secondary branches (55.3 vs 4.7, p < 0.0001) were more common in the conservative management group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCAD angiotype 4 who underwent PCI had a higher frequency of STEMI and involvement of proximal and longer coronary segments, particularly affecting the left anterior descending artery. NSTEMI and isolated involvement of secondary branches were more frequently found in those managed conservatively.

Clinical implication of totally occluded infarct-related coronary artery in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the TOTAL-NSTEMI study.

BACKGROUND: A subset ofpatients found to have total occlusion of the culprit artery (TOCA), present with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and elevated biomarkers. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the TOCA in patients presenting with NSTEMI. METHODS: This multicenter observational study was retrospectively conducted between 2015 and 2019. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades 0-1 was defined as the TOCA. The primary end point included a combination of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. RESULTS: Of 3272 patients, TIMI 0-1 flow in the culprit artery was present in 488 (14.9%) patients. TOCA was more likely to be of thrombotic origin (54.1% vs. 10.3%; P < 0.001) and visible collaterals (22.5% vs. 4.4%; P < 0.001). The rates of 30-day (14.3% vs. 7.2%; P < 0.001) and 2-year (25% vs. 19.1%; P = 0.003) primary end points were significantly higher in TOCA patients. Fatal arrhythmias were remarkably higher at 30-day (8.6% vs. 4%; P < 0.001) and 2-year (9% vs. 5.2%; P = 0.001) follow-ups. Mechanical complications were also higher in patients with TOCA at 30 days (0.8% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.013). Moreover, TOCA (OR, 1.379; P = 0.001) was one of the independent predictors of MACCE in NSTEMI patients. CONCLUSION: The current data suggest that patients with TOCA in the context of NSTEMI are at higher risk of MACCE, fatal arrhythmias, and mechanical complications.

Impact of medications on outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Various inhaled bronchodilators have been associated with cardiovascular safety concerns. This study aimed to investigate the long-term impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the safety of COPD medications in patients after their first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This nationwide cohort study was conducted using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients hospitalized between 2000 and 2012 with a primary diagnosis of first AMI were included and divided into three cohorts (AMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], and non-STEMI [NSTEMI]). Each cohort was propensity score matched (1:1) with patients without COPD. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 186 112 patients with AMI were enrolled, and COPD was diagnosed in 13 065 (7%) patients. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with COPD had a higher mortality risk than those without COPD in all cohorts (AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI). The HR of mortality in AMI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients with COPD was 1.12 (95% CI, 1.09-1.14), 1.20 (95% CI, 1.14-1.25), and 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04-1.10), respectively. Short-acting inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids increased mortality risk in all three cohorts. However, long-acting inhaled bronchodilators reduced mortality risk in patients with AMI (long-acting beta-agonist [LABA]: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94; long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA]: HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.96) and NSTEMI (LABA: HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97; LAMA: HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that AMI patients with COPD had higher mortality rates than those without COPD. Using inhaled short-acting bronchodilators and corticosteroids reduced survival, whereas long-acting bronchodilators provided survival benefits in AMI and NSTEMI patients. Therefore, appropriate COPD medication for acute AMI is crucial.

Assessment of a New Electrocardiographic Marker for the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is clinically defined as myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive atherosclerosis on coronary angiography. Diagnosis may require multiple diagnostic tools in addition to standard coronary angiography, including cardiac imaging or provocative tests, according to clinical suspicion. We assessed the usefulness of the DETERMINE (Defibrillators to Reduce Risk by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation) score for distinguishing patients with MINOCA from those with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease (NSTEMI-CAD) in a single-center observational study. The patients were divided into two groups according to coronary angiography findings. The study included 277 patients: 227 with NSTEMI-CAD and 50 with MINOCA. The DETERMINE score (6.1 ± 3.7 vs 1.9 ± 2.1, P<.001) was significantly higher in the NSTEMI-CAD than MINOCA group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the DETERMINE score (OR=0.591, P<0.001) was an independent predictor of MINOCA. The incidence of diabetes mellitus and glucose levels were significantly higher in the NSTEMI-CAD group; however, ejection fraction was significantly higher in the MINOCA group (P<0.05). Our findings suggest that the DETERMINE score constitutes a simple and inexpensive tool for the assessment of MINOCA.

Performance of the ATRIA Bleeding Score in Predicting the Risk of In-Hospital Bleeding in Patients with ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

INTRODUCTION: A clear assessment of the bleeding risk score in patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) is crucial because of its impact on prognosis. The Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA score is a validated risk score to predict bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation (AF), but its predictive value in predicting bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients receiving antithrombotic therapy is unknown. Our aim was to investigate the predictive performance of the ATRIA bleeding score in STEMI and NSTEMI patients in comparison to the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) and ACUITY-HORIZONS (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY-Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) bleeding scores. METHODS: A total of 830 consecutive STEMI and NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI were evaluated retrospectively. The ATRIA, CRUSADE, and ACUITY-HORIZONS risk scores of the patients were calculated. Discrimination of the three risk models was evaluated using C-statistics. RESULTS: Major bleeding occurred in 52 (6.3%) of 830 patients during hospitalization. Bleeding scores were significantly higher in the bleeding patients than in non-bleeding patients (all P<0.001). The discriminatory ability of the ATRIA, CRUSADE, and ACUITY-HORIZONS bleeding scores for bleeding events was similar (C-statistics 0.810, 0.832, and 0.909, respectively). The good predictive value of all three scores for predicting the risk of bleeding was observed in NSTEMI and STEMI patients as well (C-statistics: 0.820, 0.793, and 0.921 and 0.809, 0.854, and 0.905, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the ATRIA bleeding score is a useful risk score for predicting major in-hospital bleeding in MI patients. This good predictive value was also present in STEMI and NSTEMI patient subgroups.