Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(6): e13342, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38923314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 2022-23 US influenza season peaked early in fall 2022. METHODS: Late-season influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against outpatient, laboratory-confirmed influenza was calculated among participants of the US Influenza VE Network using a test-negative design. RESULTS: Of 2561 participants enrolled from December 12, 2022 to April 30, 2023, 91 laboratory-confirmed influenza cases primarily had A(H1N1)pdm09 (6B.1A.5a.2a.1) or A(H3N2) (3C.2a1b.2a.2b). Overall, VE was 30% (95% confidence interval -9%, 54%); low late-season activity precluded estimation for most subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: 2022-23 late-season outpatient influenza VE was not statistically significant. Genomic characterization may improve the identification of influenza viruses that circulate postinfluenza peak.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estaciones del Año , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Gripe Humana/virología , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano , Niño , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Preescolar , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Urology ; 151: 94-97, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32389817

RESUMEN

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common childhood bacterial infections. Recurrent UTIs can lead to renal scarring. Compared to boys, girls are more likely to develop scars as a result of recurrent UTIs. Therefore, there is a need to identify girls at high risk for recurrent UTIs and develop interventions to decrease the risk of recurrent UTIs. In this commentary, we will review the hypothesized pathophysiology of recurrent UTIs, explore the literature on the role of the microbiome in recurrent UTIs, focusing on female pediatric patients when able, and highlight the need for future research in this area.


Asunto(s)
Microbiota , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Disbiosis/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Intestinos/microbiología , Recurrencia , Sistema Urinario/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Vagina/microbiología
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(5): 429-433, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196562

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical implications of reduced vancomycin susceptibility (RVS) among pediatric Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are unknown. METHODS: We identified all children at 2 children's hospitals with ≥1 blood culture positive for S. aureus. We compared patient and clinical factors for RVS and non-RVS infections using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-squared tests. Treatment failure and the duration of bacteremia for RVS versus non-RVS and for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) versus methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections were compared using multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions, respectively. For MRSA infections, the association of empiric vancomycin monotherapy with treatment failure was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: RVS was present in 72% (309/426) of cases. No patient or infection characteristics, including methicillin resistance, were associated with RVS. RVS was associated with an increased duration of bacteremia compared with non-RVS infections, aIRR = 1.15 (95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.30). The odds of treatment failure was similar for RVS and non-RVS infections, aOR = 1.04 (0.62-1.74). In contrast, MRSA infections were more likely to have treatment failure than MSSA infections, aOR = 3.03 (95% confidence interval: 1.84-5.00). For MRSA infections, empiric vancomycin monotherapy was associated with an increased odds of treatment failure compared with non-vancomycin or combination anti-MRSA antibiotics, aOR = 3.23 (1.12-9.26). CONCLUSIONS: RVS was common and was associated with a longer duration of bacteremia but not with treatment failure. Treatment failure was more common for MRSA than for MSSA bloodstream infections. Empiric vancomycin monotherapy increased the odds of treatment failure for MRSA infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Análisis Multivariante , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Resistencia a la Vancomicina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA