RESUMEN
Intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) is an important component of obesity treatment and can reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Objective was to compare the effectiveness of IBT to usual care in achieving weight loss in two study cohorts within PaTH Network: T2DM and At-Risk of T2DM. The TD2M cohort was defined as age 18 years and older with an indication of T2DM in the EHR based on a validated algorithm and at least 2 outpatient primary care visits. The At-Risk of T2DM cohort was defined by a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. The primary outcome was weight change within 1-year of index date. Mixed-effects models assessed the effectiveness of IBT by comparing the changes between study groups. Between 2009 and 2020, a total of 567,908 patients were identified in the T2DM cohort and2,054,256 patients in the At-Risk of T2DM cohort. Both IBT patients and matched non-IBT patients in the T2DM cohort had decreased mean weight (primary outcome) (-1.56 lbs, 95 %CI: -1.88, -1.24 vs -1.70 lbs, 95 %CI: -1.95, -1.44) in 1-year after index date. In the At-Risk of T2DM cohort, both IBT and non-IBT patients experienced weight gain and resultant increased BMI. Patients with more than one IBT visit gained less weight than those with only one visit (1.22 lbs, 95 %CI: 0.82, 1.62 vs 6.72 lbs, 95 %CI: 6.48, 6.97; p < 0.001). IBT was unlikely to result in clinically significant weight loss. Barriers to utilizing IBT require further research to ensure broader adoption of obesity management in primary care.
RESUMEN
Engaging a diverse stakeholder group, including patients, clinicians, policy makers, and leadership from national professional organizations as partners in research supports the pursuit of patient-centered outcomes. Utilizing the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Engagement Principles and applying adult learning theories to training opportunities can enhance stakeholder-investigator collaborations. Regularly scheduled study meetings with stakeholders can help streamline communication, offer a platform for stakeholder voices to be shared, and increase study productivity. Ongoing engagement evaluations provide an important opportunity to assess engagement activities and improve processes moving forward. Benefits of a robust patient partner and stakeholder body extend beyond the study's objectives and translate into the creation of larger networks where resources are shared and patient-centeredness is enhanced.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Política de Salud , Participación de los Interesados/psicología , Humanos , Investigación/tendenciasRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Although reproductive life planning (RLP) is recommended in federal and clinical guidelines and may help insured women make personalized contraceptive choices, it has not been systematically evaluated for effectiveness. METHODS: In 2014, some 984 privately insured women aged 18-40 who were not intending to become pregnant in the next year were randomly assigned to receive RLP, RLP with contraceptive action planning (RLP+) or information only (the control group). Women's contraceptive use, prescription contraceptive use, method adherence, switching to a more effective method, method satisfaction and contraceptive self-efficacy were assessed at six-month intervals during the two-year follow-up period. Differences between groups were identified using binomial logistic regression, linear regression and generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, the proportion of women using any contraceptive method increased from 89% to 96%, and the proportion using a long-acting reversible contraceptive or sterilization increased from 8% to 19%. Contraceptive adherence was high (72-76%) in all three groups. In regression models, the sole significant finding was that women in the RLP+ group were more likely than those in the RLP group to use a prescription method (odds ratio, 1.3). No differences were evident between the intervention groups and the control group in overall contraceptive use, contraceptive adherence, switching to a more effective method, method satisfaction or contraceptive self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The study does not provide evidence that web-based RLP influences contraceptive behaviors in insured women outside of the clinical setting. Further research is needed to identify strategies to help women of reproductive age identify contraceptive methods that meet their needs and preferences.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Planificación Familiar/métodos , Seguro de Salud , Intervención basada en la Internet , Cooperación del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Autoeficacia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/uso terapéutico , Efectividad Anticonceptiva , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Retrospective studies suggest 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys will experience sexual abuse before 18 years of age, resulting in future morbidity. Successful interventions exist, however, victims are reluctant to disclose. Screening for childhood sexual abuse (CSA) may provide an opportunity to overcome this barrier, yet no current model for universal CSA screening exists. We sought to understand the perspective of key stakeholders on CSA screening through qualitative research. Eight focus groups of 7-10 participants each (n=62) were conducted from April-September 2016. Stakeholders included school nurses, school teachers, counselors and administrators, pediatric providers, and parents. The interview guide focused on reporting suspected CSA and impressions of a CSA screening tool. Sessions were audiotaped and transcribed. Researchers used qualitative content analysis to develop conceptual categories that related to CSA screening and reporting. Two research team members independently open-coded 20% of the data for interrater reliability (kappa=0.98) prior to completing the coding process. Three major categories emerged to inform CSA screening. First, early screening (e.g. kindergarten) was preferred. Confidentiality was a concern, specifically privacy in the school-setting. As CSA perpetrators are often known to the child, parental presence in the medical office was also a concern. Finally, refinement of the screening process was discussed starting with routine education on safe touch and defining "normal." Rather than direct questioning, consistent and repeated offering of opportunities to disclose CSA and identification of a trusted adult were suggested. Next steps should involve partnering with evidence-based CSA prevention programs to incorporate and evaluate the aforementioned elements.
Asunto(s)
Abuso Sexual Infantil/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Recolección de Datos , Revelación , Diagnóstico Precoz , Emociones , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Padres , Investigación Cualitativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Maestros , Instituciones AcadémicasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Recent federal legislation in the USA highlights the role schools play in student health by requiring the utilisation of wellness councils for policy development and oversight. One barrier to developing good-quality wellness policies and wellness culture is limited knowledge of resources among school professionals. This article describes an approach to webinar delivery to improve school wellness efforts. DESIGN: Eight webinars, 30-60 minutes in length, were delivered on topics designed to enhance school wellness environments. SETTING: Webinars were delivered using an online meeting software platform to school professionals, who participated from their respective school buildings remotely. METHOD: Webinars featured content experts for the selected topics and were promoted to school professionals and wellness organisations. Attendees were invited to participate in a post-webinar questionnaire regarding satisfaction with the session and intent to act on knowledge gained from participation. RESULTS: Webinars reached 280 school and wellness professionals (teachers, administrators, nurses, etc.). Participants who completed post-webinar surveys (n = 78) rated the webinar's ability to enhance their knowledge in the respective topic area with an average score of 4.3 out of 5.0 (1 = poor, 5 = excellent). Most respondents (n = 69) intended to share the information gained with a colleague. CONCLUSION: Webinars provide a viable method of instruction and education for school personnel interested in strategies for improving a school's wellness environment. Further investigation is necessary to determine the best strategies for promoting webinar engagement. Future research should also explore the link between webinar participation and positive changes in school wellness environments.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act mandates that most women of reproductive age with private health insurance have full contraceptive coverage with no out-of-pocket costs, creating an actionable time for women to evaluate their contraceptive choices without cost considerations. The MyNewOptions study is a three-arm, randomized, controlled trial testing web-based interventions aimed at assisting privately insured women with making contraceptive choices that are consistent with their reproductive goals. METHODS: Privately insured women between the ages of 18 and 40 not intending pregnancy were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) a reproductive life planning (RLP) intervention, 2) a reproductive life planning enriched with contraceptive action planning (RLP+) intervention, or 3) an information only control group. Both the RLP and RLP+ guide women to identify their individualized reproductive goals and contraceptive method requirements. The RLP+ additionally includes a contraceptive action planning component, which uses if-then scenarios that allow the user to problem solve situations that make it difficult to be adherent to their contraceptive method. All three groups have access to a reproductive options library containing information about their contraceptive coverage and the attributes of alternative contraceptive methods. Women completed a baseline survey with follow-up surveys every 6 months for 2 years concurrent with intervention boosters. Study outcomes include contraceptive use and adherence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02100124. DISCUSSION: Results from the MyNewOptions study will demonstrate whether web-based reproductive life planning, with or without contraceptive action planning, helps insured women make patient-centered contraceptive choices compared with an information-only control condition.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Anticonceptiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticoncepción/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Embarazo no Planeado , Embarazo no Deseado , Salud Reproductiva/educación , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Internet , Cooperación del Paciente , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Embarazo , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Self-contained self rescuers (SCSRs) are used for emergency escapes in oxygen-deficit atmospheres. Certified by NIOSH to last 1 hour, SCSRs generate oxygen by chemical reaction and must meet a minimum oxygen generation time of 60 min when used according to instructions. Wearers must walk or crawl at a controlled rate to conform to the limits of the devices. The aim of the is study was intended to determine the distance that can be walked when using SCSRs as intended. Fourteen volunteer subjects walked on a treadmill at moderate rates that they controlled. They were instructed to walk as far as possible without using oxygen at a rate higher than the SCSR could produce. Distances walked ranged from 2.1 km to 9.2 km with an average distance of 6.0 km. SCSR operating times ranged from 30 min to 94 min. If the required walking distance is farther than this, multiple units will have to be available to allow safe escape.
Asunto(s)
Minería , Consumo de Oxígeno , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria , Caminata/fisiología , Adulto , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esfuerzo Físico/fisiología , Valores de Referencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Many studies have shown that individuals perform better if not wearing a respirator compared with wearing a respirator. This study examined the degree of performance reduction attributable to specific dominant character traits. The subjects performed on a treadmill at a constant speed and grade resulting in 80-85% VO(2)max. A modified M40 respirator was used to create three levels of inspiratory resistance: 2.8, 16.8, and 27.3 cmH(2)O*(sec/L). The 31 subjects were tested using a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Multiple regressions and an ANOVA were used to test for correlation. When air intake is very constricted, the only multiple regression equation that was found to be statistically significant was sensing-intuition (how one takes in information) and thinking-feeling (how one makes a decision) vs. performance time for the highest value of inhalation resistance. A simple linear regression between trait anxiety level and performance time was not found to be statistically significant for the same highest value of inhalation resistance.