An overview on fermentation strategies to overcome lignocellulosic inhibitors in second-generation ethanol production using cell immobilization.

The development of technologies to ferment carbohydrates (mainly glucose and xylose) obtained from the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of second-generation ethanol (2G ethanol) has many economic and environmental advantages. The pretreatment step of this biomass is industrially performed mainly by steam explosion with diluted sulfuric acid and generates hydrolysates that contain inhibitory compounds for the metabolism of microorganisms, harming the next step of ethanol production. The main inhibitors are: organic acids, furan, and phenolics. Several strategies can be applied to decrease the action of these compounds in microorganisms, such as cell immobilization. Based on data published in the literature, this overview will address the relevant aspects of cell immobilization for the production of 2G ethanol, aiming to evaluate this method as a strategy for protecting microorganisms against inhibitors in different modes of operation for fermentation. This is the first overview to date that shows the relation between inhibitors, cells immobilization, and fermentation operation modes for 2G ethanol. In this sense, the state of the art regarding the main inhibitors in 2G ethanol and the most applied techniques for cell immobilization, besides batch, repeated batch and continuous fermentation using immobilized cells, in addition to co-culture immobilization and co-immobilization of enzymes, are presented in this work.

Cachaça yeast strains: alternative starters to produce beer and bioethanol.

This work was performed to verify the potential of yeast strains isolated from cachaça distilleries for two specific biotechnological applications: beer and bioethanol production. In the beer production, the strains were tested for characteristics required in brewery practices, such as: capacity to ferment maltose and maltotriose, ability to grow at lowest temperatures, low H2S production, and flocculation profile. Among the strains tested, two of them showed appropriate characteristics to produce two different beer styles: lager and ale. Moreover, both strains were tested for cachaça production and the results confirmed the capacity of these strains to improve the quality of cachaça. In the bioethanol production, the fermentation process was performed similarly to that used by bioethanol industries: recycling of yeast biomass in the fermentative process with sulfuric acid washings (pH 2.0). The production of ethanol, glycerol, organic acids, dry cell weight, carbohydrate consumption, and cellular viability were analyzed. One strain presented fermentative parameters similar to PE2, industrial/commercial strain, with equivalent ethanol yields and cellular viability during all fermentative cycles. This work demonstrates that cachaça distilleries seem to be an interesting environment to select new yeast strains to be used in biotechnology applications as beer and bioethanol production.