Low-fidelity Medical Simulation: Relevance in the Learning of Dental Students in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare embraces simulation's learning boost, from medicine to dentistry. But can it unlock the secrets of intricate fixed prosthodontics? This study takes a pioneering step to find out. AIM: To evaluate low-fidelity medical simulation (LFMSim) in fixed prosthodontics by assessing its effectiveness in training corono-radicular preparations and by exploring participants' perceptions of LFMSim as an innovative teaching tool for developing pre-practice skills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, descriptive study was executed to explore these facets among 6th-year students. The Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH©) evaluation grid, student version, was employed for assessment. The study encompassed one week, from 03/03/2023 to 10/03/2023. RESULTS: The study involved 28 learners with an average age of 23 and a sex ratio of 0.33, half of whom had prior exposure to simulation sessions. Seventy-five percent of participants watched the instructional video a day before the simulation, with nine expressing presession stress. Overall, 19% of students found the session as expected, while 43% considered it better than anticipated. Satisfaction levels varied, with 50% indicating they were "rather satisfied," and 46.4% expressing absolute satisfaction. The Debriefing Assessment using DASH yielded an average score of 4.85. CONCLUSION: The study's findings shed light on the effectiveness of LFMSim in training corono-radicular preparations and post-space impressions for fixed prosthodontics among 6th-year students. The varied satisfaction levels and the emphasis on debriefing discussions suggest avenues for improving simulation sessions in the future. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These insights are pertinent for educators and institutions aiming to enhance dental education through innovative teaching tools like simulation. By refining simulation sessions based on debriefing feedback, educators can better prepare students for real-world clinical scenarios, ultimately improving patient care outcomes. This highlights the practical importance of incorporating simulation-based learning into dental curricula. How to cite this article: Hadyaoui D, Boukhris H, Riahi Z, et al. Low-fidelity Medical Simulation: Relevance in the Learning of Dental Students in South Africa. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(5):463-472.

The effects of video-based simulation in Collaborative Learning in a Student-led Global Classroom (CLSGC) program on non-technical skills among undergraduate nursing students in three regions: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Global nursing shortages and increasing cultural diversity in healthcare necessitate the development of culturally sensitive nurses. Intercultural learning and exchange programs have been shown to enhance nursing students' intercultural knowledge, cultural awareness, and sensitivity. However, non-technical skills such as communication, leadership, and teamwork are less emphasized in existing programs, despite their importance in facilitating adaptation to clinical contexts and ensuring patient safety across different ethnic groups. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a Collaborative Learning in a Student-led Global Classroom (CLSGC) program that employs video-based learning and student-led debriefings to enhance non-technical skills, and to explore the experiences of undergraduate nursing student participants from three different regions. METHODS: Seventy-eight nursing students from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Malmo University, and La Trobe University participated in the program. The program included three webinars on teamwork, communication skills, and leadership, facilitated through student-led discussions and video simulations. Data were collected using the Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire, and qualitative methods including focus groups and reflective journals. A paired t-test and manifest content analysis were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. RESULTS: The quantitative results indicated significant improvements in the students' attitudes towards teamwork, communication, and leadership. The qualitative data shed light on the students' learning experiences, highlighting the value of cultural exchanges in exploring the importance of non-technical skills in practice, and the effectiveness of the program structure. CONCLUSIONS: The CLSGC program effectively improved nursing students' non-technical skills and enriched their clinical practice. Integrating simulation-based learning and student-led debriefing sessions to enhance nursing students' knowledge and attitudes towards teamwork, communication, and leadership is recommended in nursing education. Continuous exposure to simulation should be part of nursing education to reinforce the significance of non-technical skills in practice.

Development of the coreHEM mental health patient-reported outcome measure - A novel mental health outlook measure for people with haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, no quality-of-life instrument exists that captures the full experience of the mental health outlook (MHO), a coreHEM core outcome, in people with haemophilia, including the potential transformational experience of receiving gene therapy. AIM: To describe the methods used to develop a content validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that measures MHO for people with haemophilia. METHODS: A conceptual framework, developed from a literature/evidence review, was used to create an interview guide and draft a questionnaire. Males aged 15 or older with severe/moderate haemophilia were eligible to participate in concept elicitation or cognitive debriefing interviews. The conceptual framework was refined based on a thematic analysis of concept elicitation interviews and PROM items were developed from the conceptual framework. Cognitive debriefing sessions that prioritised relevance and understanding of the PROM were held in two rounds; items were updated iteratively. RESULTS: A conceptual framework with five domains (stigma, anxiety, depression, life interference and identity) was constructed from over 300 identified MHO concepts. Fifty-three participants took part in interviews. After 32 concept elicitation interviews, the framework was updated by including eight new sub-concepts and eliminating two. Updates to the questionnaire included items added or removed and improved wording. The final coreHEM MHO PROM has 26 questions in two sections (general mental health associated with haemophilia, and a gene therapy section). CONCLUSIONS: The instrument is content-validated and can be used as an exploratory outcome. MHO scores can be measured and compared to give more insight into patient quality of life.

Effect of simulation based workshop on changing faculty perception for simulation-based education.

Objective: To compare the perceptions of participants before and after a one-day workshop on Simulation-based Education. The other objective was to determine the feedback of participants about the one day workshop on Simulation-based Education. Methods: In March 2023, a one-day workshop on Simulation-Based-Education (SBE) was conducted by the Department of Medical Education of Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical Education in collaboration with the foreign guest faculty through zoom. This workshop was conducted with the participants (faculty members) of the Certificate program. The study adopted quasi experimental (pretest posttest) research design. For data collection we used a validated questionnaire which compromises of three parts. Data was analyzed using SPSS 23. This is a semi-structured questionnaire which consists of four parts. The first part entails the demographic data of the participants. The second structured part collects the perception of participants through 26 statements on 5 points Likert scale (strongly disagree = 1, disagree = 2, agree to some extent = 3, agree = 4, strongly agree = 5). Results: The mean difference in participant perceptions was significant (P<0.05)on 13 statements: Improves communication skills (pretest 3.05±1.050, posttest 4.20±1.056; p=0.004), enhance teamwork (pretest 3.30±0.979, posttest 4.30±0.923; p=0.004), overcomes the challenge of uncooperative patients during real practice (pretest 3.80±0.696, posttest 4.30±0.470; p= 0.008), enact live patients (pretest 2.70±0.923, posttest 3.65±1.040; p=0.004), incopororation into medical education (pretest 3.20±0.894, posttest 4.40±0.503; p=0.000), provide safe, reliastic and conducive learning environment (pretest 2.85±0.875, postest4.00±0.795; p=0.000), provide easy learning (pretest 2.75±0.716, posttest 4.05±0.605 p=0.000), decrease ethical issues with more repeated practice (pretest 2.75±0.716, posttest 3.90±0.788; p=0.000), reduces the effort put in by a faculty in clinical teaching (pretest 2.80±0.696, posttest 3.45±0.999; p=0.039), supplement to clinical practice (pretest 2.75±0.444, posttest 4.55±0.510; p=0.000), evidence required for simulation activities (pretest 2.95±0.605, posttest 4.10±0.641; p=0.000), able to add simulation in clinical subject (pretest 3.15±1.089, posttest 3.80±0.834; p= 0.055), can instruct complex skills without simulation (pretest 2.55±0.887, posttest 3.40±0.883; p=0.018). Conclusions: The study signifiacnaty changed the faculty members' perceptions of simulation-based education.These encouraging findings may influence their future practice in simulation-based education, allowing them to provide safe, high-quality health care in the workplace and, eventually, enhance patient outcomes.

Helping clinicians debrief themselves: a simple how-to guide.

The operating theatre is a dynamic and challenging environment where effective teamwork is essential. Routine clinical debriefings, which involve brief reflections on collaboration to identify successes and areas for improvement, have proved to enhance teamwork, particularly in the operating theatre. However, barriers such as time constraints, conflicting priorities, and a lack of standardised debriefing processes hinder their regular use. Implementation of TALK©, a voluntary self-debriefing method, showed significant improvements in debriefing performance and integration of debriefing into routine practice, although long-term consistency remains a challenge.

A rapid evidence review of postnatal listening services for women following a traumatic or negative childbirth experience.

PROBLEM: Currently there is a lack of clear guidance to underpin postnatal listening services for women who have had a traumatic or difficult birth. BACKGROUND: Postnatal listening (or birth reflections) services are important to help women review their birth and ask questions about their care, but currently there is no clear guidance on how these services should be provided. AIM: To synthesise existing evidence on postnatal listening services for women following a traumatic or negative childbirth experience. METHODS: A rapid evidence review using four databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science), backward and forward chaining, and hand searches of previous systematic reviews. The Mixed Methods Appraisal tool was used to appraise the studies. Quantitative and qualitative data were synthesised into descriptive themes. FINDINGS: Database searches (n = 9,459 hits), backward and forward chaining and hand searching identified 27 articles for inclusion. Nineteen different services are described, evaluated as part of controlled trials (n = 16) or using quantitative and/or qualitative data (n = 8); three studies are audits of UK services. Findings are reported in 5 themes, 'Who provides the service?', 'Types and quality of care', 'Targeting the support', 'Timing and location', and 'Training and experiences of maternity staff'. DISCUSSION: The findings identify who, how, when, where and what should be provided within postnatal listening services. Services should be flexibly provided by trained maternity staff via active listening, empathy, and a non-judgmental approach. CONCLUSION: Further work is needed to develop an optimum training programme, to identify key components of effectiveness, and to ensure these services are culturally relevant.

Evaluation of TALK© training for interprofessional clinical debriefing in Latin America.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems must adapt iteratively in response to external and local challenges while keeping patients and staff safe. Clinical debriefing is a cost-effective contributor to safety culture, facilitating learning and team adaptations that lead to improved processes, patient outcomes, and staff resilience. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, an interest has emerged in adopting TALK© to guide clinical debriefing to promote safety, mutual support, and cultural change within healthcare teams in Latin American contexts. AIMS: To evaluate the quality and applicability of TALK© debriefing training in Latin American settings and the willingness to debrief after an educational intervention. METHODS: Retrospective and descriptive study, examining anonymous data collected over 18 months after completing a "TALK© Debriefing Course for Healthcare Professionals" face-to-face or online. Data collected included participant characteristics, course details, quality and applicability of the intervention, and willingness to debrief. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-five participants were enrolled, most from Argentina and Mexico. The overall quality of the intervention scored 19.62/20 points, obtaining 4.86/5 points for applicability. There were no significant differences between virtual and face-to-face sessions. After the intervention, ≥93.76% of participants felt able to engage in clinical debriefing, and 97.06% reported willingness to debrief. CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination of multi-professional clinical debriefing training in Latin America is feasible and easily scalable. The quality of the educational intervention was rated excellent in both virtual and face-to-face settings, supporting the value of remote educational diffusion. Most participants in this study intervention felt prepared and willing to debrief following the intervention.

Effective debriefings in the clinical setting: a pilot study to test the impact of an evidence based debriefing app on anesthesia care providers' performance.

Background: Debriefing enhances team learning, performance, and patient safety. Despite its benefits, it's underused. To address this, we developed an evidence-based debriefing app. Methods: This pilot study, conducted at a Swiss hospital, evaluated team performance during two anesthesia inductions using the Team Performance Scale (TPS). Following the first induction, teams engaged with the Zurich Debriefing App, with debriefing sessions meticulously recorded for subsequent evaluation. To mitigate bias, raters underwent comprehensive TPS training. The debriefings were analyzed through the DE-CODE framework. We utilized paired t-tests to examine performance improvements and linear regressions to assess the impact of reflective statements on performance, moderated by psychological safety. Results: Team performance significantly improved from the first to the second induction (t (9) = -2.512, p = 0.033). Senior physicians' (n = 8) reflective statements predicted post-assessment TPS scores (R 2 = 0.732, p = 0.061), while consultants (n = 7) and nurse anesthetists (n = 10) did not. Interaction analysis revealed no moderation effects, but a main effect indicated the significance of senior physicians' reflective statements. Conclusion: This pilot study confirms the efficacy of the evidence-based debriefing app in enhancing anesthesia team performance. Senior physicians' reflective statements positively influenced performance; however, no moderation effects were observed. The study highlights the potential of debriefing apps to streamline and enhance team debriefing processes, with significant implications for improving clinical practice and patient safety. Further research is needed to validate these findings on a larger scale and optimize the integration of debriefing into routine clinical practice.

In-Person Versus Online Training in Simulations of Helping Babies Breathe: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Birth asphyxia is a leading cause of neonatal deaths, but simple interventions may prevent it. The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) course has significantly reduced neonatal mortality rates in lower and middle-income countries (LMICs) by training healthcare providers (i.e. midwives and nurses) on the essential skills of bag-and-mask ventilation and postnatal care. Although several studies have supported the efficacy of virtual learning in other medical education programs, there is still a lack of knowledge regarding a virtual approach to HBB. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of online versus in-person learning of the HBB course among medical and nursing students. METHODS: The study is a two-arm parallel randomized non-inferiority controlled trial, that includes medical and nursing students. Participants were randomly assigned to either online or in-person debriefing during the hands-on simulations of HBB. They attended a pre-recorded lecture before being assigned to one of three instructors for the simulation lab. Participants completed a seven-point anonymous Likert-based questionnaire and a standardized Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare Student Version (DASH-SV) Short Form. The primary outcome was the Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) grade. The trial is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT05257499. RESULTS: 47 participants completed the study, with similar baseline characteristics in each arm (gender, age, and class). The participants in both arms reported high levels of satisfaction and confidence, with no significant difference between the two arms. The DASH score over 7 was also similar in the online arm (6.27±0.26) compared to the in-person arm (6.55±0.13) (p=0.07). The mean OSCE score in the online arm (45.8±5.2) was comparable to the mean OSCE score in the in-person arm (41.3±5.0) (p=0.22). Both online and in-person participants failed the OSCE. CONCLUSION: The survey responses conveyed that online simulation training is comparable to in-person simulation for the HBB course. Both online and in-person participants failed the OSCE most likely because they needed more training on HBB. This could be due to the fact that the material is too new to the students who needed more practice to pass the OSCE. Further research is needed to confirm these results and explore the long-term impact of online neonatal resuscitation training.

Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The voice of the students should be engaged in simulation curriculum development. Involving the students in the development of debriefing strategies might result in a deeper understanding of learning. However, few studies have investigated the students' perspectives on debriefing strategies. The aim of the study was to explore nursing students' perspectives on the post-simulation debriefing. METHODS: An explorative, descriptive design with a qualitative approach was used. Data were collected in December 2017 and May 2018 through focus group interviews with undergraduate nursing students in Norway immediately after a 2-day high-fidelity simulation course in the second year of their Bachelor of Nursing degree. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Thirty-two nursing students participated in the study. The data analysis identified two main categories. The category 'Facilitator as a catalyst for reflection' illustrated the facilitator's multifaceted and vital role in initiating and guiding the students' reflection process in the debriefing. The category 'A process towards increased awareness' encompasses the students' guided process of acquiring new insight into their professional development, and how they put parts together to see the wholeness in what was simulated. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides knowledge to facilitators regarding nursing students' perspectives on facilitating reflection and learning during debriefing discussions. The facilitator's multifaceted role in guiding the students' reflections and their process of acquiring new insight into their professional development were identified as critical to learning during debriefing.

Testing reliability and validity of the Korean version of Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (K-DASH).

BACKGROUND: Use of the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH©) would be beneficial for novice debriefers with less or no formal training in debriefing. However, the DASH translated into Korean and tested for psychometrics is not yet available. Thus, this study was to develop a Korean version of the DASH student version (SV) and test its reliability and validity among baccalaureate nursing students in Korea. METHODS: The participants were 99 baccalaureate nursing students. Content validity using content validity index (CVI), construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient were assessed. RESULTS: Both Item-CVIs and Scale-CVI were acceptable. EFA supported the unidimensional latent structure of Korean DASH-SV and results of CFA indicated 6 items converged within the extracted factor, significantly contributing to the factor (p ≤ .05). Items were internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.82). CONCLUSION: The Korean version of the DASH-SV is arguably a valid and reliable measure of instructor behaviors that could improve faculty debriefing and student learning in the long term.

Exploring communicative interactions in debriefing sessions with nursing students: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Debriefing as a learning activity aims to elevate participants' competence through communicative interaction. This activity is an integral component of any formative simulation. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to explore debriefing as a communicative experience in nursing students within the context of interactive virtual simulation. The secondary objectives were: 1) To investigate the typology of interactions based on participants' discourse and 2) To identify the actions that students use to develop knowledge during debriefing. METHOD: A qualitative exploratory study design involving six debriefing groups was conducted with 105 s-year nursing students. The debriefing sessions were analyzed following interactive virtual simulations in an in-person setting in the classroom. All sessions were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A mixed (deductive and inductive) content analysis approach was used. RESULTS: A total of 2187 units of meaning were identified and categorized into 3 themes (interaction by participant, interaction by communicative action, and interaction by participant's communicative goal); nine subthemes (facilitator-student, student-student and student-facilitator; declarative - unidirectional, reactive - bidirectional and multidirectional-interactive; individualistic, competitive, and collaborative), and 5 categories (providing information; generating creative solutions; processing critical and deliberative information; positive interdependence and psychosocial relationships). CONCLUSION: The students developed knowledge and practical communication skills, particularly reinforcing soft skills through collaborative interactions, predominantly multidirectional-interactive in nature. The facilitator and the interpersonal relationships among the participants fostered a safe and positive environment.

Eliciting debriefing experiences: A scoping review.

Debriefing is a process in physical or online learning that encourages learners to reflect on their own learning experiences. Effective questioning techniques and evoking positive experiences are methods for regulating and guiding students toward an environment that promotes mental health. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify effective debriefing questioning techniques and experiences for addressing the three presences in the Community of Inquiry framework, namely social presence, cognitive presence, and instructor presence, among learners in an educational or occupational setting. The result of the synthesis provided a comprehensive picture of which question types and experiences are present for the projection of each or a combination of the three presences. On Google Scholar, Education Resources Information Center, ResearchGate, and ScienceDirect, a search pertaining to debriefing strategy and questioning techniques was performed. From 2002 to 2020, 265 articles on debriefing strategy and questioning techniques were eliminated, leaving only 60 articles that were largely relevant. Results indicated that open-ended questions that are oriented toward higher-order thinking with the purpose of stimulating, following up, and clarifying are prevalent. Based on the Debriefing Experience Scale, the majority of the learners' experiences involve Learning and Making Connections with Learning, followed by Appropriate Facilitator Guidance, Facilitator Skill in Conducting Debriefing, and then Analyzing Thoughts and Feelings. Questioning is a relevant aspect of facilitating experiences in different types of presence, and the types of questions used can influence the quality of those experiences.

Implementation of the TALK© clinical self-debriefing tool in operating theatres: a single-centre interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Debriefing in operating theatre environments leads to benefits in mortality, efficiency, productivity, and safety culture; however, it is still not regularly performed. TALK© is a simple and widely applicable team self-debriefing method to collaboratively learn and improve. METHODS: An interventional study introducing TALK© for voluntary clinical debriefing was carried out in operating theatre environments in a UK National Health Service hospital over 18 months. It explored compliance with the Five Steps to Safer Surgery and changes in behaviour in surgical teams regarding consideration and completion of debriefing. RESULTS: Team briefing and compliance with the WHO surgical safety checklist were performed consistently (>95% and >98%, respectively) throughout the study, which included 460 surgical lists. Consideration of debriefing increased at all data collection periods after intervention, from 35.6% to 60.3-97.4% (P≤0.003). Performance of debriefing, which was 23.3% at baseline, reached 39% at 6 months (P=0.039). Team planning of actions for improvement during debriefing also increased (P<0.001). A decline in performance of debriefing and subsequent improvement actions was observed after 6 months, albeit rates were above baseline at 18 months. The most reported reason not to carry out a debriefing was 'lack of issues'. After implementation, nurses and allied healthcare professionals increased their contribution to initiating and leading debriefing. Reported barriers were <18% at baseline, and decreased after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A simple intervention introducing TALK© for voluntary debriefing in theatres prompted significant changes in team behaviour and sustained growth regarding consideration and performance of debriefing, especially in the first 6 months.

Honesty in Human Subject Research.

In this paper, I discuss the ethical issues related to deception in human subject research in terms of honesty. First, I introduce the background and suggest the conception of honesty that understands it as involving respect for the right not to be deceived (RND). Next, I examine several ways to address the ethical issues of deceptive elements in the human subject research and show why they fail to adequately meet the demand of honesty. I focus on how to make an honest research plan and examine after participation and before participation phases in turn. Then I conclude by suggesting possible strategies to minimize dishonesty in human subject research.

Social and Cognitive Skills (SCOPE)-a generic model for multi-professional work and education in healthcare.

In this article, we present a generic model for social and cognitive skills that can be used in work and (simulation-based) education in healthcare. We combined existing non-technical skills tools into a tool that we call SCOPE. SCOPE is a model that comprises the three social categories of "teamwork", "leading", and "task management" as well as the two cognitive categories of "situation awareness" and "decision making". Each category comprises between three and six elements. We formulated guiding questions for each category in an attempt to emphasize its core meaning. We developed a dynamic graphical representation of the categories that emphasize the constant changes in the relative importance of the categories over the course of a clinical or educational situation. Anecdotal evidence supports the value of the model for aligning language around social and cognitive skills across specialties and professions.

The Essentials of Debriefing and Reflective Practice.

Debriefing is a specific type of reflective learning. Debriefing follows an experience, with the goal of taking meaningful learning away from the experience. It is often used following a simulation-based educational experience but the same techniques can be used following actual clinical care. Early studies in simulation suggest that learning does not occur in simulation-based education in the absence of debriefing. There are phases of a debriefing discussion and specific conversational strategies that are used to engage learners and provoke engaging learning discussions. Standards of practice call for facilitators with specialized training and a debriefing method that is theory based.

Content validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFLymSI-18) in indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The NFLymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome measure comprised of the highest priority symptoms, emotional concerns, treatment side effects, and other concerns identified by lymphoma patients and oncologists. This study assessed the content validity of the NFLymSI-18 for patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL), with a focus on the Disease-Related Symptoms Physical (DRS-P) subscale. METHODS: Patients with a confirmed iNHL diagnosis who had received one or more lines of treatment were recruited during clinic visits. Patients described their symptoms, treatment side effects, and emotional concerns related to iNHL in a semi-structured interview. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVivo10. RESULTS: Data saturation was obtained by the 18th interview. Most participants (67%) had follicular lymphoma. 28% of participants had marginal zone lymphoma, and one participant had lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Mean age of the 18 participants was 67 years. 56% of the sample was male. Most participants (67%) had a college or advanced degree. When asked to describe their iNHL symptoms, patients most often discussed swelling (n = 14), fatigue (n = 11), and pain (n = 8). The following symptoms were mentioned by three patients each: anxiety, appetite loss, rash, sleep disruption, trouble breathing, and malaise. Mapping of NFLymSI-18 content to these concerns showed the instrument includes all those most frequently mentioned symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the content validity of the NFLymSI-18, including its DRS-P Subscale, for patients with iNHL. The instrument shows strong validity for the most referenced symptoms of swelling, fatigue, and pain. The diversity of additional symptoms reported by patients is consistent with the heterogeneous symptomology of iNHL.

Implementation of a routine post-shift debriefing program in ICU aiming at quality-of-care improvement: A primary analysis of feasibility and impacts.

OBJECTIVES: This report describes the implementation of a clinical debriefing (CD) program in intensive care units (ICU) and analyses its feasibility and its impact on staff well-being. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: From April to September 2023, post-shift CDs were run once a week in 2 out of 7 units in our department, using an adapted version of the DISCOVER-PHASE tool. CD sessions were performed face-to-face with volunteer members of the multidisciplinary ICU team. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After 6 months, a survey assessing the satisfaction of the debriefed teams was conducted. The impact of CD on staff well-being was assessed using three validated questionnaires (Maslach Burnout Inventory, Ways of Coping Checklist, Professional Quality of Life Scale) administered in the 7 units before and after the CD period. RESULTS: A total of 44 CDs were performed, lasting 15 (4-35) min. There were 6 (1-9) attendees per CD, mainly nurses (64.6%). Discussions focused mainly on basic problems related to dysfunctional material, communication and organization inside the team. The two debriefed teams were satisfied of the program and gave 9, 8 and 8 out of 10 on a visual analogical scale for the climate of confidence of the DC, their organisation, and their ability to improve working conditions and quality of care, respectively. Subscores at the three questionnaires assessing staff well-being before and after the CD period were similar, whether teams experienced CD or not. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing of post-shift debriefings in our ICU was feasible and well accepted. More prolonged programs are probably needed to demonstrate benefits on staff well-being. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: This report offers elements that other teams can use to successfully conduct post-shift debriefings and to plan future research on longer-term programs.

Getting slapped and kicked: the experience of judicial bullying for lawyers providing publicly funded criminal defence.

Judicial bullying has received increased attention in Australia in the past decade. Traditional attitudes that dismissed judicial bullying as a rite of passage have been superseded by recognition about the negative impact it has on lawyers' mental health and wellbeing. In interviews about wellbeing and burnout with lawyers in five Australian jurisdictions, judicial bullying was identified as having a significant role in lawyers' mental health and careers. This research affirms current formal steps being undertaken in Victoria to address judicial bullying, but also emphasises the informal mechanisms employed by lawyers to mitigate the risk and reduce the impact of judicial bullying.