The COVID19 pandemic has changed women's experiences of pregnancy in the UK

IntroductionDuring the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, maternity care has been substantially altered to reduce transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Many antenatal services are now restricted or delivered online, and visiting has been restricted during labour and in the postnatal period. MethodsWe conducted an online survey from 1st August to 31st December 2020 to investigate the experiences of women who were pregnant or breastfeeding in the UK during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The survey included 55 open and closed questions and required 5 minutes to complete. We publicised the survey using social media. ResultsWe received 96 responses, including 66 currently pregnant women and 22 women who were pregnant during the pandemic. The response rate was 70.1% of survey views. We found mixed experiences of the impact of the pandemic on antenatal and perinatal care, notably with some women feeling visiting restrictions were insufficient and others feeling they were too strict. Twenty-nine women received no information about COVID-19, and 6 women found it very difficult to find information. Thirty-nine women would have liked to have more information about breastfeeding after a pregnancy affected by COVID-19, and 37 women wanted more information about antibody persistence and transfer. DiscussionAdditional support is required for pregnant and lactating women during the current pandemic. Provision of information and support, including via social media, may improve womens experiences of pregnancy in the current environment. SignificanceMaternity services in the UK have been significantly restructured to prevent transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including restrictions to in-person antenatal care, and perinatal visiting. It is not fully known how these changes are perceived by pregnant and breastfeeding women. Reactions to changes in antenatal care are mixed, including whether restrictions were too lenient or too strict. Most women underwent online antenatal care in addition in-person visits. Some received no information about COVID-19, and a significant proportion of women would have liked more information, particularly regarding antibody transfer and benefits of breastfeeding during the pandemic. Ethical statementThis study was approved by North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee

Global research priorities for COVID-19 in maternal, reproductive and child health: results of an international survey

BackgroundThe World Health Organizations "Coordinated Global Research Roadmap: 2019 Novel Coronavirus" outlined the need for research that focuses on the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women and children. More than one year after the first reported case, significant knowledge gaps remain, highlighting the need for a coordinated approach. To address this need, the Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Working Group (MNCH WG) of the COVID-19 Clinical Research Coalition conducted an international survey to identify global research priorities for COVID-19 in maternal, reproductive and child health. MethodThis project was undertaken using a modified Delphi method. An electronic questionnaire was disseminated to clinicians and researchers in three different languages (English, French and Spanish) via MNCH WG affiliated networks. Respondents were asked to select the five most urgent research priorities among a list of 17 identified by the MNCH WG. Analysis of questionnaire data was undertaken to identify key similarities and differences among respondents according to questionnaire language, location and specialty. Following elimination of the seven lowest ranking priorities, the questionnaire was recirculated to the original pool of respondents. Thematic analysis of final questionnaire data was undertaken by the MNCH WG from which four priority research themes emerged. ResultsQuestionnaire 1 was completed by 225 respondents from 29 countries. Questionnaire 2 was returned by 49 respondents. The four priority research themes were 1) access to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2) the direct and 3) indirect effects of COVID-19 on pregnant and breastfeeding women and children and 4) the transmission of COVID-19 and protection from infection. ConclusionThe results of these questionnaires indicated a high level of concordance among continents and specialties regarding priority research themes. This prioritized list of research uncertainties, developed to specifically highlight the most urgent clinical needs as perceived by healthcare professionals and researchers, could help funding organizations and researchers to answer the most pressing questions for clinicians and public health professionals during the pandemic. It is hoped that these identified priority research themes can help focus the discussion regarding the allocation of limited resources to enhance COVID-19 research in MNCH globally.

Indirect Effects of COVID-19 on Maternal, Neonatal, Child, Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Kampala, Uganda

BackgroundCOVID-19 impacted global maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes. We hypothesised that the early, strict lockdown which restricted individuals movements in Uganda limited access to services. MethodsAn observational study, using routinely collected data from Electronic Medical Records was carried out, in Kawempe district, Kampala. An interrupted time series analysis assessed the impact on maternal, neonatal, child, sexual and reproductive health services from July 2019 to December 2020. Descriptive statistics summarised the main outcomes before (July 2019 - March 2020), during (April 2020 - June 2020) and after the national lockdown (July 2020 - December 2020). ResultsBetween 1st July 2019 and 31st December 2020 there were 14,401 antenatal clinic attendances, 33,499 deliveries, 111,658 childhood service attendances and 57,174 for sexual health. All antenatal and vaccination services ceased in lockdown for four weeks. During the three-month lockdown, the number of antenatal attendances significantly decreased, and remain below pre-COVID levels (370 fewer/month). Attendances for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV dropped then stabilised. Increases during lockdown and immediately postlockdown included the number of women treated for high blood pressure, eclampsia and pre-eclampsia (218 more/month), adverse pregnancy outcomes (stillbirths, low-birth-weight and premature infant births), the rate of neonatal unit admissions, neonatal deaths and abortions. Maternal mortality remained stable. Immunisation clinic attendance declined whilst neonatal death rate rose (from 39-49/1000 livebirths). The number of children treated for pneumonia, diarrhoea and malaria decreased during lockdown. ConclusionThe Ugandan response to COVID-19 negatively impacted maternal, child and neonatal health, with an increase seen in pregnancy complications, and fetal and infant outcomes, likely due to delayed care-seeking behaviour. Decreased vaccination clinic attendance leaves a cohort of infants unprotected, affecting all vaccine-preventable diseases. Future pandemic responses must consider impacts of movement restrictions and access to preventative services to protect maternal and child health. O_TEXTBOXKEY QUESTIONS What is already known?O_LIThe response to COVID-19 has been shown to have indirectly impacted on maternal, child, neonatal, sexual, and reproductive health. C_LIO_LIThis is largely related to access to services and fear of contracting COVID-19 in outpatient departments. C_LIO_LIThere has been very little data published on the health impacts of the COVID-19 response in Uganda. C_LI What are the new findings?O_LIAntenatal attendances decreased dramatically in April, followed by increased numbers low-birthweight infants and neonatal deaths. C_LIO_LINewborn immunisations against polio, tetanus, diphtheria, hepatitis B, haemophilus influenzae, rotavirus and pneumococcus decreased significantly. C_LIO_LISexual, and reproductive health services were reduced in number. C_LI What do the new findings imply?O_LIAlthough Uganda has been less affected directly by COVID-19 infections in the first wave, the indirect impacts are far-reaching and will have future influences on population health. C_LIO_LIThere is a degree of resilience within the healthcare service, but many services were adversely affected by the lockdown leading to poorer pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. C_LIO_LIAntenatal and vaccination services are of particular importance in ensuring the safety of mother and child and must be prioritised in the responses to future pandemics. C_LI C_TEXTBOX