Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, and Vitamin D.

The high prevalence of obesity is a worldwide problem associated with multiple comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases. Vitamin D deficiency with secondary hyperparathyroidism is common in obese individuals and can be aggravated after bariatric surgery. Moreover, there is no consensus on the optimal supplementation dose of vitamin D in postbariatric surgical patients. We present new data on the variability of 25(OH)D response to supplementation in postmenopausal obese women. It is important to recognize and treat vitamin D deficiency before bariatric surgery to avoid postoperative complications, such as metabolic bone disease with associated high fracture risk. The objective of this article is to discuss the bone metabolism consequences of vitamin D deficiency after bariatric surgery.

The Clinical Utility of Vertebral Fracture Assessment in Predicting Fractures.

Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. VFs are associated with diminished quality of life and high morbidity and mortality. The presence of a VF, especially a recent one, is an important risk factor for developing another fracture. However, most VFs are not clinically recognized. VF assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a convenient, low-cost, low-radiation, reliable method to identify VFs during bone mineral density measurement. The finding of a previously unrecognized VF may change the diagnostic classification, assessment of fracture risk, and treatment strategies. This paper focuses on the utility of VF assessment in clinical practice.

Accelerated fracture healing with teriparatide.

Satisfactory healing of the osteoporotic fracture is critically important to functional recovery, morbidity, and quality of life. Some therapies for osteoporosis may affect the processes associated with bone repair. For example, bisphosphonates in experimental models are associated with increased callus size and mineralization, reduced callus remodeling, and improved mechanical strength. Local and systemic bisphosphonate treatment may improve implant fixation. No negative impact on fracture healing has been observed, even after major surgery or when administered immediately after fracture. For the osteoanabolic agent teriparatide, case reports and a randomized trial have produced mixed results, but they are consistent with a positive impact of teriparatide on fracture healing. Some of the agents currently being developed for osteoporosis, notably sclerostin and DKK1 antibodies have shown a beneficial effect on fracture healing. At this point, therefore, there is no evidence that osteoporosis therapies are detrimental to fracture healing with some promising experimental evidence for positive effects on healing, notably for those agents whose actions are primarily anabolic.

Accelerated fracture healing with teriparatide / Consolidação de fratura acelerada com teriparatida

Satisfactory healing of the osteoporotic fracture is critically important to functional recovery, morbidity, and quality of life. Some therapies for osteoporosis may affect the processes associated with bone repair. For example, bisphosphonates in experimental models are associated with increased callus size and mineralization, reduced callus remodeling, and improved mechanical strength. Local and systemic bisphosphonate treatment may improve implant fixation. No negative impact on fracture healing has been observed, even after major surgery or when administered immediately after fracture. For the osteoanabolic agent teriparatide, case reports and a randomized trial have produced mixed results, but they are consistent with a positive impact of teriparatide on fracture healing. Some of the agents currently being developed for osteoporosis, notably sclerostin and DKK1 antibodies have shown a beneficial effect on fracture healing. At this point, therefore, there is no evidence that osteoporosis therapies are detrimental to fracture healing with some promising experimental evidence for positive effects on healing, notably for those agents whose actions are primarily anabolic.

A consolidação adequada da fratura osteoporótica é essencial para recuperação funcional, morbidade e qualidade de vida. Alguns tratamentos para osteoporose podem afetar os processos associados ao reparo ósseo. Por exemplo, os bisfosfonatos, em modelos experimentais, estão associados com aumento do tamanho do calo e a mineralização, reduzindo o remodelamento do calo e melhorando a força mecânica. Tratamento com bisfosfonato, local ou sistêmico, pode melhorar a fixação de implantes. Não foi observado impacto negativo na consolidação da fratura, mesmo após uma cirurgia maior ou quando administrado imediatamente após a fratura. Relatos e um estudo randomizado com o osteoanabólico teriparatida produziram resultados mistos, mas que são consistentes com o impacto positivo da teriparatida na consolidação da fratura. Algumas das drogas que estão sendo desenvolvidas no momento para osteoporose, como anticorpos para esclerotina e DKK1, têm mostrado efeito benéfico na consolidação da fratura. No estágio atual, portanto, não há evidência de que terapias para osteoporose impeçam a consolidação da fratura, mas existem algumas evidências experimentais promissoras de efeito positivo na consolidação, especialmente daqueles agentes cuja ação é primariamente anabólica.

Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate (150 mg) and once-weekly oral alendronate (70 mg): additional results from the Monthly Oral Therapy With Ibandronate For Osteoporosis Intervention (MOTION) study.

BACKGROUND: The MOTION (Monthly Oral Therapy with Ibandronate for Osteoporosis Intervention) study reported that once-monthly ibandronate was noninferior to once-weekly alendronate in terms of increasing bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip over 12 months. On analysis of secondary and exploratory end points in MOTION, which included trochanter and femoral neck BMD, monthly ibandronate was found to be noninferior to weekly alendronate. The coprimary, secondary, and exploratory BMD end points from MOTION have been previously reported. OBJECTIVE: This report presents additional results from the MOTION study, including response rates in terms of lumbar spine and total hip BMD gains above baseline; findings from a comparison of serum concentrations of bone turnover markers; and tolerability analysis, including adverse events that led to withdrawal and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. METHODS: MOTION was a 12-month (with 15-day follow-up), randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, noninferiority study in postmenopausal women aged 55 to <85 years with osteoporosis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 150-mg-monthly oral ibandronate and weekly alendronate-matched placebo, or 70-mg-weekly oral alendronate and monthly ibandronate-matched placebo, for 12 months. At baseline, day 7 of treatment, 3 and 6 months, 6 months + 7 days, and 12 months, serum concentrations of markers of bone resorption (C-telopeptide of the a chain of type 1 collagen [sCTX]) and bone formation (serum N-terminal propeptides of type 1 collagen) were measured in a subset of the total trial population. At baseline and month 12, BMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Exploratory analyses of patients whose spine, total hip, and trochanter BMD at 12 months were above baseline (responders) were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 1760 women were enrolled (ibandronate, 887 patients; alendronate, 873). The median changes in the trough concentrations of sCTX were -75.5% with monthly ibandronate and -81.2% with weekly alendronate. The percentage of patients with mean lumbar spine and total hip BMD gains above baseline (responders) were 90% and 87%, respectively, for ibandronate and 92% and 90%, respectively, for alendronate. GI adverse events were reported in

Densitometria clínica: posições oficiais 2006 / Clinical densitometry: official positions 2006

Descrevemos as posições oficiais da Sociedade Brasileira de Densitometria Clínica (SBDens) para a realização e o relato do exame de densitometria óssea. Essas posições foram obtidas por consenso em encontro realizado em São Paulo no ano de 2006. A SBDens contou com o apoio de várias sociedades científicas descritas no texto.

We describe the official positions of the Brazilian Society for Clinical Densitometry (SBDens) for the performance and report of the bone mineral density testing. These positions were obtained by consensus in a meeting at São Paulo in 2006. SBDens positions were supported by other scientific societies described in the text.

Bone density testing in clinical practice.

The diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring of treatment is a challenge for physicians due to the large number of available tests and complexities of interpretation. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing is a non-invasive measurement to assess skeletal health. The "gold-standard" technology for diagnosis and monitoring is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine, hip, or forearm. Fracture risk can be predicted using DXA and other technologies at many skeletal sites. Despite guidelines for selecting patients for BMD testing and identifying those most likely to benefit from treatment, many patients are not being tested or receiving therapy. Even patients with very high risk of fracture, such as those on long-term glucocorticoid therapy or with prevalent fragility fractures, are often not managed appropriately. The optimal testing strategy varies according to local availability and affordability of BMD testing. The role of BMD testing to monitor therapy is still being defined, and interpretation of serial studies requires special attention to instrument calibration, acquisition technique, analysis, and precision assessment. BMD is usually reported as a T-score, the standard deviation variance of the patient's BMD compared to a normal young-adult reference population. BMD in postmenopausal women is classified as normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis according to criteria established by the World Health Organization. Standardized methodologies are being developed to establish cost-effective intervention thresholds for pharmacological therapy based on T-score combined with clinical risk factors for fracture.

Update on osteoporosis therapy.

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength that predisposes a person to increased fracture risk. Fractures are often associated with increased morbidity, higher mortality, loss of function and even psychological consequences. Pharmacotherapeutic interventions (e.g., bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, calcitonin, and teriparatide) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis provide substantial reduction in fracture risk over and above risk reduction with calcium and vitamin D supplementation alone. The importance of nutritional support along with an appropriate exercise regimen, avoiding smoking and excessive alcohol use is to be emphasized along with the pharmacologic approach to osteoporosis. Despite the effectiveness of therapy with pharmacologic agents, most patients who start therapy do not remain on treatment for more than 1 year.

Low bone mass in children and adolescents.

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mass and micro architectural alterations of bone tissue leading to enhanced bone fragility and increased fracture risk. Although research in osteoporosis has focused mainly on the role of bone loss in the elderly population, it is becoming increasingly clear that the amount of bone that is gained during growth is also an important determinant of future resistance to fractures. Thus, considerable interest is being placed on defining preventive strategies that optimize the gain of bone mass during childhood and adolescence. Knowledge of the determinants accounting for the physiologic and genetic variations in bone accumulation in children will provide the best means toward the early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. This article reviews the techniques available for bone mass measurements in children and the major determinants and diseases influencing bone accretion during childhood and adolescence.

Bone density testing in clinical practice / Densitometria óssea na prática clínica

The diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring of treatment is a challenge for physicians due to the large number of available tests and complexities of interpretation. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing is a non-invasive measurement to assess skeletal health. The "gold-standard" technology for diagnosis and monitoring is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine, hip, or forearm. Fracture risk can be predicted using DXA and other technologies at many skeletal sites. Despite guidelines for selecting patients for BMD testing and identifying those most likely to benefit from treatment, many patients are not being tested or receiving therapy. Even patients with very high risk of fracture, such as those on long-term glucocorticoid therapy or with prevalent fragility fractures, are often not managed appropriately. The optimal testing strategy varies according to local availability and affordability of BMD testing. The role of BMD testing to monitor therapy is still being defined, and interpretation of serial studies requires special attention to instrument calibration, acquisition technique, analysis, and precision assessment. BMD is usually reported as a T-score, the standard deviation variance of the patient's BMD compared to a normal young-adult reference population. BMD in postmenopausal women is classified as normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis according to criteria established by the World Health Organization. Standardized methodologies are being developed to establish cost-effective intervention thresholds for pharmacological therapy based on T-score combined with clinical risk factors for fracture.

O diagnóstico e monitoração do tratamento da osteoporose é um desafio para os médicos devido ao grande número de testes disponíveis e a complexidades da interpretação. O exame da densidade mineral óssea é uma medida não-invasiva da avaliação da saúde esquelética. A tecnologia "padrão-ouro" para o diagnóstico e monitoração é a absorciometria por raios-X duo-energética (DXA) da coluna, quadril ou antebraço. O risco de fratura pode ser previsto usando DXA e outras tecnologias em vários sítios esqueléticos. Apesar das diretrizes para a medida de da DMO e identificação daqueles que mais provavelmente irão se beneficiar do tratamento, muitos pacientes não estão sendo testados ou recebendo tratamento. Mesmo pacientes com elevado risco de fratura, tais como aqueles em terapia de longo prazo com glicocorticóides, ou mesmo aqueles com fraturas por fragilidade prevalentes, quase nunca estão sendo conduzidos adequadamente. A estratégia diagnóstica ótima varia de acordo com a disponibilidade e acesso à medida da DMO. O papel da medida da DMO para monitorar terapia ainda está sendo definido, e a interpretação de estudos seriados requer atenção para calibração instrumental, técnica de aquisição, análise e avaliação da precisão. A DMO é geralmente descrita como T-score, a variação do desvio-padrão da DMO da paciente pós-menopausa comparada com a DMO de uma população de referência adulta, jovem e normal, sendo classificada como normal, osteopenia ou osteoporose, de acordo com os critérios estabelecidos pela Organização Mundial de Saúde. Metodologias-padrão estão sendo desenvolvidas para estabelecer os custos-efetividade dos limiares de intervenção para terapia farmacológica baseado no T-score combinado com fatores clínicos de risco de fraturas.

Update on osteoporosis therapy / Atualização no tratamento da osteoporose

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength that predisposes a person to increased fracture risk. Fractures are often associated with increased morbidity, higher mortality, loss of function and even psychological consequences. Pharmacotherapeutic interventions (e.g., bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, calcitonin, and teriparatide) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis provide substantial reduction in fracture risk over and above risk reduction with calcium and vitamin D supplementation alone. The importance of nutritional support along with an appropriate exercise regimen, avoiding smoking and excessive alcohol use is to be emphasized along with the pharmacologic approach to osteoporosis. Despite the effectiveness of therapy with pharmacologic agents, most patients who start therapy do not remain on treatment for more than 1 year.

Osteoporose é uma doença esquelética caracterizada pelo comprometimento da força óssea que predispõe ao aumento do risco de fratura na pessoa. As fraturas são sempre relacionadas com aumento da morbidade, alta mortalidade, perda funcional e mesmo conseqüências psicológicas. Intervenções farmacoterapêuticas (por exemplo, bisfosfonatos, moduladores seletivos dos receptores de estrogênios, calcitonina e teriparatida) na mulher com osteoporose pós-menopausa resultam numa redução substancial do risco de fratura, superior ao risco obtido com suplementação de cálcio e vitamina D somente. A importância do suporte nutricional junto com série de exercícios apropriados, o evitar o tabagismo e uso excessivo de álcool devem ser enfatizados junto com a abordagem farmacológica da osteoporose. Apesar da efetividade da terapia com agentes terapêuticos, a maioria dos pacientes que iniciam tratamento não o mantém por mais de um ano.

Low bone mass in children and adolescents / Baixa massa óssea em crianças e adolescentes

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mass and micro architectural alterations of bone tissue leading to enhanced bone fragility and increased fracture risk. Although research in osteoporosis has focused mainly on the role of bone loss in the elderly population, it is becoming increasingly clear that the amount of bone that is gained during growth is also an important determinant of future resistance to fractures. Thus, considerable interest is being placed on defining preventive strategies that optimize the gain of bone mass during childhood and adolescence. Knowledge of the determinants accounting for the physiologic and genetic variations in bone accumulation in children will provide the best means toward the early diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. This article reviews the techniques available for bone mass measurements in children and the major determinants and diseases influencing bone accretion during childhood and adolescence.

Osteoporose é uma doença caracterizada pela baixa massa óssea e alterações de micro arquitetura do tecido ósseo, levando ao aumento da fragilidade óssea e aumento do risco de fratura. Apesar da pesquisa em osteoporose ter focalizado principalmente no papel da perda óssea na população idosa, está começando a ficar claro que a quantidade de osso que é ganho durante o crescimento é também um determinante importante de resistência futura para fraturas. Portanto, interesse considerável está sendo colocado na definição de estratégias preventivas que otimizam o ganho de massa óssea durante a infância e adolescência. O conhecimento dos determinantes responsáveis pelas variações fisiológicas e genéticas, na acumulação óssea nas crianças, irá levar aos melhores meios para o diagnóstico precoce e tratamento da osteoporose. Este artigo revê as técnicas disponíveis para a medida da massa óssea em crianças e os maiores determinantes e doenças que influenciam a aquisição óssea durante a infância e adolescência.