A patient-level pooled analysis assessing the impact of the SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery) score on 1-year clinical outcomes in 6,508 patients enrolled in contemporary coronary stent trials.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score (SXscore) on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: The SXscore has been demonstrated to have an ability to predict clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization. Current studies are limited by the relatively small number of patients in each SXscore group. METHODS: Patient-level data from 7 contemporary coronary stent trials were pooled by an independent academic research organization (Cardialysis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Analysis was performed on a cohort of 6,508 patients treated with drug-eluting stents and who had calculated SXscores. Clinical outcomes in terms of death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite of death, MI, and repeat revascularization) were subsequently stratified according to SXscore quartiles: SXscore(Q1) ≤ 8 (n = 1,702); 8 < SXscore(Q2) < 15 (n = 1,528); 15 ≤ SXscore(Q3) < 23 (n = 1,620); and SXscore(Q4) ≥ 23 (n = 1,658). RESULTS: One-year outcomes were available in 6,496 patients (99.8%). At 1-year follow-up, all clinical outcomes including mortality, MI, repeat revascularization, MACE, and definite and any stent thrombosis were all significantly higher in patients in the highest SXscore quartile. Similar trends were observed in a subgroup of 2,093 patients (32.2%) who presented with an ST- or non-ST-segment elevation MI. The rate of MACE among patients with an SXscore > 32 and ≤ 32 was 24.9% and 14.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). The SXscore was identified as an independent predictor of all clinical outcomes including mortality, MACE, and stent thrombosis (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the consistent ability of the SXscore to identify patients who are at highest risk of adverse events.

Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of SYNTAX score (SXscore), and compare its performance in isolation and combination with the PAMI (The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study) score, for the prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Patients with STEMI were excluded from the original SYNTAX score (SXscore) algorithm. Therefore, the utility of using the SXscore in this patient group remains undefined. METHODS: SXscore was calculated retrospectively in 807 patients with STEMI enrolled in the randomized STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) clinical trials. Clinical outcomes of all-cause death, reinfarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization were subsequently stratified according to SXscore tertiles: SX(LOW) ≤ 9 (n = 311), 9 < SX(MID) ≤ 16 (n = 234), SX(HIGH) >16 (n = 262). RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, all clinical outcomes including mortality, mortality/reinfarction, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of all-cause death, reinfarction and target vessel revascularization), and definite, definite/probable, and any stent thrombosis were all significantly higher in patients in the highest SXscore tertile. SXscore was identified as an independent predictor of mortality, MACE, and stent thrombosis out to 1-year follow-up. The combination SYNTAX-PAMI score led to a net reclassification improvement of 15.7% and 4.6% for mortality and MACE, respectively. The C-statistics for the SXscore, PAMI score, and the combined SYNTAX-PAMI score were 0.65, 0.81, and 0.73 for 1-year mortality, and 0.68, 0.64, and 0.69 for 1-year MACE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SXscore does have a role in the risk stratification of patients with STEMI having primary percutaneous coronary intervention; however, this ability can be improved through a combination with clinical variables. (Multicentre 2×2 Factorial Randomised Study Comparing Tirofiban Versus Abciximab and SES Versus BMS in AMI; NCT00229515).

Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents.

BACKGROUND: New-generation coronary stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to reduce the risk of restenosis. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in efficacy and safety between the two types of stents on the basis of prospectively adjudicated end points endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration. METHODS: In this multicenter, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 2292 patients to undergo treatment with coronary stents releasing either zotarolimus or everolimus. Twenty percent of patients were randomly selected for repeat angiography at 13 months. The primary end point was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, any myocardial infarction (not clearly attributable to a nontarget vessel), or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization within 12 months. The secondary angiographic end point was the extent of in-stent stenosis at 13 months. RESULTS: At least one off-label criterion for stent placement was present in 66% of patients. The zotarolimus-eluting stent was noninferior to the everolimus-eluting stent with respect to the primary end point, which occurred in 8.2% and 8.3% of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of death from cardiac causes, any myocardial infarction, or revascularization. The rate of stent thrombosis was 2.3% in the zotarolimus-stent group and 1.5% in the everolimus-stent group (P=0.17). The zotarolimus-eluting stent was also noninferior regarding the degree (+/-SD) of in-stent stenosis (21.65+/-14.42% for zotarolimus vs. 19.76+/-14.64% for everolimus, P=0.04 for noninferiority). In-stent late lumen loss was 0.27+/-0.43 mm in the zotarolimus-stent group versus 0.19+/-0.40 mm in the everolimus-stent group (P=0.08). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: At 13 months, the new-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent was found to be noninferior to the everolimus-eluting stent in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00617084.)

The SYNTAX score revisited: a reassessment of the SYNTAX score reproducibility.

OBJECTIVES: To reassess the reproducibility of the SYNTAX score. BACKGROUND: The SYNTAX score appears to have an important role to play in the evaluation of patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing revascularisation. However, the calculation of the SYNTAX score relies on the subjective assessment of lesions using coronary angiography, and therefore is subject to intra-and inter-observer variability. METHODS: The SYNTAX score was calculated in 100 patients randomly selected from the SYNTAX trial, on two occasions 8 weeks apart, by a team made up of three interventional cardiologists. The weighted kappa values were compared with values obtained 1 year previously, when core lab analysts assessed the intra-observer reproducibility amongst the same patient cohort. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard deviation difference in SYNTAX score was 2.1 +/- 7.6. The respective weighted kappa values for the number of lesions, bifurcation lesions, ostial lesions, and total occlusions were 0.62, 0.36, 0.66, and 0.91 compared with 0.59, 0.41, 0.63, and 0.82 in the previous core lab assessment. The weighted kappa for the intra-observer reproducibility of the SYNTAX score grouped into deciles was 0.54, and according to the terciles < or = 22, >22-< or = 32, >32 was 0.51 both indicating a moderate level of agreement beyond the level of chance. In the previous assessment, the comparative kappa values were 0.45 and 0.53. CONCLUSIONS: The SYNTAX score has moderate intra-observer reproducibility when assessed by a team of three interventional cardiologists, which is consistent with a prior evaluation performed by core lab analysts. The scoring of bifurcation lesions remains the main source of inconsistency.

Biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting permanent polymer stent performance in long lesions: results from the LEADERS multicentre trial substudy.

AIMS: Lesion length remains a predictor of target lesion revascularisation and results of long lesion stenting remain poor. Sirolimus-eluting stents have been shown to perform better than paclitaxel eluting stents in long lesions. In this substudy of the LEADERS trial, we compared the performance of biolimus biodegradable polymer (BES) and sirolimus permanent polymer stents (SES) in long lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1,707 'all-comer' patients were randomly allocated to treatment with BES and SES. A stratified analysis of angiographic and clinical outcomes at nine months and one year, respectively was performed for vessels with lesion length <20 mm versus >20 mm (as measured by quantitative angiography).Of 1,707 patients, 592 BES patients with 831 lesions and 619 SES patients with 876 lesions had only short lesions treated. One hundred and fifty-three BES patients with 166 lesions and 151 SES patients with 162 lesions had long lesions. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics, except for higher number of patients with long lesions presenting with acute myocardial infarction in both stent groups. Long lesions tended to have lower MLD and greater percent diameter stenosis at baseline than short lesions. Late loss was greater for long lesions than short lesions. There was no statistically significant difference in late loss between BES and SES stents (0.32+/-0.69 vs 0.24+/-0.57, p=0.59). Binary in-segment restenosis was present in 23.2% versus 13.1% of long lesions treated with BES and SES, respectively (p=0.042). In patients with long lesions, the overall MACE rate was similar for BES and SES (17% vs 14.6%; p=0.62). There was a trend towards higher overall TLR rate with BES (12.4 % vs 6.0%; HR=2.06; p=0.07) and clinically driven TLR (10.5% vs 5.3%: HR 1.94; p=0.13). Rates of definite stent thrombosis were 3.3% in the long lesion group and 1.3-1.7 % in the short lesion group. CONCLUSIONS: BES and SES appear similar with respect to MACE in long lesions in this "all-comer" patient population. However, long lesions tended to have a higher rate of binary in-segment restenosis and TLR following BES than SES treatment.

Three-year follow-up of the ARTS-II# - sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

AIMS: Late stent thrombosis has been documented in on- and off-label populations. Stent thrombosis is more frequently in higher risk patients and there is still scarce data about the impact on late adverse cardiac events. The aim therefore is to determine the 3-year safety and effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (SES) (Cypher(R)) implantation in patients with multivessel disease and to compare outcomes with the historical results of the two arms of the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study (ARTS-I). METHODS AND RESULTS: ARTS-II is a 45 centre, 607 patient single-arm study. Three years outcomes were compared to the outcome of the historical cohorts of ARTS-I using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) definitions. Patients were stratified by clinical site to ensure that at least 1/3 had 3-vessel disease to achieve a number of treated lesions per patient comparable to ARTS-I. Stent thrombosis was re-adjudicated using the ARC definitions. An angiographic coronary score to characterise lesion complexity was applied to allow the identification of patients who might benefit the most from multivessel stenting. In ARTS-II, 46.6% of the patients underwent 3-vessel treatment as compared to 18.0% in ARTS-I percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=600) with bare metal stents (BMS). Diabetes was present in 26.2% in ARTS-II as compared to 17.3% in ARTS-I. In ARTS-II, patients received on average 3.7 stents resulting in a mean total stented length of 72.5 mm. The 3-year survival rate in ARTS-II was 97.0%, comparable to the 95.6% and 96.0% of the historical surgical (n=605) and PCI cohorts of ARTS-I. The death/cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/myocardial infarction (MI) event free survival rate in ARTS-II was 91.7%, versus 89.1% (p=0.1) and 87.2% (p=0.007) in ARTS-I coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and PCI cohorts, respectively. Freedom from revascularisation in ARTS-II was 85.5%, lower than in ARTS-I CABG (93.4%; p<0.001) but higher than in ARTS-I PCI (73.7%; p<0.001) cohorts. MACCE free survival was 80.6% in ARTS-II, comparable to ARTS-I CABG (83.8%; p=0.21) but superior to ARTS-I PCI (66.0%; p<0.0001). The incidence of stent thrombosis (ARC any) in ART-II was 6.4% (39/607 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher clinical and angiographic risk profile, the overall MACCE rate at three years was lower in ARTS-II than in the ARTS-I PCI and comparable to ARTS-I CABG. However, the re-intervention rate in ARTS-I CABG remained significantly lower than in ARTS-II.

Short- and long- term health related quality-of-life and anginal status after randomisation to coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: results of the Arterial Revascularisation Therapy Study (ARTS).

BACKGROUND: Health related quality-of-life (HRQL) beyond one year of treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with stenting or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is yet unknown. The Arterial Revascularisation Therapy Study (ARTS) was designed to compare CABG and stenting in multivessel disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: HRQL was evaluated at baseline, at 1- month and at 6-, 12- and 36 months after revascularisation using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in patients randomised to stenting (n=483) versus CABG (n=492). Both stenting and CABG resulted in significant improvement of HRQL and anginal status. Although there was a trend for better HRQL after CABG up to one year, the disparity between the two procedures decreased long-term. Most of the difference between the two procedures was attributed to repeat interventions in the stent group; at three years, 19% of stent patients versus 13% of CABG patients (p<0.0001) had undergone a repeat intervention. On most of the SF-36 scores, there was no difference between diabetics and non-diabetics, with diabetic patients having a worse score only on general health and physical functioning at all time points (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both stenting and CABG resulted in a significant improvement in HRQL especially up to one year, but CABG was associated with less angina at all time points. There was a trend for better HRQL after CABG, but this difference was mainly attributed to repeat revascularisation in the stent group. Based on these findings, patients should select for themselves whether or not they would prefer the improved HRQL benefits after CABG, or whether they would prefer more angina after PCI and avoid a major operation.

The clinical outcome of percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions in multivessel coronary artery disease with the sirolimus-eluting stent: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study part II (ARTS II).

AIMS: Little is known about the impact of treating bifurcations on the overall outcome of multivessel coronary artery disease treated with stenting. This analysis was made to investigate the 1 year clinical outcome of the treatment of bifurcation lesions using sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with multivessel disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among a total of 607 patients (2160 lesions) in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study part II (ARTS II), there were 324 patients in whom at least one bifurcation lesion was treated (465 lesions). Patients with bifurcations were compared with those without bifurcations in terms of baseline characteristics and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Patients with 'true' (200 patients) vs. 'partial' bifurcations (124 patients) and usage of a one- (263 patients) vs. two-stent strategy (61 patients) were also evaluated. The bifurcation group was associated with more complex lesion and procedural characteristics than the non-bifurcation group. However, there was no significant difference in 1 year MACCE rates between the bifurcation group and the non-bifurcation group (13.3 vs. 11.0%, P=0.46). MACCE in patients with true bifurcations was 13.0 vs. 13.7% for partial bifurcations (P=0.87) and 14.1 vs. 9.8% for one- vs. two-stent strategy (P=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial without angiographic follow-up, the presence of bifurcations did not affect 1 year outcomes after SES implantation. The outcomes in true vs. partial bifurcations and using one vs. two stents were similar when the treatment strategies were left to the operator's discretion.

Randomised comparison of Nobori, biolimus A9-eluting coronary stent with a Taxus(R), paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent in patients with stenosis in native coronary arteries: the Nobori 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: We studied the Nobori coronary stent coated with a bioabsorbable polymer and the anti-proliferative agent Biolimus A9 which may reduce neointimal formation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in up to two native coronary arteries, in 29 centres across Europe, Asia and Australia were randomly (2:1) assigned to receive the Biolimus A9 eluting stent Nobori (85 patients) or paclitaxel eluting stent Taxus(R) (35 patients). The two groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. The primary end point of non-inferiority for in-stent late loss of Nobori stent versus Taxus(R) stent, at 9 months, was reached with the values of 0.15+/-0.27 mm with Nobori stent and 0.32+/-0.33 mm with Taxus(R) stent (p=0.006). Neointimal volume obstruction was 2.2+/-6.0% and 8.9+/-9.2% for Nobori and Taxus(R) stent respectively (p=0.017). The rates of death, myocardial infarction and any target vessel revascularisation at 9 months were 0%, 4.7%, and 7.1% respectively for Nobori stent, and 0%, 8.6% and 14.3% respectively for Taxus(R) stent. Clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation rate was 0% for Nobori stent and 2.9% for Taxus(R) stent. Stent thrombosis rates at 9 months were 0% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial the Nobori Biolimus A9 eluting stent proved to be safe and effective in reducing neointimal proliferation. The long term safety remains to be confirmed during the extended follow-up period of 5 years.

Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis: implications for the design of longitudinal studies.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess in vivo the reproducibility of tissue characterization using spectral analysis of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) radiofrequency data (IVUS-VH). BACKGROUND: Despite the need for reproducibility data to design longitudinal studies, such information remains unexplored. METHODS AND RESULTS: IVUS-VH (Volcano Corp., Rancho Cordova, USA) was performed in patients referred for elective percutaneous intervention and in whom a non-intervened vessel was judged suitable for a safe IVUS interrogation. The IVUS catheters used were commercially available catheters (20 MHz, Volcano Corp., Rancho Cordova, USA). Following IVUS-VH acquisition, and after the disengagement and re-engagement of the guiding catheter, an additional acquisition was performed using a new IVUS catheter. Fifteen patients with 16 non-significant lesions were assessed by 2 independent observers. The relative inter-catheter differences regarding geometrical measurements were negligible for both observers. The inter-catheter relative difference in plaque cross-sectional area (CSA) was 3.2% for observer 1 and 0.5% for observer 2. The limits of agreement for (observer 1 measurements) lumen, vessel, plaque and plaque burden measurements were 0.82, -1.10 mm(2); 0.80, -0.66 mm(2); 1.08, -0.66 mm(2); and 5.83, -3.89%; respectively. Limits of agreement for calcium, fibrous, fibrolipidic and necrotic core CSA measurements were 0.22, -0.25 mm(2); 1.02, -0.71 mm(2); 0.61, -0.65 mm(2); and 0.43, -0.38 mm(2) respectively. Regarding the inter-observer agreement, the limits of agreement for lumen, vessel, plaque and plaque burden measurements were 2.61, -2.09 mm(2); 2.20-3.03 mm(2); 1.70, -3.04 mm(2); and 9.16, -16.41%; respectively, and for calcium, fibrous, fibrolipidic and necrotic core measurements of 0.08, -0.09 mm(2); 0.89, -1.28 mm(2); 0.74, -1.06 mm(2); and 0.16, -0.20 mm(2); respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the geometrical and compositional output of IVUS-VH is acceptably reproducible.

One-year results of coronary revascularization in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.Sirolimus stent vs. coronary artery bypass surgery and bare metal stent: insights from ARTS-II and ARTS-I.

BACKGROUND: ARTS-II was designed to evaluate the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus ARTS-I. The objective of this analysis is to assess the safety and efficacy of the SES in diabetic patients with multivessel disease (MVD) versus both arms of ARTS-I. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ARTS studies included 367 diabetic patients (ARTS-II: 159; ARTS-I-CABG: 96; ARTS-I-PCI: 112). Baseline characteristics showed a more diseased patient population in the ARTS-II study: 50.3% with 3VD vs. 35.4% (ARTS-I-CABG) and 30.8% (ARTS-I-PCI) (p=0.003). Treated or anastomosed lesions were 3.2+/-1.2 (ARTS-II), 2.8+/-0.8 (ARTS-I-CABG) and 2.5+/-1.1 (ARTS-I-PCI). At 30 days there was a significant difference in MACCE between ARTS-II (4.4%) and ARTS-I-PCI (12.5%) (p=0.02). At 1-year, the death rate was 2.5% (ARTS-II) vs. 3.1% (ARTS-I-CABG) and 6.3% (ARTS-I-PCI) without significant differences. Myocardial infarction rate was 0.6% (ARTS-II) vs. 2.1% (ARTS-I-CABG; p=0.56) and 6.3% (ARTS-I-PCI; p=0.01). The need for repeat revascularization was 12.6% (ARTS-II) vs. 4.2% (ARTS-I-CABG; p=0.027) and 22.3% (ARTS-I-PCI; p= 0.046). MACCE-free survival was 84.3% (ARTS-II) vs. 85.4% (ARTS-I-CABG; p=0.86) and 63.4% (ARTS-I-PCI; p<0.001). Also at 1 year, the overall MACCE rate in patients with diabetes was significantly higher than in nondiabetic patients, 15.7% vs. 8.5%, respectively [RR 1.85, 95%CI (1.16,2.97), p=0.015), due to a higher incidence of death and need for repeat revascularization, 2.5% vs. 0.4 and 12.5% vs. 5.6% in diabetes vs. nondiabetes groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite more extensive and treated disease, the overall MACCE-free survival in diabetic patients at 1 year in ARTS-II is similar to ARTS-I-CABG.

Virtual histology and remodelling index allow in vivo identification of allegedly high-risk coronary plaques in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a three vessel intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Virtual histology (VH) uses intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) radiofrequency spectral analysis to locally identify the morphology and composition of atherosclerotic plaques. We sought to explore in vivo the relation between IVUS-derived thin cap fibro-atheroma (IDTCFA) and remodelling index in patients with acute coronary syndromes using IVUS-VH. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (63 vessels) were enrolled. When compared to cross sectional areas (CSAs) without necrotic core in contact with the lumen (NCCL), CSAs with NCCL had a larger plaque burden 42.8+/-11.5% vs. 32.8+/-11.5%, p<0.001; higher overall necrotic core content [13.8+/-10.7% vs. 2.3+/-7.9% (p<0.001)] and calcified tissue [4.7+/-6.5 vs. 0.66+/-2.1% (p<0.001)]. On average there were 2 IVUS-derived thin cap fibro-atheroma (IDTCFA) per patient. Nearly half of the IDTCFAs had positive remodelling. CONCLUSIONS: CSAs with NCCL had worse morphological profiles than those with no NCCL. The simultaneous and more detailed assessment of IDTCFA and remodelling index identifies a reduced number of allegedly high-risk plaques. The findings of this study may have important clinical implications, since they shed light into a possible method of identiying potentially high-risk plaques suitable for pharmacological and/or local treatment.

The effect of variable dose and release kinetics on neointimal hyperplasia using a novel paclitaxel-eluting stent platform: the Paclitaxel In-Stent Controlled Elution Study (PISCES).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of variable dose and release kinetics of paclitaxel on neointimal hyperplasia. BACKGROUND: Conventional paclitaxel-eluting stents use a durable polymer coating as a vehicle for drug delivery. The Conor stent (Conor Medsystems, Menlo Park, California) with intra-strut wells and erodable polymer is specifically designed for drug delivery with programmable pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-four patients with single vessel disease received either a bare metal Conor stent (n = 53) or one of six different release formulations that varied in dose (10 or 30 microg) and elution release kinetics (first order, zero order), direction (abluminal, luminal), and duration (5, 10, and 30 days). End points at six months (bare stent group) and at four months (eluting stent groups) were angiographic late loss and neointimal tissue volume by intravascular ultrasound and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: The lowest in-stent late loss (0.38 mm, p <0.01, and 0.30 mm, p <0.01) and volume obstruction (8%, p <0.01, and 5%, p <0.01) were observed with the 10-microg and 30-microg doses in the 30-day release groups respectively, whereas the highest in-stent late loss (0.88 mm), volume obstruction (26%), and restenosis rate (11.6%) were observed in the bare stent group. The overall MACE rate of the eluting stent group was 8.6%: death 0.5%, myocardial infarction 2.7%, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) 5.3%. Sub-acute thrombosis was 0.5%. The TLR rates in the two 30-day release groups were 0% and 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This novel eluting stent platform, using an erodable polymer with complete elution of low doses of paclitaxel, is safe. The inhibition of the in-stent neointimal hyperplasia was best in the long release groups.

Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study Part II - Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel de novo coronary artery lesions.

AIM: To determine the safety and effectiveness of CYPHER(R) sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with multivessel disease; and to compare outcomes against the historical results of the two arms of the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study (ARTS I). METHODS AND RESULTS: ARTS II is a 45 center, 607 patient single arm trial; the1-year outcomes were compared to the historical controls of the ARTS I trial, using conventional and Bayesian statistical methods. Patients were stratified by clinical site to ensure that at least one-third had 3-vessel disease to achieve the number of treatable lesions per patient comparable to ARTS I. Multivessel stenting was performed with sirolimus-eluting stents according to local institutional practice with the goal of achieving complete revascularisation. The majority of patients (53.5%) had 3-vessel disease and diabetes was present in 26.2%. Mean stented length was 72.5mm, with 3.7 stents implanted per patient. The 1-year survival rate was 99.0%, the composite of death / stroke and MI-free survival was 96.9%, freedom from revascularisation was 91.5% and the composite endpoint of MACCE-free survival was 89.5% (the primary endpoint). Diabetic patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents were more likely to undergo repeat revascularisation (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.16 - 3.34) and experience a MACCE (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.16 - 2.97) than non-diabetics at 1-year. In the unadjusted comparison with the historical control arms of ARTS-I-CABG and ARTS-I-PCI, the respective relative risks (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the endpoints were: (1) freedom from repeat revascularisation RR 2.03 (1.23-3.34) and RR 0.44 (0.31-0.61) respectively; and (2) MACCE free survival RR 0.89 (0.65-1.23) and RR 0.39 (0.30-0.51) respectively. CONCLUSION: The low incidence of MACCE and repeat revascularisation in ARTS II suggests that contemporary PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents is safe and efficacious for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Compared to the historical population of ARTS I, surgery still afforded a lower need for repeat revascularisation although overall MACCE rates in ARTS II approached the surgical results and were significantly better than bare stenting in ARTS I.

One-year clinical outcome of various doses and pharmacokinetic release formulations of paclitaxel eluted from an erodable polymer - Insight in the Paclitaxel In-Stent Controlled Elution Study (PISCES).

AIMS: The one year clinical benefit of various doses and release durations of paclitaxel eluted from an erodable polymer has not been evaluated so far. METHODS AND RESULTS: Conor paclitaxel-eluting stents have intra-stent wells in which drug and polymer are deposited. Stents with six different release formulations (dose: 10 microg or 30 microg, duration: 5, 10 or 30 days, direction: mural or bidirectional) were implanted in 6 patient cohorts. Clinical follow-up was conducted at 4 and 12 months. Quantitative angiography and IVUS were performed at 4 months, and additional angiographic and IVUS follow-up were performed for groups D5 (10microg/30days/mural) and D6 (30microg/30days/mural), as they had shown the most favorable results at 4 months. At one year, the lowest major adverse cardiac event rates were observed in the slow release (30 day) group (5.1% in D5 and 6.9% in D6). One-year in-stent late loss was 0.52+/-0.34 mm in D5 and 0.36+/-0.50mm in D6 (p=0.20) while neointimal area was 0.99+/-0.54 mm2 in D5 and 0.77+/-0.92 mm2 in D6 (p=0.42). Corresponding in-stent binary restenosis at one year was 0% and 5.6% respectively (p=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received the slow release formulation stent had better clinical outcome at one year than those who received the fast release formulation. However, the effect on neointimal suppression requires investigation in a larger population to determine whether the high dose formulation confers an additional clinical benefit.

The effect of variable dose and release kinetics on neointimal hyperplasia using a novel paclitaxel-eluting stent platform

The aim of this study was to evaluate th effect of variable dose and release kinetics of paclitaxel on neointimal hyperplasia.Conventional paclitaxel-eluting stents use a durable polymer coating as vehicle for drug delivery.The Conor stent (Conor Medsystem, Menlo Park, Califórnia) with intra-strut wells and erodable polymer is specifically designed for drug delivery with programmable pharmakocinetics.Two hundred and forty-four patients with single vessel disease received either a bare metal Conor stent(n=53) or one of six different release formulations that varied in dose (10 or 30yg) and elution release kinetics (first order, zero oder), direction (abluminal, luminal), and duration (5, 10, and 30 days)...

One-year clinical outcome of various doses and pharmacokinetic release formulations of paclitaxel elutedfrom an erodable polymer - Insight in the PaclitaxelIn-Stent Controlled Elution Study (PISCES)

The one year clinical benefit of various doses and release durations of paclitaxel eluted from an erodablepolymer has not been evaluated so far.Methods and results: Conor paclitaxel-eluting stents have intra-stent wells in which drug and polymer aredeposited. Stents with six different release formulations (dose: 10 μg or 30 μg, duration: 5, 10 or 30 days,direction: mural or bidirectional) were implanted in 6 patient cohorts. Clinical follow-up was conducted at4 and 12 months. Quantitative angiography and IVUS were performed at 4 months, and additional angiographicand IVUS follow-up were performed for groups D5 (10μg/30days/mural) and D6(30μg/30days/mural), as they had shown the most favorable results at 4 months. At one year, the lowestmajor adverse cardiac event rates were observed in the slow release (30 day) group (5.1% in D5 and 6.9%in D6). One-year in-stent late loss was 0.52±0.34 mm in D5 and 0.36±0.50mm in D6 (p=0.20) whileneointimal area was 0.99±0.54 mm2 in D5 and 0.77±0.92 mm2 in D6 (p=0.42). Corresponding in-stentbinary restenosis at one year was 0% and 5.6% respectively (p=0.36).Conclusions: Patients who received the slow release formulation stent had better clinical outcome at oneyear than those who received the fast release formulation. However, the effect on neointimal suppressionrequires investigation in a larger population to determine whether the high dose formulation confers anadditional clinical benefit.

Effect of structure and form on the ability of plant sterols to inhibit cholesterol absorption in hamsters.

We investigated the effect of three types of plant sterols (4-desmethylsterols, 4,4'-dimethylsterols, and pentacyclic triterpene alcohols) in three forms (free, esterified with FA, or with phenolic acids) on cholesterol absorption. Plant sterol fractions derived from soybean (99% 4-desmethylsterols), rice bran (70% 4,4'-dimethylsterols), or shea nut (89% pentacyclic triterpene alcohols) were fed to male hamsters (n = 20/group) as free sterols or esterified with FA or phenolic acids (cinnamic or ferulic). Cholesterol absorption was measured after 5-8.5 (mean, 7) wk by a dual-isotope technique. Soybean sterol intake significantly reduced cholesterol absorption efficiency (23%) and plasma total cholesterol (11%). Rice bran sterols tended to lower cholesterol absorption efficiency by 7% and plasma total cholesterol by 5%, whereas shea nut sterols had no effect. In hamsters, dietary 4-desmethylsterols were more effective than 4,4'-dimethylsterols in lowering cholesterol absorption and levels of cholesterol in blood. Pentacyclic triterpene alcohols had no effect on the absorption of cholesterol or on its level in blood. Esterification with FA did not impair the ability of 4-desmethylsterols and 4,4'-dimethylsterols to inhibit cholesterol absorption, whereas esterification with phenolic acids reduced this ability. This study supports the use of 4-desmethylsterols, esterified with FA to increase solubility, as the most effective cholesterol-lowering plant sterols in the diet.

A randomized comparison of the value of additional stenting after optimal balloon angioplasty for long coronary lesions: final results of the additional value of NIR stents for treatment of long coronary lesions (ADVANCE) study.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the clinical benefit of additional stent implantation after achieving an optimal result of balloon angioplasty (BA) in long coronary lesions (>20 mm). BACKGROUND: Long coronary lesions are associated with increased early complications and late restenosis after BA. Stenting improves the early outcome, but stent restenosis is also related to both lesion length and stent length. METHODS: A total of 437 patients with a single native lesion 20 to 50 mm in length were included and underwent BA, using long balloons matched to lesion length and vessel diameter (balloon/artery ratio 1.1) to achieve a diameter stenosis (DS) <30% by on-line quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). "Bail-out stenting" was performed for flow-limiting dissections or >50% DS. Patients in whom an optimal BA result was achieved were randomized to additional stenting (using NIR stents) or no stenting. The primary end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at nine months, and core laboratory QCA was performed on serial angiograms. RESULTS: Bailout stenting was necessary in 149 patients (34%) and was associated with a significantly increased risk of peri-procedural infarction (p < 0.02). Among the 288 randomized patients, the mean lesion length was 27+/-9 mm, and the vessel diameter was 2.78+/-0.52 mm. The procedural success rate was 90% for the 143 patients assigned to BA alone (control group), as compared with 93% in the 145 patients assigned to additional stenting (stent group), which resulted in a superior early minimal lumen diameter (0.54 mm, p < 0.001) and led to reduced angiographic restenosis (27% vs. 42%, p = 0.022). Freedom from MACE at nine months was 77% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of provisional stenting for long coronary lesions led to bailout stenting in one-third of patients, with a threefold increase in peri-procedural infarction. Additional stenting yielded a lower angiographic restenosis rate, but no reduction in MACE at nine months.