Efficacy and safety of ossein-hydroxyapatite complex versus calcium carbonate to prevent bone loss.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ossein-hydroxyapatite complex (OHC) versus calcium carbonate (CC) for preventing bone loss during perimenopause in current clinical practice.Methods: The prospective, comparative, non-randomized, open-label study included 851 perimenopausal women with basal bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≥-2 standard deviations (SDs). Participants received either OHC (712 mg calcium/day) or CC (1000 mg calcium/day) over 3 years. BMD was evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) at baseline and after 18 and 36 months of follow-up. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were also recorded.Results: In women receiving OHC, BMD at the L2-L4 site remained stable over the 3-year follow-up period (mean [SD] change 0.00 [0.11] g/cm2). BMD in the CC arm decreased -3.1% (mean [SD] - 0.03 [0.11] g/cm2). Between-group differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001) and favored OHC. ADRs were more frequent in the CC group (7.7% vs. 2.7% in the OHC group; p = 0.001), affecting primarily the gastrointestinal system.Conclusion: OHC showed greater efficacy and tolerability than CC for bone loss prevention in perimenopausal women in real-world practice. As the daily dose of calcium was higher in the CC group, the differences might be linked to the ossein compound in OHC.

The association between type 2 diabetes mellitus, hip fracture, and post-hip fracture mortality: a multi-state cohort analysis.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an excess risk of fractures and overall mortality. This study compared hip fracture and post-hip fracture mortality in T2DM and non-diabetic subjects. The salient findings are that subjects in T2DM are at higher risk of dying after suffering a hip fracture. INTRODUCTION: Previous research suggests that individuals with T2DM are at an excess risk of both fractures and overall mortality, but their combined effect is unknown. Using multi-state cohort analyses, we estimate the association between T2DM and the transition to hip fracture, post-hip fracture mortality, and hip fracture-free all-cause death. METHODS: Population-based cohort from Catalonia, Spain, including all individuals aged 65 to 80 years with a recorded diagnosis of T2DM on 1 January 2006; and non-T2DM matched (up to 2:1) by year of birth, gender, and primary care practice. RESULTS: A total of 44,802 T2DM and 81,233 matched controls (53% women, mean age 72 years old) were followed for a median of 8 years: 23,818 died without fracturing and 3317 broke a hip, of whom 838 subsequently died. Adjusted HRs for hip fracture-free mortality were 1.32 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.37) for men and 1.72 (95% CI 1.65 to 1.79) for women. HRs for hip fracture were 1.24 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.43) and 1.48 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.60), whilst HRs for post-hip fracture mortality were 1.28 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.60) and 1.57 (95% CI 1.31 to 1.88) in men and women, respectively. CONCLUSION: T2DM individuals are at increased risk of hip fracture, post-hip fracture mortality, and hip fracture-free death. After adjustment, T2DM men were at a 28% higher risk of dying after suffering a hip fracture and women had 57% excess risk of post-hip fracture mortality.

El papel de la determinación de un marcador de resorción, el telopéptido carboxiterminal del colágeno I, en la valoración del cumplimiento terapéutico en pacientes tratadas con bifosfonatos orales / The determining role of a resorption marker,carboxyterminal telopeptide of collagen I,in assessing therapeutic compliance inpatients treated with oral bisphosphonates

Objetivo: Se estima que al año entre el 50-60% de los pacientes tratados con fármacos para la osteoporosis son incumplidores. Disponemos de diferentes métodos indirectos de valoración del cumplimiento. Nuestro objetivo es testar una única determinación del telopéptido carboxiterminal del colágeno tipo I (CTX) para valorar el cumplimiento en pacientes tratadas con bifosfonatos, de forma aislada o junto al cuestionario de Morinsky-Green. Material y método: Estudio de validación diagnóstica realizado en 10 centros de Cataluña. Mediante muestreo consecutivo se seleccionaron mujeres postmenopáusicas con osteoporosis y tratadas con un mismo fármaco antirresortivo en el último año; se excluyeron aquellas tratadas con un fármaco diferente a bifosfonato, con deterioro cognitivo, enfermedad terminal, o insuficiencia renal avanzada, o fractura en el año previo. Se recogieron datos sobre el diagnóstico de osteoporosis y tipo de tratamiento. Se solicitó analítica con determinación del CTX. Como gold-standard se utilizó la tasa de posesión de medicación (Medication Possession Ratio, MPR). Mediante metodología de la curva ROC se estableció el punto de corte teórico del CTX. Se calculó la sensibilidad, la especificidad y los valores predictivos positivos para estimar el cumplimiento terapéutico. Resultados: Se incluyeron 100 pacientes, de las cuales más de la mitad recibían alendronato. Según la MPR, un 70% eran cumplidoras. El valor medio del CTX fue de 0,193±0,146 ng/ml, siendo inferior en las pacientes cumplidoras. Se estableció como punto de corte para valorar el cumplimiento un valor de 0,196 ng/ml. La valoración conjunta del CTX junto al cuestionario de Morinsky-Green presentó mayor capacidad discriminativa. Conclusiones: La realización de una única determinación del CTX (<0,196 ng/ml) junto al cuestionario de Morinsky-Green permite valorar mejor el cumplimiento terapéutico en pacientes tratadas con bifosfonatos

Objective:It is estimated that in one year between 50‐60% of patients treated with osteoporosis drugs are non‐com‐pliant. There are different indirect methods of assessing compliance. Our objective is to test a single determination ofthe carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) to assess compliance in patients treated with bisphosphonates,either on its own or together with the Morinsky‐Green questionnaire.Material and method:A diagnostic assessment study was carried out in 10 centers in Catalonia. Through consecutivesampling, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were selected and treated with the same antiresorptive drug inthe last year. Those treated with a drug other than bisphosphonate, with cognitive impairment, terminal illness, advancedrenal failure or fracture in the previous year, were excluded. Data were collected on the diagnosis of osteoporosis andtype of treatment. Analysis was requested with CTX determination. As a gold standard, the medication possession rate(MPR) was used. Using the ROC curve methodology, the theoretical CTX cut‐off point was established. Sensitivity, spe‐cificity and positive predictive values were calculated to estimate therapeutic compliance.Results:100 patients were included, of which more than half were being treated with alendronate. According to theMPR, 70% were compliant. The mean CTX value was 0.193±0.146 ng/ml. It was lower in the compliant patients. A valueof 0.196 ng/ml was established as a cut‐off point to assess compliance. The joint assessment of the CTX together withthe Morinsky‐Green questionnaire showed greater discriminatory capacity.Conclusions:Carrying out a single determination of CTX (<0.196 ng/ml) along with the Morinsky‐Green questionnaireallows us to more accurately assess the therapeutic compliance in patients treated with bisphosphonates

Uso de fármacos para la osteoporosis en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2: estudio de cohortes de base poblacional / Use of drugs for osteoporosis treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: population-based cohort study

Objetivo: Determinar si existen diferencias en la prevalencia del uso de fármacos para la osteoporosis entre pacientes diabéticos tipo 2 (DM2) y no diabéticos. Material y método: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivas con datos del Sistema de Información para el Desarrollo de la Investigación en Atención Primaria (SIDIAP), que contiene información clínica anonimizada de más de 5 millones de pacientes de Cataluña. Se seleccionaron todos los pacientes de ≥50 años de edad con diagnóstico de DM2, que fueron apareados con dos sujetos sin diabetes. Se recogió información sobre variables descriptivas, fracturas prevalentes y el uso de fármacos para la osteoporosis agrupados en bifosfonatos (BF), suplementos calcio y vitamina D (CaD), y cualquier fármaco para la osteoporosis (FPO). Mediante regresión logística se calculó la asociación entre la presencia de DM2 y el uso de FPO, ajustando por variables confusoras. Resultados: Se identificaron 166.106 pacientes con DM2 y 332.212 no diabéticos. Los DM2 tenían mayor prevalencia de fractura que los no diabéticos (1,3% vs. 0,3%). El uso de BF en los pacientes con DM2 era del 6,6%, frente al 9,3% en los no diabéticos (p<0,001); de CaD, 9,7% vs. 12,3% (p<0,001); y de FPO, 7,6% vs. 10,7% (p<0,001). Tras ajustar por variables confusoras, los pacientes con DM2 presentaban menor probabilidad de ser tratados con BF (OR=0,67; IC95%: 0,64-0,68), con CaD (OR=0,71; IC95%: 0,70-0,73) o con FPO (OR=0,66; IC95%: 0,64-0,67) que los no diabéticos. Conclusiones: A pesar de presentar una mayor prevalencia de fracturas previas, los pacientes con DM2 tienen más del 30% de probabilidad de no recibir un FPO que los no diabéticos. Esto podría ser debido a una infravaloración del riesgo en estos pacientes (AU)

Objective: Ascertain whether there are differences in the prevalence of osteoporosis drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and non-diabetic patients. Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study with data from the Information System for the Development of Primary Care Research (SIDIAP), which contains anonymous clinical information from more than 5 million patients in Catalonia. All 50-year-old patients diagnosed with DM2, who were matched with two subjects without diabetes, were selected. Information on descriptive variables, prevalent fractures and the use of osteoporosis drugs grouped in bisphosphonates (BF), calcium and vitamin D supplements (CaD), and any osteoporosis drug (OD) were collected. Through logistic regression, the association between the presence of DM2 and the use of OD was calculated, adjusting for confounding variables. Results: A total of 166,106 patients with DM2 and 332,212 non-diabetics. The DM2 group presented a higher prevalence of fracture than did diabetics (1.3% vs 0.3%). The use of BF in patients with DM2 was 6.6%, compared to 9.3% in non-diabetics (p<0.001). Of CaD, 9.7% vs 12.3% (p<0.001) and OD, 7.6% vs 10.7% (p<0.001). After adjusting for variable confounders, the patients with DM2 presented a lower probability of being treated with BF (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.64-0.68), with CaD (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.70-0.73) or with OD (OR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.64-0.67) than non-diabetics. Conclusions: Despite having a higher prevalence of fractures in patients with DM2, they have more than 30% chance of not having received an OD than non-diabetic patients. This may be attributed to an underestimation of risk in these patients (AU)

Excess of all-cause mortality after a fracture in type 2 diabetic patients: a population-based cohort study.

Post-fracture mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients has been poorly studied. We report an absolute and relative excess all-cause mortality following a fracture in these patients compared to non-diabetic patients. INTRODUCTION: T2DM and osteoporotic fractures are independently associated with a reduced lifespan, but it is unknown if T2DM confers an excess post-fracture mortality compared to non-diabetic fracture patients. We report post-fracture all-cause mortality according to T2DM status. METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study using data from the SIDIAP database. All ≥50 years old T2DM patients registered in SIDIAP in 2006-2013 and two diabetes-free controls matched on age, gender, and primary care center were selected. Study outcome was all-cause mortality following incident fractures. Participants were followed from date of any fracture (AF), hip fracture (HF), and clinical vertebral fracture (VF) until the earliest of death or censoring. Cox regression was used to calculate mortality according to T2DM status after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, smoking, alcohol intake, and previous ischemic heart and cerebrovascular disease. RESULTS: We identified 166,106 T2DM patients and 332,212 non-diabetic, of which 11,066 and 21,564, respectively, sustained a fracture and were then included. Post-fracture mortality rates (1000 person-years) were (in T2DM vs non-diabetics) 62.7 vs 49.5 after AF, 130.7 vs 112.7 after HF, and 54.9 vs 46.2 after VF. Adjusted HR (95% CI) for post-AF, post-HF, and post-VF mortality was 1.30 (1.23-1.37), 1.28 (1.20-1.38), and 1.20 (1.06-1.35), respectively, for T2DM compared to non-diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: T2DM patients have a 30% increased post-fracture mortality compared to non-diabetics and a remarkable excess in absolute mortality risk. More research is needed on the causes underlying such excess risk, and on the effectiveness of measures to reduce post-fracture morbi-mortality in T2DM subjects.

Early (1-year) Discontinuation of Different Anti-osteoporosis Medications Compared: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Although a number of reports suggest very low persistence with oral bisphosphonates, there is limited data on persistence with other anti-osteoporosis medications. We compare rates of early discontinuation (in the first year) with all available outpatient anti-osteoporosis drugs in Catalonia, Spain. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from the SIDIAP database. SIDIAP contains computerized primary care records and pharmacy dispensing data for >80 % of the population of Catalonia (>5 million people). All SIDIAP participants starting an anti-osteoporosis drug between 1/1/2007 and 30/06/2011 (with 2 years wash-out) were included. We modelled persistence as the time between first prescription and therapy discontinuation (refill gap of at least 6 months) using Fine and Gray survival models with competing risk for death. We identified 127,722 patients who started any anti-osteoporosis drug in the study period. The most commonly prescribed drug was weekly alendronate (N = 55,399). 1-Year persistence ranges from 40 % with monthly risedronate to 7.7 % with daily risedronate, and discontinuation was very common [from 49.5 % (monthly risedronate) to 84.4 % (daily risedronate)] as was also switching in the first year of therapy [from 2.8 % (weekly alendronate) to 10 % (daily alendronate)]. Multivariable-adjusted models showed that only monthly risedronate had better one-year persistence than weekly alendronate and teriparatide equivalent, whilst all other therapies had worse persistence. Early discontinuation with available anti-osteoporosis oral drugs is very common. Monthly risedronate, weekly alendronate, and daily teriparatide are the drugs with the best persistence, whilst daily oral drugs have 40-60 % higher first-year discontinuation rates compared to weekly alendronate.

Percepción de los médicos de Atención Primaria en el manejo clínico de la osteoporosis. Influencia de los planes de salud / Primary care perception of clinical management of osteoporosis. The influence of healthcare policies

Introducción: El objetivo es conocer el manejo clínico de la osteoporosis y la influencia de los planes de salud en la práctica clínica. Material y métodos: Se realizó una encuesta transversal dirigida a 465 médicos de Atención Primaria (MAP) de España y una revisión sistemática de 15 planes de salud (PS) autonómicos. En la encuesta se evaluó el uso de escalas de valoración de factores de riesgo (FR) de osteoporosis, el uso de pruebas diagnósticas, su accesibilidad en AP y tratamiento farmacológico. Resultados y Conclusión: La revisión de los PS determinó tres grupos de comunidades autónomas (CCAA) según cómo consideraban a la osteoporosis: (1) formulación explícita, (2) formulación implícita como problema de salud y (3) sin referencia a la osteoporosis. El 49% de los MAP utilizaban escalas de valoración de FR. El 98% de los MAP creían que el diagnóstico inicial de osteoporosis debía realizarse en AP, y más del 50% afirmaron que las mujeres diagnosticadas eran tratadas y seguidas en AP. El acceso a la densitometría ósea es más sencillo en las CCAA del grupo 1. El tratamiento más utilizado son los bifosfonatos y el calcio con la vitamina D, sin diferencias por CCAA. Conclusión: Los MAP consideran que la Atención Primaria es un marco inmejorable para la atención preventiva, terapéutica y rehabilitadora de la osteoporosis. A pesar de ello existen ciertas barreras para la utilización de escalas de valoración de FR. Los MAP de las CCAA con PS para la osteoporosis tienen mejor acceso a la densitometría ósea (AU)

Introduction: This study aims to assess the clinical management of osteoporosis and the influence of the health care plans in the clinical practice. Material and methods: A cross-sectional survey was made of 465 general practitioners (GP) from Spain. The survey included the following information: osteoporosis risk factors (RF) scales, diagnostic tests and their accessibility from primary care, and pharmacological treatment. In addition, a systematic review of 15 regional healthcare plans (RHP) was performed. Results and conclusions: The RHP review determined 3 autonomous region (AR) groups according to how they considered osteoporosis: (1) explicit formulation, (2) implicit as a health problem and (3) without any reference to osteoporosis. Forty-nine percent of the GP used risk factor scales. A total of 98% of the GPs thought that the initial diagnosis of osteoporosis should be made in PHC, and over 50% stated that the women diagnosed were treated and followed-up in PHC. Access to bone densitometry is easier in those belonging to group 1 AR. The most used treatments were bisphosphonates and calcium plus D vitamin, there being no differences among AR groups. Conclusions: The GPs consider that primary health care is an excellent framework for prevention, therapeutic attention and osteoporosis rehabilitation. In spite of this, there are still some barriers regarding the use of RF scales. In those ARs with specific osteoporosis health plans, the GPs have easier accessibility to bone densitometry (AU)