Survival after biochemical failure in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: Spanish Registry of Prostate Cancer (RECAP) database outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical course in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after biochemical failure (BF) has received limited attention. This study analyzes survival time from recurrence, patterns of progression, and the efficacy of salvage therapies in patients treated with radical or postoperative radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective comparative study of 1135 patients diagnosed with BF and treated with either radical (882) or postoperative (253) RT. Data correspond to the RECAP database. Clinical, tumor, and therapeutic characteristics were collected. Descriptive statistics, survival estimates, and comparisons of survival rates were calculated. RESULTS: Time to BF from initial treatment (RT or surgery) was higher in irradiated patients (51 vs 37 months). At a median follow-up of 102 months (14-254), the 8-year cause-specific survival (CSS) was 80.5%, without significant differences between the radical (80.1%) and postoperative (83.4%) RT groups. The 8-year metastasis-free survival rate was 57%. 173 patients (15%) died of PCa and 29 (2.5%) of a second cancer. No salvage therapy was given in 15% of pts. Only 5.5% of pts who underwent radical RT had local salvage treatment and 71% received androgen deprivation (AD) ± chemotherapy. The worst outcomes were in patients who developed metastases after BF (302 pts; 26.5%) and in cases with a Gleason > 7. CONCLUSIONS: In PCa treated with radiotherapy, median survival after BF is relatively long. In this sample, no differences in survival rates at 8-years have been found, regardless of the time of radiotherapy administered. AD was the most common treatment after BF. Metastases and high Gleason score are adverse variables. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare outcomes after BF among patients treated with primary RT vs. those treated with postoperative RT and to evaluate recurrence patterns, treatments administered, and causes of death. The results allow avoiding overtreatment, improving quality of life, without negatively affecting survival.

Outcomes and prognostic factors in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: multi-institutional analysis of the Spanish RECAP database.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess outcomes and to identify prognostic factors in patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) treated with primary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the multi-institutional Spanish RECAP database, a population-based prostate cancer registry in Spain. All IR patients (NCCN criteria) who underwent primary EBRT were included. The following variables were assessed: age; prostate-specific antigen (PSA); Gleason score; clinical T stage; percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC); androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); and radiotherapy dose. The patients were stratified into one of three risk subcategories: (1) favourable IR (FIR; GS 6, ≤ T2b or GS 3 + 4, ≤ T1c), (2) marginal IR (MIR; GS 3 + 4, T2a-b), and (3) unfavourable IR (UIR; GS 4 + 3 or T2c). Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1754 patients from the RECAP database were included and stratified by risk group: FIR, n = 781 (44.5%); MIR, n = 252 (14.4%); and UIR, n = 721 (41.1%). Mean age was 71 years (range 47-86). Mean PSA was 10.4 ng/ml (range 6-20). The median radiotherapy dose was 74 Gy, with mean doses of 72.5 Gy (FIR), 73.4 Gy (MIR), and 72.8 Gy (UIR). Most patients (88%) received ADT for a median of 7.1 months. By risk group (FIR, MIR, UIR), ADT rates were, respectively, 88.9, 86.5, and 86.9%. Only patients with ≥ 24 months of follow-up post-EBRT were included in the survival analysis (n = 1294). At a median follow-up of 52 months (range 24-173), respective 5- and 10-year outcomes were: OS 93.6% and 79%; BRFS 88.9% and 71.4%; DFS 96.1% and 89%; CSS 98.9% and 94.6%. Complication rates (≥ grade 3) were: acute genitourinary (GU) 2%; late GU 1%; acute gastrointestinal (GI) 2%; late GI 1%. There was no significant association between risk group and BRFS or OS. However, patients with favourable-risk disease had significantly better 5- and 10-year DFS than patients with UIR: 98.7% vs. 92.4% and 92% vs. 85.8% (p = 0.0005). CSS was significantly higher (p = 0.0057) in the FIR group at 5 (99.7% vs. 97.3%) and 10 years (96.1% vs. 93.4%). On the multivariate analyses, the following were significant predictors of survival: ADT (BRFS and DFS); dose ≥ 74 Gy (BRFS); age (OS). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first nationwide study in Spain to report long-term outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk PCa treated with EBRT. Survival outcomes were good, with a low incidence of both acute and late toxicity. Patients with unfavourable risk characteristics had significantly lower 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates. ADT and radiotherapy dose ≥ 74 Gy were both significant predictors of treatment outcomes.

Adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer: multi-institutional retrospective analysis of the Spanish RECAP database.

PURPOSE: To compare adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a cohort of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The primary aim was to comparatively assess 2- and 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS). A secondary aim was to identify predictors of survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were acquired from the RECAP database, a population-based prostate cancer registry in Spain. Inclusion criteria included RP (with or without lymphadenectomy) followed by ART or SRT. A total of 702 patients were analyzed. Pre-RT PSA values (>0.5 vs. ≤0.5 ng/ml), pathological stage (T1-2 vs. T3-4), post-surgical Gleason score (≤7 vs. 8-10), margin status (positive vs. negative), hormonal treatment (yes vs. no), and RT dose (≤66 Gy vs. >66 Gy) were evaluated to assess their impact on BRFS. RESULTS: The mean patient age in the ART and SRT groups, respectively, was 64 years (range 42-82) and 64.8 years (range 42-82). Median follow-up after RT in the whole sample was 34 months (range 3-141). A total of 702 patients were included: 223 (31.8%) received ART and 479 (68.2%) SRT. BRFS rates (95% CI) in the ART and SRT groups at months 24 and 60 were, respectively: 98.1% (95.9-100.0%) vs. 91.2% (88.2-94.2%) and 84.5% (76.4-92.6%) vs. 74.0% (67.4-80.7%) (p = 0.004). No significant differences in OS were observed (p = 0.053). The following variables were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence in the SRT group: (1) positive surgical margin status (p = 0.049); (2) no hormonotherapy (p = 0.03); (3) total prostate dose ≤66 Gy (p = 0.004); and pre-RT PSA ≥0.5 ng/ml (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first nationwide study in Spain to evaluate a large cohort of PCa patients treated with RP followed by postoperative RT. ART yielded better 2- and 5-year BRFS rates, although OS was equivalent. These findings are consistent with most other published studies and support ART in patients with adverse prognostic characteristics after radical prostatectomy. Prospective trials are needed to compare immediate ART to early SRT to better determine their relative benefits.

Infrastructures, treatment modalities, and workload of radiation oncology departments in Spain with special attention to prostate cancer.

AIM: The purpose of the study was to describe infrastructures, treatment modalities, and workload in radiation oncology (RO) in Spain, referred particularly to prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: An epidemiologic, cross-sectional study was performed during 2008-2009. A study-specific questionnaire was sent to the 108 RO-registered departments. RESULTS: One hundred and two departments answered the survey, and six were contacted by telephone. Centers operated 236 treatment units: 23 (9.7 %) cobalt machines, 37 (15.7 %) mono-energetic linear accelerators, and 176 (74.6 %) multi-energy linear accelerators. Sixty-one (56.4 %) and 33 (30.5 %) departments, respectively, reported intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guided RT (IGRT) capabilities; three-dimensional-conformal RT was used in 75.8 % of patients. Virtual simulators were present in 95 departments (88.0 %), 35 use conventional simulators. Fifty-one departments (47.2 %) have brachytherapy units, 38 (35.2 %) perform prostatic implants. Departments saw a mean of 24.9 new patients/week; the number of patients treated annually was 102,054, corresponding to 88.4 % of patients with a RT indication. In 56.5 % of the hospitals, multidisciplinary teams were available to treat PC. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide an accurate picture of current situation of RO in Spain, showing a trend toward the progressive introduction of new technologies (IMRT, IGRT, brachytherapy).

Afectación ganglionar como factor pronóstico en el carcinoma localmente avanzado de cérvix / Lymph node involvement as a prognostic factor in locally advanced cervix carcinoma

Propósito: Estudiar los resultados del tratamiento con radioterapia y braquiterapia del carcinoma de cérvix avanzado en función de la afectación ganglionar. Material y métodos: Se analizan 68 pacientes en estadio IIB y IIIB, 16 con ganglios pélvicos afectos por TAC o linfografía, 33 sin afectación y 19 sin estudio previo. Se dieron 50 Gy en pelvis con fotones de 10 MV y dos aplicaciones con braquiteropia de baja tasa. Sólo en 6 casos se hizo RT paraaórtica. Resultados: La supervivencia global a 5 años es 57 por ciento. Con ganglios positivos es 43 por ciento, frente a 60 por ciento sin ganglios afectos (p<0,1). En estadios IIB N + es 15 por ciento frente a 76 por ciento (p<0,01). En estadios IIIB no hay diferencias. El control loco-regional a 5 años es de 60 por ciento en ambos estadios. Con ganglios positivos es 44 por ciento frente a 60 por ciento (p<0,1). En estadio IIB N + es 20 por ciento, y en N - 76 por ciento (p<0,01). En estadio IIIB no hay diferencias significativas. Cuando hay N + hay mayor afectación paraaórtica (44 por ciento frente a 18 por ciento), pero no aumentan las metástasis a distancia (25 por ciento y 24 por ciento), que sí aumentan en estadios IIIB respecto a IIB (29 por ciento frente a 18 por ciento)Conclusiones: Cuando hay ganglios pélvicos afectos se recomienda añadir RT paraaórtica. Con enfermedad voluminosa es preferible asociar RT con QT concomitante para intentar mejorar el control locoregional (AU)

[Experience in the treatment of 98 carcinomas of the nasopharynx. Long-term follow-up and analysis of prognostic factors]. / Experiencia en el tratamiento de 98 carcinomas de nasofaringe. Seguimiento a largo plazo y análisis de factores pronósticos.

This was a retrospective study of 98 patients (pts.) with histologically confirmed nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The clinico-demographic characteristics were: median age of 53 years (11-83); 74 males and 24 females (ratio 3:1); histology subtype OMS 2-3 in 89 pts. (90.8%); cranial nerve deficits in 11 pts. (11.2%); 50 (51%) were stage T3T4; 68 pts. (69.4%) N2N3 and 77 pts. (78.6%) stage IV. The therapeutic modalities were: radical radiotherapy (RT) alone in 42 pts., chemotherapy (CT) alone in 4 pts., RT + adjuvant CT in 10 pts. and neoadjuvant CT + RT in 42 pts. RT was delivered in wide fields, doses between 50-75 Gy with conventional fractionation. CT consisted in cisplatinum-based schedules (PF in 34 pts., BEC in 9 and others in 13 pts.). Analyzed by treatment, more males and stages N2N3 and IV were accrued in neoCT + RT arm (p < or = 0.05). For the entire population, the overall complete response was achieved in 65 pts. (66.3%); in 27/35 pts. (77.1%) of the RT group and 30/51 pts. (58.8%) of CT + RT group (p 0.07) of pts. with III-IV stages. With a median follow-up of 74.5 months, 32 pts. (32.65%) are alive and free of disease. The projected OS for all pts. was 40 months (m), 51.4% at 3 years (y) and 45.5% at 5 y with a disease free survival of 37 m (0-236). No differences between treatment arms were found (p 0.4). In univariant analysis for OS in stage III-IV pts., age > 50 y, histology OMS1, cranial nerve deficits, stage T3T4 and N2N3, were considered adverse prognostic factors (p < or = 0.05). In multivariant analysis, only age > 50 y and stages T3-T4, N2-N3 were significant (p < or = 0.05). In conclusion, we demonstrated good long term survival without any differences among treatment modalities in pts. with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas. New therapeutic approaches are warranted in order to improve the outcome of this patients.