RESUMO
Evaporation is a major factor controlling the hydrological dynamics of surface water reservoirs in dry environments, therefore quantification with minimal uncertainties is desired. The aim of this paper is to assess the spatial variability and impact of riparian vegetation on reservoir evaporation by remote sensing. Eight reservoirs located in subhumid and semi-arid climates in the Brazilian Drylands were studied. Scenes from Landsat 5 and Landsat 8 satellites (1985 and 2018) supplied the data for four evaporation models. For reference evaporation, the Class A Pan and Piché Evaporimeter closest to the reservoirs were considered. The occurrence/density of riparian vegetation was associated with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and its influence on evaporation was assessed. The Surface Energy Balance System for Water (AquaSEBS) model presented the best average performance (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient 0.40 ± 0.19). Evaporation was observed to be higher at the reservoirs' margins and near the dams, due to the contact of exposed soil and rock/concrete, respectively, which transfer heat to the water. Marginal areas near the riparian forest presented low evaporation rates with decreases between 18% and 31% in relation to the average. This interdependence was evidenced by the high negative correlation (R2 0.87-0.96) between NDVI and evaporation; vegetation reduces radiation because of the shading of the reservoir margin and changes local aerodynamics, reducing evaporation. Depending on the spatial variability of evaporation, it was found that the volumes transferred to the atmosphere may have variations of up to 30%. On average, the evaporated volume in all the studied reservoirs is 450,000 m3/day, a quantity enough to supply more than two million people. Overall, the results of this study contribute not only to a better understanding of the spatial variability of evaporation in surface reservoirs, but also of the interdependence between riparian vegetation and evaporation rates.
Assuntos
Ecossistema , Hidrologia , Florestas , Humanos , Solo , ÁguaRESUMO
In this research, the trade-off between the number of restrictions and the robustness of the primary formulation of entropy models was evaluated. The performance of six hydrodynamic models in open channels was assessed based on 1730 Laser-Doppler anemometry data. It was investigated whether it is better to use an entropy-based model with more restrictions and a weak primary formulation or a model with fewer restrictions, but with a strong formulation. In addition, it was also investigated whether the model performance improves with the insertion of restrictions. Three of the investigated models have a weak formulation (open-channel velocity field represented by Cartesian coordinates); while the other three models have a strong formulation, according to which isovels are represented by curvilinear coordinates. The results indicated that models with two restrictions performed better than those with one restriction, since the additional restriction includes information relevant to the system. Models with three restrictions perform worse than those with two restrictions, because the information lost due to the use of a numerical solution was more substantial than the information gained by the third restriction. In conclusion, a strong primary formulation brought more information to the system than the inclusion of a third constraint.