Frequency of human leukocyte antigens class II-DR alleles (HLA-DRB1) in Argentinian patients with early arthritis.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or undifferentiated arthritis (UA) in the CONAART database (Argentine Consortium for Early Arthritis) were assessed for genetic risk factors for RA, specifically for HLA-DRB1 alleles and the PTPN22 rs2476601 polymorphism associated with progression to RA. This is a case-control study. Blood samples were obtained to determine HLA-DRB1 genotypes by PCR-SSO Luminex and PTPN22 (rs2476601) polymorphism by allelic discrimination. A control group of individuals from the general Argentinian population were obtained from the national register of cadaveric organ donors. A total of 1859 individuals were included in this analysis: 399 patients from the CONAART database (347 patients with RA at study end and 52 patients with UA at study end, mean follow-up time 25 ± 18 months) and 1460 individuals from the general Argentinian population. Compared with the controls, the HLA-DRB1*04 and DRB1*09 alleles were more commonly detected in patients with RA diagnosis (OR (95% CI) 2.23 (1.74-2.85) and 1.89 (1.26-2.81)) respectively. Both patients with UA and the general population showed higher frequency of DRB1*07, DRB1*11 and DRB1*15 alleles than patients with RA. PTPN22 rs2476601 polymorphism frequency was higher in RA and UA vs the general population; however, this was significantly different only for RA vs control group (OR [95% CI] = 1.81 [1.10-3.02], P = 0.018. HLA-DRB1 typing and PTPN22 allelic discrimination could distinguish between patients with UA, patients with early RA, and the general population in Argentina. This is the first study of HLA-DRB1 alleles and PTPN22 polymorphism associations with progression to early RA in an Argentinian population.

Reliability of OMERACT ultrasound elementary lesions in gout: results from a multicenter exercise.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the outcome measures in rheumatology (OMERACT) definitions for ultrasound (US) elementary lesions in gout through an image reading exercise. Images from patients with gout (static images and videos) were collected. As an initial step, we carried out a image reading exercise within the experts of the Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) US Study Group (n = 16). The following step consisted in a web-based exercise with the participation of larger number of sonographers (n = 63) from different centers. Images were rated evaluating the presence/absence of any US elementary lesion. Inter- and intra-reader reliabilities were analyzed using kappa coefficients. Participants were stratified according to their level of experience. In the first exercise, inter-reader kappa values were 0.45 for aggregates, 0.57 for tophus, 0.69 for erosions, and 0.90 for double contour (DC). Intra-reader kappa values were 0.86, 0.76, 0.80, and 0.90, respectively. The web-based exercise showed inter-reader kappa values for aggregates, tophus, erosions, and DC of 0.42, 0.49, 0.69, and 0.79, respectively. The intra-reader kappa values were 0.62, 0.69, 0.77, and 0.85, respectively. Reliability was not influenced by the sonographer's level of experience. The reliability of the new OMERACT US definitions for elementary lesions in gout ranged from moderate to excellent, depending on the type of lesion.

La utilidad de la ultrasonografía como herramienta diagnóstica para detectar artritis psoriásica en pacientes con psoriasis / Utility of ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool to detect psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis

Objetivo: El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue evaluar la prevalencia de entesopatía subclínica en pacientes con psoriasis cutánea (Ps) utilizando un score ultrasonográfico (US) como herramienta diagnóstica en la práctica diaria y evaluar la habilidad de dicho score para discriminar pacientes con Ps y Artritis Psoriásica (APs). Material y Métodos: Se estudiaron pacientes con diagnóstico de Ps (según diagnóstico por dermatólogo), APs (según criterios CASPAR) y controles sanos (CS). Se evaluaron diez sitios de entesis (de manera bilateral): inserción del tendón del cuádriceps, tendón proximal y distal del ligamento patelar, tendón de Aquiles y fascia plantar. La US identificó los siguientes hallazgos: engrosamiento tendinoso, erosión ósea, entesofito, bursitis y señal Power Doppler (PD). Se calculó el score US para entesitis GUESS. El desempeño del score para discriminar entre APs y Ps se evaluó utilizando curvas ROC. Resultados: Se incluyeron 51 sujetos: APs=16, Ps=15 y CS=20. La edad media fue de 42±13 años y el 39% eran mujeres. La mitad de los pacientes con APs presentaron entesopatía clínica en comparación con ninguno de los otros grupos. Se evaluaron un total de 510 sitios de entesis (APs=160, Ps=150, HC=200). Los pacientes con Ps mostraron significativamente una mayor frecuencia de entesofitos, erosiones y PD que los CS. La puntuación media del score GUESS fue diferente entre los grupos (media±DE): APs=13±4, Ps=8±4, CS=3±2 (p<0,01). El área bajo la curva (ABC) para el diagnóstico de APs fue de 0,79 (IC95%=0,63 a 0,95). Conclusiones: Los pacientes con Ps mostraron una alta frecuencia de entesopatía subclínica en la evaluación US. El score GUESS mostró una alta sensibilidad y moderada especificidad para discriminar entre los pacientes con APs y Ps

Uso de autocuestionarios en reumatología. ¿Por qué su uso creciente y la necesidad de adaptarlos a cada población? / Usefulness of auto-questionnaires in rheumatology. Why its increasing use and the need to adapt them to each population?

Cualquier reumatólogo habituado a leer publicaciones y revisar presentaciones científicas en congresos, le puede haber llamado la atención la creciente cantidad de trabajos referentes al desarrollo y validación de autocuestionarios. Pero ¿por qué utilizar autocuestionarios y no medidas que incluyan sólo evaluación directa por parte del médico? Sin bien existen numerosas razones, se podrían resumir en dos principales

Eficacia y costo-utilidad de primer reemplazo total de cadera y rodilla en pacientes con osteoartritis / Efficacy and cost-utility of first total hip and knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis

Objetivo: Determinar la eficacia, costos y razón incremental de costo-utilidad (RICu) de la cirugía de primer reemplazo total de rodilla y cadera en pacientes con osteoartritis. Material y métodos: Se diseñó un ensayo no controlado de tipo antes-después, incluyendo pacientes con osteoartritis primaria de cadera o rodilla en plan de primera cirugía de reemplazo articular total. El seguimiento incluyó los primeros 12 meses postcirugía, registrándose capacidad funcional [versión corta del Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-PS) y Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome (HOOS-PS)], y calidad de vida (EuROQOL­5D). El análisis de costo se realizó desde la perspectiva de la sociedad, calculándose la eficacia, años de vida ajustados por calidad (AvAC), y RICu del procedimiento. Se definió un valor dep de 0,05 como estadísticamente significativo. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 23 pacientes [coxartrosis (52%), gonartrosis (48%)]. Los pacientes sometidos a reemplazo articular presentaron una mejoría estadísticamente significativa en la funcionalidad y calidad de vida de los pacientes [diferencia de medias: Eu-ROQOL=0,69, HOOS-PS=-49, KOOS-PS=-31]. Al año de seguimiento se registró una ganancia de 0,43 AvACs. El costo de la cirugía y seguimiento postquirúrgico fue de 141.343 pesos por paciente, siendo el costo adicional de someterse al reemplazo de 3140 pesos por paciente. LaRICu resultante fue de 7302 pesos por AvAC ganado. Conclusiones: El reemplazo articular total resultó ser un procedimiento "muy costo-efectivo", mejorando la funcionalidad y calidad de vida de los pacientes con osteoartritis de caderay rodilla

Effect of Body Mass Index and Psychosocial Traits on Total Knee Replacement Costs in Patients with Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical and psychosocial attributes are associated with clinical outcomes after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), but their relationship with TKR-related costs is less clear. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of clinical and psychosocial attributes on TKR costs. METHODS: We conducted a 6-month prospective cohort study of patients with knee OA who underwent TKR. We examined baseline demographic, clinical [body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities], and psychosocial attributes (social support, locus of control, coping, depression, anxiety, stress, and self-efficacy); baseline and 6-month OA clinical outcomes [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function]; and 6-month direct and indirect TKR-related costs. Multiple regression was performed to identify determinants of TKR-related costs. RESULTS: We included 212 patients; 66% were women, 71% were white, and the mean age was 65.2 years. The mean baseline WOMAC pain score was 55 (SD 19) and WOMAC function score was 54 (SD 20). Mean total TKR-related costs were US$30,831 (SD $9893). Multivariate regression analyses showed that increasing BMI and anxiety levels and decreasing levels of positive social interactions were associated with increased costs. A lower cost scenario with a lower range of normal BMI (19.5), highest positive social interaction, and no anxiety predicted TKR costs to be $22,247. Predicted costs in obese patients (BMI 36) with lowest positive social interaction and highest anxiety were $58,447. CONCLUSION: Increased baseline BMI, anxiety, and poor social support lead to higher TKR-related costs in patients with knee OA. Preoperative interventions targeting these factors may reduce TKR-related costs, and therefore be cost-effective.

Cost-effectiveness of total knee replacement: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Total knee replacement (TKR) rates have significantly increased in the past decade. While the procedure itself might be costly, the cost-effectiveness and potential offset costs from patient and societal benefits have not been clearly established. The objective of this study was to perform an economic evaluation of TKR in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: We conducted a 6-month prospective cohort study of 212 patients with knee OA who underwent TKR at a single hospital in Houston, Texas. We included patient-level data from hospital billing databases and the patients' self-reported direct and indirect costs. The clinical outcome measure was pain and function measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire; we used the minimum clinically important difference (MCID; ≥20-point change) and the WOMAC 20% (WOMAC20), 50% (WOMAC50), and 70% (WOMAC70) relative improvement criteria. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated using direct and indirect costs and WOMAC improvement. A societal perspective was used and multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the principal analysis. RESULTS: The total incremental cost per TKR was $20,133. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for improvement at 6 months were $33,345, $25,255, $35,274, and $56,908 for the MCID, WOMAC20, WOMAC50, and WOMAC70, respectively. Best- and worst-case scenario sensitivity analyses did not have a significant impact on the ICERs. Patient time lost was the most influential variable in the multiway sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: TKR is an effective intervention in reducing pain and improving functional status among patients with knee OA and is cost effective at both low and high levels of improvement.

Electronic monitoring of oral therapies in ethnically diverse and economically disadvantaged patients with rheumatoid arthritis: consequences of low adherence.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify adherence to oral therapies in ethnically diverse and economically disadvantaged patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using electronic medication monitoring, and to evaluate the clinical consequences of low adherence. METHODS: A total of 107 patients with RA enrolled in a 2-year prospective cohort study agreed to have their oral RA drug therapy intake electronically monitored using the Medication Event Monitoring System. Adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and prednisone was determined as the percentage of days (or weeks for methotrexate) on which the patient took the correct dose as prescribed by the physician. Patient outcomes were assessed, including function measured by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, disease activity measured by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), health-related quality of life, and radiographic damage measured using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method. RESULTS: Adherence to the treatment regimen as determined by the percentage of correct doses was 64% for DMARDs and 70% for prednisone. Patients who had better mental health were statistically more likely to be adherent. Only 23 of the patients (21%) had an average adherence to DMARDs ≥80%. These patients showed significantly better mean DAS28 values across 2 years of followup than those who were less adherent (3.28 versus 4.09; P = 0.02). Radiographic scores were also worse in nonadherent patients at baseline and at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Only one-fifth of RA patients had an overall adherence to DMARDs of at least 80%. Less than two-thirds of the prescribed DMARD doses were correctly taken. Adherent patients had lower disease activity across the 2 years of followup.

Patient preferences for biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete-choice experiment.

OBJECTIVES: To assess patients' preferences for rheumatoid-arthritis treatments with biologic agents using a discrete-choice experiment. METHODS: A discrete-choice experiment was conducted with adult rheumatoid-arthritis patients who had never been treated with biological agents from two university hospitals-public and private-in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We evaluated preferences for seven treatment attributes (with two to three levels each): effectiveness, mode of administration, frequency of administration, local and systemic adverse events, severe infections, and out-of-pocket costs.A probit regression model was used to analyze the relative importance of rheumatoid-arthritis treatment attributes. We estimated attributes' relative importance and their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Survey responses from 240 patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were included in the study. All tested biological agents' attributes significantly affected the choice of treatment. Attributes' relative importance in decreasing order was the following (mean, confidence interval 95%): cost, 0.81 (0.69-0.92); systemic adverse events, 0.66 (0.57-0.76); frequency of administration, 0.61 (0.52-0.71); efficacy, 0.42 (0.32-0.51); route of administration, 0.41 (0.30-0.52); local adverse events, 0.40 (0.31-0.49); and serious infections, 0.29 (0.22-0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Different treatment attributes had a significant and different influence in rheumatoid-arthritis patients' choice of biological agents. This type of study can not only inform about patients' preferences but also about the trade-offs among different possible treatments or process-related attributes.

Quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Argentina: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of a Spanish version of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life questionnaire.

The Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL) questionnaire is the first needs-based instrument specifically designed to measure quality of life (QoL) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aims of our study were to develop an Argentinean version of the RAQoL and to determine its reproducibility, validity, and sensitivity to change in patients with RA. Translation process was performed according to internationally accepted methodology. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were calculated. Criterion and construct validity were assessed by comparing the RAQoL with parameters of disease activity, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item health survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Sensitivity to change was measured at 6-12 months using standardized response mean (SRM). The minimal important change was defined as a change of 1 or 1.96 times the standard error of measurement. A total of 97 patients with RA were included. Cronbach's α was 0.93, and test-retest reliability was 0.95. The RAQoL showed moderate to strong correlation with parameters of disease activity, the HAQ, and the SF-36. Functional status was the main determinant of patients' level of QoL. The SRM of the RAQoL was 0.24. Agreement between 20 % improvement in RAQoL and ACR20 response was moderate. Minimal important change was 2.2 (1 SEM) or 4.3 (1.96 SEM). The Argentinean version of the RAQoL is the first Spanish translation of this questionnaire. Our findings show it to be valid, reliable, and sensitive to changes in RA clinical status.

Rheumatic manifestations of primary and metastatic bone tumors and paraneoplastic bone disease.

Bone tumors can show a wide range of nonspecific rheumatic manifestations. The presence of unexplained or atypical chronic bone pain, an enlarging bone mass, neurovascular compression syndromes, or pathologic fractures should alert us to the possibility of a bone tumor causing these symptoms. These patients must undergo a complete physical examination; adequate imaging; and, if needed, a biopsy to confirm their diagnosis and offer them an opportune treatment. In addition, bone tumors and other malignancies can present remote clinical manifestations and unusual laboratory findings (eg, HOA, hypophosphatemia, hyperphosphaturia, and hypercalcemia) that may be the first and early manifestation of an occult cancer. These findings should motivate a cancer screening according to age, sex, and personal history. Cancer therapies also have a big impact on bone health, increasing the risk of osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and/or osteonecrosis. Rheumatologists should be aware of possible long-term adverse events of cancer treatment to avoid future complications.

General characteristics of an early arthritis cohort in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to describe the general characteristics of a cohort of patients with early arthritis in Argentina. METHODS: CONAART (Consorcio Argentino de Artritis Temprana--Argentine Consortium for Early Arthritis) is an initiative of seven rheumatology centres across Argentina. Patients were included if they had at least one or more swollen joints and <2 years of disease duration. Social, demographic, familiar, hereditary, clinical and laboratory data were recollected. At first visit and every year, X-rays of hands and feet were performed and working characteristics and pharmaco-economic data were re-collected. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were included. Of them, 327 (79.2%) were women with a median age of 49 years and a median disease duration of 6 months. Of the total, 183 (44.3%) had RA (ACR 1987) and 167 (40.4%) undifferentiated arthritis (UA). Other diagnoses included: 12 crystalics, 11 PsA, 6 uSpA, 6 other CTD, 1 AS and 27 other diagnosis. As 85% of our population had RA and UA, we only compared these two groups of patients. Patients with RA had significantly worse activity parameters of the disease (DAS of 28 joints), functional capacity (HAQ) and quality of life (Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life) than patients with UA. The frequency of RF and anti-CCP, and symmetrical distribution were also significantly higher in patients with RA compared with UA patients. All patients with RA initiated early specific treatment, in a period no longer than 6 months from the beginning of the disease. CONCLUSION: Early arthritis clinics are a useful tool to identify and treat patients with different forms of joint involvement.