The Synergy Zone: Connecting the Mind, Brain, and Heart for the Ideal Classroom Learning Environment.

This paper proposes a new perspective on implementing neuroeducation in the classroom. The pandemic exacerbated the mental health issues of faculty and students, creating a mental health crisis that impairs learning. It is important to get our students back in "the zone", both cognitively and emotionally, by creating an ideal learning environment for capturing our students and keeping them-the Synergy Zone. Research that examines the classroom environment often focuses on the foreground-instructors' organizational and instructional aspects and content. However, the emotional climate of the classroom affects student well-being. This emotional climate would ideally exhibit the brain states of engagement, attention, connection, and enjoyment by addressing the mind, brain, and heart. This ideal learning environment would be achieved by combining proposed practices derived from three areas of research: flow theory, brain synchronization, and positive emotion with heart engagement. Each of these enhances the desired brain states in a way that the whole is greater than the sum of the individual parts. I call this the Synergy Zone. A limitation of this proposed model is that implementation of some aspects may be challenging, and professional development resources might be needed. This essay presenting this perspective provides the relevant scientific research and the educational implications of implementation.

The emerging role of educational neuroscience in education reform / El papel emergente de la neurociencia educativa en la reforma de la educación

In the early 90s a movement began in education called "brain-based learning" that attempted to link neuroscience and education. However, many in both science and education felt it was untenable to make this leap. While early attempts to bridge the fields sparked controversy, it can now be argued that neuroscience does have a role to play in education reform. This paper explores suggestions for the appropriate training of the Educational Neuroscientist, broad interventions based on Educational Neuroscience that could reform curriculum, and emerging ways the Educational Neuroscientist can inform professional development of educators

A principios de los años 90 surgió un movimiento en educación llamado "aprendizaje basado en el cerebro" que trataba de unir neurociencia y educación. No obstante, muchas personas tanto en ciencia como en educación, pensaban que no era viable dar tal salto. Mientras que los primeros intentos por tender puentes entre estos campos suscitó controversia, puede decirse ahora que la neurociencia sí tiene un papel que jugar en la reforma de la educación. Este artículo explora propuestas para el adecuado entrenamiento del neurocientífico educativo, intervenciones amplias sustentadas en la neurociencia educativa que podrían reformar el currículum y de qué nuevas maneras podría contribuir neurocientífico educativo al desarrollo profesional de los educadores

Atypical brain torque in boys with developmental stuttering.

The counterclockwise brain torque, defined as a larger right prefrontal and left parietal-occipital lobe, is a consistent brain asymmetry. Reduced or reversed lobar asymmetries are markers of atypical cerebral laterality and have been found in adults who stutter. It was hypothesized that atypical brain torque would be more common in children who stutter. Magnetic resonance imaging-based morphology measures were completed in boys who stutter (n = 14) and controls (n = 14), ages 8-13. The controls had the expected brain torque configurations whereas the boys who stutter were atypical. These results support the hypothesis that developmental stuttering is associated with atypical prefrontal and parietal-occipital lobe asymmetries.

Lobar asymmetries in subtypes of dyslexic and control subjects.

Reading involves phonologic decoding, in which readers "sound out" a word; orthographic decoding, in which readers recognize a word visually, as in "sight reading"; and comprehension. Because reading can involve multiple processes, dyslexia might be a heterogeneous disorder. This study investigated behavior and gross lobar anatomy in subtypes of dyslexic and control subjects. Subjects aged 18 to 25 years with identified reading problems and a group of healthy controls were given cognitive and behavioral tests and volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Because atypical cerebral laterality has been proposed as a potential neural risk for dyslexia, dyslexic and control subjects were compared on anatomy of gross lobar regions. On asymmetry quotients, no significant differences were found between groups. Examination of the percentage of total brain volume of each structure revealed that control and dyslexic subjects were significantly different (P = .018). Dyslexic subjects had a larger percentage of brain volume than did the controls in the areas of total prefrontal (P = .003; 9.30% larger) and superior prefrontal (P = .004; 11.48% larger region). A Pearson correlation was performed to investigate whether a relationship existed between behavioral measures and either volumes of total prefrontal and total occipital regions or asymmetry quotients. A significant positive relationship between the left total occipital and word identification performance existed (R = .452, P = .045). Because it is believed by some that dyslexia occurs in varying degrees of severity, and because one of the research questions in this study is whether anatomy relates to severity or to distinct biologic groups, subjects were grouped according to both the nature and distinct pattern of reading or language performance and the degree of deficit. A battery of reading tests revealed five clinical subgroups of control (two) and dyslexic (three) subjects. These subgroups were statistically different on all cognitive and behavioral measures. When asymmetry was investigated across subgroups, significant differences between subgroups were found at the multivariate level (P = .043). Only the phonologic deficit groups (weak phonologic controls, phonologic deficit dyslexic subjects) had atypical asymmetry patterns. This finding suggests that lack of subtyping could have confounded earlier studies and that anomalous asymmetry might be related to phonologic dyslexia, whereas other subtypes might be reflective of environmental factors. Examination of volume at the subgroup level also showed differences between subgroups that might have implications for the nature of compensation. This study supports the concept that anomalous anatomy might reflect anomalous functional cerebral laterality, which could be a risk factor for developmental dyslexia, varying according to the nature of the deficit.