Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Talanta ; 219: 121369, 2020 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32887086

RESUMO

This study reports a novel and environmentally friendly method based on bar adsorptive microextraction (BAµE) with cork pellet as extraction phase for the determination of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben and butylparaben in river water samples. This natural approach consists of a cork pellet recycled from wine stoppers used as biosorbent material to replace the traditional BAµE device. The analytical determinations were performed using a high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector (HPLC-DAD). Parameters such as type of desorption solvent, desorption and extraction time, sample pH and ionic strength were carefully optimized through univariate and multivariate approaches. Cork pellets of 15 mm length were inserted into vials containing 15 mL of water sample adjusted at pH 3 and 25% (w/v) of NaCl. The extraction step was carried out under agitation for 45 min followed by liquid desorption with 120 µL of methanol:acetonitrile (1:1 v/v) for 30 min. Satisfactory analytical performance was obtained with coefficients of determination ranging from 0.9921 for methylparaben to 0.9994 for propylparaben; intraday precision ranged from 6.7 to 18.3%, and interday precision varied from 7.2 to 20.0%. Accuracy was assessed through relative recovery assays and varied from 53 to 124%.

2.
Talanta ; 178: 886-893, 2018 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29136910

RESUMO

In this study, a novel apparatus for bar adsorptive microextraction (BAµE) using a voltage regulator was proposed as an alternative tool to improve the analysis throughput. In addition, recycled diatomaceous earth obtained as a brewery residue was employed as a biosorbent coating for the determination of methyl paraben, ethyl paraben, benzophenone and triclocarban in water samples by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD). The use of the extraction devices, comprised of floating adsorptive bars of 7.5mm length, in the extractions with magnetic stirrers linked to a voltage regulator enabled the analysis of multiple samples, simultaneously. The method optimization was carried out by univariate and multivariate analyses. The optimal conditions for the method were sample solution at pH 5, extraction time of 90min and liquid desorption in 100µL of acetonitrile:methanol (50:50, v/v) for 15min. The total sample preparation time was 17.5min per sample for a simultaneous batch of six extractions. The R2 values for the calibration curves obtained were higher than 0.9985. The limits of detection (LODs) varied from 0.19 to 2µgL-1 and the limits of quantification (LOQs) ranged from 0.63 to 6.9µgL-1. The method was applied to freshwater samples collected from Peri Lagoon (Florianópolis, SC, Brazil) and the relative recoveries ranged from 63% to 124% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of < 20% (n = 2). The RSD values for the reproducibility of the performance of the magnetic stirrers and inter-device extraction efficiency were lower than 14% (n = 3) and 11% (n = 3), respectively.

3.
Anal Chim Acta ; 965: 54-62, 2017 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28366212

RESUMO

In this paper, a remodeling of the bar adsorptive microextraction (BAµE) technique is proposed with impregnation of the derivatization reagent on the surface of the adsorptive bar containing a biosorbent material. The derivatization reagent was 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH), which was adsorbed on the surface of the bar containing cork powder as the extractor phase for the determination of two aldehydes (hexanal and heptanal) which are known as lung cancer biomarkers in human urine samples. The derivatization reaction and the extraction occurred simultaneously on the surface of the bar (length 7.5 mm) under acidic conditions. The method optimization was carried out by univariate and multivariate analysis. The optimal conditions for the method were a DNPH to aldehydes ratio of 40:1, buffer solution of pH 4.0, extraction time of 60 min and liquid desorption of 10 min in 100 µL of acetonitrile. The aldehydes were analyzed by HPLC-DAD with a simple and fast (6 min) chromatographic run. The limits of detection (LODs) for hexanal and heptanal were 1.00 and 0.73 µmol L-1, respectively. The relative recoveries in urine samples ranged from 88 to 111% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) being less than 7%. The method developed is of low cost and can be successfully used for the quantification of these two lung cancer biomarkers in human urine samples, potentially providing an early diagnosis of lung cancer.


Assuntos
Aldeídos/urina , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Microextração em Fase Líquida , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/urina , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Humanos
4.
J Sep Sci ; 39(4): 756-61, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26632142

RESUMO

This manuscript addresses the determination of triazines (ametryn, atrazine, simazine, and terbutryn) in corn matrices using bar adsorptive microextraction coated with a selective molecularly imprinted polymer phase following microliquid desorption and high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. The molecularly imprinted polymer was synthesized using atrazine as a template and methacrylic acid as a functional monomer. Assays performed in 25 mL of ultrapure water samples spiked at 8.0 µg/L yielded 80-120 % recoveries under the evaluated experimental conditions. The method showed an accuracy (0.2 < bias < 17.9%), precision (relative standard deviation <17.4%), convenient detection (0.2 µg/L), and quantification (0.7 µg/L) limits, as well as linear dynamic ranges (0.8-24.0 µg/L) with remarkable determination coefficients (R(2) > 0.9926). The proposed analytical method was applied to monitor triazines in three types of corn matrices using the standard addition methodology. Experiments performed in corn samples spiked with triazines at the trace level (8.0 µg/kg of each analyte) gave rise to recoveries (81.0-119.4%) with good reproducibility and robustness. The proposed methodology is also easy to implement and showed to be a good analytical alternative to monitor triazines in complex matrices, when compared with other sorption-based microextraction techniques.


Assuntos
Polímeros/química , Microextração em Fase Sólida/métodos , Triazinas/química , Adsorção , Cromatografia Gasosa , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Gasolina , Géis/química , Hidrocarbonetos/química , Microextração em Fase Líquida , Tamanho da Partícula , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Dióxido de Silício/química , Temperatura , Zea mays
5.
Anal Chim Acta ; 888: 59-66, 2015 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26320959

RESUMO

This study describes the use of cork as a new coating for bar adsorptive microextraction (BAµE) and its application in determining benzophenone, triclocarban and parabens in aqueous samples by HPLC-DAD. In this study bars with 7.5 and 15 mm of length were used. The extraction and liquid desorption steps for BAµE were optimized employing multivariate and univariate procedures. The desorption time and solvent used for liquid desorption were optimized by univariate and multivariate studies, respectively. For the extraction step the sample pH was optimized by univariate experiments while the parameters extraction time and ionic strength were evaluated using the Doehlert design. The optimum extraction conditions were sample pH 5.5, NaCl concentration 25% and extraction time 90 min. Liquid desorption was carried out for 30 min with 250 µL (bar length of 15 mm) or 100 µL (bar length of 7.5 mm) of ACN:MeOH (50:50, v/v). The quantification limits varied between 1.6 and 20 µg L(-1) (bar length of 15 mm) and 0.64 and 8 µg L(-1) (bar length of 7.5 mm). The linear correlation coefficients were higher than 0.98 for both bars. The method with 7.5 mm bar length showed recovery values between 65 and 123%. The bar-to-bar reproducibility and the repeatability were lower than 13% (n = 2) and 14% (n = 3), respectively.


Assuntos
Benzofenonas/análise , Carbanilidas/análise , Microextração em Fase Líquida/métodos , Parabenos/análise , Phellodendron/química , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Adsorção , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Química Verde , Limite de Detecção , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Microextração em Fase Sólida , Água/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA