Validez actual de la litotricia extracorpórea como tratamiento de primera línea de la litiasis / Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?

Objetivo Evaluar la eficacia y complicaciones de la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque (LEOCh) como tratamiento de primera línea de la litiasis renal y ureteral. Métodos Estudio observacional retrospectivo de todos los pacientes tratados con litotricia en un centro de tercer nivel entre enero de 2014 y enero de 2021. Se recogieron las características de los pacientes, de la litiasis, y las complicaciones y resultados de la LEOCh. Se realizó una regresión logística multivariante de los factores asociados a la reducción del tamaño litiásico. También se llevó a cabo un análisis estadístico de los factores asociados a la necesidad de tratamiento adicional tras la LEOCh y de los factores asociados a las complicaciones. Resultados Se incluyeron 1.727 pacientes. El tamaño litiásico medio fue de 9,5 mm. En 1.540 (89,4%) pacientes se observó la reducción del tamaño litiásico. En el análisis multivariante, el tamaño (OR=1,13; p=0,00), la localización de la litiasis en el uréter (OR=1,15; p=0,052) y el número de ondas (p=0,002; OR=1,00) utilizadas en la LEOCh son los factores asociados a la reducción del tamaño litiásico. Un total de 665 pacientes (38,5%) precisaron tratamiento adicional tras la litotricia. Los factores asociados a la necesidad de retratamiento fueron el tamaño litiásico (OR=1.131; p=0,000), el número de ondas (OR=1.000; p=0,000) y la energía administrada (OR=1.005; p=0,000). En 153 pacientes (8,8%) se produjeron complicaciones tras la LEOCh. Se encontró una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre el tamaño de la litiasis (p=0,024; OR=1.054) y la derivación urinaria previa (p=0,004; OR=0,571). Conclusión La litotricia sigue siendo eficaz como tratamiento de primera línea para la litiasis reno-ureteral, con un bajo porcentaje de complicaciones. (AU)

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones. Methods Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed. Results 1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5 mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR=1.13; P=0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR=1.15; P=0.052) and number of waves (P=0.002; OR=1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR=1.131; P=0.000), number of waves (OR=1.000; P=0.000), energy (OR=1.005; P=0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (P=0.024, OR=1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P=0.004, OR=0.571). Conclusion Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications. (AU)

¿Cómo calcular el volumen litiásico y cuál es su aplicación quirúrgica? / How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: A comprehensive review?

Objetivo Las guías actuales para el tratamiento intervencionista sugieren el diámetro acumulativo de la litiasis (DAL) como factor decisivo en la elección del tratamiento quirúrgico óptimo (ureteroscopia [URS], litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque [LEOCh] y nefrolitotomía percutánea [NLPC]). El volumen litiásico (VL) se ha introducido recientemente para obtener una estimación más precisa de la carga litiásica. El objetivo de esta revisión es resumir los métodos disponibles para calcular el VL y su aplicación quirúrgica. Material y métodos En diciembre de 2022 se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura mediante búsquedas en las bases de datos Embase, Cochrane y Pubmed. Los artículos se consideraron elegibles si describían la medición del VL o la tasa libre de litiasis (TLL) tras diferentes modalidades de tratamiento (LEOCh, URS, NLPC) o la expulsión espontánea, basándose en la medición del VL. Dos revisores evaluaron de forma independiente la elegibilidad y la calidad de los artículos y realizaron la extracción de datos. Resultados En total se incluyeron 28 estudios. Todos los estudios utilizaron diferentes técnicas para calcular el VL. La medición automática del volumen pareció ser más precisa que la estimación del volumen. Los estudios in vitro mostraron que la medición automática del volumen se ajustaba más al volumen real de la litiasis, con una menor variabilidad interobservador. A diferencia de la NLPC y la LEOCh, en la URS se observó que el VL era un mejor predictor de mejor la TLL que el diámetro litiásico mayor o el diámetro acumulativo en litiasis >20mm. Conclusiones Calcular el VL —de forma manual o automática— es factible, y probablemente se ajuste más a la carga litiásica real. Aunque en el caso de las litiasis grandes tratadas mediante cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada el VL parece predecir mejor la TLL, la superioridad del VL en todas las cargas litiásicas y para todos los tipos de tratamiento está aún por demostrar. ... (AU)

Objective Current interventional guidelines refer to the cumulative stone diameter to choose the appropriate surgical modality (ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)). The stone volume (SV) has been introduced recently, to better estimate the stone burden. This review aimed to summarize the available methods to evaluate the SV and its use in urolithiasis treatment. Material and methods A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in December 2022 by searching Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed databases. Articles were considered eligible if they described SV measurement or the stone free rate after different treatment modalities (SWL, URS, PCNL) or spontaneous passage, based on SV measurement. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction. Results In total, 28 studies were included. All studies used different measurement techniques for stone volume. The automated volume measurement appeared to be more precise than the calculated volume. In vitro studies showed that the automated volume measurement was closer to actual stone volume, with a lower inter-observer variability. Regarding URS, stone volume was found to be more predictive of stone free rates as compared to maximum stone diameter or cumulative diameter for stones >20mm. This was not the case for PCNL and SWL. Conclusions Stone volume estimation is feasible, manually or automatically and is likely a better representation of the actual stone burden. While for larger stones treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery, stone volume appears to be a better predictor of SFR, the superiority of stone volume throughout all stone burdens and for all stone treatments, remains to be proven. Automated volume acquisition is more precise and reproducible than calculated volume. (AU)

How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: a comprehensive review.

OBJECTIVE: Current interventional guidelines refer to the cumulative stone diameter to choose the appropriate surgical modality (ureteroscopy [URS], extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [ESWL] and percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL]). The stone volume (SV) has been introduced recently, to better estimate the stone burden. This review aimed to summarize the available methods to evaluate the SV and its use in urolithiasis treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in December 2022 by searching Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed databases. Articles were considered eligible if they described SV measurement or the stone free rate after different treatment modalities (SWL, URS, PCNL) or spontaneous passage, based on SV measurement. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction. RESULTS: In total, 28 studies were included. All studies used different measurement techniques for stone volume. The automated volume measurement appeared to be more precise than the calculated volume. In vitro studies showed that the automated volume measurement was closer to actual stone volume, with a lower inter-observer variability. Regarding URS, stone volume was found to be more predictive of stone free rates as compared to maximum stone diameter or cumulative diameter for stones >20 mm. This was not the case for PCNL and SWL. CONCLUSIONS: Stone volume estimation is feasible, manually or automatically and is likely a better representation of the actual stone burden. While for larger stones treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery, stone volume appears to be a better predictor of SFR, the superiority of stone volume throughout all stone burdens and for all stone treatments, remains to be proven. Automated volume acquisition is more precise and reproducible than calculated volume.

Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones METHODS: Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed. RESULTS: 1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR=1.13; p=0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR=1.15; p=0.052) and number of waves (p=0.002; OR=1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR=1.131; p=0.000), number of waves (OR=1.000; p=0.000), energy (OR=1.005; p=0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (p=0.024, OR=1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P=0.004, OR=0.571). CONCLUSION: Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.

Litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque (LEOCh) Para litiasis de grupo calicial inferior: ¿cómo predecir el éxito del tratamiento? / Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyx stones: Predicting treatment success

Introducción El uso de la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque (LEOCh) en litiasis de grupo calicial inferior (GCI) se asocia con una alta tasa de fragmentos residuales. Nuestro objetivo es analizar la efectividad y complicaciones del tratamiento con LEOCh en litiasis de GCI. Métodos Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes con litiasis en GCI tratadas con LEOCh entre enero 2014 y diciembre del 2020. Se determina anatomía favorable del GCI mediante longitud infundibular, ancho infundibular y ángulo infundibulopélvico. Se considera fracaso de LEOCh la presencia de fragmentos >3mm en radiografía simple, TC o ecografía a los 3 meses del procedimiento. Análisis de complicaciones, procedimientos auxiliares y factores de riesgo asociados con hematoma perirrenal. Análisis estadístico mediante software SPSS. Resultados En total, 512 pacientes con litiasis en GCI fueron tratados con LEOCh. El 80,3% de los pacientes tenía anatomía GCI favorable. La tasa libre de litiasis (TLL) fue 70,5%. Las principales complicaciones fueron: calle litiásica (5 pacientes) e infección del tracto urinario (3 casos). Se describen 10 hematomas perirrenales (2%). La toma de antiagregantes mostró asociación estadística con el riesgo de hematoma perirrenal (p=0,004). Mediante regresión logística binaria se demuestra asociación entre anatomía desfavorable del GCI (p=0,000), tamaño de litiasis (p=0,001), número de ondas de choque (p=0,003), energía aplicada (p=0,038) y necesidad de tratamiento adicional tras LEOCh. Conclusiones El tratamiento con LEOCh puede ser considerado de primera elección en litiasis de GCI. El tamaño de la litiasis, anatomía calicial desfavorable, número de ondas de choque y energía utilizadas pueden predecir la necesidad de retratamiento. (AU)

Introduction The use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower calyx stones is associated with a high rate of residual fragments. Our aim is to analyse the effectiveness and complications of ESWL for lower calyx stones. Methods Retrospective review of patients with lower renal calyx stones treated with ESWL between January-2014 and December-2020. Measurement of infundibular length, infundibular width and infundibulopelvic angle in lower renal pole to determine favourable anatomy. ESWL failure: fragments >3mm detected in plain abdominal film, CT scan and/or renal ultrasound 3 months after treatment. Complications after ESWL, auxiliary procedures along with risk factors associated with perirenal haematoma were analysed. SPSS statistical software was used. Results 512 patients with lower calyx stones were treated with ESWL. 80.3% of patients had a favourable anatomy. Overall stone-free rate was 70.5%. Regarding main complications after ESWL, stainstrasse was described in 5 patients and urinary tract infection in 3 patients. 10 perirenal haematomas (2%) were reported. Statistical association was found between antiplatelet treatment and the risk of perirenal haematoma (p=0.004). Logistic binary regression proved the association between unfavourable anatomy of the lower renal pole (p=0.000), size of the stone (p=0.001), number of shock waves (p=0.003), energy applied (p=0.038) and the need for additional treatment after ESWL. Conclusions ESWL can still be considered as the initial treatment option for lower renal pole stones. The size of the stone, an unfavourable anatomy of the lower renal calyx, number of shock waves and energy applied can help predict the need for additional treatment. (AU)

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyx stones: predicting treatment success.

INTRODUCTION: The use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower calyx stones is associated with a high rate of residual fragments. Our aim is to analyse the effectiveness and complications of ESWL for lower calyx stones. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with lower renal calyx stones treated with ESWL between January-2014 and December-2020. Measurement of infundibular length, infundibular width and infundibulopelvic angle in lower renal pole to determine favourable anatomy. ESWL failure: fragments >3 mm detected in plain abdominal film, CT scan and/or renal ultrasound 3 months after treatment. Complications after ESWL, auxiliary procedures along with risk factors associated with perirenal haematoma were analysed. SPSS statistical software was used. RESULTS: 512 patients with lower calyx stones were treated with ESWL. 80.3% of patients had a favourable anatomy. Overall stone-free rate was 70.5%. Regarding main complications after ESWL, stainstrasse was described in 5 patients and urinary tract infection in 3 patients. 10 perirenal haematomas (2%) were reported. Statistical association was found between antiplatelet treatment and the risk of perirenal haematoma (p = 0.004). Logistic binary regression proved the association between unfavourable anatomy of the lower renal pole (p = 0.000), size of the stone (p = 0.001), number of shock waves (p = 0.003), energy applied (p = 0.038) and the need for additional treatment after ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: ESWL can still be considered as the initial treatment option for lower renal pole stones. The size of the stone, an unfavourable anatomy of the lower renal calyx, number of shock waves and energy applied can help predict the need for additional treatment.

[Assessment of radiopaque kidney stone treatment: Combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and Fagolitos Plus®. Preliminary case control description.] / Evaluación del tratamiento de litiasis renal radiopaca mediante la combinación de litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque y Fagolitos Plus®. Estudio preliminar de casos y controles.

INTRODUCTION: The nutritional supplement called Fagolitos plus® contains hydroxycitric acid as main component, in addition to zinc, magnesium, vitamin A and vitamin B6. It is necessary to study new molecules as chemolytic treatment in calcium lithiasis or that facilitate its fragmentation with the help of other instrumental treatments. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combined treatment of Fagolitos plus® and extracorporeal lithotripsy in the fragmentation of the lithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective case-control study includes 88 patients with lithiasis. Group 1: Treated with 1 session of extracorporeal lithotripsy and Fagoliths plus®. Group 2: Treated with 1 session of extracorporeal lithotripsy. The variables analyzed were: Age, sex, body mass index, maximum diameter of the stone, area of the stone, hounsfield units of the stone measured by axial tomography, location of the stone, result after 1 session of extracorporeal wave lithotripsy shock [complete fragmentation, partial fragmentation (presence of a fragment greater than 5 mm) and absence of fragmentation (same size of the lithiasis)], adverse effects that occurred after taking Fagolitos plus®, days of treatment with Fagolitos plus® and energy shock wave applied to lithiasis. Results were analyzed with SPSS 20.0, p≤0.05. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients included in the study is 53.81 ± 12.62 years in group 1 compared to 56.53 ± 12.37 years in group 2, p=0.31. According to the distribution by sex, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.5), including 24 men and 24 women in group 1 and 23 men and 17 women in group 2. The mean of body mass index of the patients in group 1 was 28.39 ± 2.27 kg/m2 in group 1 versus 28.39 ± 3.03 kg/m2 in group 2, p=0.9. The maximum diameter of the stone was 11.5 ± 3.91 mm in group 1 compared to 13.15 ± 5.49 mm in group 2, p=0.1. The area of the lithiasis measured by tomography was 104.74 ± 70.56 mm2 in group 1 compared to 141.91 ± 80.95 mm2 in group 2, p=0.3. The Hounsfield units measured by tomography of the lithiasis in group 1 was 1061.98 ± 213.68 compared to 1143.15 ± 172.24 in group 2, p=0.06. Relation to fragmentation, complete fragmentation was observed in 66.7% of group 1 patients, compared to 41% of group 2 patients (p=0.02), between 20-30 days after the first session of Extracorporeal Lithotripsy evaluated by means of a simple X-ray of the Abdomen. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of Fagolitos plus® concomitant to extracorporeal lithotripsy could increase its effectiveness in lithiasis fragmentation, requiring clinical trials and prospective studies to confirm these findings.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El complemento nutricional denominado Fagolitos plus® contiene como principal componente ácido hidroxicítrico, además de zinc, magnesio, vitamina A y vitamina B6. Es necesario estudiar nuevas moléculas como tratamiento quimiolítico en litiasis cálcica o que faciliten su fragmentación con la ayuda de otros tratamientos instrumentales. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento combinado de Fagolitos plus® y Litotricia extracorpórea en la fragmentación de la litiasis.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles, incluye 88 pacientes con litiasis. Grupo 1: Tratados con 1 sesión de litotricia extracorpórea y Fagolitos plus®. Grupo 2: Tratados con 1 sesión de litotricia extracorpórea. Las variables analizadas fueron: Edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, diámetro máximo de la litiasis, área de la litiasis, unidades hounsfield de la litiasis medida por Tomografía axial, localización de la litiasis, resultado tras 1 sesión de Litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque [fragmentación completa, fragmentación parcial (presencia de un fragmento mayor a 5 mm) y ausencia de fragmentación (mismo tamaño de la litiasis)], efectos adversos acontecidos tras la toma de Fagolitos plus®, días de tratamiento con Fagolitos plus® y energía de ondas de choque aplicada a la litiasis. Se analizaron resultados con SPSS 20.0, p≤0,05. RESULTADOS: La edad media de los pacientes incluidos en el estudio es de 53,81 ± 12,62 años en el grupo 1 frente a 56,53 ± 12,37 años en el grupo 2, p=0,31. Según la distribución por sexos, tampoco existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p=0,5), incluyendo 24 hombres y 24 mujeres en el grupo 1 y 23 hombres y 17 mujeres en el grupo 2. El índice de masa corporal medio de los pacientes del grupo 1 fue de 28,39 ± 2,27 kg/m2 en el grupo 1 frente a 28,39 ± 3,03 kg/m2 en el grupo 2, p=0,9. El diámetro máximo de la litiasis fue de 11,5 ± 3,91 mm en el grupo 1 frente a 13,15 ± 5,49 mm en el grupo 2, p=0,1. El área de la litiasis medida por tomografía computarizada fue de 104,74 ± 70,56 mm2 en el grupo 1 frente a 141,91 ± 80,95 mm2 en el grupo 2, p=0,3. Las unidades Hounsfield medidas por tomografía de la litiasis en el grupo 1 fue de 1061,98 ± 213,68 frente a 1143,15 ± 172,24 en el grupo 2, p=0,06. En relación con la fragmentación, se observó fragmentación completa en el 66,7% de los pacientes del grupo 1, frente al 41% de los pacientes del grupo 2 (p=0,02) entre 20-30 días tras la primera sesión de Litotricia Extracorpórea evaluado mediante Radiografía simple de Abdomen. CONCLUSIONES: La administración de Fagolitos plus® concomitante a la Litotricia extracorpórea podría aumentar su efectividad en la fragmentación de la litiasis, siendo necesarios ensayos clínicos y estudios prospectivos que confirmen estos hallazgos.

Evaluación del tratamiento de litiasis renal radiopaca mediante la combinación de litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque y fagolitos plus. Estudio preliminar de casos y controles / Evaluation of the treatment of radiopaque renal lithiasis through the combination of extracorporeal lithotripsy by shock waves and phagoliths plus. Preliminary case-control study

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento combinado de Fagolitos plus® yLitotricia extracorpórea en la fragmentación de la litiasis.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de casosy controles, incluye 88 pacientes con litiasis. Grupo 1:Tratados con 1 sesión de litotricia extracorpórea y Fagolitos plus ®. Grupo 2: Tratados con 1 sesión de litotriciaextracorpórea. Las variables analizadas fueron: Edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, diámetro máximo dela litiasis, área de la litiasis, unidades hounsfield de lalitiasis medida por Tomografía axial, localización de lalitiasis, resultado tras 1 sesión de Litotricia extracorpóreapor ondas de choque [fragmentación completa, fragmentación parcial (presencia de un fragmento mayor a5 mm) y ausencia de fragmentación (mismo tamaño dela litiasis)], efectos adversos acontecidos tras la toma deFagolitos plus ®, días de tratamiento con Fagolitos plus ®y energía de ondas de choque aplicada a la litiasis. Seanalizaron resultados con SPSS 20.0, p≤0,05. Resultados: La edad media de los pacientes incluidos en el estudio es de 53,81 ± 12,62 años en elgrupo 1 frente a 56,53 ± 12,37 años en el grupo 2,p=0,31. Según la distribución por sexos, tampoco existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p=0,5),incluyendo 24 hombres y 24 mujeres en el grupo 1 y23 hombres y 17 mujeres en el grupo 2. El índice demasa corporal medio de los pacientes del grupo 1 fuede 28,39 ± 2,27 kg/m 2 en el grupo 1 frente a 28,39± 3,03 kg/m2 en el grupo 2, p=0,9. El diámetro máximo de la litiasis fue de 11,5 ± 3,91 mm en el grupo1 frente a 13,15 ± 5,49 mm en el grupo 2, p=0,1.El área de la litiasis medida por tomografía computarizada fue de 104,74 ± 70,56 mm 2 en el grupo 1frente a 141,91 ± 80,95 mm2 en el grupo 2, p=0,3.Las unidades Hounsfield medidas por tomografía de lalitiasis en el grupo 1 fue de 1061,98 ± 213,68 frentea 1143,15 ± 172,24 en el grupo 2, p=0,06...(AU)

Objetive: The objective of this study is to evaluatethe effectiveness of the combined treatment of Fagolitosplus® and extracorporeal lithotripsy in the fragmentationof the lithiasis.Material and methods: Retrospective case-control study includes 88 patients with lithiasis. Group 1:Treated with 1 session of extracorporeal lithotripsy andFagoliths plus ® . Group 2: Treated with 1 session of extracorporeal lithotripsy. The variables analyzed were:Age, sex, body mass index, maximum diameter of thestone, area of the stone, hounsfield units of the stonemeasured by axial tomography, location of the stone,result after 1 session of extracorporeal wave lithotripsy.shock [complete fragmentation, partial fragmentation(presence of a fragment greater than 5 mm) and absence of fragmentation (same size of the lithiasis)], adverse effects that occurred after taking Fagolitos plus ® ,days of treatment with Fagolitos plus ® and energyshock wave applied to lithiasis. Results were analyzedwith SPSS 20.0, p≤0.05.Results: The mean age of the patients included in thestudy is 53.81 ± 12.62 years in group 1 compared to56.53 ± 12.37 years in group 2, p=0.31. Accordingto the distribution by sex, there were no statisticallysignificant differences (p=0.5), including 24 men and24 women in group 1 and 23 men and 17 women ingroup 2. The mean of body mass index of the patientsin group 1 was 28.39 ± 2.27 kg/m 2 in group 1 versus 28.39 ± 3.03 kg/m 2 in group 2, p=0.9. The maximum diameter of the stone was 11.5 ± 3.91 mm ingroup 1 compared to 13.15 ± 5.49 mm in group 2,p=0.1. The area of the lithiasis measured by tomography was 104.74 ± 70.56 mm 2 in group 1 comparedto 141.91 ± 80.95 mm 2 in group 2, p=0.3. TheHounsfield units measured by tomography of the lithiasis in group 1 was 1061.98 ± 213.68 compared to1143.15 ± 172.24 in group 2, p=0.06.Relation to fragmentation, complete fragmentation wasobserved in 66.7% of group 1 patients, compared to...(AU)

Factors to predict shock-wave lithotripsy results in pediatric patients and external validation of a nomogram. / Factores para predecir los resultados de la litotricia por ondas de choque en pacientes pediátricos y validación externa de un nomograma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the Dogan nomogram in predicting stone-free (SF) rate after a single shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) session and evaluate factors that predict SWL results in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 68 patients under 18 years of age who had been treated with SWL for radiopaque upper urinary tract stones in our tertiary centre from January 2010 to December 2016. The median age is 50 (6-207) months and median follow-up period is 9 (4-50) months. Patients with known cystine stone disease, abnormal renal anatomy, urinary diversion and multiple stones located in different calyces were excluded like in the original nomogram study. SF status was evaluated by performing plain abdominal radiography and urinary ultrasonography 2 weeks after each SWL session. Patients who were completely free of stones were considered to be SF. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the variables affecting SF status. The bootstrap method with 1,000 replicates was used for the external validity of a nomogram developed by Dogan. RESULTS: SF rates for each SWL session were determined as 54.4% (37/68) for the first session, 33.3% (7/21) for the second session and 55.6% (5/9) for the third session. Overall, the SF rate was 72.1% (49/68). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed positive and significant correlations of age and stone size with risk of SWL failure. The external calibration plot showed a nearly good validation with Dogan nomogram to predict SWL failure in first session. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that the Dogan nomogram can be used to predict the SF status after one session of SWL in pediatric patients.

Shock wave lithotripsy deteriorates male sexual functions related to the treatment-driven anxiety: A prospective, non-randomized, self-controlled study. / La litotricia extracorporea deteriora la función sexual masculina en relación a la ansiedad por el tratamiento: un estudio prospectivo, no randomizado auto-controlado.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigatel ongitudinal changes in sexual functions (SF), anxiety status, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in male urolithiasis patients. METHODS: Between February 2015 and April 2017, 85 consecutive male patients with kidney or ureter stones and treated with SWL were included. Patients were evaluated for SF, anxiety status, and HRQoL with questionnaire forms before and at the third month after SWL. Correlation between baseline and third-month scores of International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) subdomains and anxiety was evaluated. Uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to identify changes in IIEF-15 subdomain scores at three months. RESULTS: Mean age was 42.80 ± 9.42 years. Significantly decreased IIEF-15 subdomain scores, increased anxiety and Short Form-36 (SF-36) subdomain scores were achieved at three months (p<0.05, for each). The baseline median values of erectile function (IIEFEF), orgasmic function (IIEF-OF), sexual desire (IIEF-SD), intercourse satisfaction (IIEF-IS), and overall satisfaction (IIEF-OS) were 26, 9, 8, 12, and 8, respectively. The same scores were 26, 9, 6, 9, and 8 at month 3, respectively. According to multivariable analysis, the difference in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores was an independent risk factor for both changing in IIEF-SD and IIEF-IS (b= -0.094, 95%CI: -0.179 - -0.009, p=0.030 and b= -0.197, 95%CI: -0.350 - -0.044, p=0.012, respectively). The difference in the State Anxiety (STAISA) scores was an independent risk factor for changing in IIEF-IS (b= -0.075, 95%CI: -0.146 - -0.004,p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: SWL may lead to impaired SF related to treatment-driven anxiety and significantly improve HRQoL of male patients in short term.

OBJETIVO: Este estudio tiene como objetivo investigar los cambios longitudinales en la función sexual, estado de ansiedad y calidad de vida después de la litotricia extracorpórea en pacientes varones conlitiasis. MÉTODOS: Entre febrero 2015 y abril 2017, 85 pacientes varones consecutivos con litiasis renales o ureterales tratados con litotricia extracorpórea fueron incluidos. Los pacientes fueron evaluados en relación a la función sexual, estado de ansiedad, y calidad de vida con cuestionarios de calidad de vida antes y a los 3 meses de la litotricia extracorpórea. Correlación entre los resultados de International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) iniciales y a los 3 meses en los dominios de ansiedad, fueron evaluados. Análisis de regresión univariada y multivariada fue utilizada para identificar cambios en IIEF-15 a los 3 meses. RESULTADOS: La edad media fue de 42,80 ± 9,42 años. Una caída significativa de los resultados de los subdominios de IIEF-15 con incremento de la ansiedad y Short Form-36 (SF-36) fueron conseguidos a los 3 meses (p<0,05, para cada uno). Los resultados medios en función eréctil (IIEF-EF), función orgásmica (IIEF-OF), deseo sexual (IIEF-SD), satisfacción en las relaciones (IIEF-IS), y satisfacción general (IIEF-OS) fueron 26, 9, 8, 12, y 8, respectivamente. Los mismos resultados fueron 26, 9, 6, 9, y 8 a los 3 meses, respectivamente. En el análisis multivariado, la diferencia en Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) fue un factor de riesgo independiente para ambos, cambiando en IIEF-SD y IIEF-IS (b= -0,094, 95%CI: -0,179 ­ -0,009, p=0,030 y b= -0,197, 95%CI: -0,350 ­ -0,044, p=0,012, respectivamente). La diferencia en el State Anxiety (STAI-SA) fue un factor de riesgo independiente para cambio en IIEF-IS (b= -0,075, 95%CI: -0,146 ­-0,004, p=0,039). CONCLUSIONES: La litotricia extracorpórea comporta cierto grado de disfunción sexual relacionada con la ansiedad del tratamiento y mejora significativamente la calidad de vida en los pacientes varones a corto plazo.

Comparative analysis of direct and indirect costs of two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm. / Análisis comparativo de costes directos e indirectos de dos técnicas mínimamente invasivas, para el tratamiento de la litiasis renoureteral menor de 2 cm.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a comparative analysis of indirect and direct costs of two minimally invasive techniques (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) vs. ureteroscopy with holmium laser (URS/RIRS)) for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, comparative, non-randomized study of 84 patients treated for kidney stones smaller than 2 cm between January and December 2016. Of these, 38 (45.67%) were treated with ESWL (18 renal lithiasis and 20 ureteral lithiasis) and 46 (54.32%) with URS/RIRS (22 renal lithiasis and 24 ureteral lithiasis). A total of 19 (41.3%) patients in the URS/RIRS group and 15 (39.5%) patients in the ESWL group were actively working before treatment. The variables analyzed were sex, age, number and size of lithiasis, time (days) off from work due to treatment, estimate of indirect cost due to labor productivity loss and direct treatment costs including follow-up (total number of procedures, ancillary care, visits and diagnostic tests). The 2015 Wage Structure Survey (INE) was used to estimate the indirect cost. In addition, the «Work Productivity and Activity Impairment¼ (WPAI) questionnaire was also used to determine the level of perceived productivity loss. RESULTS: The mean number of sessions until lithiasis resolution was achieved was 2.57 for the ESWL group and 1.04 for the URS. The mean number of days off from work in the URS group was 7.16 days and 3.18 (p = 0.034) in the ESWL group. The total indirect costs resulting from productivity loss were EUR 621.55 and EUR 276.05 for the URS and ESWL, respectively. Direct costs in the ESWL group were EUR 1,382.9 and EUR 2,317.71 in the URS group. The level of work impairment perceived by patients undergoing URS was 18.88% and 21.33% in the ESWL group. The degree of impairment for performing activities of daily living was 24.44% in the URS and 15% in ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: The ESWL technique requires a higher number of sessions for the resolution of kidney stones under 2 cm, but it has a lower impact on total costs and on the perceived degree of affectation.

Effect of JJ stent on outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment of moderate sized renal pelvic stones: A randomized prospective study. / Resultados de LEOCH con o sin catéter para el tratamiento de cálculos en la pelvis renal: un estudio aleatorizado.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of JJ stents on SWL treatment of moderate (15-25mm) renal pelvic stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2017, a total of 152 adult patients who were planned to undergo SWL for a single radiopaque renal pelvic stone were included in the study. Patients with solitary kidney, congenital abnormality, skeletal tract abnormalities, previous urinary system surgery, hydronephrosis (grade 2 or more), untreated urinary tract infection, bleeding disorder, and suspected pregnancy were excluded. The remaining 114 patients were randomly divided into two groups; non-stented and stented. Twenty-two patients whose stone could not be fragmented despite 3 consecutive sessions were also excluded from the study. A total of 92 patients (54 non-stented and 38 stented) were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of age, sex, body mass index, renal parancyhimal thickness, hydronephrosis, skin-to-stone distance, Hounsfield units, and stone size between the groups. Success was significantly higher in the stented group than in the non-stented group (71% vs. 39%, P=.002). In stone-free patients, the number of emergency department visits and analgesic tablet consumption was significantly lower in the stented group than in the non-stented group (P<.001 and P<.001, respectively). In non- stone-free patients, analgesic tablet consumption was significantly lower in the stented group than in the non-stented group (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-stenting before SWL treatment of moderate sized renal pelvic stones has some advantages in terms of success, emergency service visits, and analgesic tablet consumption.

[Treatment of uretero-renal stones with shock wave lithotripsy. Results and complications with the dornier gemini emse 220f-XXP.] / Tratamiento de la litiasis reno-ureteral con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque. Resultados y complicaciones con el equipo Dornier Gemini EMSE 220f-XXP.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a minimally invasive therapeutic option for the treatment of renal-ureteral lithiasis. The aim of this study was to analyze the results and complications of shock wave extracorporeal lithotripsy treatment with the Dornier Gemini® Generator EMSE 220f-XXP device in patients with renal and ureteral lithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study including 377 patients with renal or ureteral lithiasis with indication for treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The following variables were analyzed, age, sex, body mass index, lithiasis size, lithiasis location, presence of urinary diversion, number of lithotripsy sessions, number of shock waves, fluoroscopy time, wave energy, applied focal energy coefficient, efficiency coefficient, lithiasic fragmentation, lithiasic clearance, residual lithiasis, presence of lithiasis and complications. The results were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 considering statistical significance p≤0.05. RESULTS: Of the 377 patients, 213 were men and 164 women, with a mean age of 51.28 ± 12.77 years. The mean size of the stones in maximum diameter was 11.77 ± 6.13 mm. Lithiasis fragmentation occurred in 81.9% of cases, with a percentage of residual lithiasis after the first session of 58.7% and a total or partial expulsion rate of lithiasis fragments of 68.3%, with global success at the end of sessions of lithotripsy of 69.8%. The overall Efficiency Ratio was 0.42, higher in upper calyx 0.51 and lower in medium calyx 0.35, with significant differences (p<0.05). The only differences were found in relation to the success of lithotripsy treatment (75% versus 64.6%, p=0.02), according to lithiasis size (≤10 mm maximum diameter in comparison to >10 mm). In patients with a DJ catheter there is a higher percentage of residual lithiasis (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with extracorporeal lithotripsy in small lithiasis and in well-selected patients obtains good results with a low rate of complications regardless of sex and body mass index.

OBJETIVOS: La litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque es una opción terapéutica mínimamente invasiva para el tratamiento de las litiasis reno-ureterales. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los resultados y complicaciones del tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque con el dispositivo de última generación Dornier Gemini® generador EMSE 220f-XXP en pacientes con litiasis renal y ureteral. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyen 377 pacientes con litiasis renal o ureteral con indicación de tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea con ondas de choque. Se analizan las siguientes variables que incluyen la edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, tamaño litiásico, localización de la litiasis, presencia de derivación urinaria, número de sesiones de litotricia, número de ondas de choque, tiempo de escopia, energía de las ondas, coeficiente de energía focal aplicada, coeficiente de eficiencia, fragmentación litiásica, expulsión litiásica, litiasis residual, presencia de calle litiásica y complicaciones. Se analizan los resultados con programa SPSS 17.0 considerando significación estadística p≤0,05. RESULTADOS: De los 377 pacientes, 213 fueron hombres y 164 mujeres, con edad media 51,28 ± 12,77 años. El tamaño medio de las litiasis en diámetro máximo fue de 11,77 ± 6,13 mm. Se produce fragmentación de la litiasis en el 81,9% de los casos, con un porcentaje de litiasis residual tras la primera sesión de 58,7% y una tasa de expulsión total o parcial de fragmentos litiásicos del 68,3%, con un éxito global al finalizar las sesiones de litotricia del 69,8%. El Coeficiente de Eficiencia global fue de 0,42, más elevado en cáliz superior 0,51 y más bajo en cáliz medio 0,35, con diferencias significativas (pencontradas se observan según tamaño litiásico (≤10 mm de diámetro máximo con respecto a >10mm) en relación al éxito del tratamiento con litotricia (75% versus 64,6%, catéter DJ existe un mayor porcentaje de litiasis residual (p=0,006). CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento con litotricia extracorpórea en litiasis de pequeño tamaño y en pacientes bien seleccionados obtiene buenos resultados con un bajo índice de complicaciones independientemente del sexo y del índice de masa corporal.

Shockwave lithotripsy with music: Less painful and more satisfactory treatment. / Litotricia por ondas de choque con música: un tratamiento menos doloroso y más satisfactorio.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine whether listening to music during a session of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) improves patients' pain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A simple, blind randomisation was undertaken of patients with kidney and ureter stones attending an ESWL session of 7,000 waves for the first time, between September and December 2014. One group was given music and the other was not. The age, gender, location of stones (kidney/ureter) were recorded and 2questionnaires: pre ESWL (questionnaire A) and postESWL (questionnaire B). Each questionnaire contained a question about anxiety and another question on pain on the Likert scale (0-10). Questionnaire B also had a question on satisfaction and comfort (Likert 0-10). Other variables included heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure on wave 2,000, 5,000 and 7,000, reason for halting the procedure, total pethidine (mg), secondary analgesia, energy (J) and frequency (Hz). Bivariate analysis using the Student's t-test, X2/Fisher test and a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: The sample comprised 95 patients, with a mean age of 52 (±13) years, 35 (36.84%) females, 60 (63.2%) males. A total of 25 (26.3%) ureter stones and 70 (73.7%) kidney stones. A number of 42 (44.2%) patients were given music. There were no differences between the demographic variables or questionnaire A scores. Satisfaction and pain were better on questionnaire B with music. CONCLUSION: Music can reduce pain and improve patient satisfaction in ESWL treatment. More studies are required to confirm this effect.

Predicting the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on urinary tract stones. Risk groups for accurate retreatment. / Predicción de efectividad de litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque en cálculos del tracto urinario. Grupos de riesgo para precisar retratamiento.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a non-invasive, safe and effective treatment for urinary tract lithiasis. Its effectiveness varies depending on the location and size of the stones as well as other factors; several sessions are occasionally required. The objective is to attempt to predict its success or failure, when the influential variables are known beforehand. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed 211 patients who had had previous CT scans and were treated with ESWL between 2010 and 2014. The influential variables in requiring retreatment were studied using binary logistic regression models (univariate and multivariate analysis): maximum density, maximum diameter, area, location, disintegration and distance from the adipose panniculus. With the influential variables, a risk model was designed by assessing all possible combinations with logistic regression (version 20.0 IBM SPSS). RESULTS: The independent influential variables on the need for retreatment are: maximum density >864HU, maximum diameter >7.5mm and pyelocaliceal location. Using these variables, the best model includes 3risk groups with a probability of requiring significantly different retreatment: group 1-low risk (0 variables) with 20.2%; group 2-intermediate risk (1-2 variables) with 49.2%; and group 3-high risk (3 variables) with 62.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The density, maximum diameter and pyelocaliceal location of the stones are determinant factors in terms of the effectiveness of treatment with ESWL. Using these variables, which can be obtained in advance of deciding on a treatment, the designed risk model provides a precise approach in choosing the most appropriate treatment for each particular case.

Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy a current treatment for urolithiasis? A systematic review. / ¿Es la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque en la actualidad un tratamiento vigente para el tratamiento de la litiasis urinaria? Revisión sistemática.

INTRODUCTION: Technological advances have prompted a change in the management of urolithiasis. Endourological techniques are gaining importance because they are highly effective treatments. The aim of this study was to answer the question of whether extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is still a competitive alternative compared with other therapeutic modalities. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: We conducted a literature search of articles published in the past 5 years. We identified 12 randomized and comparative studies and assessed the methodology and results of the study variables. We performed a narrative synthesis of the included studies. To summarise the variables, we used the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and absolute numbers and percentages for the qualitative variables. ANALYSIS OF THE EVIDENCE: Of the studies reviewed, 7 evaluated the various treatments for nephrolithiasis and 5 evaluated the treatments for ureteral lithiasis. At the renal level, a stone-free rate of 33.33-91.5% at 3 months was reached with ESWL, while a rate of 90.4-100% was achieved with the other endourological techniques, without finding statistically significant differences in the studies. At the ureteral level, a stone-free rate of 73.5-82.2% at 3 months was reached with ESWL, while a rate of 79-94.1% was achieved with the other endourological techniques, without finding statistically significant differences in the studies. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of homogeneity among the published studies. ESWL is a minimally invasive treatment that with an appropriate technique and patient selection achieves high effectiveness, thus maintaining an important role at this time.

Efficacy of low-intensity shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Eficacia de la terapia de ondas de choque de baja intensidad para la disfunción eréctil: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis.

CONTEXT: The low-intensity shockwave (LISW) therapy is a recently developed modality for treating erectile dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of LISW therapy for treating erectile dysfunction as described in the literature. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: Two independent reviewers identified studies eligible for a systematic review and meta-analysis of various sources written in English and Spanish, using the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. We excluded studies on Peyronie's disease. We employed the DerSimonian-Laird method for defining heterogeneity, calculating the grouped standard deviation of the mean (SDM). The primary objective of this review is to assess efficacy based on the change in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) over baseline at 1 month from the start of treatment, both for the treatment arm and the placebo arm. The secondary objective is focused on analysing IIEF-EF at 3-6 months from the start of the therapy. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE: The pooled data of 636 patients from 12 studies showed that treatment with LISW resulted in a significant increase in IIEF-EF at 1 month with respect to baseline (SDM, -2.92; P=.000), to a greater degree than placebo (SDM, -.99; P=.000). The IIEF-EF at 3-6 months for the treated patients was significantly greater than baseline (SDM, -2.78; P=.000). Only one study compared the efficacy of placebo at 3-6 months versus baseline (SDM, -9.14). The comparison between LISW and placebo favours active treatment (SDM, 2.53; P=.000) at 1 month. There are insufficient data in the literature to assess the response over placebo at 3-6 months. CONCLUSIONS: According to the literature, treatment with LISW for erectile dysfunction is effective, both in the short and medium term. LISW has been described as more effective than placebo in the short term. The long-term efficacy data are insufficient. More studies are needed to explain the role of this therapy according to specific causes of erectile dysfunction.

Analysis of the safety profile of treatment with a large number of shock waves per session in extracorporeal lithotripsy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of increasing the number of waves per session in the treatment of urolithiasis using extracorporeal lithotripsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, comparative, nonrandomized parallel study of patients with renoureteral lithiasis and an indication for extracorporeal lithotripsy who were consecutively enrolled between 2009 and 2010. We compared group I (160 patients) treated on schedule with a standard number of waves/session (mean 2858,3±302,8) using a Dornier lithotripter U/15/50 against group II (172 patients) treated with an expanded number of waves/session (mean, 6728,9±889,6) using a Siemens Modularis lithotripter. The study variables were age, sex, location, stone size, number of waves/session and total number of waves to resolution, stone-free rate (SFR) and rate of complications (Clavien-Dindo classification). Student's t-test and the chi-squared test were employed for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The total rate of complications was 11.9% and 10.46% for groups I and II, respectively (P=.39). All complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo grade I). The most common complications were colic pain and hematuria in groups I and II, respectively, with a similar treatment intolerance rate (P>.05). The total number of waves necessary was lower in group II than in group I (P=.001), with SFRs of 96.5% and 71.5%, respectively (P=.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with an expanded number of waves per session in extracorporeal lithotripsy does not increase the rate of complications or their severity. However, it could increase the overall effectiveness of the treatment.

Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) is currently the recommended treatment for intra-renal calculi smaller than 2 cm. However the low Stone Free Rate (SFR) in lower pole calculi gives rise to new techniques, such us retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), for improve the surgery outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a treatment with ESWL with RIRS, in terms of SFR after surgery, in patients with kidney stones up to 15 mm in the lower pole. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in order to assess the results of ESWL and RIRS in patients with lower pole stones less than 15 mm. Among a total of 55 patients, 31 were underwent to ESWL (Group 1) and the remaining 24 to RIRS (Group 2). Clinical data recorded, including general characteristics of each patient, were: calculi size, side, operative time, complications according to Clavien scale, SFR and the presence of residual fragments at 2 months post-treatment assessed by a CT scan. STATA 11 was used to perform the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences for general descriptors among groups with the exception of a significantly longer operative time for RIRS. The rates of SFR and residual fragments lesser than 3 mm. were lower in the RIRS group than in ESWL ones. RIRS also showed a lower rate of clinically significant fragments (0% vs 42.3%. P < .05). In the subgroup of patients with stones between 10/15 mm RIRS showed higher SFR (75% vs. 41.2%) and a lower rate of stones>3 mm (0% vs. 58.8%), being statistically significant (P < .05). Clavien III or higher complications were not reported in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of lower pole stone RIRS has the same results than ESWL in terms of SFR. Regarding absence of a clinically significant residual fragment, RIRS was superior to ESWL. A bigger sample size is required in order to confirm this results.

Invasive treatment trends in urinary calculi in a third level hospital.

OBJECTIVE: In the following study, we observe the progress of various invasive calculi treatments that have taken place in our hospital in the last 15 years. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We extracted data from our hospital database on patients who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), endoscopic surgery and open surgery. We analyzed how the incidence of these treatments has evolved over the last 15 years. We also studied the number of publications in PubMed that reference invasive calculi treatments. RESULTS: From January 1998 to December 2012, a total of 10,947 patients were treated instrumentally for lithiasis, 9,695 of whom (90.4%) underwent ESWL and 1,034 of whom underwent endoscopic or open surgery (9.6%). The incidence of lithotripsy treatments reached its maximum in 2006, with a progressive reduction thereafter. The incidence of endoscopic surgery increased progressively until 2009 and then leveled off. We can see how in recent years there has been a clear increase in the number of studies that have covered endoscopic surgery, with a decreasing number covering ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: In our community, ESWL remains the most widely used invasive treatment for calculi. In recent years, there has been a reduction in the number of ESWL treatments and an increase in the number of endoscopic treatments, with open surgery showing a clearly decreasing trend.