Genome sequencing differentiates a paracentric inversion from a balanced insertion enabling more accurate preimplantation genetic testing.

INTRODUCTION: Distinguishing paracentric inversions (PAIs) from chromosomal insertions has traditionally relied on fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, but recent advancements in high-throughput sequencing have enabled the use of genome sequencing for such differentiation. In this study, we present a 38-year-old male carrier of a paracentric inversion on chromosome 2q, inv (2)(q31.2q34), whose partner experienced recurrent miscarriages. MATERIAL AND METHODS: FISH analysis confirmed the inversion, and genome sequencing was employed for detailed characterization. RESULTS: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) revealed that all assessed embryos were balanced, consistent with the low risk of unbalanced offspring associated with PAIs. While PAI carriers traditionally exhibit low risk of producing unbalanced offspring, exceptions exist due to crossover events within the inversion loop. Although the sample size was limited, the findings align with existing sperm study data, supporting the rare occurrence of unbalanced progeny in PAI carriers. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the possibility of characterizing PAIs using genome sequencing to enable correct reproductive counseling and PGT decisions. Detailed characterization of a PAI is crucial for understanding potential outcomes and guiding PGT strategies, as accurate knowledge of the inversion size is essential for appropriate method selection in PGT. Given the very low risk of unbalanced offspring in PAI carriers, routine PGT may not be warranted but should be considered in specific cases with a history of unbalanced progeny or recurrent miscarriages. This study contributes to our understanding of PAI segregation and its implications for reproductive outcomes.

CHD2 pathogenic nonsense variant in a three-generation family with variable phenotype and a paracentric inversion 16: Case report.

Chromosomal inversions are usually balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements that do not have an impact on the clinical phenotype of a carrier. The main clinical consequence of inversions is the risk for unbalanced gametes and offspring with severe phenotypes. Rarely though, inversions are associated with a phenotype, mainly due to submicroscopic Copy Number Variants (CNVs) or disruption at the breakpoints of a functionally important gene and/or genomic elements. In this study, a paracentric inversion of chromosome 16 [inv(16)(q22.3q24.1)] was identified in a three-generation family with discordant phenotypes with/without epilepsy and/or intellectual impairment, as well as with an unaffected carrier. This finding was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Genetic investigation, initially with chromosomal microarray (CMA), did not reveal any copy number variants. Finally, Clinical Exome Sequencing (CES), detected the presence of a pathogenic nonsense variant (rs797044912) in the Chromodomain Helicase DNA-binding protein 2 (CHD2) gene [NM_001271.4:c.5035C>T p.(Arg1679Ter)]. CHD2 pathogenic variants have been associated with Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy-94 (DEE-94), a rare yet severe condition, characterized by developmental delay, seizures with an early onset, intellectual impairment, autism spectrum disorder, and sometimes behavioral issues. Family testing showed that the variant segregated with phenotypic heterogeneity in the affected individuals and appears to be causative. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first CHD2 pathogenic variant segregating in a three-generation family and the fourth familial case reported. These results further support our previous findings that familial, balanced rearrangements with discordant phenotypes in the same family are, in the vast majority, coincidental.

Dicentric Recombinant Chromosome 18 due to Maternal Paracentric Inversion Analyzed by Array CGH.

Introduction: Chromosomal abnormalities are mostly found in 0.5-0.8% of live-born infants with developmental and morphological defects. Paracentric inversions are structural intrachromosomal rearrangements resulting in a risk of chromosomally unbalanced gametes in carriers. Case Presentation: Herein, we report a patient with dicentric rearrangement of chromosome 18 due to maternal paracentric inversion of chromosome 18. The patient was a girl, aged 3 years and 11 months. She was referred due to multiple congenital abnormalities, severe intellectual disability, and motor retardation. She had microcephaly, prominent metopic suture, synophrys, epicanthic folds, telecanthus, wide-set alae nasi, wide columella, bilateral cleft lip and palate, pectus carinatum, umbilical hernia, pes planus, and anteriorly displaced anus. She had bilateral external auditory canal stenosis and mild right-sided and moderate left-sided sensorineural hearing loss. Echocardiography showed secundum-type atrial septal defect and mild tricuspid failure. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed only thinning of posterior areas of the corpus callosum. Chromosome analysis showed 46,XX,dic rec(18) by GTG and C banding. Dicentric chromosome was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Paternal karyotype was normal 46,XY but maternal chromosome analysis showed a paracentric inversion in chromosome 18 with 46,XX,inv(18)(q11.2?q21.3?) karyotype. Array CGH was performed on a peripheral blood sample from the patient and showed duplication at 18p11.32p11.21 and 18q11.1q11.2, and deletion at 18q21.33q23. The patient's final karyotype is arr 18p11.32p11.21(64,847_15,102,598)×3,18q11.1q11.2(18,542,074_22,666,470)×3,18q21.33q23(59,784,364_78,010,032)×1. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with dicentric chromosome 18 due to a parental paracentric inversion of chromosome 18. We present the genotype-phenotype correlation with literature review.

The Precise Breakpoint Mapping in Paracentric Inversion 10q22.2q23.3 by Comprehensive Cytogenomic Analysis, Multicolor Banding, and Single-Copy Chromosome Sequencing.

Detection and precise genomic mapping of balanced chromosomal abnormalities in patients with impaired fertility or a clinical phenotype represent a challenge for current cytogenomics owing to difficulties with precise breakpoint localization in the regions enriched for DNA repeats and high genomic variation in such regions. Here, we present a comprehensive cytogenomic approach to breakpoint mapping in a rare paracentric inversion on 10q (in a patient with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and necrozoospermia) that does not affect other phenotype traits. Multicolor banding, chromosomal microarray analysis, chromosome microdissection with reverse painting, and single-copy sequencing of the rearranged chromosome were performed to determine the length and position of the inverted region as well as to rule out a genetic imbalance at the breakpoints. As a result, a paracentric 19.251 Mbp inversion at 10q22.2q23.3 was described. The most probable location of the breakpoints was predicted using the hg38 assembly. The problems of genetic counseling associated with enrichment for repeats and high DNA variability of usual breakpoint regions were discussed. Possible approaches for cytogenomic assessment of couples with balanced chromosome rearrangements and problems like reproductive failures were considered and suggested as useful part of effective genetic counseling.

Maple syrup urine disease due to a paracentric inversion of chr 19 that disrupts BCKDHA: A case report.

Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) is a rare autosomal recessive inherited disorder of branched-chain amino acid metabolism caused by mutations in BCKDHA, BCKDHB, and DBT that encode the E1α, E1ß, and E2 subunits of the branched-chain α-ketoacid dehydrogenase (BCKD) complex. Various MSUD-causing variants have been described; however, no structural rearrangements in BCKDHA have been reported to cause the classic MSUD phenotype. Here, we describe the classic patient with MSUD with compound heterozygous pathogenic variants in BCKDHA: a missense variant (NM_000709.3:c.757G > A, NP_000700.1:p.Ala253Thr) and a paracentric inversion disrupting Intron 1 of BCKDHA, which was identified by whole-genome sequencing and validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Using the sequence information of the breakpoint junction, we gained mechanistic insight into the development of this structural rearrangement. Furthermore, the establishment of junction-specific polymerase chain reaction could facilitate identification of the variant in case carrier or future prenatal/preimplantation tests are necessary.

Sperm chromosome segregation of rob(4;16) and rob(4;16)inv(4) in the brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira).

The genus Mazama stands out among the Neotropical deer due to their wide intra and interspecific karyotypic diversification, which is associated with an accentuated chromosomal fragility. There are reports of heterozygous Robertsonian translocation (RT) carriers in a free-range population of Mazama gouazoubira (brown brocket deer), as well as in captive animals of this and other species of the genus. To analyze possible negative impacts of heterozygous chromosome rearrangements on reproductive fitness of the carriers, we performed an analysis of sperm meiotic segregation in four brown brocket bucks, carriers of a rob(4;16), and compared the results with those of a normal buck. We established a reliable FISH and sperm-FISH protocol for the brown brocket deer using bovine (Bos taurus; diploid number, 2n = 60) whole chromosome painting (WCP) and BAC probes. Using BAC probes, we revealed the presence of a paracentric inversion (PAI) of the fused chromosome 4 in two of the four analyzed RT carriers. The mean frequency of normal/balanced sperm in the translocation carriers was significantly lower than in the normal buck (94.78% vs 98.40%). The mean value of total unbalanced spermatozoa was almost doubled in the RT/PAI carriers (6.68%) when compared to RT carriers (3.76%), but the difference was not statistically significant. This study demonstrated the efficiency of FISH with bovine WCP and BAC probes in the characterization of chromosome rearrangements and gametic segregation patterns in brown brocket deer. Our results indicate a low to moderate increase in the rates of unbalanced meiotic segregation products in brown brocket bucks heterozygous for RT and RT/PAIs.

A 4.6 Mb Inversion Leading to PCDH15-LINC00844 and BICC1-PCDH15 Fusion Transcripts as a New Pathogenic Mechanism Implicated in Usher Syndrome Type 1.

Usher type 1 syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disorder involving congenital severe-to-profound hearing loss, development of vision impairment in the first decade, and severe balance difficulties. The PCDH15 gene, one of the five genes implicated in this disease, is involved in 8-20% of cases. In this study, we aimed to identify and characterize the two causal variants in a French patient with typical Usher syndrome clinical features. Massively parallel sequencing-based gene panel and screening for large rearrangements were used, which detected a single multi-exon deletion in the PCDH15 gene. As the second pathogenic event was likely localized in the unscreened regions of the gene, PCDH15 transcripts from cultured nasal cells were analyzed and revealed a loss of junction between exon 13 and exon 14. This aberration could be explained by the identification of two fusion transcripts, PCDH15-LINC00844 and BICC1-PCDH15, originating from a 4.6 Mb inversion. This complex chromosomal rearrangement could not be detected by our diagnostic approach but was instead characterized by long-read sequencing, which offers the possibility of detecting balanced structural variants (SVs). This finding extends our knowledge of the mutational spectrum of the PCDH15 gene with the first ever identification of a large causal paracentric inversion of chromosome 10 and illustrates the utility of screening balanced SVs in an exhaustive molecular diagnostic approach.

Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis Caused by a Familial Chromosome 7 Inversion Disrupting the ELN Gene Uncovered by Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Apparently, balanced chromosomal rearrangements usually have no phenotypic consequences for the carrier. However, in some cases, they may be associated with an abnormal phenotype. We report herein the case of a 4-year-old boy presenting with clinically isolated supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS). No chromosomal imbalance was detected by array CGH. The karyotype showed a balanced paracentric chromosome 7 inversion. Breakpoint characterization using paired-end whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed an ELN gene disruption in intron 1, accounting for the phenotype. Family study showed that the inversion was inherited, with incomplete penetrance. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a disruption of the ELN gene characterized by WGS. It contributes to refine the genotype-phenotype correlation in ELN disruption. Although this disruption is a rare etiology of SVAS, it cannot be detected by the diagnostic tests usually performed, such as array CGH or sequencing methods (Sanger, panel, or exome sequencing). With the future perspective of WGS as a diagnostic tool, it will be important to include a structural variation analysis in order to detect balanced rearrangements and gene disruption.

Retrospective analysis of meiotic segregation pattern and interchromosomal effects in blastocysts from inversion preimplantation genetic testing cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors affecting unbalanced chromosomal rearrangement originating from parental inversion and interchromosomal effect occurrence in blastocysts from inversion carriers. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University-affiliated center. PATIENT(S): Couples with one partner carrying inversion underwent preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Unbalanced rearrangement embryo rate, normal embryo rate, interchromosomal effect. RESULT(S): Preimplantation genetic testing was performed for 576 blastocysts from 57 paracentric (PAI) and 94 pericentric (PEI) inversion carriers. The percentage of normal/balanced blastocysts was significantly higher in PAI than PEI carriers (70.4% vs. 57.5%). Logistic regression indicated the inverted segment size ratio was a statistically significant risk factor for abnormality from parental inversion in both PEI and PAI. The optimal cutoff values to predict unbalanced rearrangement risk were 35.7% and 57%. In PAI, rates of abnormality from parental inversion were 0% and 12.1% in the <35.7% and ≥35.7% groups, respectively, with no gender difference. For PEI, the rates of abnormality from parental inversion were 7.9% and 33.1% in the <57% and ≥57% groups, respectively. In the ≥57% group, the rate of unbalanced rearrangement was significantly higher from paternal than maternal inversion (43.3% vs. 23.6%). In inversion carriers, 21,208 chromosomes were examined, and 187 (0.88%) malsegregations were identified from structurally normal chromosomes. In controls, 56,488 chromosomes were assessed, and 497 (0.88%) aneuploidies were identified, indicating no significant difference. CONCLUSION(S): The risk of unbalanced rearrangement is affected by the ratio of inverted segment size in both PAI and PEI carriers and is associated with gender.

RBM10-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma characterised by paracentric inversion with consistent closely split signals in break-apart fluorescence in-situ hybridisation: study of 10 cases and a literature review.

AIMS: Xp11 rearrangement in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) typically involves gene fusion to the gene encoding transcription factor E3 (TFE3), a member of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor family on chromosome Xp11.2. Dual-colour break-apart fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) is recommended to confirm histological diagnoses. Recently, RNA-binding motif protein 10 (RBM10), encoded by a gene on chromosome Xp11.3, was identified as a chimeric partner of TFE3; thus, RBM10-TFE3 fusion results from paracentric inversion. RBM10-TFE3 RCC may yield a false-negative result in FISH analysis of TFE3 expression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinicopathological features of RBM10-TFE3 RCC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten patients with RBM10-TFE3 RCC aged 31-71 years were investigated. Histological analysis, immunostaining, dual-colour break-apart FISH for TFE3, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and sequencing analysis were performed. No patient had a history of exposure to chemotherapy. Two of these patients died of RCC, and three were alive but developed metastases. Microscopically, the tumours were composed of a mixed architecture of tubulocystic and papillary patterns with scattered psammoma bodies. The tumours showed strong nuclear immunoreactivity for TFE3. FISH showed consistent closely spaced split signals in the RCCs of four patients, and polysomic signals with occasional closely spaced split signals in the RCCs of six patients. Of the latter six patients, five had renal failure, and four developed tumours in kidneys subjected to haemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the carcinogenesis of RBM10-TFE3 RCC in some, but not all, patients may be associated with chronic kidney disease. The aggressive nature of RBM10-TFE3 RCC should be considered, as five patients experienced metastases.

Whole genome sequencing identifies a de novo 2.1 Mb balanced paracentric inversion disrupting FOXP1 and leading to severe intellectual disability.

The FOXP1 gene, located on chromosome 3p13, encodes the Forkhead-box protein P1, one of the four forkhead transcription factors which repress transcription by forming active homo- and heterodimers and regulate distinct patterns of gene expression crucial for embryogenesis and normal development. FOXP1 mutations, mostly truncating, have been described in patients with mild to moderate intellectual disability (ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and speech and language impairment (MIM #613670). Here, we report a small de novo heterozygous balanced inversion of 2.1 Mb located at 3p14.1p13 identified by Whole Genomic Sequencing (WGS) and disrupting the genes FAM19A4 and FOXP1. This inversion was found in a patient with severe ID, ASD, seizures and very unusual vascular anomalies which were never described in the clinical spectrum of FOXP1 mutations. We show that the neurodevelopmental phenotype observed in the patient most likely results from FOXP1 haploinsufficiency as this heterozygous inversion leads to a 60 to 85% decrease of FOXP1 mRNA levels and to the complete absence of FOXP1 full-length protein. These findings, in addition to expanding the molecular spectrum of FOXP1 mutations, emphasize the emerging role of WGS in identifying small balanced chromosomal rearrangements responsible for neurodevelopmental disorders and not detected by conventional cytogenetics.

What is behind "centromere repositioning"?

An increasing number of observations suggest an evolutionary switch of centromere position on monocentric eukaryotic chromosomes which otherwise display a conserved sequence of genes and markers. Such observations are particularly frequent for primates and equidae (for review see Heredity 108:59-67, 2012) but occur also in marsupials (J Hered 96:217-224, 2005) and in plants (Chromosome Res 25:299-311, 2017 and references therein). The actual mechanism(s) behind remained unclear in many cases (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6542-6547, 2004; Trends Genet 30:66-74, 2014). The same is true for de novo centromere formation on chromosomes lacking an active centromere. This article focuses on recent reports on centromere repositioning and possible mechanisms behind and addresses open questions.

A Novel de Novo Paracentric Inversion [inv(20)(q13.1q13.3)] Accompanied by an 11q14.3-q21 Microdeletion in a Pediatric Patient with an Intellectual Disability.

A novel de novo paracentric inversion of the long arm of chromosome 20 [inv(20)(q13.1q13.3)], detected by conventional karyotyping in a 14-year-old boy with mental retardation is described. Further investigation by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) revealed that the 20q inversion was not accompanied by microdeletions/microduplications containing disease-associated genes near or at the breakpoints. Two deletions at chromosomal regions 11q14.3q21 and 20q12 of 4.5 and 1.97 Mb size, respectively, containing important online Mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM) genes, were detected. The 4.5Mb 11q14.3q21 microdeletion was contained within a region that is involved, in most of the reported cases, with the interstitial 11q deletion and may be related to the mental retardation and developmental delay present in the patient. On the other hand, the published data about the 20q12 microdeletion are very few and it is not possible to correlate this finding with our patient's phenotype. This case report contributes to the description of a new chromosomal entity, not previously reported, and is therefore important, especially in prenatal diagnosis and management of patients. Array comparative genomic hybridization has proven a useful technique for detecting submicroscopic rearrangements and should be offered prenatally, especially in cases of de novo karyotypically balanced chromosomal inversions or translocations in order to unveil other unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities such as deletions and amplifications.

Novel case of paternal paracentric inversion causing partial trisomy 13 and review of the literature.

Partial trisomies have often been reported secondary to inversion mutations. These occurrences are most frequently associated with pericentric inversions. In this report, we describe the first documented case of partial trisomy 13 secondary to a parental paracentric inversion, in this case a paternal paracentric 13q inversion. Our Patient exhibits a variety of clinical findings including global developmental delay with intellectual disability, sensorineural hearing loss, bilateral congenital polar cataracts with associated foveal and optic nerve hypoplasia, right retinal detachment, atrial septal defect, absence of corpus callosum, celiac disease, microcephaly, as well as other dysmorphic features.

CANPMR syndrome and chromosome 1p32-p31 deletion syndrome coexist in two related individuals affected by simultaneous haplo-insufficiency of CAMTA1 and NIFA genes.

BACKGROUND: Non-progressive cerebellar ataxia with mental retardation (CANPMR, OMIM 614756) and chromosome 1p32-p31 deletion syndrome (OMIM 613735) are two very rare inherited disorders, which are caused by mono-allelic deficiency (haplo-insufficiency) of calmodulin-binding transcription activator 1 (CAMTA1) and, respectively, nuclear factor 1 A (NFIA) genes. The yet reported patients affected by mono-allelic CAMTA1 dysfunction presented with neonatal hypotonia, delayed and ataxic gait, cerebellar atrophy, psychological delay and speech impairment, while individuals carrying a disrupted NFIA allele suffered from agenesis/hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, ventriculomegaly, developmental delay and urinary tract abnormalities. Both disorders were not seen in one patient together before. RESULTS: In this study two related individuals affected by a complex clinical syndrome, characterized by cognitive, neurological and nephrological features were studied for the underlying genetic disorder(s) by molecular cytogenetics. The two individuals present dysmorphic facies, macrocephaly, generalized ataxia, mild tremor, strabismus, mild mental retardation and kidney hypoplasia. Moreover, neuro-radiological studies showed hypoplasia of corpus callosum. Genetic investigations revealed a paracentric inversion in the short arm of one chromosome 1 with breakpoints within CAMTA1 and NFIA coding sequences. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of two patients harboring the simultaneous mono-allelic disruptions and consequent haplo-insufficiencies of two genes due to an inversion event. Disruption of CAMTA1 and NFIA genes led to neuro-psychological and nephrological dysfunctions, which comprised clinical features of CANPMR syndrome as well as chromosome 1p32-p31 deletion syndrome.

The Largest Paracentric Inversion, the Highest Rate of Recombinant Spermatozoa. Case Report: 46,XY, inv(2)(q21.2q37.3) and Literature Review.

Carriers of inversions involving euchromatic regions are at risk of having unbalanced offspring due to meiotic crossover. In carriers, recombination can occur during gametogenesis and cause genetically unbalanced sperm and subsequently unbalanced embryos. Here we present segregation analysis results of an infertile male with 46,XY,inv(2) (q21.2q37.3) using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on sperm cells. This is the largest paracentric inversion (PAI) reported so far in a meiotic segregation analysis study. Sperm FISH revealed 28.0% recombinant spermatozoa rate for chromo-some 2, which was the highest rate in PAI carriers in the literature. Our results indicate a clear correlation between the size of the inverted segment and the frequency of the recombinant spermatozoa. The results of the FISH analysis with the information of unbalanced spermatozoa rate can provide accurate counseling on the genetic risk of infertility.

Paracentric Inversions Found in Prenatal Diagnosis

PURPOSE: This study was designed to confirm whether the paracentric inversions of fetuses and parents may be harmless. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report 10 cases (0.14%) with paracentric inversions among 7,181 prenatal cases observed during prenatal diagnosis performed at Cheil General Hospital between January 2009 and June 2013. We used cytogenetic GTL- and RBG-banding techniques. RESULTS: Of the 10 cases, nine cases were transmitted from each of the parents, and one case was de novo. Nine cases were phenotypically normal up to one month of age after birth. One case was lost to follow-up. We present prenatal diagnosis and follow-up examination of the fetuses with paracentric inversion. CONCLUSION: Based on our cases, most paracentric inversions are considered to be harmless. The precise identification of paracentric inversions might be clinically important and helpful for genetic counseling.

A Prenatal Case of Paracentric Inversion of Chromosome 18, inv(18)(q21.1q22)

Paracentric inversion of chromosome 18 is a rare cytogenetic abnormality. The vast majority of paracentric inversions are harmless and the offspring of paracentric inversion carriers have only slightly elevated risks for unbalanced karyotypes. However, various clinical phenotypes are seen due to breakpoint variation or recombination. We report a prenatally detected case of familial paracentric inversion of chromosome 18, inv(18)(q21.1q22), with normal clinical features.

A Prenatal Case of Paracentric Inversion of Chromosome 18, inv(18)(q21.1q22)

Paracentric inversion of chromosome 18 is a rare cytogenetic abnormality. The vast majority of paracentric inversions are harmless and the offspring of paracentric inversion carriers have only slightly elevated risks for unbalanced karyotypes. However, various clinical phenotypes are seen due to breakpoint variation or recombination. We report a prenatally detected case of familial paracentric inversion of chromosome 18, inv(18)(q21.1q22), with normal clinical features.

Incidence and Karyotypes According to Each Chromosome in 13 Cases with Inversion / 대한주산의학회잡지

PURPOSE: This study was aimed to evaluate the incidence and karyotypes according to chromosome in 13 cases with inversion detected by cytogenetic analysis. METHODS: The incidence of inversion was calculated and karyotypes of inversion were classified according to each chromosome in cases with inversion detected from 390 individuals who had undergone cytogenetic analysis in Hanyang University Hospital from January 2005 to February 2009. RESULTS: The overall incidence of inversions was 3.3% (13/390). All of 13 cases were heterozygotes for inversions. Among these 13 inversions, 12 cases (92.3%) were having pericentric inversions showing karyotypes of 46,XX,inv(9)(p11q13) in 7 cases, 46,XX,inv(9)(p11q12) in 2 cases, and one cases of 46,X, inv(Y)(p11.3q11.23), t(8;9)(q24.3;q34.1), 46,X, del(Y)(q12), inv(Y)(p10q11. 23) and 46,XY, inv(8)(p21q24.1) respectively. Last one case (7.7%) was having paracentric inversion showing a karyotype of 46,XX,inv(9)(q22.1q34.3). Classification according to each chromosome in 13 cases with inversion was that 10 of 13 cases (76.9%) were located in chromosome 9 (9 cases of pericentric inversions and a case of paracentric inversions), 2 of 13 cases (15.4%) in chromosome Y and 1 of 13 cases (7.7%) in chromosome 8. CONCLUSION: Although patients are phenotypically normal, they might be inversion carriers. In high risk patients, inversions are more frequent than normal population. Various types of inversion could be in different chromosomes. Classification of types of inversion are needed for further genetic counseling according to the types.