Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) through elastomeric continuous infusion pumps in a real-life observational study: Characteristics, safety, and efficacy analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to present real-life data on the use, efficacy, and safety of administering antibiotic therapy through portable elastomeric pumps (pEP) in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 2020 to May 2023 in a large academic hospital in Rome, Italy. All patients receiving antibiotic therapy via pEP were included up to a follow-up period of 90 days after the end of antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was the treatment response. Secondary endpoints were adverse events attributable to the drug administered, the vascular catheter, or the infection itself. RESULTS: Of the 490 patients referred to our outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) unit, 94 (19.2%) received antibiotic therapy via pEP and were included in the final analysis. The most frequently treated infections were those involving bone and prosthetics, including spondylodiscitis (n=27; 28.8%). Most infections were due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=55; 48.3%). Cefepime (n=32; 34.0%), piperacillin/tazobactam (n=29; 30.9%), ceftolozane/tazobactam (n=7; 7.5%), and oxacillin (n=7; 7.5%) were the most frequently administered antibiotics. The infection cure rate reached 88.3% (n=83). 12 patients (12.8%) reported adverse events, of which half (6.4%) were drug-related and half (6.4%) were line-related. CONCLUSIONS: OPAT through portable elastomeric infusion pumps proved to be safe and effective. It also contributed to the reduction of healthcare costs, fully respecting the principles of personalized medicine. This strategy has emerged as a promising tool for antibiotic stewardship and infection control.

Implementación de un programa para mitigar la resistencia a los antimicrobianos en escenarios de bajos recursos / Implementation of a program to face antimicrobial resistance on a low resources hospital

Estudio cuasi-experimental desarrollado para disminuir el impacto de la resistencia a los antimicrobianos a través de un programa de prevención de infecciones y optimización del uso de antimicrobianos construido "a medida" según las posibilidades de la institución. Se implementó: vigilan-cia de colonización e infección por enterobacterias pro-ductoras de carbapenemasas (EPC); vigilancia y medidas preventivas para infecciones urinarias asociadas a sonda vesical (ITU); vigilancia e intervenciones para mejorar la higiene de manos; guías locales de tratamiento de enfer-medades infecciosas con evaluación de adherencia a las mismas y consumo de antibióticos (ATB). Resultados: Comparando periodo pre y postintervención: tasa de EPC en muestras clínicas: 1,1 a 0/días paciente; razón de tasas de incidencia (IRR: 0.00, p: 0.033); tasa de colonización: 3,3 a 0,61/días paciente (IRR: 0.18, p: 0.5). Tasa de ITU 8,9 a 7,2/1000 días catéter urinario (IRR: 0.81, p 0.5). Adherencia a higiene de manos: 77,5% a 70,38% (p 0.0067). Consumo de ATB: 376,24 a 176,82 DDD, (disminu-ción 53%). Adherencia a guías en elección de ATB: 57,1% a 95,4% (p 0.00031); duración de ATB: 92,8% a 98,4% (p 0.16); adecuación según rescate microbiológico: 57,1% a 100% (p <0.01). Conclusión: Un programa con medidas simples, a medida, con supervisión externa, redujo en un tiempo relativamente corto las infecciones por EPC, el consumo y uso apropiado de ATB en un hospital público de medianos/bajos recursos

This quasi-experimental study was developed in a public hospital with the goal of reducing the impact of antimicrobial resistance through an infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship program. The following measures were implemented: surveillance of colonization and infection by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE); surveillance and preventive measures for urinary catheter-associated infections (UTIs); surveillance and interventions for hand hygiene; local guidelines for treatment of infectious diseases with compliance and antibiotic (ATB) consumption metrics.Results: comparing the pre-intervention and post-intervention period, CPE rate in clinical samples 1.1 to 0/patient days, incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.00, p: 0.033 and colonization of 3.3 to 0.61/days patient, IRR: 0.18, p-value: 0.5. UTI rate 8.9 to 7.2/1000 days urinary catheter IRR: 0.81, p 0.5. Hand Hygiene compliance: 77.5% to 70.38%, p 0.0067. ATB consumption: 376.24 to 176.82 DDD, 53% decrease. Compliance to guidelines in ATB selection: 57.1% to 95.4% p 0.00031, duration of ATB from 92.8% to 98.4% p 0.16, and adequacy to microbiological rescue of 57.1% at 100%, p <0.01. Conclusion: it is possible to reduce CPE infections, the consumption of antimicrobials and optimize their use in a public hospital in a country with medium/low resources through a program with basic and tailored measures

Agreement between pharmacists and physicians on the assessment of appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing.

INTRODUCTION: Audits for monitoring the quality of antimicrobial prescribing are a main tool in antimicrobial stewardship programs; however, interobserver reliability has not been conclusively assessed. Our objective was to measure the level of agreement between pharmacists and physicians on the appropriateness of antimicrobials prescribing in hospitals. METHODS: A national multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted of patients who were receiving antimicrobials one day of April 2021. Hospital participation was voluntary, and the study population was randomly selected. Pharmacists and physicians performed a simultaneous, independent assessment of the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions. The observers used an assessment method by which all indicators of the quality of antimicrobial use were considered. Finally, an algorithm was used to rate overall antimicrobial prescribing as appropriate, suboptimal, inappropriate, or not assessable. Gwet's AC1 coefficient was used to assess interobserver agreement. RESULTS: In total, 101 hospitals participated, and 411 hospital antimicrobial prescriptions were reviewed. The strength of agreement was moderate regarding the overall quality of prescribing (AC1=0.51; 95%CI=[0.44-0.58]). A very good level of agreement (AC1>0.80) was observed between pharmacists and physicians in all indicators of the quality, except for duration of treatment, rated as good (AC1=0.79; 95%CI=[0.75-0.83]), and registration on the medical record, rated as fair (AC1=0.34; 95%CI=[0.26-0.43]). The agreement was greater in critical care, onco-hematology, and pediatric units than in medical and surgery units. CONCLUSIONS: In this point prevalence study, a moderate level of agreement was observed between pharmacists and physicians in the evaluation of the appropriateness of antimicrobials prescribing in hospitals.

[Translated article] Analysis of the appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures in Spain. Protocol for the "ProA-Q" study.

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the most useful measures to prevent surgical wound infection. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project is to evaluate the appropriateness of the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures performed in Spanish hospitals, both globally and according to the type of surgery performed. METHOD: For this purpose, an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, and multicentre study has been designed to collect all the variables that allow the evaluation of the appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis by comparing the prescribed treatment, the recommendations included in the local guidelines, and the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology and the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Indication, choice of antimicrobial, dose, route and duration of administration, timing, re-dosing, and duration of the prophylaxis will be taken into account. The sample will consist of patients who underwent scheduled or emergency surgery, either as inpatients or outpatients, in hospitals in Spain. A sample size of 2335 patients has been established to estimate, with 95% confidence and 80% power, a percentage of appropriateness that is expected to be around 70%. Differences between variables will be analysed using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, or Fisher's test, as appropriate. The degree of agreement between the antibiotic prophylaxis recommended by the guidelines of the different hospitals and that recommended in the literature will be analysed by calculating the Cohen's kappa indicator. Binary logistic regression analysis using generalised linear mixed models will be performed to identify possible factors associated with differences in the appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis. DISCUSSION: The results of this clinical study will allow us to focus on specific surgical areas with higher rates of inappropriateness, identify key points of action and guide future strategies for antimicrobial stewardship programs in the area of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Análisis de la adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica en procedimientos quirúrgicos en España. Protocolo del estudio ProA-Q / Analysis of the appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures in Spain. Protocol for the "ProA-Q" study

La profilaxis antibiótica quirúrgica es una de las medidas más útiles para la prevención de la infección de la herida quirúrgica.Objetivoel objetivo de este proyecto es evaluar la adecuación del uso de profilaxis antibiótica en procedimientos quirúrgicos realizados en centros hospitalarios españoles, tanto de forma global como en función del tipo de cirugía realizada. Metodología para ello, se ha diseñado un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, transversal y multicéntrico, donde se recopilarán todas aquellas variables que permitan evaluar la adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica quirúrgica mediante la comparación del tratamiento prescrito, las recomendaciones recogidas en las guías locales y el documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica y la Asociación Española de Cirujanos. Se tendrán en cuenta la indicación, elección del antimicrobiano, dosis, vía de administración y tiempo de infusión, momento de la administración de la primera dosis, redosificación y la duración de la profilaxis. La muestra estará constituida por pacientes que hayan sido intervenidos de forma programada o urgente, en régimen de hospitalización o ambulatorio, en centros hospitalarios de España. Se ha establecido un tamaño muestral de 2.335 pacientes para estimar con una confianza del 95% y una potencia del 80%, un porcentaje de adecuación que se espera esté en torno al 70%. Las diferencias entre las variables se analizarán mediante la prueba t-Student, U de Mann-Whitney, el test Chi2 o test de Fisher, según proceda. El grado de concordancia entre la profilaxis antibiótica recomendada por las guías de los distintos hospitales y la recomendada en la literatura se analizará mediante el cálculo del indicador Kappa de Cohen... (AU)

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the most useful measures to prevent surgical wound infection. Objective The aim of this project is to evaluate the appropriateness of the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures performed in Spanish hospitals, both globally and according to the type of surgery performed. Method For this purpose, an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional and multicenter study has been designed to collect all the variables that allow the evaluation of the appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis by comparing the prescribed treatment, the recommendations included in the local guidelines and the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology and the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Indication, choice of antimicrobial, dose, route and duration of administration, timing, re-dosing and duration of the prophylaxis will be taken into account. The sample will consist of patients who underwent scheduled or emergency surgery, either as inpatients or outpatients, in hospitals in Spain. A sample size of 2,335 patients has been established to estimate, with 95% confidence and 80% power, a percentage of appropriateness that is expected to be around 70%. Differences between variables will be analyzed using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, or Fisher's test, as appropriate. The degree of agreement between the antibiotic prophylaxis recommended by the guidelines of the different hospitals and that recommended in the literature will be analyzed by calculating the Cohen's kappa indicator. Binary logistic regression analysis using generalized linear mixed models will be performed to identify possible factors associated with differences in the appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis... (AU)

Analysis of the appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures in Spain. Protocol for the "ProA-Q" study. / Análisis de la adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica en procedimientos quirúrgicos en España. Protocolo del estudio ProA-Q.

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the most useful measures to prevent surgical wound infection. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project is to evaluate the appropriateness of the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures performed in Spanish hospitals, both globally and according to the type of surgery performed. METHOD: For this purpose, an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional and multicenter study has been designed to collect all the variables that allow the evaluation of the appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis by comparing the prescribed treatment, the recommendations included in the local guidelines and the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology and the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Indication, choice of antimicrobial, dose, route and duration of administration, timing, re-dosing and duration of the prophylaxis will be taken into account. The sample will consist of patients who underwent scheduled or emergency surgery, either as inpatients or outpatients, in hospitals in Spain. A sample size of 2,335 patients has been established to estimate, with 95% confidence and 80% power, a percentage of appropriateness that is expected to be around 70%. Differences between variables will be analyzed using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, or Fisher's test, as appropriate. The degree of agreement between the antibiotic prophylaxis recommended by the guidelines of the different hospitals and that recommended in the literature will be analyzed by calculating the Cohen's kappa indicator. Binary logistic regression analysis using generalized linear mixed models will be performed to identify possible factors associated with differences in the appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis. DISCUSSION: The results of this clinical study will allow us to focus on specific surgical areas with higher rates of inappropriateness, identify key points of action and guide future strategies for antimicrobial stewardship programs in the area of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Impacto del tratamiento antimicrobiano domiciliario endovenoso (TADE) como parte de un programa de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) específico para pediatría / Impact of an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) as part of a paediatric-specific PROA program

Introducción: El tratamiento antimicrobiano domiciliario endovenoso (TADE) es una alternativa a la hospitalización para pacientes pediátricos bien seleccionados. Presentamos un programa TADE basado en un modelo de autoadministración e integrado en el programa de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) de un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y unicéntrico que incluye todos los pacientes menores de 20años tratados con TADE prescrito en un hospital pediátrico entre 2019 y 2020. Se analizaron los datos sobre los días de ingreso ahorrados y una estimación económica del coste oportunidad que supone el programa TADE para el hospital. Resultados: Cincuenta y siete pacientes realizaron un total de 106 episodios de tratamiento. En el 74,5% hubo una evolución clínica favorable. El principal motivo de interrupción prematura fue una mala evolución de la infección (37,1%). Se liberaron 2,62 camas diarias, suponiendo un beneficio económico de 1.069.963€. Conclusión: Un programa TADE integrado en el PROA pediátrico de nuestro hospital y basado en un modelo de autoadministración se ha mostrado un programa seguro y efectivo y aporta importantes ventajas a nivel económico.(AU)

Introduction: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) is an alternative to in-patient care in carefully selected patients. This study presents a self-administration OPAT program integrated within the pediatric antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in a pediatric tertiary care center. Material and methods: Descriptive, retrospective and unicentric study. Data from all patients under 20years of age who were prescribed treatment by a pediatric unit during 2019 and 2020 were included. Data regarding number of saved beds and estimating the opportunity cost of the OPAT program for the hospital were analyzed. Results: Fifty-seven patients received 106 episodes of treatment. Favorable clinical outcome occurred in 74.5% of the episodes. The main cause of premature interruption was unfavorable clinical outcome of the infection (37.1%). A total of 2.62 beds/day were saved, resulting in an economic benefit of 1,069,963€. Conclusion: A self-administration OPAT program integrated within the pediatric ASP has proven to be safe and effective and provides economic benefits.(AU)

Antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals: Expert recommendation guidance document for activities in specific populations, syndromes and other aspects (PROA-2) from SEIMC, SEFH, SEMPSPGS, SEMICYUC and SEIP / Programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en hospitales: guía de recomendaciones de expertos para actividades en poblaciones específicas, síndromes y otros aspectos (PROA-2) de la SEIMC, SEFH, SEMPSPGS y SEIP

In 2012, The Spanish Societies of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH), and Preventive Medicine, Public Health and Healthcare Management (SEMPSGS) lead a consensus document including recommendations for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs (AMSP; PROA in Spanish) in acute care hospitals in Spain. While these recommendations were critical for the development of these programs in many centres, there is a need for guidance in the development of AMS activities for specific patient populations, syndromes or other specific aspects which were not included in the previous document or have developed significantly since then. The objective of this expert recommendation guidance document is to review the available information about these activities in these patient populations or circumstances, and to provide guidance recommendations about them. With this objective the SEIMC, SEFH, SEMPSPGS, the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SEMICYUC) and the Spanish Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (SEIP) selected a panel of experts who chose the different aspects to include in the document. Because of the lack of high-level evidence in the implementation of the activities, the panel opted to perform a narrative review of the literature for the different topics for which recommendations were agreed by consensus. The document was open to public consultation for the members of these societies for their comments and suggestions, which were reviewed and considered by the panel.(AU)

En 2012, las Sociedades Españolas de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC), Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH) y Medicina Preventiva, Salud Pública y Gestión Sanitaria (SEMPSPGS) lideraron un documento de consenso que incluía recomendaciones para la implementación de Programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) en hospitales de agudos en España. Si bien estas recomendaciones fueron críticas para el desarrollo de estos programas en muchos centros, actualmente es necesario establecer unas guías para la implementación de las actividades de los PROA en determinadas poblaciones de pacientes, síndromes clínicos y otros aspectos específicos que no se incluyeron en el documento previo o que desde entonces se han desarrollado significativamente. El objetivo de esta guía de recomendaciones de expertos es revisar la información disponible acerca de esas actividades en estas poblaciones o circunstancias de pacientes y proporcionar unas recomendaciones que sirvan de guía sobre ellas. Con este objetivo, la SEIMC, la SEFH y la SEMPSPGS, así como la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) y la Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica (SEIP), seleccionaron un panel de expertos que eligieron los diferentes aspectos a incluir en el documento. Debido a la ausencia de evidencia de alto nivel en la implementación de las diferentes actividades, el panel optó por realizar una revisión narrativa de la literatura de los diferentes aspectos, en los que las recomendaciones se acordaron por consenso. El documento se abrió para consulta pública a los miembros de estas sociedades para sus comentarios y sugerencias, que fueron revisadas y consideradas por el panel.(AU)

Antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals: Expert recommendation guidance document for activities in specific populations, syndromes and other aspects (PROA-2) from SEIMC, SEFH, SEMPSPGS, SEMICYUC and SEIP.

In 2012, The Spanish Societies of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH), and Preventive Medicine, Public Health and Healthcare Management (SEMPSGS) lead a consensus document including recommendations for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs (AMSP; PROA in Spanish) in acute care hospitals in Spain. While these recommendations were critical for the development of these programs in many centres, there is a need for guidance in the development of AMS activities for specific patient populations, syndromes or other specific aspects which were not included in the previous document or have developed significantly since then. The objective of this expert recommendation guidance document is to review the available information about these activities in these patient populations or circumstances, and to provide guidance recommendations about them. With this objective the SEIMC, SEFH, SEMPSPGS, the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SEMICYUC) and the Spanish Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (SEIP) selected a panel of experts who chose the different aspects to include in the document. Because of the lack of high-level evidence in the implementation of the activities, the panel opted to perform a narrative review of the literature for the different topics for which recommendations were agreed by consensus. The document was open to public consultation for the members of these societies for their comments and suggestions, which were reviewed and considered by the panel.

Impact of an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) as part of a paediatric-specific PROA program.

INTRODUCTION: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) is an alternative to in-patient care in carefully selected patients. This study presents a self-administration OPAT program integrated within the pediatric antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in a pediatric tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive, retrospective and unicentric study. Data from all patients under 20 years of age who were prescribed treatment by a pediatric unit during 2019 and 2020 were included. Data regarding number of saved beds and estimating the opportunity cost of the OPAT program for the hospital were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients received 106 episodes of treatment. Favorable clinical outcome occurred in 74.5% of the episodes. The main cause of premature interruption was unfavorable clinical outcome of the infection (37.1%). A total of 2.62 beds/day were saved, resulting in an economic benefit of 1,069,963 €. CONCLUSION: A self-administration OPAT program integrated within the pediatric ASP has proven to be safe and effective and provides economic benefits.

Estudio PAUSATE: Prevalencia y adecuación del uso hospitalario de antimicrobianos en España / PAUSATE Study: Prevalence and appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in Spanish hospitals

Objetivo: Conocer la prevalencia y el grado de adecuación del usode antimicrobianos en los hospitales españoles mediante una revisiónsistemática transversal realizada por farmacéuticos.Método: Estudio multicéntrico, nacional, transversal sobre el 10% de lospacientes ingresados en los hospitales participantes un día del mes deabril de 2021. La participación de los hospitales fue voluntaria y la selección de la población aleatoria. De la población se disgregó la muestrade estudio, constituida por los pacientes que recibían el día del corte almenos un antimicrobiano perteneciente a los grupos J01, J02, J04, J05AB,J05AD y J05AH del Sistema de Clasificación Anatómica, Terapéutica yQuímica. Sobre la muestra de estudio, el farmacéutico realizó un registroy evaluación de la adecuación del tratamiento antimicrobiano siguiendouna metódica propuesta y validada por el Grupo de trabajo de AtenciónFarmacéutica al Paciente con Enfermedad Infecciosa de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria. La metódica de evaluación consideró cadauna de las dimensiones que conforman la prescripción del antimicrobiano eincluyó un algoritmo para calificar la prescripción global como adecuada,mejorable, inadecuada y no valorable. (AU)

Objective: To determine the prevalence and appropriateness of antimicrobial use in Spanish hospitals through a pharmacist-led systematiccross-sectional review.Method: A nationwide multicenter cross-sectional study was conductedon 10% of the patients admitted to the participating hospitals on one dayin April 2021. Hospital participation was voluntary, and the populationwas randomly selected. The study sample was made up of patients who,on the day of the study, received at least one antimicrobial belonging togroups J01, J02, J04, J05AB, J05AD or J05AH in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. The pharmacist in charge madea record and carried out an evaluation of the appropriateness of antimicrobial use following a method proposed and validated by the Pharmaceutical Care of Patients with Infectious Diseases Working Group of theSpanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy. The evaluation method consideredeach of the items comprising antimicrobial prescriptions. An algorithm wasused to assess prescriptions as appropriate, suboptimal, inappropriateand unevaluable. (AU)

Adaptación nacional de la herramienta Start Smart-Then Focus para la optimización del uso de antimicrobianos / Spanish adaptation of the Start Smart-Then Focus tool for optimizing the use of antimicrobials

Objetivo: La herramienta Start Smart-Then Focus del Sistema Nacional deSalud de Reino Unido es una herramienta de ayuda de los programasde optimización de antibióticos. El objetivo de este trabajo es la adaptación de la herramienta Start Smart-Then Focus al sistema de salud español.Método: Se utilizó la metodología Delphi, mediante dos rondas deevaluación por correo electrónico. En la primera se envió un cuestionariocon los criterios de la herramienta, estos fueron evaluados de forma independiente por 16 expertos. Puntuaron de 1-9 la idoneidad y aplicabilidad de cada criterio, y realizaron comentarios libres. La herramienta fuemodificada y enviada de nuevo a todos los expertos, volvieron a puntuarindividualmente, pero conociendo los resultados de la primera ronda.Resultados: El primer cuestionario estaba constituido por 19 indicadores; 16 indicadores obtuvieron una mediana mayor de 7 en idoneidad yaplicabilidad, 3 indicadores obtuvieron mediana menor de 7 y 10 indicadores con mínimos menores de 5 en aplicabilidad. De 19 indicadoresiniciales pasamos a 8; con 8 opciones dentro del sexto indicador.Conclusiones: La adaptación de la herramienta Start Smart-Then Focus anivel nacional puede ser de utilidad para implantarla en los programas de optimización de antibióticos y contribuir a la mejora del uso de los antimicrobianos. (AU)

Objective: The Start Smart-Then Focus tool of the United Kingdom’sNational Health System is a tool to be implemented in antimicrobialstewardship programs. The objective of this work is the adaptation of StartSmart-Then Focus tool to the Spanish health system.Method: Delphi methodology was used. Two rounds were conductedby email. In the first, a questionnaire was sent out that included the criteriaof the tool. These criteria were independently assessed by 16 experts.They rated the suitability and applicability of each criterion on a scalefrom 1 to 9 and made free comments on each one. The tool was modifiedand sent out again to all the experts. They re-scored the questionnaire individually, while aware of the anonymized results of the first round.Results: The first questionnaire was made up of 19 indicators. Of these,16 indicators had a median of more than 7 in suitability and applicability.However, regarding applicability, 3 indicators had a median of less than7 and 10 had a minimum of less than 5. From the initial 19 indicators, weobtained 8 final indicators and 8 options were added to the sixth indicator.Conclusions: It would be very useful to implement the Spanish adaptationof the Start Smart-Then Focus tool in antimicrobial stewardship programs at anational level. It would also contribute to improving the use of antimicrobials. (AU)

Impact of urinary selective antibiogram in primary care / Impacto do antibiograma seletivo nas uroculturas em cuidados primários

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results (selective antibiogram), is increasingly recognized as one of the key strategies of antibiotic stewardship programs. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of selective susceptibility reporting on ciprofloxacin utilization and Escherichia coli susceptibility to ciprofloxacin in the outpatient setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A selective reporting policy was created and implemented in 2011. The policy involves the non-reporting of ciprofloxacin susceptibility to Enterobacteriaceae isolated in a urine sample when there was susceptibility to other agents with narrow spectrum. The outcomes evaluated were outpatient ciprofloxacin utilization and E. coli susceptibility to ciprofloxacin between January 2011 and December 2018 RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2018 we detected an increased susceptibility rate of E. coli to ciprofloxacin from 79% to 87% (p < 0.001) and a decreased incidence rate of E. coli resistant to ciprofloxacin from 2.52 to 0.87 (p < 0.001). The ciprofloxacin dropped from 0.75 defined daily doses (DHD) to 0.36 DHD and there was a compensatory increase in nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin utilization. DISCUSSION: Our study showed that selective reporting can influence prescribing practice in a community level and encourages clinicians to select more narrow-spectrum and cost-effective antimicrobial agents in UTIs. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that selective antibiogram should be considered an effective prevention strategy to reduce targeted antimicrobial utilization.

RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN: La notificación selectiva de resultados de la prueba de susceptibilidad bacteriana (antibiograma selectivo) es conocida como una de las estrategias clave de los programas de optimización de antimicrobianos. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar el impacto del antibiograma selectivo en el consumo de ciprofloxacino y la sensibilidad de la bacteria Escherichia coli al ciprofloxacino en la atención básica. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: La política de informe selectivo fue creada e implementada en 2011 e incluyó la no trasmisión, en el antibiograma, de sensibilidad de Enterobacteriaceae al ciprofloxacino en muestras urinarias cuando había sensibilidad a otros agentes de espectro reducido. Los desenlaces evaluados fueron el consumo de ciprofloxacino y la evolución de sensibilidad de E. coli al ciprofloxacino entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2018. RESULTADOS En esse período, se detectó un aumento en la tasa de sensibilidad de E. coli al ciprofloxacino, del 79% al 87% (p < 0,001). La tasa de incidencia de E. coli resistente al ciprofloxacino descendió de 2,52 a 0,87 (p < 0,001). El consumo de ciprofloxacino tuvo un descenso de 0,75 doses por mil habitantes día (DHD) a 0,36 DHD. Al mismo tiempo, un aumento compensatorio se observó en el consumo de nitrofurantoína y fosfomicina. DISCUSIÓN: Nuestro estudio demostró que el uso del antibiograma selectivo influyó en la práctica de prescripción de antimicrobianos y animó a los médicos generales a elegir antimicrobianos de espectro más reducido y con mejor relación de costo-beneficio. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestros resultados sugieren que la utilización de antibiogramas selectivos debe ser considerada una estrategia efectiva en la reducción del consumo de determinados antimicrobianos.

RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO: A notificação seletiva dos resultados do teste de suscetibilidade aos antimicrobianos (antibiograma seletivo) é conhecida como uma das estratégias-chave dos programas de apoio à prescrição de antibióticos. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar o impacto do antibiograma seletivo no consumo de ciprofloxacino e a suscetibilidade da bactéria Escherichia coli ao ciprofloxacino nos cuidados primários. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: A política de notificação seletiva foi criada e implementada em 2011 e envolveu a não transmissão, no antibiograma, da suscetibilidade da família Enterobacteriaceae ao ciprofloxacino em amostras urinárias quando existia suscetibilidade a outros agentes com menor espectro. Os desfechos avaliados foram consumo de ciprofloxacino e evolução da suscetibilidade de E. coli ao ciprofloxacino entre janeiro de 2011 e dezembro de 2018. RESULTADOS: Nesse período, um aumento foi detectado na taxa de suscetibilidade de E. coli ao ciprofloxacino, de 79% a 87% (p < 0,001). A taxa de incidência de E. coli resistente ao ciprofloxacino diminuiu de 2,52 para 0,87 (p < 0,001). O consumo de ciprofloxacino teve uma queda de 0,75 doses diárias definidas (DHD) para 0,36 DHD. Simultaneamente, um aumento compensatório foi observado no consumo de nitrofurantoína e fosfomicina. DISCUSSÃO: Nosso estudo demonstrou que a utilização do antibiograma seletivo influenciou a prática de prescrição dos antimicrobianos e incentivou os clínicos gerais a selecionar antimicrobianos de espectro de ação mais reduzido e com melhor relação custo-benefício. CONCLUSÃO: Nossos resultados sugerem que a utilização de antibiogramas seletivos deve ser considerada uma estratégia eficaz na redução do consumo de determinados antimicrobianos.

Programa de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos (PROA): análisis de indicadores basados en el consumo / Antimicrobial stewardship programs: analysis of indicators of antimicrobial agents based on consumption

Objetivos: Implantar un programa de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) para intervenir en el uso de antimicrobianos. Analizar el impacto de las intervenciones mediante indicadores basados en el consumo.Métodos: Fase 1. Creación equipo PROA: nombramiento; asesoramiento externo; formación; desarrollo programa informático. Fase 2. Análisis indicadores de consumo: estudio retrospectivo de intervención cuasi-experimental con evaluación pre-post: se evaluaron los indicadores del uso de antimicrobianos basados en el consumo en fase no-intervención y en fase intervención. El programa PROA consistió en un modelo de intervención no restrictivo.Resultados: Se formó e implantó el equipo PROA como órgano estructural y organizativo para la consulta, intervención y vigilancia del uso de antimicrobianos. Durante la fase intervención se realizaron 134 recomendaciones: terapia secuencial (12,69%), cambio de antimicrobiano/desescalada terapéutica (31,34%), suspensión de tratamiento antimicrobiano (55,97%); el grado de aceptación fue del 67,16%. Se analizaron 13 indicadores. En 11 de ellos se observó mejoría: consumo global antibacterianos (-2,26%), consumo global antifúngicos sistémicos (-40,60%), consumo carbapenémicos (-22,63%), consumo fluoroquinolonas (-16,52%), ratio macrólidos i.v./fluoroquinolonas respiratorias i.v. (17,49%), ratio metronidazol/carbapenémicos + piperacilina-tazobactam (15,82%), consumo fosfomicina (69,21%), ratio agentes anti-SASM/agentes anti-SARM (45,14%), ratio amoxicilina-clavulánico/piperacilina-tazobactam (24,38%), diversificación betalactámicos antipseudomónicos (7,61%), ratio fluconazol/equinocandinas (8,74%). Los indicadores en los que se obtuvo resultado negativo fueron: terapia secuencial (-8,89%), ratio amoxicilina/amoxicilina-clavulánico (-4,03%). ... (AU)

Objectives: Implementation of a program for optimizing the use of antibiotics (PROA) to manage the use of antimicrobials. Analyse the impact through indicators based on consumption.Methods: Phase 1. Creation of PROA: appointment; external advice; training; software development. Phase 2. Consumption indicators analysis: interventional, quasi-experimental, retrospective study with pre-post evaluation: indicators based on consumption were evaluated in non-intervention phase and in intervention phase. PROA consisted of a non-restrictive intervention model.Results: PROA was formed and implemented as a structural and managing body for the advice, intervention and monitoring of the use of antimicrobials. During the intervention phase, 134 recommendations related to sequential therapy IV/PO (12.69%), change of antimicrobial/de-escalation (31.34%), discontinuation of antimicrobial treatment (55.97%) were made; the degree of acceptance was 67.16%. 13 indicators based on consumption were analysed. 11 of them led to an improvement: antibacterials global consumption (-2.26%), systemic antifungals global consumption (-40.60%), carbapenems consumption (-22.63%), fluoroquinolones consumption (-16.52%), macrolide IV/ respiratory fluoroquinolones IV ratio (17.49%), metronidazole/carbapenem + piperacillin-tazobactam ratio (15.82%), fosfomycin consumption (69.21%), anti-MSSA agents/anti-MRSA agents ratio (45.14%), amoxicillin-clavulanic/piperacillin-tazobactam ratio (24.38%), diversification antipseudomonic beta-lactam (7.61%), fluconazole/echinocandins ratio (8.74%). Indicators with negative result were: sequential therapy IV/PO (-8.89%), amoxicillin/amoxicillin-clavulanic ratio (-4.03%). ... (AU)