Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology ; (12): 549-554, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-429097

ABSTRACT

Objective To study the expression of active efflux pump AdeABC,AdeIJK,AdeFGH,AbeM,AbeS,CraA,MdtL in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and whether the efflux pumps confers resistance to antibiotics.Methods Thirty-two multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii islates and 10 sensitive isolates were collected.Genes of the exporter protein were amplified by PCR.The expression of adeB,adeJ,adeG,abeM,abeS,craA,mdtL were examined by real-time fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR.The controlling genes adeRS and adeL were amplified by PCR and sequenced.Results The positivity rates of adeB,adeJ,adeG,abeM,abeS,craA,mdtL were 100%,100%,100%,96.88%,100%,100% and 93.75% respectively in 32 multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates,and all 100% in 10 sensitive isolates.The difference of expression of adeB,abeM and mdtL were significant( P<0.001,P =0.001,P=0.013) between 21 multi-drug resistant isolates of C clone and 10 sensitive isolates.The mutations of adeRS existed in 2 multi-drug resistant isolates,no point mutation of adeL.Conclusion The expression of AdeABC,AbeM and MdtL may involved in the resistant mechanisms of the clinical Acinetobacter baumannii islates.

2.
Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology ; (12): 126-129, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-380092

ABSTRACT

Objective To study the expression of active efflux pump AdeABC in clinical Acineto-bacter baumannii islates and whether this efflux pump confers resistance to antibiotics. Methods The anti-biotic susceptibility and the function of efflux pump inhibitor were tested by micro-dilution broth method. The expression of adeB was examined by RT-PCR. The controlling gene adeRS was amplified by PCR and se-quenced. Results Thirty multidrug resistance Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and 5 sensitive isolates for PCR were both abtained the expected products of adeB and adeRS. The mRNA expression of adeB in 15 multidrug resistance(MDR) isolates were positive, but there was no expression of adeB in 5 sensitive iso-lates. The mutations of adeRS existed in 2 MDR isolates. Conclusion The expression of AdeABC may in-volved in the resistant mechanisms of the clinical MDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.

3.
Tianjin Medical Journal ; (12): 849-852, 2009.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-472608

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of domestic faropenem in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double blind and double simulation clinical study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of faropenem and cefaclor in the treatment of acute bacterial infection. Patients in trial group(n = 122) were given faropenem 250 mg,and in control group (n = 118) were given cefaclor 200 mg,3 times daily for 7 to 10 days.Results: The clinical cure rates were 33.61% and 27.12% in trail and control groups respectively and the clinical effective rates were 87.70% and 83.05% respectively. There was no significant difference in terms of clinical effectiveness between the two groups(P > 0.05). The adverse reaction rates were 7.32% in trial group and 3.36% in control group(P > 0.05). The adverse reaction of the trial group was mainly exaltation of aminotransferase, which did not affect the therapy. No severe adverse reaction was found.Conclusion: Domestic faropenem is effective and safe for the treatment of bacterial respiratory tract and urinary tract infections.

4.
Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies ; (12): 87-90, 2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-411490

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cefetamet pivoxil vs cefixime in the treatment of acute bacterial infections.  METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Ninety-eight patients (M 43, F 55; age 40 a± s 13 a) with acute bacterial infections of cefetamet group were given cefetamet pivoxil 250-500 mg, po, bid, for 7-14 d, and ninty-five patients (M 44, F 51; age 42 a±14 a) of cefixime group were given cefixime 200 mg, po, bid, for 7-14 d. RESULTS: The overall clinical efficacy rates were 95 % and 94 %, the bacterial clearance rates were 96 % and 94 %, the bacterial sensitive rates were 98 % and 96 %, the adverse reaction rates were 7 % and 6 %, respectively. There was no statistical significance between two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Cefetamet pivoxil and cefixime are effective and safe in the treatment of acute bacterial infections.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL