ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Granulocyte transfusion (GTx) is performed as a supportive therapy in severe neutropenic patients caused by various conditions. The study aimed to analyze the hematologic parameters of donors, patients, and granulocyte concentrates to predict successful GTx. METHODS: This study was performed in 281 donors, with their granulocyte concentrates being collected through apheresis, and in 54 severe neutropenic patients who had various hematologic diseases. Complete blood cell counts of donors pre- and post-apheresis, granulocyte concentrates, and patients pre- and post-GTx were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to survival at discharge (Group S, survival; Group D, dead) to compare various factors including age, infection status, pre- and post-GTx total white blood cell counts (TWBCC) and absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), total number of GTx, infused TWBCC and ANC per weight, and use of G-CSF during therapy. RESULTS: Overall data of patients showed that both TWBCC and ANC were significantly increased after GTx (median values at pre-GTx, TWBCC=0.40×109/L, ANC=0.14×109/L; post-GTx, TWBCC=0.57×109/L, ANC=0.29×109/L, both P<0.0001). After GTx, Group S (N=25) showed significantly higher TWBCC and ANC than Group D (N=29) (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively). Using different cutoff levels, post-GTx TWBCC greater than 0.5×109/L showed statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01). None of the other factors showed statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: The TWBCC and ANC after GTx were significant factors to predict patients' outcome. Therefore, follow-up of those two parameters may be helpful to select or consider other therapeutic modalities including additional GTx.
Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Cell Count , Blood Component Removal , Follow-Up Studies , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Granulocytes , Hematologic Diseases , Leukocyte Count , Neutropenia , Neutrophils , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
We describe a single institution experience with the use of granulocyte transfusion in children. This is a retrospective analysis of 45 collections of granulocyte units obtained by apheresis after priming with dexamethasone, infused into 17 children with severe neutropenic infections. Ten children survived the acute infection. Granulocyte transfusion is a useful adjunct to antimicrobials and growth factors in post chemotherapy neutropenic sepsis and is highly effective in children with chronic granulomatous disease and life threatening infections.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Granulocytes , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infant , Leukocyte Transfusion/methods , Leukocyte Transfusion/mortality , Male , Neutropenia/etiology , Neutropenia/mortality , Neutropenia/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/blood , Sepsis/complications , Sepsis/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The use of granulocyte transfusion (GT) which had been diminished since 1980s has been recently interested on the base of clinical efficacy approved by transfusion of granulocyte collected after administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to donors. So we studied the clinical efficacy of GT in severe neutropenic pediatric patients with severe infections. METHODS: Twelve patients with malignant hematologic disorders and solid tumors in Ajou University Hospital from March 1997 to February 2001 were indicated for GT. These patients had continuous neutropenia-related infections despite appropriate antibiotics, antifungal or IV immunoglobulin therapy. GTs were carried out 12 hrs after collection of granulocytes using leukapheresis from donors stimulated by G-CSF. RESULTS: The median number of GT is 3 (2~7), and the mean dose of granulocyte is 3.51+/-4.21 10(10)/m(2) and mean volume of granulocyte is 220 +/-22.92 mL. The median duration of the use of G-CSF and antibiotics or antifungal agents is 6 (3~14) days and 3 (1~9) days. Ten of 12 patients had favorable responses (FR), and 2 patients had unfavorable responses (UR). Two patients who had FR died of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), complication of GT. CONCLUSION: GT is effective treatment for severe neutropenic pediatric patients with severe infections. Enough amount of granulocytes could be collected after administration of G-CSF without dexamethasone to donors. However, ARDS which is an adverse effect of GT, is considered in pulmonary compromised patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antifungal Agents , Dexamethasone , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Granulocytes , Immunization, Passive , Leukapheresis , Neutropenia , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To collect high concentration of granulocytes for transfusion to neutropenic cancer patients with infections, we investigated the effect of G-CSF or dexamethasone as granulocyte mobilizers and 10% pentastarch (PS) as the sedimentation agent in granulocyte collection by leukapheresis. Subsequently, the therapeutic effect of the granulocyte transfusions was assessed. METHODS: Forty five leukapheresis were performed with CS-3000Plus (Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA) using 10% pentastarch. The donors were classified into three groups according to their premedication drugs and the interface detector offset; group 1 used dexamethasone with offset 15 (n=16), group 2 used dexamethasone with offset 33 (n=16), and group 3 used G-CSF with offset 33 (n=10). We compared total collected granulocyte counts and granulocyte collection efficiency (GCE). RESULTS: The mean counts of total granulocytes collected and GCE were as follows; 0.9 0.5 x 1010 and 31.6 14.3% in group 1, 1.3 0.6 x 1010 and 39.0 14.2% in group 2, and 1.6 0.9 x 1010 and 63.9 32.2% in group 3, respectively. The counts of granulocytes collected in group 3 was significantly higher than that in group 1 (P<0.05). The GCE of group 3 was significantly higher than that of group 1 and group 2 (P<0.05). Sixteen granulocyte transfusions were performed to 11 patients. We observed successful therapeutic effects in 10 out of 16 transfusions (63%). CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF indicates greater potency than dexamethasone although its high cost is limitation of routine use as mobilizing agents and PS was an excellent red cell sedimenting agent in granulocyte collection. Large volume granulocyte transfusions allow high therapeutic effects in neutropenic patients with marrows of sufficient regenerating capacity.
Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Marrow , Dexamethasone , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Granulocytes , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives , Leukapheresis , Neutropenia , Premedication , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
The prognosis of invasive aspergillosis in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation recipients is grave in the absence of bone marrow recovery in spite of antifungal treatment with amphotericin B. Beneficial role of granulocyte transfusion in neutropenic patients with fungal infection has been re-evaluated since granulocyte colony-stimulating factor made effective collection of granulocyte possible. And Liposomal amphotericin appears to be an effective alternative to conventional amphotericin B with much less toxicity. A 34-year-old patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia developed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis during very early period of allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. We treated the case successfully with liposomal amphotericin and granulocyte transfusion and surgery in spite of known high mortality of invasive aspergillosis in transplantation patients.