Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
China Medical Equipment ; (12): 95-98, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-706555

ABSTRACT

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of combined spinal epidural anesthesia(CSEA)by using orbital needle in patient-controlled epidural analgesia(PCEA)post cesarean delivery.Methods: 94 puerperas who received cesarean were divided into observation group(47 cases)and control group(47 cases).The patients of two groups were narcotized by using CSEA combined with PCEA.And the observation group adopted a new type of lumbar vertebral combined puncture needle and the control group adopted the traditionally typical lumbar vertebral combined puncture needle.The score of visual analogue scale(VAS)and sedation score of Ramesay of two groups of postoperative 1h,4h,12h,24h and 48h were compared.And the number of times in 48h,the drug dosage and adverse reaction of using analgesia pump also were compared.Results: In postoperative 12 h,the VAS scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend.And the VAS scores of pain of two groups within postoperative 12-48 h decreased gradually.The differences of VAS scores of pain of two groups within postoperative 1-12h and 12-48h between observation group and control group were statistically significant(F=29.596,F=156.366,P<0.05),respectively.And the VAS scores of pain post operative 4h and 12h of observation group [(2.01±0.51)and(3.49±0.74)]were significantly lower than that of control group [(2.32±0.47)and(3.85±0.69)](t=3.064,t=2.439,P<0.05),respectively.Within postoperative 1-48h,there were no significant fluctuation in sedation score of Ramesay and the difference of sedation score between the two groups were no significant.And the number of times(11.35±3.04)and drug dosage(65.67± 7.98)mL of using analgesic pump of observation group were significantly lower than that of control group [(20.08±5.32)and(82.07 ± 9.05)mL],(t=9.768,t=9.318,P<0.05),respectively.Besides,the incidences of postoperative nausea and skin pruritus of observation group(4.26%and 14.89%)were significantly lower than that of control group(17.02%and 34.04%)(x2=4.029,x2=4.663,P<0.05),respectively.Conclusion: The analgesia effect of orbital needle external needle in implementing CSEA for cesarean delivery is better than that of traditional needle inner needle,and its adverse reactions are less and it is safety.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-186298

ABSTRACT

Background: PCEA (patient controlled epidural analgesia) is a safe and effective technique for postoperative analgesia on routine surgical wards. Use of the epidural catheter as part of a combined epidural-general anesthetic technique results in less pain and faster patient recovery immediately after surgery than general anesthesia followed by systemic opioids does. Aim: In this prospective, randomized, double – blind study, we compared the analgesic effectiveness, hemodynamic changes and other side effects of epidural analgesia with drug combination – bupivacaine with fentanyl and ropivacaine with fentanyl in different concentrations. Material and methods: It was a prospective, randomized, double – blind study. Sixty patients of ASA I-II and age group 18-65 years divided in four groups 15 patients in each group (Group B1 bupivacaine 0.1%; Group B2 bupivacaine 0.05%; Group R1 ropivacaine 0.1%; Group R2 ropivacaine 0.05% with fentanyl 5micrograms/ml in each groups). After taking consent from patients epidural catheter was placed and study drugs were given to every patient. Visual analogue scale, heart rate, Jain R, Gupta P, Jain V. A comparison of ropivacaine with fentanyl to bupivacaine with fentanyl for post-operative patient controlled epidural analgesia in patients undergone lower abdominal cancer surgery. IAIM, 2016; 3(7): 137-149. Page 138 blood pressure, sedation score, modified bromage scale and other side effects were noted for the next 48 hours. Statistical analysis was done by using Medcalc 12.2.1.0 version statistical analysis software. Results: All four groups were comparable in terms of analgesia but group B1 patients had significant decrease in blood pressure at all time intervals. This group also had loss in motor power of lower extremity p value 0.020 than all other three groups. Conclusions: We concluded that ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 5 µg/mL after major abdominal surgery provides optimal dynamic analgesia without significant adverse effects.

3.
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice ; (12): 165-166, 2006.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-973734

ABSTRACT

@#ObjectiveTo compare the effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on pulmonary function in post-thoracotomy patients.Methods33 ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ patients undergoing selective esophagectomy were randomly divided into the PCEA group (n=16, treated with morphine plus bupivacaine) and PCIA group (n=17, treated with morphine plus droperidol) for 3 days postoperatively. Pulmonary function indices including respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (Vt), vital capacity (Vc) and pulse oximetry (SpO2) were recorded before operation and on the first 2 days after operation. Pain scores with visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest, deep breathing and with cough, and adverse effects were also recorded.ResultsRR increased, Vt , Vc and SpO2 decreased markedly in both groups postoperatively compared with the base line (P<0.01), but there were no significant differences between two groups. VAS scores were much lower in PCEA group, especially, when the patient was at deep breathing or during coughing (P<0.001).ConclusionPCEA is superior to PCIA in pain relief, but contributes no more than PCIA in improving pulmonary function in post-thoracotomy patients.

4.
The Korean Journal of Pain ; : 187-191, 2006.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-17828

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using a local anesthetic-opioid mixture, has been effectively applied after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, which is associated with intense postoperative pain that requires postoperative analgesia for both rehabilitation and the pain itself. However, adverse opioid-related effects, such as nausea, vomiting and pruritus, are commonly encountered. It was our hypothesis that the adverse opioid-related effects could be reduced by the addition of naloxone, an opioid antagonist, to a mixture of fentanyl-ropivacaine PCEA. METHODS: In 120 patients undergoing elective TKR surgery, epidural or combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia was performed and PCEA applied. In the control group (n = 65), 0.16% ropivacaine and 3microgram/ml fentanyl (2.4microgram/ml for those older than 65 yrs) were administered. In the naloxone group (n = 55), naloxone (2microgram/ml) was coadministered with the above regimen. The incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the frequency of pruritus, the visual analog score (VAS) and the PCEA volume used were assessed 6 and 24 hrs after surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea and vomiting during the early postoperative period, and those of pruritus during the late postoperative period were significantly lower in the naloxone group. The VAS pain scores, the PCEA volume used and amount of rescue IV meperidine were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A small dose of naloxone mixed with an opioid significantly reduces the incidence and severity of adverse opioid-related effects in PCEA, without reducing the analgesic effect


Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesia , Analgesia, Epidural , Anesthesia , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Fentanyl , Incidence , Meperidine , Naloxone , Nausea , Pain, Postoperative , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting , Postoperative Period , Pruritus , Rehabilitation , Vomiting
5.
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice ; (12): 616-617, 2006.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-974780

ABSTRACT

@#ObjectiveTo compare the effects of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on postoperative nausea and vomit (PONV) in gynecologic and obstetric patients. Methods56 gynecologic or obstetric patients (ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ) scheduled for lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated to receive either 1 mg/ml morphine plus 0.1 mg/ml droperidol intravenously (group PCIA) or 0.1 mg/ml morphine plus 0.125% bupivacaine (group PCEA-Ⅰ) or 0.1 mg/ml morphine plus 0.1 mg/ml droperidol plus 0.125% bupivacaine (group PCEA-Ⅱ) epidurally. 4, 24, and 48 h after operation, pain scores with visual analogus scale (VAS), sedation scores with Ramesay and the incidences of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression were assessed. ResultsVAS scores in the two PCEA groups were much lower than that of PCIA (P<0.01). The incidences of nausea and vomiting in PCEA-Ⅱ group were significantly lower than those in PCIA group (P<0.05), incidences of other side-effects such as pruritus, respiratory depression etc. were similar between the three groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe regimen morphine/droperidol/bupivacaine by PCEA shows superiorities in relieving pain and reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecologic and obstetric patients.

6.
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice ; (12): 616-617, 2006.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-974777

ABSTRACT

@#ObjectiveTo compare the effects of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on postoperative nausea and vomit (PONV) in gynecologic and obstetric patients. Methods56 gynecologic or obstetric patients (ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ) scheduled for lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated to receive either 1 mg/ml morphine plus 0.1 mg/ml droperidol intravenously (group PCIA) or 0.1 mg/ml morphine plus 0.125% bupivacaine (group PCEA-Ⅰ) or 0.1 mg/ml morphine plus 0.1 mg/ml droperidol plus 0.125% bupivacaine (group PCEA-Ⅱ) epidurally. 4, 24, and 48 h after operation, pain scores with visual analogus scale (VAS), sedation scores with Ramesay and the incidences of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression were assessed. ResultsVAS scores in the two PCEA groups were much lower than that of PCIA (P<0.01). The incidences of nausea and vomiting in PCEA-Ⅱ group were significantly lower than those in PCIA group (P<0.05), incidences of other side-effects such as pruritus, respiratory depression etc. were similar between the three groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe regimen morphine/droperidol/bupivacaine by PCEA shows superiorities in relieving pain and reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecologic and obstetric patients.

7.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 516-520, 2004.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-201402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ondansetron is a specific 5-hydroxytrypamine (HT3) receptor antagonist, sodium channel blocker and mu-opioid receptor agonist. Prophylactic intravenous administration of ondansetron has an antiemetic effect in general and epidural anesthesia. This study is designed to evaluate the antiemetic effect of intravenous ondansetron in patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) patients. METHODS: Sixty ASA physical status I-II patients undergoing elective cesarean section under epidural anesthesia using 0.75% ropivacaine and fentanyl 50microgram were received intravenous fentanyl 50microgram plus ondansetron 2 mg (group 2 mg: n = 20), 4 mg (group 4 mg: n = 20) or 8 mg (group 8 mg: n = 20) after delivery of baby. PCEA was started using 0.15% ropivacaine and 50microgram/ml butorphanol (total volume: 300 ml, 4 ml of bolus dose, and 10 min of lockout interval). The intraoperative and postoperative incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting were recorded using 4 point scale (0: none, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe) for postoperative 24 hours. RESULTS: There were no significantly lower incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting in group 8 mg (10%, 5%) than group 2 mg (25%, 10%), and group 4 mg (20%, 10%) during postoperative 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic intravenous ondansetron 8 mg injection with PCEA drug has no superior antiemitic effect than 2 mg or 4 mg in cesarean section patients under PCEA without significant side effects.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Administration, Intravenous , Analgesia, Epidural , Anesthesia, Epidural , Antiemetics , Butorphanol , Cesarean Section , Fentanyl , Incidence , Nausea , Ondansetron , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting , Sodium Channels , Vomiting
8.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 749-754, 2002.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-154260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Opioids may be used in a dose-sparing capacity with local anesthetics to reduce the dose needed. This study examined the efficacy of different concentrations of ropivacaine combined with butorphanol 50 micro gram/ml to provide postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Sixty parturients were received epidural infusion with 0.075% ropivacaine (Group 1: n = 20), 0.1% ropivacaine (Group 2: n = 20) and 0.15% ropivacaine (Group 3: n = 20) in combination with butorphanol 50 micro gram/ml using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) after cesarean section. PCEA was started with basal infusion of 4 ml of PCEA solution and 4 ml of bolus infusion at 10 min of lockout interval. Using a visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed the degree of pain and incidences of side effects were checked. RESULTS: Total infusion doses of ropivacaine were significantly higher in group 3, and butorphanol consumption were significantly lower in group 3 (P<0.05). The incidences of nausea, vomiting and sedation were significantly higher in group 1 (P<0.05). There were no significantly differences in VAS pain score and other side effects among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that 0.1% or 0.15% ropivacaine with butorphanol 50micro gram//ml for PCEA can provide the most effective analgesia with less side effects after cesarean section.


Subject(s)
Female , Pregnancy , Analgesia , Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesics, Opioid , Anesthetics, Local , Butorphanol , Cesarean Section , Incidence , Nausea , Vomiting
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL