Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 121(6): e202303004, dic. 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1518182

ABSTRACT

La adecuación del esfuerzo terapéutico reemplaza la expresión limitación terapéutica y se define como la decisión de no iniciar medidas diagnósticas y terapéuticas o de suspenderlas en respuesta a la condición del paciente, para evitar conductas potencialmente inapropiadas y redireccionar los objetivos de tratamiento hacia el confort y el bienestar. En la población pediátrica, esta decisión es aún más desafiante debido a la naturaleza de la relación médico-paciente-familia y a la escasez de guías que orienten su implementación. La adecuación del esfuerzo terapéutico está enmarcada en principios éticos y legales, pero existen diversos retos a nivel práctico. Cada proceso de adecuación es único y dinámico, y debe abordarse contemplando a quién realizarlo, cuándo, cómo y con qué medidas.


The term "therapeutic limitation" has been replaced by "adequacy of therapeutic effort" and is defined as the decision to withhold or withdraw diagnostic and therapeutic measures in response to the patient's condition, avoiding potentially inappropriate behaviors and redirectong treatment goals towards comfort and well-being. In the pediatric population, this decision is even more challenging given the nature of the physician-patient-family relationship and the paucity of guidelines to address treatment goals. The adequacy of therapeutic effort is framed by ethical and legal principles, but, in practice, there are several challenges. Each adequacy process is unique and dynamic, and should be addressed by taking into account with what measures, how, when, and in whom it should be implemented


Subject(s)
Humans , Physician-Patient Relations , Withholding Treatment , Decision Making
2.
Rev. enferm. UERJ ; 31: e73672, jan. -dez. 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1525694

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: conhecer as percepções de profissionais de saúde acerca das consequências do isolamento social, causado pela pandemia da COVID-19, no desenvolvimento e na vida de crianças com Transtorno do Espectro Autista. Método: estudo exploratório, descritivo e de abordagem qualitativa, apoiado nos referenciais do Cuidado Centrado na Família e da Análise de Conteúdo de Bardin e aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa. Desenvolvido em municípios do interior paulista, de setembro a outubro/2021, com participação de doze profissionais de saúde. Resultados: as experiências apreendidas estiveram representadas nas categorias temáticas: "Interrupção das terapêuticas e estratégias profissionais", "Implicações da pandemia no desenvolvimento da criança autista" e "Isolamento social da pandemia e a dinâmica familiar da criança com autismo". Conclusão: o isolamento social decorrente da pandemia do coronavírus interferiu na vida das crianças autistas e suas famílias, com consequências ao desenvolvimento social, motor, linguístico e pedagógico.


Objective: to know the guidelines of health professionals about the consequences of social isolation, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, on the development and lives of children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder. Method: field study, exploratory, descriptive and with a qualitative approach, supported by the references of Family-Centered Care and Bardin's Content Analysis and approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Developed in municipalities in the interior of São Paulo, from September to October/2021, with the participation of twelve health professionals. Results: the experiences learned followed instructions in the thematic categories: "Interruption of therapies and professional strategies", "Implications of the pandemic on the development of the autistic child" and "Social isolation of the pandemic and the family dynamics of the child with autism". Conclusion: the social isolation resulting from the coronavirus pandemic interfered in the lives of autistic children and their families, with consequences for social, motor, linguistic and pedagogical development.


Objetivo: conocer las percepciones de los profesionales de la salud en cuanto a las consecuencias del aislamiento social, provocado por la pandemia de la COVID-19, en el desarrollo y la vida de los niños con Trastorno del Espectro Autista. Método: estudio exploratorio, descriptivo y con enfoque cualitativo, apoyado en los referenciales del Cuidado Centrado en la Familia y el Análisis de Contenido de Bardin y aprobado por el Comité de Ética en Investigación. El estudio tuvo lugar en municipios del interior de São Paulo, de septiembre a octubre/2021, contando con la participación de doce profesionales de la salud. Resultados: las experiencias aprendidas se representaron por las categorías temáticas: "Interrupción de terapias y estrategias profesionales", "Implicaciones de la pandemia en el desarrollo del niño autista" y "Aislamiento social de la pandemia y la dinámica familiar del niño con autismo". Conclusión: el aislamiento social resultante de la pandemia del coronavirus interfirió en la vida de los niños autistas y sus familias, con consecuencias para el desarrollo social, motor, lingüístico y pedagógico.

3.
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 51-55, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-992261

ABSTRACT

Objective:To summarize the situation of dead newborns and their parents after parents gave up treatment, and analyze the reasons and emotional needs of parents who gave up treatment, so as to provide reference for reducing neonatal mortality and negative emotions of parents.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to collect the data of neonates and mothers who died after giving up treatment reported in Hunan Children′s Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021. The general information, perinatal risk factors, and the incidence of in-hospital diseases were analyzed. Then, semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of newborns who died after giving up treatment from February to December 2021. Understand why parents give up treatment and their emotional needs.Results:A total of 172 newborns died after giving up were included in the analysis, including 103 males (59.88%) and 74 premature infants (43.02%); Umbilical cord, placenta and amniotic fluid abnormalities were 21 cases (12.21%), 39 cases (22.67%) and 25 cases (14.53%), respectively. Birth asphyxia was 31 cases (18.02%), including severe asphyxia in 18 cases (10.46%); There were 21 (12.21%), 35 (20.35%) and 30 (17.44%) cases of maternal infection in the third trimester, hypertension in pregnancy and diabetes in pregnancy, respectively. The top three causes of death were septicemia (18.02%), congenital malformation (16.86%) and severe pneumonia (10.47%). The main reason why parents give up treatment was that the child′s disease was critical and irreversible, and parents had strong emotional needs for hospice care in their hearts.Conclusions:There are many high risk factors of perinatal death of newborns after giving up treatment. Sepsis is the primary cause of death, and strengthening perinatal health care is fundamental. Parents have a strong demand for hospice care, so it is of practical significance to implement family-centered hospice care model for such special newborns.

4.
Rev. enferm. UERJ ; 30: e66477, jan. -dez. 2022.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1399591

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: discutir as evidências científicas sobre as causas de cancelamento em cirurgia ambulatorial. Método: trata-se de uma revisão integrativa com busca nas bases de dados eletrônicas Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Cinahl, Web of Science e Scopus, a partir dos termos controlados Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Ambulatory Surgery, Suspension e termos livres sinônimos. Resultados: selecionaram-se 13 estudos. O país com menor taxa de cancelamento cirúrgico ambulatorial foram os Estados Unidos com 0,5%, e o maior, a Nigéria com 25,40%. Foram encontradas 53 causas de cancelamento em cirurgia ambulatorial, das quais agrupou-se em três categorias: fatores do paciente, clínicos e institucionais. Conclusão: Evidencia-se que as causas de cancelamento cirúrgico ambulatorial foram diversas e comuns nas instituições, sendo o absenteísmo do paciente no dia do procedimento agendado a causa mais frequente, demonstrando que estratégias assistenciais e de gestão precisam ser realizadas.


Objective: to discuss the scientific evidence on the causes of cancellation in outpatient surgery. Method: this integrative review involved searching the Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Cinahl, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases using the controlled terms Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Ambulatory Surgery, Suspension and free synonyms. Results: 13 studies were selected. By country, the United States, with 0.5%, had the lowest outpatient surgery cancellation rate, and Nigeria, with 25.40%, the highest. The fifty-three causes of outpatient surgery cancellation found were grouped into three categories: patient, clinical, and institutional factors. Conclusion: the causes of outpatient surgical cancellation were found to be diverse and common in institutions, the most frequent cause being patient absence on the day of the scheduled procedure, demonstrating that care and management strategies need to be developed and applied.


Objetivo: discutir la evidencia científica sobre las causas de cancelación en cirugía ambulatoria. Método: se trata de una revisión integradora con búsqueda en las bases electrónicas de datos Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Cinahl, Web of Science y Scopus, utilizando los términos controlados Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Ambulatory Surgery, Suspension y términos sinónimos libres. Resultados: se seleccionaron 13 estudios. El país con la tasa de cancelación quirúrgica ambulatoria más baja fue Estados Unidos con un 0,5% y el de más alta Nigeria, con un 25,40%. Se encontraron 53 causas de cancelación en cirugía ambulatoria, las cuales se agruparon en tres categorías: factores del paciente, clínicos e institucionales. Conclusión: Se pone en evidencia que las causas de cancelación de cirugía ambulatoria fueron diversas y comunes en las instituciones, siendo la causa más frecuente el absentismo del paciente el día del procedimiento programado, demostrando que es necesario realizar estrategias de atención y de gestión.

5.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 120(1): 30-: I-38, VI, feb 2022. tab, ilus
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1353409

ABSTRACT

Introducción. Las funciones del Comité de Ética Clínica (CEC) son educativas, normativas, consultivas, mediadoras y reflexivas. Como cualquier servicio de salud, las consultas de casos a un CEC deben ser sujetas a revisión y mejora de la calidad. Los objetivos fueron evaluar la factibilidad, la efectividad y la satisfacción de las recomendaciones ético-asistenciales dadas por el CEC, y evaluar su impacto en el equipo tratante y en la familia. Población y métodos. Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, cualicuantitativo, de casos clínicos presentados en el Comité de Ética Clínica del hospital desde el 1 de enero de 2013 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2017, según datos del libro de actas, historias clínicas, registros de la Oficina de Comunicación a Distancia y entrevistas semiestructuradas al equipo de salud. Resultados. Se analizaron 108 casos (106 pacientes), 73 casos con encuesta y registros, y 35 solamente con registros. Los motivos principales más frecuentes de consulta fueron los siguientes: adecuación del esfuerzo terapéutico (46/42,6 %), compromiso neurológico grave (15/13,9 %), calidad de vida del paciente (11/10,2 %), conflictos entre el paciente, la familia y el sistema de salud (7/6,5 %), y rechazo del tratamiento por la familia (6/5,6 %). Se hallaron niveles altos de satisfacción (> 95 %) y niveles moderados de factibilidad (> 74 %) y efectividad (> 85 %). Solo en 50/108 casos (46,3 %) quedó registro en la historia clínica de la consulta al CEC y el 44 % de los profesionales opinó que la consulta tuvo un impacto positivo en la familia y en el paciente. Conclusiones. Los resultados contribuyeron a descubrir oportunidades de mejora, especialmente en la documentación y en la comunicación en el proceso de consulta.


Introduction. A clinical ethics committee (CEC) has educational, regulatory, advisory, mediation, and reflexive functions. As any health care service, the consults with the CEC should be subjected to review and quality improvement. The study objectives were to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and satisfaction with the bioethical recommendations made by the CEC and assess their impact on the treating team and the patient's family. Population and methods. Descriptive, retrospective, qualitative, and quantitative study of clinical cases submitted to the hospital's CEC between January 1 st, 2013 and December 31, 2017 using data from the CEC minute book, medical records, registries from the Office for Remote Communication, and semi-structured interviews with health care team members. Results. A total of 108 cases (106 patients) were analyzed: 73 cases with survey and registries and 35 with registries only. The main most frequent reasons for consultation were adequacy of therapeutic effort (46/42.6%), severe neurological involvement (15/13.9%), patient's quality of life (11/10.2%), patient-family-health system conflict (7/6.5%), and family's refusal of treatment (6/5.6%). High levels of satisfaction (> 95%) and moderate levels of feasibility (> 74%) and effectiveness (> 85%) were observed. In only 50/108 cases (46.3%), the consultation with the CEC was registered in the medical record, 44% of health care providers stated that the consultation had a positive impact on the patient and their family. Conclusions. Results helped to establish improvement opportunities, especially in terms of documentation and communication in the consultation process.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Personal Satisfaction , Ethics Committees, Clinical , Quality of Life , Feasibility Studies , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Retrospective Studies , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Hospitals
6.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 149(10)oct. 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1389363

ABSTRACT

Euthanasia is a subject of permanent discussion everywhere, mainly about its ethical appropriateness and about its legalization in different countries. This debate includes many ethical, legal, social, political, spiritual, religious, and public health issues. A relevant problem is the frequent misunderstanding that many have about the meaning of the terms and concepts used in different ethical and clinical end of life settings. Many views and even texts are affected by such mistakes, rendering a constructive discussion almost impossible. The goal of this article is to contribute to an improvement of the social and legislative discussion about euthanasia through an elucidation of the main terms and notions linked to this topic. We present definitions and explanations for euthanasia, assisted suicide, withdrawal or foregoing of therapy, treatment rejection, palliative sedation, dignified death and others.

7.
Rev. SOBECC ; 26(1): 21-26, 31-03-2021.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1177427

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Identificar a percepção de enfermeiros do bloco operatório sobre os motivos para o cancelamento de cirurgias eletivas e as estratégias para reduzir as taxas de suspensão. Método: Estudo de abordagem qualitativa realizado em um hospital de alta complexidade do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil, com enfermeiros atuantes no bloco operatório. A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de entrevistas gravadas com sete enfermeiros responsáveis pelas cirurgias eletivas. Para o tratamento dos dados, utilizou-se a técnica da análise de conteúdo de Bardin. Resultados: Os discursos foram agrupados em duas categorias temáticas: lacunas no planejamento cirúrgico, com três subcategorias, e prevenção de situações evitáveis, com duas subcategorias. Conclusão: Os motivos para o cancelamento de cirurgias estavam relacionados ao planejamento do ambiente cirúrgico e à preparação clínica do paciente. Os enfermeiros identificaram esses motivos como situações evitáveis e consideraram que a comunicação efetiva e atitudes de liderança assertivas são estratégias que reduzem os índices de suspensão cirúrgica.


Objective: To identify the perception of surgical block nurses of the reasons for the cancellation of elective surgeries and strategies to reduce suspension rates. Method: This is a qualitative study carried out in a tertiary hospital of Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, with nurses working in the surgical block. Data were collected through recorded interviews with seven nurses responsible for elective surgeries. Data treatment was based on Bardin's content analysis technique. Results: The statements were grouped into two thematic categories: gaps in surgical planning, with three subcategories, and prevention of avoidable situations, with two subcategories. Conclusion: The causes for surgery cancellation were related to surgical environment planning and the patient's clinical preparation. The nurses defined these reasons as avoidable situations and considered effective communication and assertive leadership attitudes as strategies that reduce surgical suspension rates.


Objetivo: Identificar la percepción de los enfermeros en el quirófano sobre los motivos de cancelación de las cirugías electivas y las estrategias para reducir las tasas de suspensión. Método: Estudio cualitativo, realizado en un hospital de alta complejidad en Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil, con enfermeros trabajando en quirófano. La recolección de datos se realizó mediante entrevistas grabadas con siete enfermeros responsables de cirugías electivas. Para el tratamiento de los datos se utilizó la técnica de Análisis de Contenido de Bardin (Bardin Content Analysis). Resultados: Los discursos se agruparon en dos categorías temáticas: brechas en la planificación quirúrgica, con tres subcategorías, y prevención de situaciones evitables, con dos subcategorías. Conclusión: Los motivos para cancelar cirugías estaban relacionados con la planificación del entorno quirúrgico y la preparación clínica del paciente. Los enfermeros identificaron estos motivos como situaciones prevenibles y consideraron que la comunicación eficaz y las actitudes de liderazgo asertivo son estrategias que reducen las tasas de suspensión quirúrgica.


Subject(s)
Humans , Operating Rooms , General Surgery , Nurses , Disease Prevention , Planning , Hospitals
8.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 115(5): 830-839, nov. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | SES-SP, LILACS | ID: biblio-1142260

ABSTRACT

Resumo Fundamentos: Poucos estudos discutiram causas para o subtratamento medicamentoso na SCA. Objetivos: Avaliar a não-administração e suspensão de medicamentos durante o tratamento intra-hospitalar da SCA na Estratégia de Registro de Síndrome Coronariana Aguda (estudo ERICO). Métodos: Analisamos prontuários de 563 participantes ERICO para avaliar a frequência e motivos da não administração e/ou suspensão de medicamentos. Construímos modelos de regressão logística para avaliar se sexo, idade ≥65 anos, nível educacional ou subtipo de SCA estavam associados com (a) não administração de ≥1 medicamentos; e (b) não administração ou suspensão de ≥1 medicamentos. O nível de significância foi 5%. Resultados: A amostra é composta por 58,1% de homens e com idade mediana de 62 anos. Em 183 (32,5%) participantes ≥1 medicamentos não foram administrados e 288 (51,2%) apresentaram ≥1 medicamentos não administrados ou suspensos. As causas mais frequentes foram risco de sangramento (aspirina, clopidogrel e heparina), insuficiência cardíaca (betabloqueadores) e hipotensão (inibidores da enzima conversora da angiotensina e bloqueadores dos receptores da angiotensina). Indivíduos com idade ≥65 anos (razão de chances [RC]:1,51; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%]:1,05-2,19) e com angina instável (RC:1,72; IC95%:1,07-2,75) tiveram maior chance de não-administração. Considerando apenas pacientes com infarto do miocárdio, idade ≥65 anos foi associada tanto à não administração quanto à não administração ou suspensão. Conclusões: A não administração ou suspensão de ≥1 medicamento não foi rara no estudo ERICO. Indivíduos com idade ≥65 anos ou com angina instável tiveram maior chance de não administração e podem ser subtratados nesse cenário.


Abstract Background: Few studies have discussed the reasons for pharmacological undertreatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Objectives: To determine the frequency and reasons for the non-administration and suspension of medications during in-hospital treatments of ACS in the Strategy of Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ERICO) study. Methods: The present study analyzed the medical charts of the 563 participants in the ERICO study to evaluate the frequency and reasons for the non-administration and/or suspension of medications. Logistic regression models were built to analyze if sex, age ≥65 years of age, educational level, or ACS subtype were associated with (a) the non-administration of ≥1 medications; and (b) the non-administration or suspension of ≥1 medications. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: This study's sample included 58.1% males, with a median of 62 years of age. In 183 (32.5%) participants, ≥1 medications were not administered, while in 288 (51.2%), ≥1 medications were not administered or were suspended. The most common reasons were the risk of bleeding (aspirin, clopidogrel, and heparin), heart failure (beta blockers), and hypotension (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers). Individuals aged ≥65 (odds ratio [OR]:1.51; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]:1.05-2.19) and those with unstable angina (OR:1.72; 95% CI:1.07-2.75) showed a higher probability for the non-administration of ≥1 medication. Considering only patients with myocardial infarction, being ≥65 years of age was associated with both the non-administration and the non-administration or suspension of ≥1 medication. Conclusions: Non-administration or suspension of ≥1 medication proved to be common in this ERICO study. Individuals of ≥65 years of age or with unstable angina showed a higher probability of the non-administration of ≥1 medication and may be undertreated in this scenario. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(5):830-839)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Aspirin , Clopidogrel
9.
Arq. bras. psicol. (Rio J. 2003) ; 72(2): 43-56, maio-ago. 2020.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1149110

ABSTRACT

O abandono em psicoterapia é um fator amplamente estudado, tendo em vista sua relevância para a prática clínica. Algumas variáveis têm sido preditoras da interrupção da psicoterapia; no entanto, há poucos estudos que diferenciam os períodos do abandono. Este estudo objetiva identificar os preditores do abandono inicial no processo psicoterapêutico de 1.272 prontuários de pacientes adultos jovens. Os instrumentos utilizados foram: a ficha de contato inicial, a avaliação e a alta institucional e o SCL-90-R. Os resultados foram obtidos por meio da análise de Regressão Logística Binária Multivariada, que indicaram como preditoras do abandono inicial, as variáveis sociodemográfica: baixa renda; clínica: ansiedade fóbica; e as de tratamento: não ter realizado psicoterapia anteriormente; e razões do término de tratamento: tipo de abandono (não compareceu à sessão e não justificou); paciente (outros motivos: mudança de cidade, falta de recursos e motivos de saúde); fatores organizacionais; insatisfação. Os resultados sugerem uma atenção às consultas iniciais para auxiliar na adesão ao tratamento.


Abandonment in psychotherapy is a widely studied factor, considering its relevance to clinical practice. Some variables have been predictive of the interruption of psychotherapy; however, there are few studies that differentiate periods of abandonment. This study aims to identify the predictors of initial abandonment in the psychotherapeutic process of 1,272 medical records of young adult patients. The instruments used were the initial contact sheet, the evaluation, the institutional discharge and the SCL-90-R. The results were obtained through the analysis of Multivariate Binary Logistic Regression, which indicated as predictors of initial abandonment, the following variables: sociodemographic: low income; clinical: phobic anxiety; and treatment: not having previously performed psychotherapy; and reasons for termination of treatment: type of abandonment (did not attend the session and did not justify); patient (other reasons: change of city, lack of resources and reasons for health); organizational factors; dissatisfaction. The results suggest an attention to the initial appointments to help in treatment accession.


El abandono en psicoterapia es un factor ampliamente estudiado, teniendo en vista su relevancia para la práctica clínica. Algunas variables han sido predictores de la interrupción de la psicoterapia; sin embargo, hay pocos estudios que diferencian los períodos del abandono. Este estudio tiene como objetivo identificar los predictores del abandono inicial en el proceso psicoterapéutico de 1.272 prontuarios de pacientes adultos jóvenes. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron la ficha de contacto inicial, la evaluación y alta institucional y el SCL-90-R. Los resultados fueron obtenidos por medio del análisis de Regresión Logística Binaria Multivariada, que indicaron como predictores del abandono inicial, las variables: sociodemográfica: baja renta; clínica: ansiedad fóbica; y las de tratamiento: no haber realizado psicoterapia anteriormente; y razones del término de tratamiento: tipo de abandono (no compareció a la sesión y no justificó); paciente (otros motivos: cambio de ciudad, falta de recursos y motivos de salud); factores organizacionales; insatisfacción. Los resultados sugieren una atención a las consultas iniciales para ayudar en la adhesión al tratamiento.


Subject(s)
Risk Factors , Psychotherapeutic Processes , Psychotherapy, Psychodynamic , Treatment Adherence and Compliance
10.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 65(9): 1168-1173, Sept. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1041072

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE Treatment limitation, as well as do-not-resuscitate (DNR) directives, are difficult but important to improve patients' quality of life and minimize dysthanasia. We aimed to study the approach to withholding, withdrawal, and DNR decisions, patients' characteristics, and process documentation in a general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Portugal. METHODS A retrospective analysis of data regarding the limitation of treatment decisions collected from previously-designed forms and complemented by medical record consultation. RESULTS A total of 1602 patients were admitted to the ICU between 2011 and 2016. DNR decisions were documented in 127 cases (7.9%). Patients with treatment limitations were older and had higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II. The most frequent diagnosis preceding these decisions was sepsis (52.0%, n = 66); the most common main reason for limiting treatment was a poor prognosis of acute illness. Of the patients to whom a DNR was implemented, 117 (92.1%) died in the ICU (40.1% of the total number of ICU deaths), and hospital mortality was 100%. Participants in these decisions, as well as types of treatment withdrawn and their respective timings, were not registered in medical records. CONCLUSION Treatment limitation and DNR decisions were relatively common, in line with other Southern European studies, but behind Northern European and North American centers. Patients with these limitations were older and more severely ill than patients without such decisions. Documentation of these processes should be clear and detailed, either in specific forms or computerized clinical records; there is room for improvement in this area.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Decisões de limitação terapêutica (DLT) e de não reanimação (DNR) são difíceis, mas importantes, visando melhorar a qualidade de vida dos doentes e minimizar distanásia. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a abordagem das DNR e DLT, as características dos doentes e a documentação dessas decisões numa Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente (Ucip) em Portugal. MÉTODOS Análise retrospectiva dos dados referentes a DLT e DNR, recolhidos a partir de formulários previamente elaborados e complementados por consulta de processo clínico. RESULTADOS Um total de 1.602 doentes foi internado na Ucip entre 2011 e 2016. DNR foi documentada em 127 casos (7,9%). Doentes com DLT eram mais velhos e tinham um Simplified Acute Physiology Score II mais elevado. O diagnóstico mais frequente que precedeu essas decisões foi sepse (52,0%, n=66); A razão mais comum para limitar o tratamento foi mau prognóstico da doença aguda. Dos doentes nos quais a DNR foi implementada, 117 (92,1%) morreram na Ucip (40,1% do total de óbitos na Ucip) e a mortalidade hospitalar foi de 100%. Os intervenientes nessas decisões, bem como os tipos de tratamento retirados, não foram rotineiramente registrados. CONCLUSÃO As DLT e DNR foram relativamente comuns, em consonância com outros estudos do sul da Europa, mas atrás dos centros do norte da Europa e da América do Norte. Os doentes com essas limitações eram mais velhos e mais gravemente doentes. A documentação dessas decisões deve ser clara e detalhada, seja em formulários específicos, seja em registros clínicos informatizados. Há espaço para melhorias nessa área.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Medical Records , Resuscitation Orders , Withholding Treatment/standards , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Portugal , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Hospital Mortality , Sepsis/mortality , Decision Making , Length of Stay , Middle Aged
11.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association ; : 350-357, 2019.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-766604

ABSTRACT

It is natural for all human beings to die; hence, death is an inevitable event. However, advances in medical technology are changing the meaning of natural death. These advanced treatments provide the capability to intervene at the time of death and to reshape the circumstances around natural death, by sustaining human life. However, it is extremely difficult to judge when treatment is futile for the patient's best interests. It is therefore recommended to make time to discuss the concept of medical futility during the course of caring for a critically ill patient. Despite the expectations and efforts of the patient, the patient's family, and medical staff, the patient will eventually, have a ‘hopeless’ medical condition. Most discussions about decision-making in end-of-life treatment have neen ethical debates focused on the patient's self-determination and best interest in the context of concepts such as euthanasia or death with dignity. However, such discussions are insufficient for resolving the wide variety of circumstances that occur in clinical settings. Instead, the various ethical dilemmas inherent to end-of-life care should be approached by educating medical teams, patients, and their families about how to recognize medical futility. Furthermore, it is important to optimize the balance between the rights of patients and the responsibility of physicians.


Subject(s)
Humans , Critical Illness , Euthanasia , Medical Futility , Medical Staff , Personal Autonomy , Right to Die , Withholding Treatment
12.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association ; : 369-375, 2019.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-766602

ABSTRACT

Hospice and palliative care can help terminal patients and their family members to face the natural end of life more comfortably, by providing them with an environment to address psychosocial and spiritual problems, as well as physical symptoms. However, most patients and their caregivers have the misconception that hospice care means the withdrawal of all treatments. Many physicians also consider hospice care to be a form of terminal care after all treatments are finished. Laws regulating the withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment came into effect in Korea in 2018, and these regulations also apply to most terminal stages of benign diseases. The withdrawal of futile life-prolonging treatment is quite different from euthanasia or negligence. At the last stage of disease, treatment aimed at alleviating various symptoms can make critically ill patients more comfortable and thereby help them to die with dignity. Patients with a terminal illness should receive hospice and palliative care, instead of futile life-prolonging treatment. Therefore, education and training programs to promote a proper understanding of hospice and palliative care should be considered mandatory.


Subject(s)
Humans , Caregivers , Critical Illness , Education , Euthanasia , Hospice Care , Hospices , Jurisprudence , Korea , Malpractice , Palliative Care , Social Control, Formal , Terminal Care , Withholding Treatment
13.
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy ; (12): 328-331, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-744364

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the clinical curative effect of using different blocking methods to renal artery in laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery.Methods A total of 118 cases admitted in the Affiliated Heji Hospital of Changzhi Medical College who reserved the nephron routine after laparoscopic surgery of renal tumor surgery were selected.According to different methods of renal artery block,the patients were divided into the whole block group (61 cases) and selective blocking group (57 cases).The clinical curative effects of the two groups were compared.Results The differences of age,sex,suffering from kidney area and excising were not statistically significant between the two groups(all P > 0.05).The blocking time,operation time and intraoperative blood loss,drainage at postoperative 1 day in the whole block group were (22.58 ± 4.62) min,(138.75 ± 21.76) min,(108.47 ± 75.39) mL and (137.36 ±18.34) mL,respectively,which in the selective block group were (28.61 ± 4.59) min,(103.26 ± 18.64) min,(132.58 ± 68.43) mL and (163.15 ± 15.87) mL,respectively,the differences were significant between the two groups (t =5.356,-8.247,7.463,10.358,all P < 0.01).The postoperative hospital stay [(8.36 ± 2.19) d vs.(7.78 ±2.35)d] had no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P >0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative creatinine level and glomerular filtration rate between the two groups (all P >0.05).After operation,the creatinine and glomerular filtration rate in the whole block group were (106.38 ±32.76) μmol/L,(33.53 ± 6.14) % statistically,which in the selective block group were (95.26 ± 25.49) μmol/L,(38.27 ± 5.29)% statistically,the differences were statistically significant between the two groups (t =-2.154,4.572,all P < 0.05).Conclusion Renal artery block has shorter operation time,larger haemorrhage amount,increased postoperative creatinine,reduced glomerular filtration rate,for a small single kidney surgery,using selective renal artery block as far as possible,it has less intraoperative bleeding,and postoperative effect is better.

14.
Rev. méd. Urug ; 34(4): 193-200, dic. 2018.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-968102

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la limitación de terapias de soporte vital (LTSV) es una práctica habitual y éticamente aceptada. La misma se enmarca en el concepto de adecuación del esfuerzo terapéutico. Objetivo: determinar la frecuencia, las directivas de implementación y los factores asociados a LSTV en los pacientes fallecidos en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Conocer la frecuencia y características del registro de este proceso en la historia clínica. Diseño: estudio observacional multicéntrico de corte transversal. Ámbito: se analizaron las historias clínicas de ocho UCI polivalentes públicas y privadas de Uruguay. Pacientes: se incluyeron todos los pacientes mayores de 18 años fallecidos en un período de seis meses consecutivos en el año 2011. Intervenciones: análisis de las características de los pacientes mediante revisión de historias clínicas. Resultados: analizamos 210 pacientes fallecidos. Se identificó LSTV en 63 (30%). El 75% de las decisiones consistió en la retirada de medidas terapéuticas. Los factores independientemente asociados a LTSV fueron: mayor edad (OR 1,04 (IC 95% 1,01-1,07), p = 0,001), mayor estadía en UCI (OR 1,06 (IC 95% 1,02 - 1,11), p = 0,001) y limitación para las actividades de la vida diaria (OR 4,65 (IC 95% 1,1-19,6), p=0,035). El 70% de las directivas LTSV fueron registradas en la historia clínica. Los soportes vitales más frecuentemente retirados fueron: nutrición parenteral (100%), vasopresores (79%), nutrición enteral (64%) y antimicrobianos (52%). La asistencia ventilatoria mecánica invasiva se retiró en el 33% de los casos. Conclusiones: un tercio de los pacientes fallece con LTSV. Este tipo de decisiones se asocian a mala calidad de vida previa, mayor edad y mayor estadía en UCI. Un tercio de las decisiones de LTSV no son registradas. (AU)


Introduction: withdraw and withhold life support therapies is an usual and ethically accepted practice. Objectives: to determine the frequency, the directives and factors associated with withdrawing and withholding life support therapies in patients who died in ICU. Determine the frequency and characteristics of the record of this process in clinical history. Design: multicentric observational study of cross section. Setting: clinical histories of 8 public and private mixed ICUs in Uruguay were analyzed. Patients: all patients over 18 years who died in a period of 6 consecutive months in 2011 were included. Interventions: analysis of the characteristics of patients through review of clinical histories. Results: we analyzed 210 patients who died. Withdrawing or withholding was identified in 63 (30%). 75% of the decisions consisted in withdraw therapeutic measures. Factors independently associated to withdrowing or withholding therapies were: an older age (OR 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.07), p = 0.001), a longer stay in ICU (OR 1.06 (95% CI 1, 02 - 1.11), p = 0.001), and the limitation for activities of daily living (OR 4.65 (95% CI 1.1 -19.6), p = 0.035). 70% of the decisions were recorded in the clinical history. The most frequently removed vital supports were: parenteral nutrition (100%), vasopressors (79%), enteral nutrition (64%) and antimicrobials (52%). Invasive mechanical ventilatory assistance was removed in 33% of the cases. Conclusions: one third of patients die with LSTL. These types of decisions are associated with a poor quality of life, an older age and a longer stay in the ICU. One third of LTSV decisions are not registered.


Introdução: a limitação do emprego de terapias de suporte vital (LTSV) é uma prática habitual e eticamente aceitada. Esta decisão está compreendida no conceito de adequação do esforço terapêutico. Objetivos: determinar a frequência, as normas de implementação e os fatores associados à LSTV nos pacientes falecidos em unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Conhecer a frequência e as características do registro deste processo no prontuário do paciente. Tipo de estudo: estudo observacional multicêntrico de corte transversal. Escopo: foram analisados os prontuários dos pacientes de 8 UCIs polivalentes públicas e privadas do Uruguai. Pacientes: foram incluídos todos os pacientes maiores de 18 anos falecidos em um período de 6 meses consecutivos em 2011. Intervenções: análise das características dos pacientes pela revisão dos prontuários dos pacientes. Resultados: analisamos 210 pacientes falecidos. Em 63 (30%) pacientes foi registrada a LTSV. 75% das decisões consistiam na retirada de medidas terapêuticas. Os fatores independentemente associados a LTSV foram: idade mais avançada (OR 1,04 (IC 95 % 1,01-1,07), p = 0,001), maior permanência na UCI (OR 1,06 (IC 95% 1,02 - 1,11), p = 0,001), e limitação para as atividades da vida diária (OR 4,65 (IC 95% 1,1 -19,6), p=0,035). 70% das diretivas LTSV foram registradas no prontuário do paciente. Os suportes vitais mais frequentemente retirados foram: nutrição parenteral (100%), vasopressores (79%), nutrição enteral (64%) e antimicrobianos (52%). A assistência ventilatória mecânica invasiva foi retirada em 33% dos casos. Conclusões: um terço dos pacientes falece com LTSV. Este tipo de decisão está associada à má qualidade de vida previa, idade mais avançada e maior permanência em UCI. Um terço das decisões de LTSV não é registrado.


Subject(s)
Terminal Care , Withholding Treatment , Decision Making , Intensive Care Units
15.
J. bras. nefrol ; 39(3): 312-322, July-Sept. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-893779

ABSTRACT

Abstract Renouncement of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a medical dilemma. This review covers the concept, the magnitude, the prognosis, and discusses strategies and management approaches about this subject in patients with CKD and AKI. Evidence suggests that refusal is more frequent and carries a more guarded prognosis than withdrawal of RRT. When RRT is not expected to be beneficial in terms of survival or quality of life, conservative treatment and palliative care are alternatives. We review the historical evolution of guidelines about renouncement of RRT and palliative care, and highlight the absence of specific recommendations in Brazil. However renouncement of RRT may be ethically and legally accepted in Brazil, as the right to a dignified death. Longer life expectancy, economic pressures, and greater awareness will require a more detailed discussion about indications and sustainable use of RRT, and possibly the elaboration of national guidelines.


Resumo A renúncia à terapia renal substitutiva (TRS) é um dilema. Essa revisão aborda o conceito, magnitude, prognóstico, estratégias e condutas sobre o tema, em pacientes com doença renal crônica e com injúria renal aguda. Evidências indicam ser a recusa mais comum e de prognóstico mais incerto do que a suspensão da TRS. Quando a TRS não agrega sobrevida ou qualidade de vida, o tratamento conservador com cuidados paliativos pode ser uma alternativa. A evolução das diretrizes sobre a renúncia à TRS e a instituição de cuidados paliativos é revista, com ressalva à ausência de tais recomendações no Brasil. Em certos casos, a renúncia à TRS pode ter sustentação ética e legal no país, amparada pelo direito à morte digna. A maior expectativa de vida e pressões econômicas exigem maior discussão sobre indicações e uso sustentável da TRS, demandando maior conscientização e, possivelmente, a elaboração de diretrizes nacionais sobre o tema.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Treatment Refusal , Renal Dialysis , Withholding Treatment , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic
16.
Mundo saúde (Impr.) ; 41(3): 385-394, maio, 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-999528

ABSTRACT

Current technological advancements have allowed for the prolongation of the dying process, especially in IntensiveCare Units (ICU). This has increased the need for decisions on the limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE), such as the useof palliative extubation that, although difficult from an emotional standpoint, has legal and ethical justifications, and hasincreased family acceptance. The objective was to evaluate the clinical and demographical profile of patients submittedto palliative extubation (PT) in the ICU of the University Hospital of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (HU/UFSC), Brazil. This was a historical cohort whose data were obtained from forms filled out by critical care doctors fromthe Hospital Death Commission at the HU/UFSC. Patients submitted to LTE that died between January 2011 andDecember 2014 were included in the study. The use of PT and clinical and epidemiological data were collected. LTEwas indicated in 374 (53.8%) patients, with 23 (6.1%) receiving PT. Average age of patients undergoing PT was 73.8years; 10 patients were over 60, and 9 were over 80 years of age. Ten (43.4%) patients had been previously in the ICU.The average time from checking in at the ICU and extubation was 4.4 days, and between extubation and death it was2.5 days. Neurological disease was the main cause of death of patients subjected to PT. All family members were awareof the extubation. Family members from 2 families witnessed the extubation. Morphine was the most common analgesicprescribed. It is concluded that patients submitted to PT were older, with neurological diseases, and the average timefrom extubation to death was 2.5 days


O desenvolvimento tecnológico do mundo atual tem permitido o prolongamento do morrer, principalmente em unidadesde terapia intensiva (UTI). Torna-se crescente a necessidade de decisões de limite de esforço terapêutico (LET), do qualse destaca a extubação paliativa (EP), que embora difícil de ser aceita do ponto de vista emocional, tem respaldo éticolegale aumenta a satisfação familiar. O estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o perfil clínico-demográfico dos pacientesextubados paliativamente (ExPl) na UTI do HU/UFSC. Trata-se de coorte histórico, cujos dados foram coletados atravésdas fichas preenchidas por médicos intensivistas que constituem a Comissão de Óbito da instituição. Foram incluídosos pacientes que morreram na UTI/HU/UFSC, após indicação de LET, entre janeiro/2011 e dezembro/2014. Foramselecionados os pacientes que foram ExPl, sendo anotados seus dados clínicos e epidemiológicos. LET foi apontado em374 (53,8%) pacientes, sendo 23 (6,1%) ExPl. A média da idade dos ExPl foi de 73,8 anos, 10 tinham mais de 60 e 9 maisde 80 anos. Dez (43,4%) pacientes já haviam sido internados previamente em UTI. O tempo médio entre a internaçãoextubaçãofoi 4,4 dias e entre extubação-morte foi de 2,5 dias. Doença neurológica foi a principal causa da morte dospacientes ExPl. Todos os familiares estavam cientes da EP. Familiares de 2 pacientes acompanharam a EP. Morfina foia medicação analgésica mais prescrita. Concluiu-se que os pacientes que foram ExPl eram mais idosos, acometidospreferencialmente por doenças neurológicas e o tempo médio entre a EP e óbito foi de 2,5 dias


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Palliative Care , Medical Futility , Terminally Ill , Withholding Treatment
17.
Child Health Nursing Research ; : 364-374, 2017.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-195010

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe feelings and actions of nurses following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from children being cared for by the nurses. METHODS: Data were collected by in-depth interviews with 7 nurses from different hospitals where children receiving nursing care had life-sustaining treatment withdrawn. The interviews were conducted from August 2016 to February 2017 when all data were saturated. Interviews lasted 30~90 minutes and were conducted 2~3 times per participant. Data were analyzed using Giorgi's phenomenological research methodology. RESULTS: The following factors constituted experiences of nurses working in pediatric wards when life-sustaining treatment was withdrawn from children: “agony and conflict in the aspects of care”, “heavy mind and regret for exhausting care”, “intentionally avoiding parents' sadness”, “comforting sadness in the heart” and “orientation in the role of caring for children undergoing withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.” CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that support systems and intervention programs need to be developed so that nurses can understand and wisely deal with experiences of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from children who receive care from nurses.


Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Nursing Care , Pediatric Nursing , Qualitative Research , Research Design , Withholding Treatment
18.
Journal of Bone Metabolism ; : 117-124, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-96446

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal changes of trabecular bone score (TBS) during and after bisphosphonate (BP) treatment in postmenopausal Korean women with osteoporosis. METHODS: We analyzed 191 patients who took BP and underwent bone mineral density (BMD) test for the period from January 2010 to December 2015. The mean follow up period during treatment and after treatment was 22.8 months and 18 months, respectively. The TBS and BMD values were evaluated by the percent changes relative to the baseline. RESULTS: In 191 patients, who treated with BPs, L-spine BMD increased 3.65±0.5% and TBS increased 0.26±0.4% from baseline during first 1 year. At 2 to 4 years, the changes of BMD and TBS from baseline gradually increased up to 9.3±3.25% and 2.69±0.98% and both results showed statistically significant correlation. In 86 patients who stopped BPs, L-spine BMD decreased -0.54±1.07% and TBS increased 0.33±1.96% from baseline during 3 years follow up period. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar spine TBS increase over time with BPs treatment although the changes were less than that of BMD. Also, it preserve for years after stopping treatment, as the changes of lumbar spine BMD. The results of BMD and TBS showed significant correlation during treatment but not during drug withdrawal.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Bone Density , Follow-Up Studies , Osteoporosis , Spine , Withholding Treatment
19.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 114(4): 298-304, ago. 2016. tab
Article in English, Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-838237

ABSTRACT

Introducción. La posibilidad de sostener artificialmente las funciones vitales hace más difícil diferenciar al paciente en agonía terminal del paciente con posibilidades de supervivencia, lo que pone al grupo que lo rodea frente a un dilema. Por un lado, se presenta la continuación de soporte que solo prolongue un proceso irreversible, que causa daños físicos, psíquicos y a su dignidad. Por otro, la abstención o retiro de soporte vital sin la reflexión y el esfuerzo diagnóstico-terapéutico apropiado puede dejar sin esperanza y llevar a la muerte a un niño potencialmente recuperable. Además, la toma de decisiones, en estas circunstancias, enfrenta diversas barreras que dificultan lograr el mejor interés del paciente. Entre ellas, los temores legales son un factor importante. ¿En qué medida esos temores están justificados? Objetivo. Explorar la opinión del Poder Judicial de la Nación respecto al enfoque que, desde el derecho, se da a situaciones de limitación de soporte vital. Población y métodos. Profesionales activos del ámbito penal, civil y médico forense. Encuesta semiestructurada sobre tres casos hipotéticos con decisiones sobre la limitación del soporte vital. Resultados. Se repartieron 185 encuestas; se contestaron 68 (36,76%) y 51 (30,3%) fueron respondidas en forma completa. No tipificaron ningún delito en ninguno de los tres casos 28 (55%) encuestados. Trece (25%) interpretaron como delitos las decisiones de los tres casos; 6 (12%), alguno de los casos; y 4 (8%), 2 de los 3 casos. Los delitos seleccionados por los encuestados incluyeron homicidio doloso, homicidio culposo y abandono de persona. Conclusiones. El 45% de los encuestados consideraron que hubo alguna forma de delito en las decisiones tomadas.


Introduction. The possibility of sustaining life functions makes it difficult to distinguish between a dying patient and a patient with chances of survival, raising a dilemma for everyone around them. On the one side, continuing with life support techniques that would only extend an irreversible process and result in physical and psychological damage and harm their dignity. On the other side, withholding or withdrawing life support without an adequate reflection and diagnostic-therapeutic effort which may lead to the death of a potentially recoverable child. In addition, making decisions in this context implies facing barriers that hinder the possibility of pursuing the patient's best interest. Among such barriers, the fear of litigation plays a major role. To what extent is this fear justified? Objective. To explore the opinions of the members of the National Judiciary regarding the approach to withholding or withdrawing of life support from a legal stance. Population and methods. Professionals working in the criminal, civil and forensic medicine settings. Semistructured survey on three hypothetical case histories that implied making a decision to withhold or withdraw life support. Results. One hundred and eighty-five surveys were distributed; 68 (36.76%) were partially completed and 51 (30.3%), in full. Twenty-eight (55%) survey respondents did not criminalize any of the three cases presented. Thirteen (25%) respondents considered that the decisions made in the three cases constituted a crime; 6 (12%), only in one case; and 4 (8%), in two out of the three. Crimes described by survey respondents included intentional homicide, wrongful death, and failure to render assistance. Conclusions. Forty-five percent of survey respondents considered that decisions made involved some form of crime.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Pediatrics/legislation & jurisprudence , Attitude to Death , Withholding Treatment/legislation & jurisprudence , Life Support Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Argentina , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Care Surveys
20.
Rev. méd. Minas Gerais ; 26: [1-5], jan.-dez. 2016.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1009052

ABSTRACT

Apesar dos grandes avanços ocorridos, nos últimos anos, no cuidado intensivo neonatal, recém-nascidos pretermo com idade gestacional abaixo de 25 semanas ainda apresentam altos índices de mortalidade e morbidade, de tal forma que familiares e médicos enfrentam dificuldades para decidir a respeito da instituição e/ou continuação da reanimação desses bebês. Trata-se, portanto, de um problema ético/moral complexo com profundo impacto na vida dos recém-nascidos pretermo (RNPT) sobreviventes e dos seus familiares, além das implicações para o sistema de saúde e a sociedade. O presente trabalho pretende discutir alguns aspectos éticos que possam contribuir para o debate contemporâneo a respeito da decisão de reanimar ou não RNPT extremos.


Despite recent advances in neonatal intensive care, prematures born at less than 25 weeks gestation have high rates of morbidity and mortality. Parents and doctors face difficult decisions concerning instituting and/ or continuing resuscitation and intensive care of these babies. This is, therefore, a complex ethical/moral problem with a strong impact on the lives of the surviving prematures and their families, as well as for the health care system and society. This paper will discuss some ethical issues that may contribute to the contemporary debate about the decision to resuscitate or not extreme preterm infants.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant Mortality , Bioethics , Infant, Premature , Parturition , Ethics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL