Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
1.
Rev. colomb. cir ; 39(2): 260-267, 20240220. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1532615

ABSTRACT

Introducción. La fístula pancreática postoperatoria es una de las complicaciones más importantes en la cirugía hepatobiliopancreática. Su diagnóstico se hace mediante la presencia de un nivel de amilasa en el líquido de drenaje al menos tres veces por encima del valor de la amilasa en suero a partir del tercer día postoperatorio. El objetivo de este estudio fue caracterizar los pacientes con fístula pancreática postoperatoria en nuestra institución, evaluando la importancia de la detección temprana y el establecimiento de un manejo oportuno. Métodos. Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, que incluyó los pacientes sometidos a pancreatoduodenectomía, con diagnóstico de fístula pancreática postoperatoria como complicación de cirugía hepatobiliopancreática, en el Hospital Internacional de Colombia, en Piedecuesta, entre enero del 2017 y diciembre de 2020. Se excluyeron los pacientes con otro tipo procedimiento quirúrgico y aquellos que decidieron no participar en el estudio. Resultados. Se evaluaron 69 pacientes, con un predominio del sexo femenino (n=38; 55,1 %) y mediana de la edad de 57 años. El 33,3 % (n=24) de los pacientes intervenidos desarrollaron fístula pancreática postoperatoria, siendo el 23,2 % fuga bioquímica, grado B 8,7 % y grado C 2,9 %, para quienes se indicaron manejo expectante, control ecográfico y reintervención, respectivamente. Fallecieron 5 pacientes (7,2 %). Conclusiones. La fístula pancreáticapostoperatoria es una complicación para tener en cuenta en todos los pacientes sometidos a pancreatoduodenectomía. Existen estrategias que pueden permitir disminuir la incidencia de esta complicación, con el fin de mejorar el desenlace, el pronóstico y la morbilidad posquirúrgica.


Introduction. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is one of the most important complications in hepatobiliopancreatic surgery. Its diagnosis is made by the presence of an amylase level in the drainage fluid at least three times above the serum amylase value from the third postoperative day. The objective of this study was to characterize patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula at our institution, evaluating the importance of early detection and to establish a timely management. Methods. Descriptive, retrospective study that included patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with a diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula as a complication of hepatobiliopancreatic surgery at the Hospital Internacional Colombia, between January 2017 and December 2020. Patients with another type of procedure performed by this specialty and those who did not decide to participate in the study were excluded. Results. A total of 69 patients were included, the median age was 57 years with a predominance of females (n=38; 55.1%). 33.3% (n=24) of the operated patients developed postoperative pancreatic fistula, with 23.2% having a biochemical leak, grade B in 8.7% and grade C in 2.9%, for whom expectant management, ultrasound control and reintervention were indicated, respectively. Five patients died (7.2%). Conclusions. Pancreatic fistula is a complication to take into account in all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. There are strategies that can reduce the incidence of this complication and thus improve not only the outcome but also the prognosis and postoperative morbidity.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pancreas , Pancreatic Fistula , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Postoperative Complications , Pancreaticoduodenectomy
2.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 75(2)abr. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1441461

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La pancreatoduodenectomía de urgencia (PDDU) es una cirugía reservada para lesiones graves pancreatoduodenales secundarias a trauma, lesiones inflamatorias o posterior a procedimientos endoscópicos. Objetivo: Describir dos casos clínicos en los que se realizó PDDU. Casos Clínicos: Se reportan 2 casos clínicos en los cuales se requirió una PDD. En el primer caso secundario a úlcera duodenal perforada que comprometía más del 50% del lumen asociado a biliperitoneo y fistula duodenal sin control; y en el segundo, a consecuencia de un trauma por herida de bala con perforación duodenal, íleon distal y desgarro de 1,5 cm en cabeza de páncreas. Discusión: En la actualidad no existe un consenso sobre las indicaciones de PPDU, sin embargo esta compleja cirugía representa una opción de tratamiento en pacientes bien seleccionados, cuando la cirugía de control de daños y los intentos de controlar la necrosis y fistulas duodenales han fracasado. Conclusión: El tratamiento de una lesión pancreática y duodenal compleja puede requerir PDDU. Sin embargo, en pacientes inestables se debe considerar una cirugía en dos tiempos por un equipo de cirujanos experimentados.


Introduction: Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (UPDD) is a surgery reserved for severe pancreaticoduodenal injuries secondary to trauma, inflammatory injuries or after endoscopic procedures. Aim: To describe two clinical cases in which PDDU was performed. Clinical Cases: 2 clinical cases are reported in which a PDDU was required. The first case was secondary to a perforated duodenal ulcer that compromised more than 50% of the lumen associated with biliperitoneum uncontrolled duodenal fistula; in the second one, as a consequence of a gunshot wound trauma with duodenal perforation, distal ileum and a 1.5 cm tear in the head of pancreas. Discussion: Currently there is no consensus on the indications for UPDD, however this complex surgery represents a treatment option in well-selected patients, when damage control surgery and attempts to control necrosis and duodenal fistulas have failed. Conclusión: Treatment of a complex pancreatic and duodenal injury may require pancreatoduodenectomy. However, in unstable patients, a two-stage surgery should be considered by an experienced surgical team.

3.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 74(4): 339-344, ago. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1407935

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: Los tumores periampulares se definen como lesiones ubicadas en un radio de 2 cm alrededor de la ampolla de Vater, constituidos por 4 tipos de neoplasias con una alta tasa de malignidad que pueden originarse en páncreas, ampolla, vía biliar distal o duodeno. El manejo quirúrgico a través de la pancreatoduodenectomía sigue siendo la mejor elección en términos de resección curativa. Objetivo: Caracterizar los tumores peri-ampulares tratados en nuestra institución y que fueron llevados a pancreatoduodenectomía, asociando la relación entre tipo de tumor y complicaciones posoperatorias. Material y Método: Estudio transversal, retrospectivo y observacional con seguimiento a 45 pacientes sometidos a pancreatoduodenectomía en el Hospital Internacional de Colombia - Fundación Cardiovascular entre enero de 2011 y marzo de 2020 con diagnostico histopatológico de tumor peri-ampular. Resultados: Se realizaron 75 pancreatoduodenectomía de las cuales 45 pacientes presentaron tumor peri-ampular, siendo de origen pancreático en un 44%, seguido de ampolla 40%, vía biliar distal 8,8% y duodenal 6,6%. Las complicaciones posoperatorias más frecuentes fueron fístula pancreática y vaciamiento gástrico retardado. Falleció 1 paciente. Conclusión: La pancreatoduodenectomía es un procedimiento con alta morbilidad. Gracias al avance tecnológico, el diagnóstico de patología peri ampular es cada vez más exacto. El tipo de tumor peri-ampular puede influir no solo en su pronóstico, sino también en su morbilidad posquirúrgica.


Introduction: Periampullary tumors are defined as lesions that are located in a radius of 2 centimeters around the ampulla of Vater, constituted by 4 types of neoplasms with a high rate of malignancy originated in the pancreas, ampulla, distal bile duct or duodenum. Surgical management through the pancreatoduodenectomy remains the best choice in terms of curative resection. Objetive: To characterize periampullary tumors treated in our institution with pancreatoduodenectomy, associating the relationship between tumor type and postoperative complications. Material and Method: Cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study with a follow-up of 45 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in the Hospital Internacional de Colombia - Fundación Cardiovascular between January 2011 and March 2020 with histopathological diagnosis of periampullary tumor. Results: Were performed 75 pancreatoduodenectomies, 45 patients presented with Periampullary tumor, 44% being of pancreatic origin, followed by ampulla 40%, distal bile duct 8.8% and duodenal 6.6%. Most frequent postoperative complications were pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying. Mortality was of 1 patient. Conclusión: Pancreatoduodenectomy is a procedure with a high morbidity rate. Thanks to technological advances, the diagnosis of periampullary pathology is increasingly accurate. The type of periampullary tumor may influence not only in its prognosis, but also in its post-surgical morbidity.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Abdominal Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects
4.
Rev. colomb. anestesiol ; 49(2): e200, Apr.-June 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1251497

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Patient reported outcomes establish the patient's own perception about his/her health and enable the development of policies designed to improve health/disease processes. These are particularly helpful in the case of diseases with a significant impact on the patient's quality of life. Objective To compare the quality of life scores assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire in patients undergoing cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (Whipple procedure) and laparoscopic cholecystectomies in the same hospital. Methodology Retrospective cohort trial between July 2018 and February 2020. Patients programmed for cephalic duodenopancreatectomy were included, regardless of the type of pathology, and over 18 years old. Patients with carcinomatosis or vascular infiltration were excluded. The EQ-5D-5L was administered following Whipple surgery and compared against a control group (laparoscopic cholecystectomy). The demographic characteristics, the diagnosis, hospital stay and 60-day mortality were assessed. Results A total of 68 patients were included. The most frequent diagnosis was pancreatic cancer (30 %) in the Whipple group and lithiasis (100 %) in the control group. In the five dimensions assessed, there were no differences in terms of mobility (OR: 0.41, 95 % CI [0.30-0.57], p = 0.103) and in terms of personal care (OR: 0.42, 95 % CI [0.32-0.58], p = 0.254). There was a difference in daily life activities (OR: 0.38, 95 % CI [0.27-0.54], p = 0.017), pain/malaise (OR: 2.33, 95 % CI [0.99-5.48]), p = 0.013 and anxiety/depression (OR: 0.39, 95 % CI [0.28-0.55], p = 0.019). The overall health perception was 80 points for Whipple (IQR 60-90) vs. 100 points for the control group (IQR 90-100). Conclusions Patients undergoing a Whipple procedure experience a health perception slightly lower than patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This difference may be associated with increased pain, anxiety/depression and a reduction in their activities of daily life. The administration of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire to measure quality of life is a friendly tool that used be used routinely to plan activities aimed at improving medical care.


Resumen Introducción Los desenlaces informados por el paciente permiten establecer cuál es la percepción que tiene de su salud y crear políticas que mejoren procesos en salud/enfermedad. Son particularmente útiles en enfermedad que afectan la calidad de vida de forma importante. Objetivo Comparar las puntuaciones de calidad de vida evaluadas mediante el cuestionario EQ-5D-5L en pacientes sometidos a duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (procedimiento de Whipple) y colecistectomías laparoscópicas en el mismo centro hospitalario. Metodología Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo entre julio de 2018 y febrero de 2020. Se incluyeron pacientes programados para duodenopancreatectomía cefálica independientemente del tipo de patología y mayor de 18 años de edad; se excluyeron pacientes con carcinomatosis o infiltración vascular. Se aplicó el cuestionario EQ-5D-5L después de cirugía Whipple y se comparó con un grupo control (colecistectomía laparoscópica). Se evaluaron características demográficas, diagnóstico, estancia hospitalaria y mortalidad a 60 días. Resultados Se incluyeron 68 pacientes. El diagnóstico más frecuente fue cáncer de páncreas (30 %) en el grupo Whipple y litiasis (100 %) en el grupo control. En las 5 dimensiones evaluadas no hubo diferencias en movilidad (OR: 0,41, IC 95 % [0,30-0,57], p = 0,103) y en cuidado personal (OR: 0,42, IC 95 % [0,32-0,58], p = 0,254). Se encontró diferencia en actividades cotidianas (OR: 0,38, IC 95 % [0,270,54], p = 0,017), dolor/malestar (OR: 2,33, IC 95 % [0,99-5,48]), p = 0,013 y angustia/depresión (OR: 0,39, IC 95 % [0,28-0,55], p = 0,019). La percepción general de salud fue 80 puntos para Whipple (RIQ60-90) vs. 100 puntos para el grupo control (RIC 90-100). Conclusiones Los pacientes sometidos a Whipple presentan una percepción de salud ligeramente menor que los pacientes de colecistectomía laparoscópica. Esta diferencia puede estar relacionada con el aumento en dolor, angustia/depresión y disminución en actividades cotidianas. La aplicación del cuestionario EQ-5D-5L para medición de calidad de vida es una herramienta fácil de aplicar que debería realizarse rutinariamente para planear intervenciones dirigidas a mejorar la atención médica.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Intraoperative Complications , Morbidity Surveys , Surveys and Questionnaires , Morbidity
5.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 73(2): 212-216, abr. 2021. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388798

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción Los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal (GIST) corresponden al 1% de todas las neoplasias gastrointestinales, sin embargo, sólo el 3-5% de estos se desarrollan en el duodeno. Objetivo Reportar el caso de un paciente masculino con localización atípica de un tumor de estroma gastrointestinal y su manejo. Caso clínico paciente masculino de 50 años con antecedente de traumatismo encefalo craneano (TEC) con daño orgánico cerebral secundario, tabaquismo, consumidor de alcohol ocasional y sometido a quistectomía branquial en la infancia, que consulta en el servicio de urgencias por cuadro de hemorragia digestiva alta con compromiso hemodinámico. Tras realizar endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA), resonancia nuclear magnética (RNM) y tomografía computada (TC) de abdomen, se pesquisa masa tumoral en segunda porción de duodenal. Discusión A pesar de que la presentación clínica de los GIST es variable, lo más frecuente es que sean pacientes asintomáticos. En algunas ocasiones, al igual que en este reporte, pueden presentarse con dolor abdominal y/o hemorragia digestiva alta. El diagnóstico preoperatorio fue difícil ya que el estudio con imágenes (TC, RNM, EDA) sólo permite establecer la sospecha; el diagnóstico definitivo se realizó con biopsia (no contamos con endosonografía en nuestro centro). Debido a los sitios de reparo anatómico, no existe una cirugía estandarizada; en este caso, debido a la localización, infiltración y características, se decidió realizar una pancreatoduodenectomía.


Introduction Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), corresponds to 1%, of all gastrointestinal neoplasms, however, only 3%-5% developed in duodenum. Aim To report a case of a male patient with atypical location of gastrointestinal stroma tumor and the treatment proposed. Case report 50-year-old male patient, with medical history of organic brain damage secondary a traumatic brain injury, smoker, occasional alcohol consumer and branquial cystomy during childhood. Consulted in the emergency department for a high digestive hemorrhage case with hemodynamic compromise. Upper digestive endoscopy, computed tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance were performed, which impresses tumor-like lesion in the second duodenal portion. Discussion Although the GIST clinical presentation is variable, most often they are asymptomatic patients. In some times, as in this report, they may present with abdominal pain and/or upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The preoperative diagnosis was difficult, because the imaging study (CT, RNM, EDA) only stablished the suspicion and the final diagnosis was made by biopsy (we don't have endosonography in our center). Due to the anatomic repair, there is not a standardized surgery, in this case, due tumor location, infiltration and characteristics, it was decided to perform a pancreatoduodenectomy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/complications , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications
6.
Rev. guatemalteca cir ; 27(1): 3-9, 2021. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIGCSA | ID: biblio-1381549

ABSTRACT

La operación de Whipple es el procedimiento quirúrgico de mayor complejidad en cirugía abdominal, este se realiza en pacientes con tumores de la encrucijada pancreatoduodenal, es la única alternativa para tratamiento curativo en fases tempranas de la enfermedad. Objetivo: Determinar los resultados del procedimiento Whipple, en pacientes intervenidos con tumores de la encrucijada pancreatoduodenal en el Hospital General de Enfermedades del Instituto Guatemalteco de Seguridad Social, en el periodo de enero 2,015 a enero 2,020. Método: Descriptivo, observacional, retrospectivo. Resultados: Se incluyeron 42 procedimientos de Whipple, 29 (69%) casos del género masculino y 13 (31%) para el género femenino. La edad media fue de 61.5 años, el 54% presentaban comorbilidad asociada. El 24% utilizo transfusión transoperatoria de hemoderivados, el tiempo quirúrgico de 5.5 horas. La reintervención fue del 4.7%. Complicaciones postoperatorias tempranas 18%. La histología más común fue el carcinoma de cabeza de páncreas en el 43%. La mortalidad postoperatoria temprana fue del 4.7%. El OR de complicaciones asociadas a comorbilidades fue de 1.7 con un IC 0.3046-7.20 y un valor de P: 0.9251 que no es estadísticamente significativo. Conclusiones: Los tumores pancreatoduodenales en nuestra población se presentan en edades más tempranas a lo reportado. La morbimortalidad es similar a lo reportado en otros estudios a nivel latinoamericano, sin embargo las complicaciones están más elevadas que las mejores series internacionales. No existe asociación entre el riesgo de complicaciones con comorbilidades del paciente. (AU)


Whipple operation is the most complex surgical procedure in abdominal surgery, it's performed in patients with tumors of the pancreaticoduodenal crossroads, it is the only alternative for curative treatment in early stages of the disease. Objective: To determine the results of the Whipple procedure in patients operated on with tumors of the ancreaticoduodenal crossroads at the Hospital General de Enfermedades del IGSS in the period from January 2015 to January 2020. Method: Descriptive, observational, retrospective. Results: fourtytwo Whipple procedures were included, 29 (69%) cases of the male gender and 13 (31%) for the female gender. The mean age was 61.5 years, 54% had associated comorbidity. Twentyfour percent used intraoperative transfusion of blood products and surgical time of 5.5 hours. Reoperation was 4.7% with early postoperative complications of 18%. The most common histology was carcinoma of the head of the pancreas in 43%. Early postoperative mortality was 4.7%. The OR of complications associated with comorbidities was 1.7 with a CI 0.3046-7.20 and a P value: 0.9251, which is not statistically significant. Conclusions: Pancreaticoduodenal tumors in our population present at an earlier age than reported. Morbidity and mortality is similar to that reported in other studies. There is no association between the risk of complications with patient comorbidities. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/mortality , Adenoma, Islet Cell/surgery , Pancreatitis/surgery , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis
7.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 72(3): 257-261, jun. 2020. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1115552

ABSTRACT

Resumen El cáncer gástrico es una patología de alta incidencia en Chile. Afortunadamente es baja la incidencia de márgenes R1 cuando se realiza una cirugía con intención curativa. Al tener un tumor subcardial o cardial es perentorio realizar una biopsia rápida (intraoperatoria), en caso que ésta resulte positiva, es difícil tomar una decisión sobre qué realizar a continuación, ya que el realizar una esofagoyeyunoanastomosis intratorácica aumenta el riesgo quirúrgico. Para esto, es de suma importancia tener la información de las características histopatológicas del tumor, el riesgo de filtración, la recurrencia, la sobrevida, las terapias adyuvantes y la realidad país. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura con el fin de poder guiar la toma de decisiones.


Gastric cancer is a pathology with a high incidence in Chile, fortunately, the incidence of R1 margins is low when performing surgery with curative intent. When having a sub cardial or cardial tumor, it is essential to perform a rapid (intraoperative) biopsy, if this is positive when cutting the esophagus just under the pillars, it is difficult to make the decision of what to do next, since performing an inthrathoracic esophagojejunostomy increases the surgical risk. For this, it is very important to have information about the histopathological characteristics of the tumor, the leakage risk, there currence, the survival, the adjuvant therapies and the reality of the country. A review of the literature was done in order to guide the decisions.


Subject(s)
Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Biopsy/methods , Margins of Excision , Recurrence , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Gastrectomy/methods , Intraoperative Period
8.
Rev. colomb. anestesiol ; 47(4): 219-225, Oct-Dec. 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1042732

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background: The administration of perioperative fluids is a controversial issue that can be associated with the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after Whipple procedure. Objective: To evaluate whether intraoperative fluid management along with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols affect outcomes following major pancreatic resection. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2012 to January 2017, collecting all patients scheduled for duodenopancreatectomy (DP). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the use of ERAS protocols and the use of a fluid therapy algorithm. Results: A total of 67 patients were analyzed, 49.3% of which were females. The most frequent diagnoses were Pancreatic Cancer n:48 (71.6%), followed by intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm n:6 (9%). The majority of patients were in the ERAS group n:46 (68.7%); 80.4% and 95.7% of them did not develop pancreatic fistula or delayed gastric emptying (DGE) respectively, and the incidence for both was 11.94%. Fluid therapy was below 5000 mL (P=0.001) with blood loss less 300 mL (P = 0.001) in the ERAS group. The length of stay was shorter in the ERAS group (7 days, interquartilel range 5-12, P < 0.001). No differences in 30 days mortality were found. Conclusion: The implementation of ERAS protocols in DP did show a decrease in intraoperative blood loss, intravenous fluids therapy, need for transfusion, DGE, or total hospital stay. However, intraoperative fluid restriction in DP did not show a reduction in the development of POPF.


Resumen Introducción: La administración de fluidos durante el perioperatorio es un tema controvertido que puede asociarse a complicaciones como la fístula pancreática después de realizar el procedimiento de Whipple. Objetivo: Evaluar si los protocolos de manejo de líquidos dentro de las recomendaciones de recuperación acelerada después de cirugía (ERAS) afectan los desenlaces después de intervención pancreática mayor. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo entre enero de 2012 y enero de 2017. Se recopilaron todos los pacientes a quienes se les practicó duodenopancreatectomía. Se dividieron en dos grupos según el uso de protocolos ERAS y el uso de algoritmos para terapia hídrica. Resultados: Se analizaron 67 pacientes, el 49,3% correspondió al sexo femenino. Los diagnósticos más frecuentes fueron cáncer de páncreas n: 48 (71,6%), seguido de neoplasia mucinosa papilar intraductal n: 6 (9%). La mayoría de los pacientes se encontraban en el Grupo ERAS n:46(68,7%).En dicho grupo, el 80,4% y el 95,7% no desarrollaron fístula pancreática o retraso del vaciamiento gástrico y la incidencia fue del 11,94%, respectivamente. La terapia hídrica estuvo por debajo de 5000 ml (p = 0,001) con una pérdida sanguínea inferior a 300 ml (p=0,001) en el grupo ERAS. La estancia hospitalaria fue más corta en el grupo ERAS (7 días, rango intercuartil [RIC] 5-12, p =<0,001). No hubo diferencias en la mortalidad a 30 días. Conclusión: La implementación de protocolos ERAS en la duodenopancreatectomía mostró una menor pérdida sanguínea, menor terapia hídrica, menor necesidad de transfusión, menor retraso del vaciamiento gástrico y menor estancia hospitalaria. Sin embargo, la terapia hídrica restrictiva no redujo el desarrollo de fístula pancreática postoperatoria.


Subject(s)
Humans , Postoperative Complications , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Fluid Therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Cohort Studies , Mortality , Pancreatic Fistula , Guidelines as Topic , Gastric Emptying , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Length of Stay , Neoplasms
9.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 71(3): 261-265, jun. 2019. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058267

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los carcinomas adenoneuroendocrinos mixtos (MANEC) son tipos de tumores bifásicos, reconocidos morfológicamente ante la presencia de una formación neoplásica constituida de manera simultánea por epitelio glandular y células neuroendocrinas. Dentro del tracto gastrointestinal, estas neoplasias predominan en el estómago o el colon. Solo 19 casos localizados en la ampolla de Vater han sido reportados por la literatura. OBJETIVO: Reportar un caso de MANEC; revisar la epidemiología, pronóstico y tratamiento de estos tumores. MATERIALES Y MÉTODO: Presentación de caso clínico de una paciente con diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma neuroendocrino mixto de la región ampular. DISCUSIÓN: La presentación clínica, el manejo y el pronóstico son similares al del adenocarcinoma ampular. Se diagnostican con el examen histopatológico de la muestra resecada. Ambos componentes deben ser histológicamente malignos, y cada uno de ellos debe representar al menos el 30% de la lesión. CONCLUSIÓN: Los MANEC ampulares son tumores poco comunes a nivel mundial, siendo éste el primer caso reportado en nuestro instituto.


INTRODUCTION: Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) are types of biphasic tumors, morphologically recognized in the presence of a neoplastic formation constituted simultaneously by glandular epithelium and neuroendocrine cells. Only 19 cases located in the ampulla of Vater have been reported in the literature. Within the gastrointestinal tract, these neoplasms predominate in the stomach or colon. AIM: Report a case of MANEC; review of the epidemiology, prognosis and treatment of these tumors. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Case presentation of a patient diagnosed with mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ampullary region. DISCUSSION: The clinical presentation, management and prognosis are similar to ampullary adenocarcinoma. These tumors are diagnosed with a histopathological examination of the resected specimen. Both components must be histologically malignant, and each of them must represent at least 30% of the lesion. CONCLUSION: MANEC of the ampulla are rare tumors worldwide, being this case the first reported in our institute.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Ampulla of Vater/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/surgery , Ampulla of Vater/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/diagnostic imaging
10.
Rev. chil. cir ; 70(4): 329-335, ago. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-959391

ABSTRACT

Resumen Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de reingreso hospitalario y sus factores asociados en pacientes sometidos a resecciones hepáticas o pancreáticas en nuestro centro. Metodología: Se revisaron registros de pacientes sometidos a resecciones hepáticas o pancreáticas entre 2012 y 2014. Se registraron variables biodemográficas, quirúrgicas y reingresos hasta 30 días posalta. Se excluyó la cirugía de urgencia, pacientes fallecidos durante la hospitalización, pacientes sometidos a resecciones hepáticas menores a dos segmentos, cirugías no anatómicas o cirugía no resectiva. El análisis estadístico univariable se realizó con prueba χ2 para variables categóricas y T Student/Mann Whitney para variables continuas. El análisis multivariable se realizó con regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyeron 116 pacientes, 50,9% mujeres. La estadía promedio fue de 14 días. El adenocarcinoma pancreático fue el diagnóstico más frecuente (25,9%) y 40,5% de los procedimientos quirúrgicos fueron pancreatoduodenectomías. La tasa de reingreso global fue 18,1%, mayor en pancreatectomías respecto a hepatectomías (23,7 vs 12,2% respectivamente p < 0,05). Los factores asociados a reingreso fueron: resección de páncreas, leucocitos preoperatorios, complicaciones posoperatorias y tiempo de estadía hospitalaria. Tras el análisis multivariable, sólo el tiempo hospitalario se asocia de forma independiente al reingreso precoz [OR 1,2 IC 95% 1,1-1,5 (p = 0,001)]. Conclusión: La estadía hospitalaria prolongada es un factor de riesgo consistente en la literatura para la rehospitalización posterior a resecciones hepáticas o pancreáticas. La tasa de reingreso posterior a resecciones hepáticas o pancreáticas es elevada, incluso en centros de alto volumen. Recomendamos el uso de este parámetro como un nuevo instrumento de medición de calidad en los resultados quirúrgicos en nuestro país.


Aim: To determine readmission rates and its associated factors in patients undergoing pancreatic and hepatic resections at our center. Matherial and Methods: Perioperative variables of patients undergoing pancreatic and hepatic resections between 2012-2014 were reviewed. Demographic and perioepartive data, as well as up —to postoperative day 30— readmisson rates were analyzed. Emergency cases, postoperative mortality and/or patients undergoing less extensive surgery (less than 2 Couinaud's segments, non-anatomical resections and non resective cases such as bilioenteric anastomoses) were excluded. Readmission associated factors were identified using both univariate (χ2 for categorical and t-student's/Mann-Whitney for continuous variables) and multivariate (logistic regression) analysis. Results: 116 cases were included, 50.9 % female. Mean postoperative stay was 14 days. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was the most frequent diagnosis (25.9%), and the 40.5% of surgical procedures were pancreaticoduodenectomy. Overall 30-day readmission rate was 18.1%, with a 23.7% for pancreatic resections and 12.2% for hepatic resections. According to univariate analysis; readmission associated factors were: pancreatic resection, preoperative White cell count, the development of postoperative complications and postoperative length of stay. On Multivariate analysis only postoperative stay was the only significant associate factor [OR 1,2 CI 95% 1.1- 1.5 (p = 0.001)]. Conclussion: Readmission rates after pancreatic and hepatic resections are elevated, even in high-volume centers. Postoperative length of stay is a consistent risk factor for readmission after these type of surgeries. We highly recommend including this parameter as a quality marker of our surgical results in our country.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pancreatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Hepatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Factors , Hepatectomy/adverse effects
11.
Rev. chil. cir ; 70(2): 133-139, 2018. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-959361

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: La pancreatoduodenectomía es una cirugía compleja, con cifras de morbilidad cercanas a 30% y mortalidad entre 1 a 5%. El principal factor responsable de morbilidad y mortalidad es la fístula pancreática posoperatoria (FPPO). En la actualidad no existe una técnica universalmente estandarizada para la reconstrucción pancreática. Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia de FPPO clínicamente relevante en una serie de pacientes en los que se realizó reconstrucción pancreática con pancreatoyeyunoanasto- mosis con técnica de Blumgart modificada para reconstrucción post-pancreatoduodenectomía en Hospital Hernán Henríquez Aravena entre los años 2014-2017. Material y Método: Serie de casos con seguimiento de julio de 2014 a abril de 2017. Se incluyeron pacientes a quienes se realizó reconstrucción pancreática con técnica de Blumgart modificada. La modificación consistió en el uso de pledgets® (poli-tetrafluoro- etileno) en los puntos iniciales en el páncreas con la idea de disminuir la posibilidad de desgarro del tejido. Se excluyeron pacientes a quienes se realizó otra técnica de reconstrucción. Se consideró FPPO clínicamente relevante (grado B/C) para evaluar morbilidad. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva con medidas de tendencia central y dispersión. Resultados: Serie de casos de 12 pacientes, 9 (75%) de género femenino y 3 (25%) de género masculino. La edad promedio fue de 59 ± 8,5 años. La morbilidad fue de 25% y la tasa de fístula grado B/C fue 0%. Todas las fístulas pancreáticas fueron grado A (33,3%), sin relevancia clínica. Conclusión: La técnica de Blumgart modificada parece ser una técnica segura y reproducible para pancreato-yeyuyoanastomosis.


Introduction: Pancreatoduodenectomy is a complex surgery, with morbidity close to 30% and mortality between 1% and 5%. The main contributing factor to morbidity and mortality is postoperative pancrea- tic fistula (POPF). At present, there is no globally standardized technique for pancreatic reconstruction. Aim: To determine the prevalence of clinically relevant POPF in a sample of patients who underwent pancreaticojejunal anastomosis reconstruction with Blumgart's modified technique for post-pancreato- duodenectomy reconstruction at Hospital Hernán Henríquez Aravena between 2014 and 2017. Material and Method: Case series with follow-up from july 2014 to april 2017. Patients who underwent pancreatic reconstruction with Blumgart's modified technique were included. The modification consisted of the use of Pledgets® (poly-tetrafluoro-ethylene) at the inicial points in páncreas with the idea of reducing the possibility of tissue tearing. We excluded patients who underwent another reconstruction technique. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B/C) was considered to asses morbidity. Descriptive statistics were used with measures of central tendency and dispersion. Results: Case series of 12 patients, 9 (75%) were female and 3 (25%) were male. The mean age was 59 ± 8.5 years. The morbidity was 25% and the rate of grade B/C fistula was 0%. All pancreatic fistulas were grade A, not clinically relevant. Conclusion: The Blumgart's modified technique seems to be a safe and reproducible technique for pancreticojejunal anastomosis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Pancreaticojejunostomy/adverse effects , Pancreatic Fistula/epidemiology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Pancreaticojejunostomy/methods , Prevalence , Suture Techniques , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Risk Assessment , Plastic Surgery Procedures
12.
ABCD (São Paulo, Impr.) ; 31(1): e1345, 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-885761

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: The value of drain amylase on the first postoperative day after pancreatic resections has been described as an efficient predictor of pancreatic fistula. In spite of this, the cut-off point below which the drains can be removed early remains controversial. Aim: Validate the use of the amylase on the 1st postoperative day in the correlation with pancreatic fistula and define the value at which early drain removal is safe. Method: Were included patients undergoing Whipple surgery in the period of 2007 to 2016. Group 1 enrolled the ones who did not develop fistula and those who developed biochemical fistula for less than seven days postoperatively and group 2 included patients who developed persistent biochemical fistula between seven and 21 days and those with grade B and C fistula. Results: Sixty-one patients were included, 41 comprised group 1 and 20 group 2. The incidence of abdominal collections, need for reoperation and time of hospitalization were for group 1 and 2, respectively: 17.1%, 17.1% and 9.5 days, and 65%, 40% and 21.1 days. The median of the amylase from the drain at 1st postoperative day was in group 1 and 2, respectively: 175 U/l and 3172.5 U/l (p=0.001). Using a cut-off of 180 to predict the group to which the patient would belong there was obtained sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 100%, 48.8%, 50% and 100% respectively. Conclusion: It was validated the cut-off value of 180 U/l as appropriate to early drain removal.


RESUMO Racional: O valor da amilase do dreno no primeiro dia pós-operatório após ressecções pancreáticas é descrito como eficiente preditor de fístula pancreática. Entretanto, o valor abaixo do qual os drenos podem ser removidos precocemente permanece controverso. Objetivo: Validar o uso da amilase do primeiro dia pós-operatório na correlação com a fístula pancreática e definir o valor em que seja segura a retirada precoce do dreno. Método: Foram incluídos pacientes submetidos à operação de Whipple no período de 2007 a 2016. No grupo 1 entraram os que não desenvolveram fístula e os que desenvolveram fístula bioquímica por menos de sete dias de pós-operatório e no grupo 2 os que desenvolveram fístula bioquímica persistente entre 7 e 21 dias e aqueles com fístula grau B e C. Resultados: Sessenta e um pacientes foram incluídos, sendo 41 do grupo 1 e 20 do grupo 2. A incidência de coleções abdominais, necessidade de reoperação e tempo de internação foram para o grupo 1 e 2, respectivamente 17,1%, 17,1% e 9,5 dias, e 65%, 40% e 21,1 dias. A mediana da amilase no grupo 1 e 2, respectivamente foi de 175 U/l e 3172,5 U/l (p=0,001). Utilizando o ponto de corte de 180 para predizer o grupo a que o paciente pertenceria, obteve-se sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo e valor preditivo negativo de: 100%, 48,8%, 50% e 100% respectivamente. Conclusão: Esta amostra pôde validar o ponto de corte de 180 U/l como adequado para a retirada precoce do dreno.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care/methods , Drainage , Pancreatic Fistula/diagnosis , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Amylases/analysis , Amylases/metabolism , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies
13.
ACM arq. catarin. med ; 46(4): 82-90, 01/12/2017.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-913324

ABSTRACT

Com os resultados cirurgia minimamente invasiva em outras áreas, houve interesse em estender a videolaparoscopia para a cirurgia do pâncreas, contudo, ainda existem controvérsias na literatura. Buscou-se descrever a morbimortalidade perioperatória dos primeiros pacientes submetidos à pancreatectomia videolaparoscópica por neoplasia maligna em um serviço de cirurgia do aparelho digestivo. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo e retrospectivo, em uma população de pacientes com câncer de pâncreas/periampular, que foram submetidos à pancreatectomia videolaparoscópica. Todos os pacientes foram incluídos. Buscou-se descrever os principais resultados do intraoperatório até 60 dias após a cirurgia. Entre 2013 e 2015, 9 pacientes foram submetidos à pancreatectomia videolaparoscópica. A média de idade foi de 57 anos e os tumores do tipo adenocarcinoma foram os mais comuns (78%). 3 pacientes foram submetidos a pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica e 6 foram submetidos a gastroduodenopancreatectomia laparoscópica. A morbidade perioperatória foi de 67%, entretanto, apenas um paciente apresentou complicação grave. Houve dois casos de fístula pancreática. Não ocorreram óbitos no período perioperatório. Todas as ressecções apresentaram margens cirúrgicas negativas. Os dados indicam que a pancreatectomia videolaparoscópica é segura e apresenta viabilidade técnica em relação aos resultados perioperatórios.


The results of minimally invasive surgery in other areas have led to interest in extending the laparoscopic approach to pancreatic surgery, however, controversies still exist in the literature. The aim was to describe the perioperative morbidity and mortality of the first patients that underwent laparoscopic pancreatectomy for malignancy in a service of gastrointestinal surgery. This is a descriptive/retrospective study in a population of patients with pancreatic/periampullary cancer, who underwent laparoscopic pancreatectomy. All patients were included. We aimed to describe the main results from the intraoperative up to 60 days after surgery. Between 2013 and 2015, 9 patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatectomy. The average age was 57 years and adenocarcinoma were the most common tumor type (78%). 3 patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and 6 underwent laparoscopic gastroduodenopancreatectomy. Perioperative morbidity was 67%, however, only one patient had serious complications. Pancreatic fistula occurred in two cases. There were no deaths in the perioperative period. All resections showed negative surgical margins. The data indicate that laparoscopic pancreatectomy is safe and feasible regarding perioperative results.

14.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 37(1): 71-76, ene.-mar. 2017. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-991227

ABSTRACT

El tumor sólido pseudopapilar de páncreas (TSP) en niños es una neoplasia rara en este grupo etareo y con bajo potencial de malignidad. Presentamos el caso de una niña de 9 años con TSP de cabeza de páncreas que fue resecado mediante una pancreatoduodenectomía (PD) con evolución favorable. La PD en centros de alto volumen de cirugías de páncreas es segura tanto en adultos como en niños.


The solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPT) is a rare neoplasm with low malignant potential in children. We report the case of a 9 years old child with a SPT localized in the pancreatic head. She underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with favorable evolution. The PD in high-volume centers is safe in both adults and children.


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy
15.
Acta méd. (Porto Alegre) ; 38(2): [7], 2017.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-883224

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: O câncer de pâncreas é normalmente diagnosticado em maiores de 40 anos e possui sua maior prevalência em pacientes ao redor dos 70 anos Apesar dos avanços da medicina, o carcinoma de pâncreas segue sendo uma doença de elevada morbimortalidade, visto que a sobrevida em 5 anos, é de aproximadamente 8%. A dificuldade de realizar a detecção precoce do câncer de pâncreas decorre do fato dessa doença não apresentar sintomas nos estágios iniciais. Na maioria dos casos, a identificação da neoplasia é feita tardiamente, o que inviabiliza o tratamento curativo. Métodos: Esse estudo constitui-se de uma revisão da literatura especializada, realizada entre os anos de 2013 e de 2017. Resultados: A neoplasia da cabeça do pâncreas tem como pilar central do seu tratamento a ressecção cirúrgica, tendo a pancreatoduodenectomia (PD) como procedimento de escolha, idealmente associado a uma terapia adjuvante e/ou neoadjuvante. Conclusões: Apesar dos progressos nos métodos de diagnóstico e terapêuticos, o carcinoma de pâncreas segue sendo uma doença de elevada morbimortalidade e de péssimo prognóstico. Dessa maneira se faz importante o entendimento da doença a fim de aprimorar as taxas de diagnóstico precoce e de implementar melhores terapêuticas.


Aims: Pancreatic cancer is usually diagnosed in older than 40 years and its prevalence peak is at the age of 70 years old. Besides the recent advances in the medical field, pancreatic carcinoma is still a disease with high morbimortality, since the mean survival in 5 years in the United States is approximately 8%. The difficulty in a early diagnosis is based on the fact that this pathology does not present relevant symptoms in early stages. Most cases present belatedly, making the curative treatment unfeasible. Methods: This study is the result of a revision from a specialized literature which has been realized between the years of 2013 and 2017. Results: Pancreas head neoplasia has the tumor resection as the main pillar of treatment. Duodenopancreatomy, is the fundamental procedure, ideally associated with a neoadjuvancy and/or adjuvancy therapy. Conclusions: Besides the medicine progress, pancreatic carcinoma is still being a disease with high morbimortality and frightful diagnosis. Therefore, the comprehension of the disease towards the improvement of diagnosis and therapeutic is imperative.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ampulla of Vater , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Laparoscopy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
16.
ABCD (São Paulo, Impr.) ; 29(2): 97-101, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-787897

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Solid pseudopapillary pancreatic neoplasia is usually a large well-circumscribed pancreatic mass, with cystic and solid areas more frequently found in young women. It is a benign pancreatic neoplasia in most cases, therefore minimally invasive surgery could be an interesting approach. Aim: Evaluate the results of minimally invasive surgery for this neoplasia. Methods: Patients with this tumor who underwent minimally invasive pancreatectomies between 2009 and 2015 in a single institution, were analyzed regarding demographic, clinical-pathological futures, post-operative morbidity and disease-free survival. Results: All were women, and their median age was 39 (18-54) years. Two patients with tumor in the head of the pancreas underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, and another one underwent laparoscopic enucleation. Two patients with tumor in the neck underwent central pancreatectomy. Distal pancreatectomies were performed in the other five, one with splenic preservation. None required blood transfusion or conversion to open surgery. Two (20%) developed clinical relevant pancreatic fistulas, requiring readmission. Median length of postoperative hospital stay was five days (2-8). All resection margins were negative. Patients were followed for a median of 38 months (14-71), and there was no recurrence. Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery for solid pseudopapillary pancreatic neoplasia is feasible for tumors in different locations in the pancreas. It was associated with acceptable morbidity and respected the oncologic principles for treatment.


RESUMO Racional: Tumores sólidos pseudopapilíferos do pâncreas são em geral massas circunscritas, com componentes sólidos e císticos, mais frequentemente encontrados em mulheres jovens. Na maioria dos casos, são neoplasias benignas e portanto, a abordagem minimamente invasiva pode ser considerada vantajosa. Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados das pancreatectomias laparoscópicas em pacientes com esses tumores. Métodos: Foram avaliados pacientes submetidos à pancreatectomias minimamente invasivas em um única instituição. Foram analisadas variáveis demográficas, clinicopatológicas, complicações pós-operatórias e sobrevida. Resultados: Todos os pacientes eram mulheres e a idade mediana foi de 39 (18-54) anos. Duas pacientes com tumores na cabeça do pâncreas foram submetidas à duodenopancreatectomia e outra à enucleação. Duas pacientes com tumores no colo do pâncreas realizaram pancreatectomia central. Outras cinco com neoplasias no corpo e cauda foram submetidas à pancreatectomia distal, uma delas com preservação do baço. Nenhuma necessitou de conversão para laparotomia. Houve duas fístulas pancreáticas clinicamente relevantes (20%). O tempo mediano de internação foi de cinco (2 a 8) dias e duas pacientes foram reinternadas (20%). Todas as margens de ressecção foram negativas e após seguimento mediano de 38 (14-71) semanas, todas estavam livres de doença. Conclusão: As ressecções pancreáticas minimamente invasivas de tumores sólidos pseudopapilíferos são factíveis para tumores em diferentes localizações no pâncreas, com morbidade aceitável obedecendo-se os princípios oncológicos para o tratamento dessas neoplasias.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Retrospective Studies , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
17.
CCH, Correo cient. Holguín ; 19(1): 145-152, ene.-mar. 2015. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-738419

ABSTRACT

Se presentó una paciente femenina de 28 años de edad, raza negra y procedencia rural con antecedentes de litiasis vesicular hace siete años, la cual acudió a consulta de Cirugía General por presentar vómitos ocasionales al ingerir alimentos, de color amarillo, escasos en cantidad y de contenido alimentario, al ser examinada se encuentra tumor palpable en hipocondrio derecho de ocho centímetros, por lo que se ingresó para estudio, luego de este fue sometida a tratamiento quirúrgico, encontrándose gran tumor de la cabeza pancreática, con compresión del duodeno, sin ictericia, ni dilatación de vías biliares extrahepáticas, realizándose pancreatoduodenectomía con reconstrucción del tránsito gastrointestinal y biliodigestivo.


A 28 - year-old female patient, black and rural origin with a history of lithiasis during seven years ago was presented in this paper. She assisted to General Surgery consultation because when eating food occasionally presented vomiting of yellow color, few in number and food content. When examination was performed a palpable tumor in the right upper quadrant of eight centimeters was found, so she was admitted for evaluation, after the surgical treatment was performed a big pancreatic head adenocarcinoma was found, with compression of the duodenum, neither jaundice nor extrahepatic bile duct dilatation were observed. Pancreatoduodenectomy with reconstruction of gastrointestinal and biliodigestive traffic was performed.

18.
Rev. guatemalteca cir ; 21(1): 18-21, 2015. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-982849

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El 80% de los pacientes con cáncer de páncreas son diagnostcados en estadío tardío, y la sobrevida a los cinco años es menor del 2% sintratamiento. La resección quirúrgica parece ofrecer el único medio que extende la sobrevida hasta un 20% en el primer año, es necesario conocer lastasas de morbi-mortalidad en las insttuciones que cuentan con un equipo de cirujanos entrenados en cirugía hepatopancreatobiliar.Método: Se realizó una revisión retrospectva, observacional y descriptva de cinco años (2010-2015), de pacientes sometdos a pancreatoduodenectomíaspor cáncer de páncreas, determinando morbilidad y sobrevida. El análisis se dividió en dos períodos: Primer período 2010-2011 y el Segundoperíodo del 2012-2015.Resultados: Se analizaron 41 pacientes que presentaron 11(26.82%) complicaciones; cuatro fstulas pancreátcas y una fstula biliar consideradas comocomplicaciones mayores entre el primer período; el resto fueron por infección de herida operatoria reportadas en el segundo período, clasifcadascomo menores. Se reportaron tres (7.31%) casos de mortalidad durante el primer período. La sobrevida a los 5 años en nuestro estudio es 25%. Nose encontró diferencia en el promedio de complicaciones mayores, ni menores, ni de mortalidad entre el primer período y el segundo (p=0.18, p=0.1,p=0.25, respectvamente).Conclusión: Es necesario un razonable nivel de experiencia en pancreatoduodenectomías para alcanzar bajos niveles de morbi-mortalidad postoperatoria.


Background: At the tme of diagnosis, eighty percent of pancreatc cancer patents have advanced disease and a fve-year survival rate less than 2%without any treatment. Surgical resecton is the only treatment that extends survival rate to 20%. Every insttuton that performs pancreatc surgeriesneed to know their mortality rates.Methods: A retrospectve study of pancreatc cancer patents surgically treated from 2010 to 2015 in which pancreatoduodenectomy was performed.The morbidity, mortality and survival rate were analyzed divided by frst (2010-2011) and second (2012-2015) periods.Results: Forty one patents were analyzed. Complicaton rate was 26.82% (11/41): 5 major complicatons: 4 pancreatc fstulas and one biliary fstulapresented during the frst period. The rest were minor complicatons: surgical site infectons presented during the second period. Mortality rate was7.31% during the frst period. There was no mortality in the second period. Survival rate at 5 years was 25%. No statstcal diference was found for majoror minor complicaton rate nor for mortality between the frst or second period; (p=0.18, p=0.1, p=0.25, respectvely).Conclusions: Experience in pancreatoduodenectomy is necessary for low morbidity and mortality rates.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/mortality
19.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 34(3): 247-253, jul. 2014. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: lil-728531

ABSTRACT

Mujer de 30 años con 13 semanas de su segunda gestación que se presentó con síntomas de anemia severa, hemorragia digestiva alta, dolor epigástrico y baja de peso. Mediante endoscopía alta se diagnosticó un adenocarcinoma bien diferenciado de ampolla de Vater. Se le practicó pancreato-duodenectomía a las 16 semanas de su embarazo sin complicaciones. Durante el seguimiento se identificó recurrencia ganglionar loco-regional 4 meses después por lo que se le realizó parto por cesárea a las 34 semanas con neonato saludable de 2500 gr. Se decidió reintervención para resección de enfermedad ganglionar la cual se realizó con éxito. Lleva 36 meses de seguimiento sin evidencia de recidiva de la enfermedad. Su hija ha tenido un desarrollo normal.


A 30 years old woman in the 13 week of her second pregnancy who had severe anemia, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and weight loss. She was given the endoscopic diagnosis of a well differentiated ampullary adenocarcinoma. She underwent a pancreato duodenectomy during the 16 week of pregnancy without complications. After 4 months of follow up we identified a ganglionar local recurrence so that´s why she underwent a cesarean in the 34 week of pregnancy. The product was a healthy 2500 gr. newborn. We decided a reoperation for the resection of the recurrence and it was carried out successfully. Currently the patient has 36 months of follow up without evidence of recurrence and her baby has a normal grow up.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Ampulla of Vater , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Reoperation
20.
Rev. chil. radiol ; 20(3): 122-125, 2014. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-726156

ABSTRACT

La pancreatoduodenectomía (cirugía de Whipple) es un procedimiento realizado frecuentemente para el manejo de neoplasias pancreáticas. Las complicaciones hemorrágicas de este procedimiento son bien conocidas, sin embargo, existe escasa información sobre el desarrollo de pseudoaneurisma portal como complicación de esta cirugía. Aquí presentamos un caso de pseudoaneurisma portal en una paciente de 76 años que evoluciona con hemorragia tardía post pancreatoduodenectomía. Se realiza una tomografía computada de abdomen que demuestra el pseudoaneurisma de la vena porta, que se corrobora quirúrgicamente como un desgarro de 2 centímetros en esta estructura. El pseudoaneurisma se desarrolla adyacente a un tubo de drenaje abdominal y en el intraoperatorio se evidencia filtración de la anastomosis, hallazgos también descritos en otro caso de pseudoaneurisma portal post pancreatoduodenectomía, situación que sugiere que estas condiciones pudiesen ser factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de esta complicación.


Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple surgery) is a procedure commonly performed for the management of pancreatic neoplasms. Hemorrhagic complications for this procedure are well known, however, there is little information on the development of portal vein pseudoaneurysm as a complication of this surgery. We present a case of a 76 year old patient with portal vein pseudoaneurysm which formed as a result of lateonset bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Computed tomography of the abdomen was performed showing the portal vein pseudoaneurysm, which was surgically corroborated as a 2cm tear in this structure. The pseudoaneurysm developed adjacent to an abdominal drainage tube and in the intraoperative anastomotic leakage was evident, findings also described in another case of portal vein pseudoaneurysm after pancreaticoduodenectomy, a situation that suggests that these conditions might be risk factors for the development of this complication.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Aneurysm, False/etiology , Aneurysm, False , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Portal Vein , Aneurysm, False/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL