Mycobacterium leprae: aspectos da resistência aos fármacos na poliquimioterapia / Drug resistance in multidrug therapy for Mycobacterium leprae

Introdução: O diagnóstico da hanseníase possui números significativos que causam preocupação à saúde pública. Os casos de resistência medicamentosa nessa doença se iniciaram em meados dos anos 60 e diante do problema, a Organização Mundial da Saúde instituiu em 1981 a poliquimioterapia, associação dos antibióticos rifampicina, dapsona e clofazimina, tratamento atual de escolha. A resistência aos fármacos na hanseníase é reportada pela literatura, desvelando um obstáculo à sua eliminação. Apresentamos nessa revisão os principais aspectos da resistência medicamentosa no tratamento para hanseníase e seus impactos. Metodologia: Revisão sistemática sobre os aspectos da resistência medicamentosa utilizando a pesquisa exploratória como metodologia de abordagem. Foram pesquisados os termos resistência medicamentosa, hanseníase, recidiva, alterações genéticas e os operadores booleanos "and" e "or" na busca. Resultados e discussão: A dificuldade de tomar a medicação corretamente foi um dos principais fatores que acarretaram resistência do bacilo Mycobacterium leprae aos fármacos. Homens de países norte e sul-americanos e asiáticos foram os mais atingidos por episódios de resistência. A resistência medicamentosa é uma das principais causas de recidivas em hanseníase. O principal fármaco causador de resistência medicamentosa descrito nos trabalhos foi a dapsona (46,6%) e a maioria das alterações genéticas encontradas estão no gene rpoB; 23,2% dos registros relatados foram de resistência secundária aos fármacos e, também, sete casos de resistência múltipla a esses medicamentos. Conclusão: Os principais aspectos da resistência medicamentosa na hanseníase são os equívocos ao ingerir os medicamentos e as alterações genéticas na bactéria. Os impactos causados estão na dificuldade de refazer o tratamento, a possibilidade de nova transmissão e o aparecimento de sintomas mais graves.

Introduction: The diagnosis of leprosy has significant numbers causing public health concern. Reports of drug resistance in this disease begun in the mid-1960s and due to this problem, the World Health Organization instituted a multidrug therapy with rifampicin, dapsone, and clofazimine antibiotic association in 1981, which is currently the first-choice treatment for leprosy. Cases of drug resistance have been reported in literature, revealing an obstacle to the eradication of the disease. This paper has the purpose of presenting the key aspects and impacts of drug resistance in the treatment for leprosy. Methods: Systematic review of the drug resistance aspects using exploratory research as an approach methodology. The authors searched the terms drug resistance, leprosy, recurrence, genetic alterations, and the Boolean operators "and" and "or" between them. Results and discussion: The difficulty in taking the medication correctly was one of the key factors that led to drug resistance for Mycobacterium leprae. Men from North and South American, as well as from Asian countries, were the most affected by episodes of resistance. Drug resistance is one of the main causes of leprosy recurrences. Dapsone was the most frequently identified drug resistance in the studies (46.6%), while most of the genetic alterations were found in the rpoB gene; 23.2% of the cases were from secondary resistance episodes, and seven cases of multiple resistance were reported. Conclusion: The misconceptions when taking the treatment and the Mycobacterium leprae genetic alterations have been described as the key aspects of drugs resistance in leprosy and the impacts caused are the difficulty in redoing the treatment, the possibility of new transmission, and the appearance of more severe symptoms.

Number of leprosy reactions during treatment: clinical correlations and laboratory diagnosis

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of leprosy reactions, a common event during treatment, may be mostly related to the action of multidrug therapy on Mycobacterium leprae. The clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients with reactions is important, since collecting data that assists in predicting the risk of reactions may help to prevent disability. METHODS: This was a sectional study, in order to correlate clinical and laboratory diagnosis with the number of reactions during treatment. Spearman's correlation was used to verify the degree of association between the assessed variables. RESULTS: This study was conducted with 211 patients with leprosy reactions during treatment of M. leprae. The borderline tuberculoid group was the most prevalent clinical form (74/211; 35.1%) and the type one reaction showed the highest frequency (136/211; 64.5%). It was observed that 73.5% (155/211) of reactions occurred within 3 months of the initiation of multidrug therapy. The diagnostic values, including the bacterial indices (BIs) of dermal smears (r = 0.21, p < 0.05) and skin biopsies (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), showed a positive correlation with the number of reactions during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This research showed a positive correlation between bacillary load markers and the number of leprosy reactions. This study provided scientific support to future research aiming to elucidate the influence of antigenic load on the number of leprosy reactions during treatment.

Is drug-resistant Mycobacterium leprae a real cause for concern?: First approach to molecular monitoring of multibacillary Colombian patients with and without previous leprosy treatment / ¿Es la resistencia de Mycobacterium leprae a los medicamentos un verdadero motivo de preocupación?: Primera aproximación a la vigilancia molecular de pacientes colombianos multibacilares con tratamiento previo para lepra y sin él

Introduction: There is no information in Colombia on Mycobacterium leprae primary and secondary drug resistance in regards to the WHO-multidrug therapy regime. On the other hand, public health authorities around the world have issued various recommendations, one of which prompts for the immediate organization of resistance surveillance through simple molecular methods. Objective: To determine the prevalence of Mycobacterium leprae drug resistance to rifampicin, ofloxacin and dapsone in untreated and previously treated patients at the Centro Dermatológico Federico Lleras Acosta during the 1985-2004 period. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study which included multibacillary patient biopsies through elective sampling: 381 of them from new patients and 560 from previously treated patients. Using a microtome, we obtained six slides from each skin biopsy preserved in paraffin, and we extracted M. leprae DNA. We amplified three molecular targets through PCR and obtained the patterns of drug resistance to dapsone, rifampicin and ofloxacin by reverse hybridization. Finally, we collected epidemiological, clinical and demographical data for analyses. Results: From 941 samples under study, 4.14% of them were resistant to one or more drugs, and 5.77 and 3.04% had resistant genotypes in new and previously treated patients, respectively. Total resistance for each drug was 0.43% for dapsone, 3.19% for rifampicin and 1.17% for ofloxacin. We found statistically significant differences for rifampicin and for the total population when comparing the results from untreated versus previously treated patients. Two thirds of the resistant samples were resistant to rifampicin alone or combined. Conclusions: The standard multidrug therapy schemes continue being effective for leprosy cases; however, it is necessary to guarantee adherence and regularity. Surveillance to drug resistance in new and previously treated leprosy cases should be established.

Introducción. Colombia no dispone de información sobre farmacorresistencia primaria y secundaria de Mycobacterium leprae al esquema de terapia múltiple de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) y las autoridades de salud pública del mundo han emitido varias recomendaciones, entre las cuales está organizar de inmediato la vigilancia a la resistencia empleando métodos moleculares simples. Objetivo. Determinar la prevalencia de la resistencia de M. leprae a rifampicina, ofloxacina y dapsona en pacientes del Centro Dermatológico Federico Lleras Acosta con tratamiento previo y sin él durante el período de 1985 a 2004. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo. Mediante muestreo electivo se incluyeron biopsias de pacientes multibacilares: 381 de pacientes nuevos y 560 de pacientes previamente tratados. Se obtuvieron con micrótomo seis cortes de cada biopsia de piel incluida en parafina, y se realizó la extracción de ADN de M. leprae. Se llevó a cabo la amplificación de tres blancos moleculares mediante PCR y se obtuvieron los patrones de resistencia a los medicamentos dapsona, rifampicina y ofloxacina por hibridación inversa. Se recolectaron datos epidemiológicos, clínicos y demográficos para llevar a cabo los análisis. Resultados. De las 941 muestras estudiadas, 4,14 % era resistente a uno o más fármacos, y se detectaron 5,77 y 3,04 % con genotipos resistentes en pacientes nuevos y previamente tratados, respectivamente. La resistencia total para cada fármaco fue de 0,43 % a dapsona, 3,19 % a rifampicina y 1,17 % a ofloxacina. Se encontró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa para rifampicina y para la población total al comparar los resultados de los pacientes no tratados con los de los pacientes tratados previamente. Dos tercios de las muestras resistentes lo fueron a rifampicina sola o combinada. Conclusiones. Los esquemas de terapia múltiple estándar siguen siendo efectivos para los casos de lepra; sin embargo, es necesario garantizar el cumplimiento y la regularidad y establecer la vigilancia de la farmacorresistencia en pacientes nuevos y previamente tratados.

Estudio de resistencia a la rifampicina y la dapsona en tres pacientes con recurrencia de lepra / Study of rifampin and dapsone resistance in three patients with recurring leprosy

OBJETIVO: Detectar la presencia de cepas de Mycobacterium leprae resistentes a la rifampicina y la dapsona en tres pacientes con recurrencia de lepra y sospecha clínica de resistencia antimicrobiana, mediante la aplicación de técnicas moleculares. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo en tres pacientes multibacilares del Sanatorio de Agua de Dios, Cundinamarca, Colombia, que habían presentado recidivas de lepra documentadas por su historia clínica, baciloscopia y biopsia. Se obtuvieron biopsias de lesiones cutáneas que se procesaron para la extracción y purificación del ADN bacilar. Se amplificaron regiones de los genes rpoB y folP1 asociadas con la resistencia antimicrobiana, mediante la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa "touch-down" y se secuenciaron los productos amplificados mediante el método de Sanger. RESULTADOS: Se detectó una mutación puntual en el nucleótido 1367 del gen rpoB en dos de las muestras estudiadas. No se encontró la mutación estudiada en el gen folP1 en ninguno de los tres pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: La mutación identificada demostró la presencia de bacilos de M. leprae resistentes a la rifampicina en dos de los tres pacientes estudiados con recurrencia de la enfermedad. No se detectó la mutación indicadora de resistencia a la dapsona en ninguno de los tres pacientes.

OBJECTIVE: To detect the presence of rifampin- and dapsone-resistant strains of Mycobacterium leprae in three patients with recurring leprosy and clinically-suspected antimicrobial resistance through molecular techniques. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted of three multibacillary patients at the "Agua de Dios" Sanitarium in Cundinamarca, Colombia, that presented leprosy relapses that were documented by medical history, bacilloscopy, and biopsy. Biopsies were taken of the skin lesions and the bacteria were subject to DNA extraction and purification. Regions of the rpoB and folP1 genes associated with antimicrobial resistance were amplified and subjected to touch-down polymerase chain reaction and the amplified products were sequenced using the Sanger method. RESULTS: A punctual mutation was identified in nucleotide 1367 of the rpoB gene in two of the samples studied. This mutation was not found in the folP1 gene of any of the three patients. CONCLUSIONS: The mutation identified showed strains of rifampin-resistant M. leprae in two of the three patients with recurring leprosy. Mutations that indicate dapsone-resistance were not detected in any of the three patients.

Lepromatous leprosy of histoid type.

Histoid leprosy is a variant of lepromatous leprosy, which develops as a result of resistance to dapsone monotherapy. Here we report two cases of lepromatous leprosy of histoid type, one with typical and another with atypical presentations.

Reverse line probe assay for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium leprae.

Mutations in the rpoB gene of 40 biopsy isolates of Mycobacterium leprae were analyzed by reverse hybridization-based line probe assay after PCR, and nine distinct single-nucleotide substitutions were found. Among them, a 3-nucleotide substitution was found in two, and 2-nucleotide substitutions were found in seven isolates. This is a new finding of multiple mutations in a single point of the rpoB gene for rifampicin resistance. This investigation demonstrates that the pattern of mutations in the rpoB gene for rifampicin resistance in Nepal involves more variety.

Are viable Mycobacterium leprae present in lepromatous patients after completion of 12 months' and 24 months' multi-drug therapy?

A study was carried out to determine whether or not viable bacilli persist in MB patients treated with 12-month and 24-month multidrug therapy (MDT). In the first group, 60 untreated lepromatous patients who had an initial average bacterial index (BI) of 3+ or more were enrolled. At the completion of 12 months of MDT, skin biopsies were obtained and M. leprae concentrate was inoculated into the footpads of five thymectomized and irradiated (T900r) mice. Rees technique was used for the mouse footpad (MFP) experiment. Harvesting was done it the 6th, 9th and 12th months. Out of the 60 biopsies inoculated into mouse footpads to check the viability of bacilli, 2 skin biopsies (3.3%) showed significant growth and 10 (16%) showed equivocal growth. 27 patients also had nerve biopsies tested for growth in MFP studies. None of the inoculated nerve biopsies showed significant multiplication in the MFP experiments. However, 4 biopsies (14%) showed equivocal growth. In the second group, 20 patients had skin biopsies and 10 had nerve biopsies done at the end of 24 doses of MDT in order to test the viability of bacilli; none of the skin or nerve biopsies from these patients showed any growth. This study showed that M. leprae present in the tissues after 24 doses of MDT are not viable and the drug schedule of 24 doses is adequate to treat leprosy patients, irrespective of their BI. However, a small (3.3%) percentage of the patients with a high BI harbour viable bacteria in the skin after 12 doses of treatment. Since a large majority of the patients (38 patients) who had a high initial BI responded well to the treatment, it is important to find out the reason for the lack of response in two patients. One of the reasons may be the presence of drug-resistant strains. It is important to follow up on these patients for a longer duration to ascertain whether or not they would relapse.

Comparison of multidrug therapy treatment results between multibacillary leprosy patients in hyperendemic and hypoendemic areas in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.

We studied 88 multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients, who received multidrug therapy (MDT) treatment in hyperendemic (44 persons) and hypoendemic (44 persons) areas in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Bacteriological examinations were carried out (bacteria index and morphology index), immunological examinations (MLPA and TNF-alpha) and genetic variation in blood and ear lobe slit skin smears of MB leprosy patients, which had been treated by MDT, were performed. The collected data were analyzed with the chi-square test and discriminant analysis. Eight persons (9.1%) had a positive bacteria index and 2 persons (2.4%) had a morphology index. All patients (100%) increased their TNF-alpha concentration. All the samples (100%) showed an increase in the TNF-alpha concentration, compared to controls. MLPA positive conversion was found in 4 persons (47.7% samples) and TNF-alpha gene genetic variation at the position of -308, occurred in 12 persons (13.6% samples). Statistic test results showed a significant difference (p<0.01) in the TNF-alpha concentration between hyperendemic and hypoendemic areas. On the basis of a positive conversion by bacteriological results and its association with immunological results, it can be concluded that multibacillary leprosy patients with MDT treatment did not become a source of leprosy transmission.

Drug resistant-Mycobacterium leprae--results of mouse footpad studies from a laboratory in south India.

Out of 265 biopsies of leprosy patients received at the Experimental Pathology Laboratory of Schieffelin Leprosy Research and Training Centre from 1987 to 1997 for evaluating resistant strains of M. leprae, using the mouse footpad technique, 49 showed resistant strains of M leprae to varying concentrations of dapsone, rifampicin and clofazimine. 23 (47%) of these were from a control area. With 369 skin-smear positive multibacillary (MB) patients as the risk group (denominator), 23 (6.23%) were resistant to one or more drugs. 18 (4.88%) had dapsone resistance, 5 (1.36%) were resistant to rifampicin and 9 (2.44%) had resistance to low concentrations of clofazimine (0.0001%). Out of the 23 biopsies with drug resistance from the control area, primary dapsone resistance was seen in 7 (30%) biopsies and secondary dapsone resistance in 11 (48%). Primary rifampicin resistance was seen in 4 (17.4%) patients, secondary rifampicin resistance in 1 (4.35%) and primary clofazimine resistance in 7 (30%). 3 (13%) of the strains showed secondary clofazimine resistance. One biopsy had resistant strains to all the three drugs. In a control area where properly supervised effective multidrug therapy (MDT) was regularly administered over the years, the emergence of drug resistance is negligible. It may not be the case if the content, duration and regularity of the drug regimen were not satisfactory. Aware of the possible shortcomings in mass administration of MDT, it is emphasized that mouse footpad studies on drug resistance should be made available at least in endemic areas where the incidence of the disease has not changed despite good MDT coverage in order to monitor the emergence of drug resistance. Research into molecular biological identification of drug resistant-M.leprae should be intensified. These steps would help to institute timely measures to check the spread of any drug-resistant organisms in the community.

Relapses in leprosy patients treated with rifampicin plus dapsone after varying periods of dapsone monotherapy.

Leprosy patients treated formerly with dapsone monotherapy followed by combined therapy with rifampicin plus dapsone were surveyed for relapse and rifampicin resistance. The relapse rate was significantly low for the 482 multibacillary (MB) patients receiving > 12 months combined therapy compared with the 49 MB cases receiving < 12 months of combined therapy. The relapse rate was related to the duration of dapsone monotherapy prior to combined therapy. The difference in relapse rate in 247 paucibacillary (PB) patients following > 12 months combined therapy was also of significance, compared with the 66 PB cases who had received < 12 months combined therapy. Five strains of M. leprae isolated from relapsed patients were sensitive to rifampicin by mouse foot-pad test and all relapsed patients responded favourably to fixed duration MDT regimen for MB cases.

Assessment of viability by normal mouse foot-pad and bacillary ATP bioluminescence assay in multibacillary cases treated with an MDT regimen using conventional as well as newer drugs like minocycline and ofloxacin.

The therapeutic effect of a drug regimen of conventional drugs as well as newer drugs like ofloxacin and minocycline in smear-positive multibacillary (MB) leprosy cases was assessed by mouse foot-pad and ATP bioluminiscence methods. Biopsies were taken before starting treatment and after one year of treatment. They were processed for viability assessment by normal mouse foot-pad inoculation and bacillary ATP assay techniques. The test regimen was quite effective in its anti-bacterial effect as it was found to result in loss of bacillary viability in all the cases, as assessed by both methods.

Intranasal administration of fusidic acid cream in leprosy.

The effect of local treatment of nostrils with fusidic acid cream was investigated in 30 previously untreated lepromatous leprosy patients. The cream was applied in the nostrils after flushing the nostrils with normal saline, twice a day for a period of four weeks. It was found that 20 mg/gm of sodium fusidate was effective in reducing the morphological index of the nose-blow smear to zero in two weeks in majority of the patients. No untoward side effect was seen in any of the patients. Such nasal treatment along with multidrug therapy may help in reducing the patient's level of infectiousness to their contacts, since the nose is recognized to be an important portal of exit of M. leprae.

Multidrug therapy--the pathway for global leprosy elimination.

Introduction of dapsone therapy paved the way for better and more humanitarian way of dealing with the leprosy victims who, prior to 1943, were simply rejected and segregated from society. Emergence of dapsone-resistant M. leprae and mycobacterial persistence provoked our quest for another solution. More drugs were discovered for treatment of leprosy. But the real breakthrough was the recommendation of regimens of multidrug therapy (MDT) for the treatment of leprosy by the WHO Study Group on Chemotherapy of Leprosy in October 1981. Subsequent world wide development of leprosy control activities was phenomenal. The impact of MDT has led to the cure of over eight million leprosy sufferers and the saving of one million patients from becoming crippled. Leprosy prevalence has decreased by 80% in ten years. By the end of May 1999 the leprosy burden remained concentrated in only 12 countries of the world. These achievements are mainly attributed to the development and worldwide adoption of the MDT programme.

Search for newer antileprosy drugs.

In 1991 World Health Organization proclaimed the goal of global elimination of leprosy as a public health problem by year 2000 by implementing multidrug therapy (MDT). Since then the prevalence rate has declined by 85%. However, during the same period the incidence rate of leprosy has remained constant or even has been increasing. This suggests that it will take a long time for the eradication of leprosy and that without in-vitro cultivation of M. leprae, eradication of leprosy is not likely to be achieved. While in-vitro cultivation is a long-term goal, as an immediate measure, there is an urgent need for the development of newer drugs and newer multidrug therapy regimens. Using the in-vitro system for screening potential antileprosy drugs and also using the mouse foot-pad system we have evaluated several compounds in four classes of drugs--dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors, fluoroquinolones, rifampicin analogues and phenazines--and identified at least two compounds that appear to be more potent than dapsone, rifampicin and clofazimine. Newer combinations of rifampicin analogues and fluoroquinolones have also been identified that seem to be better than the combination of rifampicin and ofloxacin.

Community participation in case detection of leprosy in Nagpur district of Maharashtra.

Involving special community groups for new case detection is of great importance for achieving the target of elimination of leprosy. During 1998-99, thirty village level Mahila mandals (women's groups), 6950 teachers and students and 34,548 heads of families were co-opted to participate in case detection. They examined 56,113 persons including 378,959 school students and 184,940 family members. Of the examined population, 275 were suspected to be cases of leprosy by mahila mandals, 411 by teachers and students and 747 by heads of families. Subsequent examination of the suspected cases by trained medical officers and paramedical workers confirmed 203 of them to be cases of leprosy. This exercise showed that when proper attempts were made to involve the community, case detection activity became easier, besides helping to disseminate knowledge about leprosy in the community.

Drug resistance in leprosy: lessons from past and future perspective.

Some recent studies indicate that the problem of drug resistance in leprosy is very much there but the exact picture is not clear. In the emerging scenario with increasing number of new cases with low bacterial load, the conventional in-vivo and most of current in-vitro methods for determination of drug resistance may not help. It is pointed out that newer molecular approaches may be more useful and that it will be important to undertake studies to develop such tools.

Dapsone resistance does not appear to be associated with a mutation in the dihydropteroate synthase-2 gene of Mycobacterium leprae.

Evidence suggests that resistance to dapsone (DDS) in Mycobacterium leprae is related to the enzyme dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS). Two M. leprae genes (folP-1 and folP-2) encoding DHPS-1 and DHPS-2, respectively, have been identified through the M. leprae genome project. We have studied DDS-susceptible and resistant strains of M. leprae to determine whether the DDS-resistant phenotype is associated with a mutation(s) in folP-2 and to establish the number of genomic copies of the gene encoding DHPS-2 (folP-2). RFLP analysis of genomic DNA from DDS-susceptible and resistant strains of M. leprae exhibited a unique 4.2 kb restriction fragment consistent with a single genomic copy of folP-2 in both phenotypes. DNA encoding folP-2 was amplified by PCR and sequenced from two susceptible and two resistant strains of M. leprae. The folP-2 sequences from these strains were identical indicating that resistance to DDS was not associated with mutation(s) in the gene encoding DHPS-2.